BTCDice.io - New dice site, fast rolls, instant withdrawals - INVEST

[Bitinity]

The leaderboard is paying 0.05 Bitcoin and currently you would only need to wager 0.00011618 to win the whole lot!

Any gambler would risk depositing 0.0000001 bitcoin to win 0.05 bitcoin for free.

I'm interested with above posts especially the words "the whole lot" and 'to win 0.05". Do you mean that a user is able to win all the prize? For me it sounds like you are letting people to create multiple accounts and wager on every account so all prizes will be won by 1 person only. Correct me if I misunderstand your post.
Related to leaderboard, how often you do the update as it seems that it is not updated lively?

Even if they let players to create more and more account but they can't wagered this amount on leaderboard which is currently 52,000 bits for thr first place, so this will be pointless because only one account that able to get it. Instead of creating more account why dont you put it into one account? And btw I still saw some unfilled spots which is still very low wagered but it is still 3 days long. Let see how much this wagered will go then

You did not get my point here.
My main idea is that once a user create multiple accounts the he/she can get the whole prizepool (not only for the 1st place). It will worth with this current situation as someone do not need to wager much to be on the leaderboard. Surely it wont worth to have multiple accounts for wagering competition if there are so many participants who wager a lot.

[BTCDice.io]

Current leaderboard standings



Still 3 spots you can win by betting 1 satoshi! All other spots easy to win.

[BTCDice.io]

A little over 1 day left in our weekly leaderboard contest.
Easy prizes to win currently

[rexxarofmoknathal]

I wonder if just4fun will still be the top player in the leader board once the run finishes. Either way, this guy is estimated to win 5x his wagered amount which in my opinion it isn't bad!!!

[BTCDice.io]

We just added 10 bitcoin investment to the bankroll so you can now place large bets and win larger payouts.

Good luck

[Murat]

I wonder if just4fun will still be the top player in the leader board once the run finishes. Either way, this guy is estimated to win 5x his wagered amount which in my opinion it isn't bad!!!

He isn't top anymore!

https://btcdice.io/leaderboard

I deposited some funds & withdraw successfully. No issue.

[BTCDice.io]

Less than 5 hours to go now. Competition is heating up

A reminder that we just increased our bankroll to 10 Bitcoin. You can invest with low 25% commission at https://btcdice.io

[BTCevo]

The leaderboard is paying 0.05 Bitcoin and currently you would only need to wager 0.00011618 to win the whole lot!

Any gambler would risk depositing 0.0000001 bitcoin to win 0.05 bitcoin for free.

I'm interested with above posts especially the words "the whole lot" and 'to win 0.05". Do you mean that a user is able to win all the prize? For me it sounds like you are letting people to create multiple accounts and wager on every account so all prizes will be won by 1 person only. Correct me if I misunderstand your post.
Related to leaderboard, how often you do the update as it seems that it is not updated lively?

Even if they let players to create more and more account but they can't wagered this amount on leaderboard which is currently 52,000 bits for thr first place, so this will be pointless because only one account that able to get it. Instead of creating more account why dont you put it into one account? And btw I still saw some unfilled spots which is still very low wagered but it is still 3 days long. Let see how much this wagered will go then

You did not get my point here.
My main idea is that once a user create multiple accounts the he/she can get the whole prizepool (not only for the 1st place). It will worth with this current situation as someone do not need to wager much to be on the leaderboard. Surely it wont worth to have multiple accounts for wagering competition if there are so many participants who wager a lot.

So you are saying that most of them will try to create more accounts and aim for every prize for this current time because the wagered amount is still so small? Is this possible to create like 10 accounts and get everything here? Wont they get banned just to try something like this? I believe OP is smart enough to not let people try this kind of thing. Instead of getting banned why not try to get something for sure, with the current leaderboard I think it is still easy to get the first prize

[BTCDice.io]

The leaderboard contest is over.

There was a small issue with some payments not being automatic. If you haven't received the leaderboard prize email support@btcdice.io or pm me and I'll credit it.

We need to fix a little display issue with the leaderboard but will start a new week contest tomorrow.

[BTCDice.io]

We had 2.5 Bitcoin wagered on last day of the leaderboard.
Think we should add a daily leaderboard contest as well as a weekly one?
This would reduce the chance of people sniping the weekly leaderboard at last minute.

[BTCevo]

We had 2.5 Bitcoin wagered on last day of the leaderboard.
Think we should add a daily leaderboard contest as well as a weekly one?
This would reduce the chance of people sniping the weekly leaderboard at last minute.

What does this matter? I believe most of the sites also have the same situation but the problem here is about the wagering amount. Most of them having such a very huge amount which it can't be sniped meanwhile this site is still new so most of the players will wait for this opportunity to get easy money without wagering so much. To have split contest is good enough but if there is only huge prize but without good prize it wont do anything good either

[Bitinity]

We had 2.5 Bitcoin wagered on last day of the leaderboard.
Think we should add a daily leaderboard contest as well as a weekly one?
This would reduce the chance of people sniping the weekly leaderboard at last minute.

No it wont, there will be always some people with huge balance who come in the last minute to overtake those who play every single hour during the day. This is the art of wagering contest where whale will bust small players in the last minute. If you want to get something different then you should make different promotions where there is no chance for people snipping in the last minute. Surely, it wont be something related to wagering contest but it should be something like number hunt competition where all players has the same chance unless you set too high minimum bet.

[hopenotlate]

Tried the site I really liked it : site run flawless and autobet speed is incredibly stunning.

I'd like to see implemented some more features for autobet like : change target on win/lose and also a "stop on win" button to select when you are chasing high multiplier.

Site staff was very friendly and helpful and my overall experience there is positive.

[leea-1334]

I got the PM from OP so I am checking this place out. I see many new names coming up in the gambling scene so that is good for us overall as players. But of course,,, the newer they are the more they have to prove about themselves.

Can those who won the last leaderboard come and say some testimonials here?

Daily leaderboard is good idea but always same person anyway;)

[BTCevo]

We had 2.5 Bitcoin wagered on last day of the leaderboard.
Think we should add a daily leaderboard contest as well as a weekly one?
This would reduce the chance of people sniping the weekly leaderboard at last minute.

No it wont, there will be always some people with huge balance who come in the last minute to overtake those who play every single hour during the day. This is the art of wagering contest where whale will bust small players in the last minute. If you want to get something different then you should make different promotions where there is no chance for people snipping in the last minute. Surely, it wont be something related to wagering contest but it should be something like number hunt competition where all players has the same chance unless you set too high minimum bet.

Yes agree with you, the only way I can think of is about the winning percentage like what other sites doing. I think this is pretty fair enough for everyone. Because most of the big whale sure hard enough to handle this kind of losing. But when it comes to the winning percentage then they should really careful on what they do. They can't randomly just place their bet, they sure need to have some calculations

[panjul07]

Good to see that the wagering contest continues after the first one ended few days ago. I have suggestion for the contest related to its timeframes because the ending time may not be ao friendly for some timezone. So I think you should change the timeframe as well, at least give opportunity to those who live in area where the last hours of the contest is during their sleeping time.

[BTCevo]

Good to see that the wagering contest continues after the first one ended few days ago. I have suggestion for the contest related to its timeframes because the ending time may not be ao friendly for some timezone. So I think you should change the timeframe as well, at least give opportunity to those who live in area where the last hours of the contest is during their sleeping time.

No matter how well are your timeframe setting, the result will be just the same. OP does not want to let players in the last minute snipe everything away from the people who join in the first time they start the contest. OP want everything to have a  fair chance among the players. So in order to make it fair, their team will do their best. Mean while you can start wagering here when it still around 60k bits

[panjul07]

Good to see that the wagering contest continues after the first one ended few days ago. I have suggestion for the contest related to its timeframes because the ending time may not be ao friendly for some timezone. So I think you should change the timeframe as well, at least give opportunity to those who live in area where the last hours of the contest is during their sleeping time.

No matter how well are your timeframe setting, the result will be just the same. OP does not want to let players in the last minute snipe everything away from the people who join in the first time they start the contest. OP want everything to have a  fair chance among the players. So in order to make it fair, their team will do their best. Mean while you can start wagering here when it still around 60k bits

Even if the owner does not want players snipping in the last minutes, what can they do about it? This kind of activity will always happen in any wagering contest.
My main idea is the same, waiting for the last minutes/hour to see the whole situation on the leaderboard. By this way I and most players will be able to calculate whether it will worth to wager and compete in the last minutes or not. I also think that sniping in the last minutes is not something unfair as it is like a strategy to be used on the contest. I wonder how it can be unfair just because the winners plays in the last minutes and how the site will do to make it fair like what you say.

[BTCDice.io]

We have now started a daily leaderboard contest.

The top 10 users who wager the most each day will win a share of the progressive prize pool.

The prizepool increases by 10% of the edge on every bet.

Join https://btcdice.io now for your chance to win

[RealMalatesta]

When you do a contest you can put a lag in there or a latency, doesn't have to be because of the internet connection or anything, you can put a latency in the results, so you can actually gamble let's say at 14:59 but your bet still may not be considered in the contest that ends at 15:00 (times are just for example) hence if you actually put that in there then people will have to play even earlier to get away from it and if they play earlier than their opponents they are racing will see it as well and at least it will be a fair race, however if you don't put it there then someone may come in and do a huge bet on the last minute without anyone noticing. That's how you can eliminate the last second snipers, you just have to put some small latency like 30 seconds and it will be fine.