Removal of signature before end of the campaign shouldn't cause disqualification

[ahmadakbari]

There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"

In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.

[AB de Royse777]

Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.

Yes it is unfair but when someone read the rule and agree with the term then why would they complain? I personally would not enroll for such terms. I would rather have my signature space empty.

[Darkoth89]

If they have this rule from the beginning and they clearly state how long the campaign will run, I am okay with it. But nowadays a lot of projects extend their sales (because of low sale numbers) and hence extend their bounty. If this is the case it should be allowed to leave such campaigns without losing all previous earned stakes.

[joniboini]

There is no use when you complain here. Every campaign has its own managers and team, and they decide the rules for their own benefits most of the times. If you don't agree with it, complain before you start participating and if they don't budge, then don't join their campaign. This is the same as no refund policy in all case at some e-commerce stores. It isn't fair for buyers so don't buy there.

[TheUltraElite]

If you feel its unfair then stop participating in altcoin bounty signature campaigns.

I went through your post history and all I can say that you need to improve the content level of your posts. Even if they might seem good to you, an decent manager would consider them as shitposts and some people might as well report them for moderation. Teach yourself basics about bitcoin and trading and try visiting other sections of the forum. By doing so you would prime your account to be ready to participate in bitcoin signature campaigns which are more prestigious then shitcoin bounties.

All the best!

[babysweetTiger0401]

There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"

In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.

Honestly and literally speaking, it is actually unfair. As you can see there are some bounty campaign they've already inform the community about their rules. But even they have that kind of rules, there are some Bounty Manager will allow you to remove your siggy if you are personally pm the BM and permission to leave the campaign with the respect of BM position, and mostly if you leave nicely they will save or freeze your stakes total.

[sunsilk]

If its included from the very start of the campaign. You need to think if you are willing to dedicate your time up to the end of the campaign. But if you think that you can't or there will be some change of mind in the future and you can't dedicate to wear their signature until the end, don't join them.

There might be some managers that are considerably understanding with this situation if you can just ask them politely to consider you. But overall, if the decision is final, respect the managers decision.

[janggernaut]

There were few campaigns which act like you said,

all participants should wearing the signature & avatar (if their rank allows it)until ICO/IEO ends or they will not get any bounty/reward.

and some of campaigns also have same rules, but they still gave you stakes which you deserved it when you've decided to leave the campaign.
IMO it's unfair since you have promoted their site for some weeks (you have wasted your time too) and you didn't get any payment just because you leave in the middle of campaign.

anyway, i agree with this

If its included from the very start of the campaign. You need to think if you are willing to dedicate your time up to the end of the campaign. But if you think that you can't or there will be some change of mind in the future and you can't dedicate to wear their signature until the end, don't join them.

[akram143]

There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"

In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.

Bounty manager decide the rules for the bounty campaign show so you can't change any rules decided by the bounty manager if you really think it is unfair then you need to participate on campaign where this rules are not available.

[Findingnemo]

The reason why you are changing from one signature to another might be the project you are already promoting is not going to be successful right? Then why you are expecting rewards from then because even if you have them will no use.If you are just changing for no reason then I don't think it is unfair to remove the stakes of you.

[Weng_saboh]

in my opinion you should always read and know the rules that already exist in the bounty program, this is very fair if there are people who break the rules in the campaign program and are disqualified. because there is already a provision from the manager so we have to follow it

[sunsilk]

in my opinion you should always read and know the rules that already exist in the bounty program, this is very fair if there are people who break the rules in the campaign program and are disqualified. because there is already a provision from the manager so we have to follow it

Some bounty hunters find it offensive and unfair but they have to realize that if its already indicated in the first place, they have to obey and respect the rules that is being implemented.

As I've said, things can be settled through talks and it's okay to reach out to the manager for this matter. If the bounty manager responded positively, you are good but if the manager can't grant your request, respect him/her decision.

[Bunsomjelican]

There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"

In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.

Certainly, yes it is really unfair! So I suggest never join in a campaign like this, just join only as much as possible with a campaign project that will only run for 1 to 3 months only, over this period don't attempt to do it. But there are some managers they are giving consideration to save yours stakes but majority of them are not.

[milewilda]

There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"

In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.

Depends on the team or into its manager because most of todays rule's you would still able to get stakes even if you do leave out but there were managers
who do void all of those stakes if you decide to leave thats the hardest part on being a bounty hunter where you would leave no choice but to stay up if
you do like to have stakes or not.Its a matter of decisions though on which one you would choose up.

[numanoid]

in my opinion you should always read and know the rules that already exist in the bounty program, this is very fair if there are people who break the rules in the campaign program and are disqualified. because there is already a provision from the manager so we have to follow it

You are the one who should be blacklisted and disqualified for any of bounty on here. Did you read OP's question? When did he break the rules?

The reason why you are changing from one signature to another might be the project you are already promoting is not going to be successful right? Then why you are expecting rewards from then because even if you have them will no use.If you are just changing for no reason then I don't think it is unfair to remove the stakes of you.

most of them doing that because of higher pay rates they will get

[Bttzed03]

It is also unfair imo. Participants should be allowed to leave and still be rewarded for the weeks they promoted the project. Sometime, that rule is not specifically stated in the rules and the best thing to do is to confirm it first with the manager before wearing the signature to be safe.

Additionally, it is better to join short campaigns instead of more than 10-week or "when ICO ends" campaigns.

[joniboini]

It is also unfair imo. Participants should be allowed to leave and still be rewarded for the weeks they promoted the project. Sometime, that rule is not specifically stated in the rules and the best thing to do is to confirm it first with the manager before wearing the signature to be safe.

In some case, there is also a lack of clarity. In the beginning, the manager could say yes but then the team decides no, just like what happened with Anyone. The point is, with altcoin bounty campaign, everything is really risky. You can get thousands of dollars or just $3 for months.

If you don't want any of those risky scenarios, then weekly paid campaign is your choice.

[Ridwan Fauzi]

This is pointed out if you have taken part with one of bounty campaign you have to promote the project until end.

I think to take part bounty campaign is not only choose the new bounty program, but you have to convince that the bounty campaign that you choose is really promising and will give you a profit when the campaign end. Which is mean you need an analyst against it, there is many aspect that you consider before choosing bounty program. Hence, if you have chosen one campaign you don't need look for another campaign just stay on it until the program end.

Yeah, I look it is a fair thing as long as the bounty manager have said that for those bounty hunter who remove the signature before the campaign end will not get a reward in the rule. So as when you don't comply these things you will get as a result, and didn't give a negative point to those manager who have a such rule.

[rosezionjohn]

This is pointed out if you have taken part with one of bounty campaign you have to promote the project until end.

This is the other rule that I hate in most bounty campaigns. It's unfair to force hunters to comply to this when they can freely extend their token sale (including the bounty) for a few more months. They should be allowed to leave and get paid.

[Lauren Smith]

Doing 10 weeks of work is too long to begin with. Wow. How much longer was the campaign if this person did up until 10 weeks? When would they have been paid? Campaigns should not be that long to begin with.

I also don't care what anyone says or what rules or terms there are, not paying someone for the weeks they were their signature is EXTREMELY petty and I wouldn't invest 10 cents in a shithole run bounty that treats people that way.

in my opinion you should always read and know the rules that already exist in the bounty program, this is very fair if there are people who break the rules in the campaign program and are disqualified. because there is already a provision from the manager so we have to follow it

Go back to sleep.