Removal of signature before end of the campaign shouldn't cause disqualification

[fortunecrypto]

There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"

In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.

If that is the rule from the start of the campaign, then it's your fault if you remove the signature, but if there is no mention from the start of the campaign that removing the signature will remove from all your stakes, then it's really unfair.
This is the reason why I never join a long campaign when I was still active in ICO bounty campaign, they can change the rule, so it's better to join short duration campaign.

[Saisher]

There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"

In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.

You should understand that every campaign has a set of rules and they always state that they can change the rules anytime, it's unfair but this is their campaign and their project, if it's a long campaign, then look for a short one if you think the project is good to promote in a long term, then bear with it.

[aioc]

There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"

In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.

If the rules state that you should keep the signature at all time during the campaign, then we can't do anything on it, it looks unfair but this is their rule, their token and their campaign, just don't participate if you cannot keep going, or join a short term campaign like 4 weeks.

[jrrsparkles]

People who are participating in the bounties which has long campaign period to get rewards are literally stupids because even if the project is worth to do we are not going to anything valuable for few months even after the campaign completion because lot of works needed to get some value for that token so pick campaign with 8 or less weeks or don't just participate on the bounties.

[hahay]

It was indeed unfair and I was ready with the risk even though in the end I chose to never participate again in the bounty campaign. IMO, Because that decision would be better if we had agreed to the rules but finally we complained. Imagine, in the past I have long been a participant and the campaign has been finished but there are rules for not releasing the signature until the prize is credited. So the problem here is, when the campaign was over I decided to remove the signature because I was interested in participating in other campaigns, but still, even though I participated and wearing signature until the last week of the campaign but I didn't get any prize just because I removed the signature before the prize is credited.

[Pamadar]

It was indeed unfair and I was ready with the risk even though in the end I chose to never participate again in the bounty campaign. IMO, Because that decision would be better if we had agreed to the rules but finally we complained. Imagine, in the past I have long been a participant and the campaign has been finished but there are rules for not releasing the signature until the prize is credited. So the problem here is, when the campaign was over I decided to remove the signature because I was interested in participating in other campaigns, but still, even though I participated and wearing signature until the last week of the campaign but I didn't get any prize just because I removed the signature before the prize is credited.

That's annoying since the campaign already ended there's should some consideration from the manager, you completed the required weeks and it's only the extended time for calculations when you removed the signature codes, you can try communicating with the manager and state your case. Though if there's really a set of rules in regards to this matter and it's clearly stated from the start but it should  discuss from the manger and know how to workout with your case.
 

[Lanatsa]

It was indeed unfair and I was ready with the risk even though in the end I chose to never participate again in the bounty campaign. IMO, Because that decision would be better if we had agreed to the rules but finally we complained. Imagine, in the past I have long been a participant and the campaign has been finished but there are rules for not releasing the signature until the prize is credited. So the problem here is, when the campaign was over I decided to remove the signature because I was interested in participating in other campaigns, but still, even though I participated and wearing signature until the last week of the campaign but I didn't get any prize just because I removed the signature before the prize is credited.

That's annoying since the campaign already ended there's should some consideration from the manager, you completed the required weeks and it's only the extended time for calculations when you removed the signature codes, you can try communicating with the manager and state your case. Though if there's really a set of rules in regards to this matter and it's clearly stated from the start but it should  discuss from the manger and know how to workout with your case.
 

With some shady managers out there then the word "consideration" isn't on their vocabulary knowing that wasted stakes or extra tokens would be credited to them that's why
any violations or that doesn't able to comply with the rules even with the slightest error would really face up the consequences.Unless, if the team itself do able to check the spreadsheet and saw that you haven't wear the signature then they do have the right to do such action since they already announced that it should be wear until they do pay up.
If you do join up other campaign and you are pretty aware on that certain rule then the mistake was on yours and yes it do sucks but rules is rules which should be followed.

[robelneo]

There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"

In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.

It's really unfair but they are the one that is setting the rules and we are just here to follow it if you are not comfortable wearing the signature in the duration of the campaign, nobody's forcing you to join, I will not laso join that kind of campaign and with these kinds of rules, I doubt if many signature bounty hunters will join the campaign, I think only few campaign are implementing this.

[matchi2011]

It's really unfair but they are the one that is setting the rules and we are just here to follow it if you are not comfortable wearing the signature in the duration of the campaign, nobody's forcing you to join, I will not laso join that kind of campaign and with these kinds of rules, I doubt if many signature bounty hunters will join the campaign, I think only few campaign are implementing this.

You are right, there's no participants that will be joining without accepting the rules and willing to work with the entire durations of the campaign periods. Most of them are trusting either the team or the campaign manager who's holding the job, if such rules being implemented the only thing that participants needed to do is to follow and keep the code, and wait for further announcement when the campaign manager's done counting the stake.

[ecnalubma]

Its your due diligence you should have read the rules first before you wear signature of particular campaign. If the campaign is not yet ended but you had removed your signature already you should have asked permission or acknowledged that you have stopped the campaign even its not require just to pay respect for the bounty managers. No rules are perfect.

[magneto]

I think that it depends on the campaign that you are currently in.

If the rule was in place before you even signed up, then it's nothing unfair. Every single campaign manager can set their own terms, and it's up to the people providing the service to decide whether or not these terms are favourable to them or not.

If they only changed the rules after you removed your signature, then it may be shady. Especially if they haven't mentioned of this rule previously, they should at least pay on a pro-rata basis.

[Taskford]

Every campaign have it's own rules that's why you should read the rules before joining on campaigns so that you won't get annoyed if the campaign manager imposed there rules and also I suggest that if you are in a signature finish it since sometimes leaving on campaigns without prior notice can give bad impact to your account since some other managers will mark you and they will not let you join on there camps on next time around especially if they have a btc paying campaign.

[Rodeo02]

Every campaign have it's own rules that's why you should read the rules before joining on campaigns so that you won't get annoyed if the campaign manager imposed there rules and also I suggest that if you are in a signature finish it since sometimes leaving on campaigns without prior notice can give bad impact to your account since some other managers will mark you and they will not let you join on there camps on next time around especially if they have a btc paying campaign.

and also dont forget before removing the signature code ask the manager if you are able to remove it, wait for the reply in that case you will not be remove in that particular campaign. Other participants do not know that manager also needs some time to calculate all stakes before they are able to remove it.

[judeafante]

There is a same rule in all of signature campaigns
"You must keep the signature till end of the campaign"

In my opinion it's really unfair.
Assume that a campaign includes 20 weeks. One person participate from week 1 until week 10 and makes effort for advertising the ICO. But he/she decided to participate in another campaign. In this case, bounty managers remove all the stakes that have been earned before. Don't you think it's unfair? In my opinion, he/she should give the reward for those weeks that had worn the signature.

It really is unfair, it's wasted effort in the part of bounty hunters and there should not be this kind of rules, but each campaign has their own set of rules, if they have then it's better that you not participate or as the bounty manager to change the rule, majority of the bounty hunters will not like this kind of rules, bounty hunters that has this kind of rules seldom attract bounty hunters in the signature campaign.

[skarais]

It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks. But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.

[Anonylz]

I think as long as hunters can inform the bounty manager of their intention to leave campaign it should be okey to keep your stakes or not to get disqualified,
But I don't it is right for hunters to just work away from a campaign just like that without given prior notice, such actions can warrant disqualification, this things should work both ways.

[TheUltraElite]

It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks.

Work for weeks on some shitcoin project? Nah, those guys should know better what t promote and what not to. They are a part of this forum and they need to know the things that go on the forum. Otherwise they are just being selfish.

But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.

Depends on individual projects as per the decision of the team. Most of the time when the funding for the project is going badly you will see such measures of forcing people to wear signatures. You can get the hint that the project would not be able to reach a good cap and so its better to exit and consider the money you expected to get as lost. Those tokens anyway are worthless so dont waste time on them but develop your own skills and go for bitcoin payment campaigns.

[Dewi Aries]

From my perpective it is to prevent people who want to join and out from campaign. I think there are some people who join in 2 signature campaign and i think managers only want people to be serious join project that they handle. But if people think it is unfair, just pick project that the manager said can remove as long tell them first to keep the stake, in past Sylon did it.

[carlfebz2]

It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks.

Work for weeks on some shitcoin project? Nah, those guys should know better what t promote and what not to. They are a part of this forum and they need to know the things that go on the forum. Otherwise they are just being selfish.

Most managers do really have this kind of mindset where they do mind up on accepting projects without having any strict criterias on which one should really be supposed to be accepted and which is not.Due to greed and the thirst of community handling for the sake of getting some shit tokens they do accept without minding the possibilities of scam and fraud.Even they do tagged up theirselves on not getting paid on all the work that have been done specially if the project team do deal out with shit tokens payout for someone who do manage but if its on btc and other top alts then i shall say that they are too greedy without minding others situation.

[safari88]

It's true, it's not fair for those who work for weeks. But these rules will still apply so that all participants can better support the project to completion. In my opinion, there are a number of campaign managers who give participants to their signature campaigns the opportunity to remove their signatures but must be reported in advance. Without reporting, all bets will also be deleted. I think this is fair enough for participants.

why you said it's not fair? as you can see usually that rules already there before you join it
so it will be good if you not join it at first and just choose another bounty