But the current praise I think is still too early for Hansi Flick to be that good and bring big changes to Barcelona. As a new coach, it is certain that the proof is the first season to be good so that before he presents at least 1 trophy I think he still can't change Barcelona better and can't even match Xavi in the end so that no matter how good Flick is now I think saying he changed Barcelona is still 50/50 because the evidence is still not too clear overall considering this is still the beginning of the season.
Indeed, Hansi Flick cannot yet be called the best coach, but in my opinion, the positive results he has achieved are one of the early signs of Barcelona's success. We don't just look at the best results by lifting trophies in certain competitions, but we also have to consider other factors like Barcelona's poor finances, yet Hansi Flick was still able to bring Barcelona to perform as well as possible.
Well, even if Barcelona ultimately fails in the UCL and only wins the domestic league title, in my opinion, that praise is deserved for Hansi Flick.
As I said in the article you quoted, I don't deny that because after all the positive results in domestic competitions despite last week's shock defeat against Osasuna and the defeat to AS Monaco were a little disturbing but we have to admit that Flick is still one of the great coaches at the moment, it's just that when saying that he is the best coach of course as long as there is no real proof in terms of trophies, it still cannot be determined from now on especially since our current benchmark is only for a few matches at the beginning of the season so it is still uncertain whether he will be consistent until the end or not.
The proof is still very long for Flick to be said to be the best coach for Barcelona at this time.
But the current praise I think is still too early for Hansi Flick to be that good and bring big changes to Barcelona. As a new coach, it is certain that the proof is the first season to be good so that before he presents at least 1 trophy I think he still can't change Barcelona better and can't even match Xavi in the end so that no matter how good Flick is now I think saying he changed Barcelona is still 50/50 because the evidence is still not too clear overall considering this is still the beginning of the season.
If Barcelona weren't in financial trouble I'd say Hansi Flick would definitely have secured a title this season. But Barcelona management could not provide Hansi Flick with big funds for player purchase. Hansi Flick has managed to build a youth-oriented squad. Still, he's got some very talented players. And Flick has managed to develop a wonderful bond between the players. Also Hansi Flick's match strategy is excellent. This is why Barcelona's overall performance is still stable. Barcelona lost the first match of the Champions League unluckily. However, Barcelona made a great comeback in the second match. Despite losing against Osasuna in the last match of La Liga, Barcelona is expected to win by a big margin against Alaves in the next match.
Financial problems for Barcelona have occurred in recent seasons even the Koeman era and Xavi felt it so when talking about trophies when Xavi could do it then when the current Flick era is considered very good then surely he can also do it, because in the end there is no reason when a great coach who is ready to accept all forms of risks that occur then when talking about trophies he must try to get it regardless of the problems faced. Not that this is demanding too much because for player problems even though in the end Barcelona is still experiencing financially, they are still one of the clubs that is indeed complex in terms of players even if you look at the nominal salary of the largest in Europe now the top 2 players come from Barcelona.