Removal of signature before end of the campaign shouldn't cause disqualification

[3DBrushes]

It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks. But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.

why you said it's not fair? as you can see usually that rules already there before you join it
so it will be good if you not join it at first and just choose another bounty

No this is unfair.
Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule. You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?

[safari88]

No this is unfair.
Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule. You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?

i rarely see any bounty program that don't mention this rules in their thread.
In that case why you not join the bounty at the last month and join another bounty before that

[Bitkoyns]

It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks. But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.

why you said it's not fair? as you can see usually that rules already there before you join it
so it will be good if you not join it at first and just choose another bounty

No this is unfair.
Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule. You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?

There are bounty managers and campaigns that have the rules on leaving the campaign since the start and some are just adding it right in the middle period of the campaign, it the latter is the case then we shouldn't join any bounty of that type as we never know if there will be extensions on the campaign which lots of project do

[3DBrushes]

No this is unfair.
Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule. You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?

i rarely see any bounty program that don't mention this rules in their thread.
In that case why you not join the bounty at the last month and join another bounty before that

I've checked many altcoin bounty programs. None of them mentioned this rule in their thread. But I'm sure most of them will impose this at the end.

It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks. But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.

why you said it's not fair? as you can see usually that rules already there before you join it
so it will be good if you not join it at first and just choose another bounty

No this is unfair.
Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule. You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?

There are bounty managers and campaigns that have the rules on leaving the campaign since the start and some are just adding it right in the middle period of the campaign, it the latter is the case then we shouldn't join any bounty of that type as we never know if there will be extensions on the campaign which lots of project do

That's what I told earlier. It is such a disgrace to see this rule added suddenly in middle of the campaign.

[Anonylz]

That rule is often included in most bounty campaigns where they wrote "all signature code must be kept on throughout the campaign period and removal of the signature will result to disqualification without payment",  but I think any bounty that is more than a month long can always give opportunity for those who intends to leave to do so provided they have given a prior notice to the bm, this shouldn't be a problem or reason to lose months of hard work over, bm should be more understanding in this aspect.

[liuqi]

Dude this is one of unofficial rule you can find in all the signature campaigns as well as in bounty campaigns. Is that this discussion is under that much low level.
I hope we might not be created this thread to discuss it. Simple pm answer from the manager will be enough for it.

[spngebob]

Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule.

So far every bounty I participated had rule about it and I don't recall that any bounty which didn't let me leave if rule about leaving wasn't there.

You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?

Don't do long term campaigns, stay some time but not too long, manage your time better and join each month different campaign.

[3DBrushes]

Most of the bounty programs won't mention this rule in their thread. But when users want to leave the campaign in the middle, they will impose this rule.

So far every bounty I participated had rule about it and I don't recall that any bounty which didn't let me leave if rule about leaving wasn't there.

You can't permanently stick to a campaign which won't end after a certain period of time. I have seen some campaigns which are running for almost a year. Do you still think it's a good idea to stick into these type of campaigns?

Don't do long term campaigns, stay some time but not too long, manage your time better and join each month different campaign.

If you see this rule or if this rule is mentioned before then it's not a problem at all. Users will join by accepting these terms.
We don't know how long will the campaign last. Most of the bounty programs won't mention this. You can't join a new campaign every month in case of signature campaigns.

[nonbody]

This situation varies from person to person. When you accept a bounty, you must stick to the end. If you quit halfway, you can only blame the initial decision.

[onyek16M]

It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks. But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.

why you said it's not fair? as you can see usually that rules already there before you join it
so it will be good if you not join it at first and just choose another bounty

yes agree with you, when you think its not fair you havenot to join and choose another bounty . all requirement   of signature campaigns is like that so you have to follow the rule and waiting for end of campaign to get reward
its look hard but requirement   have to do, if not you have unfair in your life

[aTriz]

I think campaign manager should consider this rule. and allow users to leave the campaign if they want to after finishing the running week..

It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks. But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.

why you said it's not fair? as you can see usually that rules already there before you join it
so it will be good if you not join it at first and just choose another bounty

I think he's just saying a general thing. not complaining about a specific campaign. its same with almost every campaign. and he's right. campaign managers should not force this rule from beginning.

[cabron]

If you have worked more than 10 weeks of the campaign and removed the signature because you joined another campaign its really just gonna turn the hard work to waste and I hope the bounty manager consider counting stakes. For me, joining a campaign that would take 20 weeks is a tiring campaign, this is when bounty manager has to have a voice when they extend another weeks for the campaign. 20 weeks is a sign of scam.

[safari88]

I think he's just saying a general thing. not complaining about a specific campaign. its same with almost every campaign. and he's right. campaign managers should not force this rule from beginning.

but it's their campaign rules so he can do that but i think the user itself must read it before joining
because there is a few campaigns that not force this rules

[Casdinyard]

I think he's just saying a general thing. not complaining about a specific campaign. its same with almost every campaign. and he's right. campaign managers should not force this rule from beginning.

but it's their campaign rules so he can do that but i think the user itself must read it before joining
because there is a few campaigns that not force this rules

The manager should at least be considerate for saving the stakes, like working for months hence bounty hunters could not assure if they even get a decent value for their token.

Anyway, OP created this thread last August so perhaps he even got over by this or at least get back here if he got anything from the bounty.

[janggernaut]

If you have worked more than 10 weeks of the campaign and removed the signature because you joined another campaign its really just gonna turn the hard work to waste and I hope the bounty manager consider counting stakes. For me, joining a campaign that would take 20 weeks is a tiring campaign, this is when bounty manager has to have a voice when they extend another weeks for the campaign. 20 weeks is a sign of scam.

How long the campaign doesn't guarantee you will get paid though. Even if you joined in a campaign which running only for 1 week, there is also no guarantee you will get paid. Just make sure don't join in a bounty where they offered huge bounty and also don't want to use escrow for their bounty

[freedomgo]

Every campaign has their own rules, if you find it unfair, just try not to join even if the reward is too attractive, everyone live by the rules man but the campaign has the advantage as they will put they have the right to change the rules.