Craig Wright is official a fraud

[chek2fire]

This is not new and we all know this from the beginning. And i talk about Craig Wright. The court today official announce that he is a fraud and call him to pay the half of this bitcoin that supposed to hold with Kleiman. That means 500k bitcoin and that means that craig wright fell to his own lies.
Of course this bitcoin never exist from the first place.
The most laughable was this


"Dr.Wright is Dishonest. He is a Serial Forger!"

(we all know that even his Dr is a lie)...

https://twitter.com/PeterMcCormack/status/1166086602441068544

I like to remind everyo who was first introduce this scammer fraudster to bitcoin community.
It was Gavin, he never say public that Wright is not satoshi, and Matonis.

[dkbit98]

Great news!
And I am not surprised at all with the outcome, but C.Wrong is now officially a fraud and a liar,
and we have it confirmed and on paper.
Next one should be check of his head and mental health...

[Leonardo7]

This is a remarkable judgment. Wright should have joined the community in propagating cryptocurrency in a good light rather resorting to self-inflicted destruction, and now his believers that bought BSV are currently in pains. Heros never try to prove their identities, his followers should have known this.

[pooya87]

That means 500k bitcoin and that means that craig wright fell to his own lies.

did he "legally" claim to have a certain amount of bitcoin (in this case 1 million) or is it just the assumption?
the article on Coindesk[1] only says "50 percent of the bitcoin that Wright held prior to Dec. 31, 2013" without mentioning any numbers. of course i haven't really been following the case, so maybe the value was mentioned before?

[1] https://www.coindesk.com/judge-recommends-ruling-in-favor-of-kleiman-in-craig-wright-case

[Xpod78]

This is not new and we all know this from the beginning. And i talk about Craig Wright. The court today official announce that he is a fraud and call him to pay the half of this bitcoin that supposed to hold with Kleiman. That means 500k bitcoin and that means that craig wright fell to his own lies.
Of course this bitcoin never exist from the first place.
The most laughable was this


"Dr.Wright is Dishonest. He is a Serial Forger!"

(we all know that even his Dr is a lie)...

https://twitter.com/PeterMcCormack/status/1166086602441068544

I like to remind everyo who was first introduce this scammer fraudster to bitcoin community.
It was Gavin, he never say public that Wright is not satoshi, and Matonis.

A good friend of mine and I have been following the court cases. I called him right as he got off work today and we legit laughed our asses off with joy. This guy is a fucking joke. If you have any question as too if he's a fraud or not watch the video below:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWix77CEcFg

[pereira4]

That means 500k bitcoin and that means that craig wright fell to his own lies.

did he "legally" claim to have a certain amount of bitcoin (in this case 1 million) or is it just the assumption?
the article on Coindesk[1] only says "50 percent of the bitcoin that Wright held prior to Dec. 31, 2013" without mentioning any numbers. of course i haven't really been following the case, so maybe the value was mentioned before?

[1] https://www.coindesk.com/judge-recommends-ruling-in-favor-of-kleiman-in-craig-wright-case

CSW was already exposed years ago by the awesome wizsec.jp blog, see this pic:



His ego has brought himself into a trap, he wanted to twist the facts to get institutions claiming he is satoshi to collect his coins and his fame. The boomerang keeps hitting back on his forehead and he digs an increasingly deeper holes of lies.

To be honest, I have always thought CSW suffers from some sort of mental condition. He should admit this, and try to use it in court to make fines less heavy, it's the only thing he's got now.

[avikz]

We all expected the same judgement since last few years when Dave's brother filed the lawsuit in Florida. However, the court did not mention any amount, rather passed the judgement on percentage saying 50% of the bitcoins mined prior to 2014 will be awarded to Kleiman Estate. I am sure Craig is now planning his next step on how he can minimize the amount that needs to be given out.

While we all assumed that Craig is an impostor and now when he will have to shell out a fortune, it's BSV which he needs to sell in order to satisfy the terms and conditions of the judgement. If you happen to hold any BSV, sell it off right now because it is going to bleed big time!

[Reid]

Oh thank God.
The truth always comes out.

Good thing is that it was legal by now. Even before it can be seen in plain sight.
Why the hell did it took so long before the jurisdiction can tell what is real.
Are they really that dumb to not see it?
I mean it didn't really have to go that far. Perhaps there should also be another consequences for doing this.
They have also dragged some newbies in their lies. Some did believe him and maybe even worshipped him.

[btc_angela]

We all expected the same judgement since last few years when Dave's brother filed the lawsuit in Florida. However, the court did not mention any amount, rather passed the judgement on percentage saying 50% of the bitcoins mined prior to 2014 will be awarded to Kleiman Estate. I am sure Craig is now planning his next step on how he can minimize the amount that needs to be given out.

Knowing his personality, he will fight for it until the bitter end. He is already exposed big time here and it will just futile on his end to plan his next step because he will just fail over and over again.

While we all assumed that Craig is an impostor and now when he will have to shell out a fortune, it's BSV which he needs to sell in order to satisfy the terms and conditions of the judgement. If you happen to hold any BSV, sell it off right now because it is going to bleed big time!

He really needs to liquidate his assets including his beloved BSV so I'm not surprised if he indeed cash it out that will affect the price negatively and went into a downward spiral. It will be interesting to see what's going to happen to BsV.

[Fundamentals Of]

Craig Wright has always been a fraud and a shill. And now his lies are already asking for the price. He is asked to pay for the amount he does not truly own. This is going to be funnier in the days to come. The next thing he does will be a complete turnaround of what he did before. He will disprove his previous statements. He will admit and prove that he does not actually own these much Bitcoins. He is becoming a joke more and more.

[maxreish]

He can ate all his lies now. At the beginning, I really doubt Craig Wright is the great Satoshi. There are so many misleading statement of him, claiming unbelievable things, owning what he did not really own is something pyschotic mind will do. The court did the right thing to expose his all lies and to pay for all the damages his been done to mislead crypto people. I wonder how he gonna compensate that 500k bitcoin if he really own thousands of them which I surely thought that is another lie.

[AGD]

 Isn't it rather, that the judge confirmed CSW as Satoshi Nakamoto, because CSW has to pay half of Satoshi's Bitcoins?

[akhjob]

Isn't it rather, that the judge confirmed CSW as Satoshi Nakamoto, because CSW has to pay half of Satoshi's Bitcoins?

Did the order say to pay half of Satoshi's Bitcoin? I don't think so. The current judgement doesn't prove anything as Craig is Satoshi. This case is not about "whether Craig is Satoshi" but about the rights over the bitcoin holdings, which Craig was allegedly trying to seize. In the due course, it was ordered that Kleiman be awarded 50 percent of the bitcoin and IPs that Wright held prior to Dec. 31, 2013.

[antisocial77]

What if Kleiman decide to sell those btc's? Actually he is going to sell, time to another bear market? I dont like this.Zeus hellp us.

[franky1]

I like to remind everyo who was first introduce this scammer fraudster to bitcoin community.
It was Gavin, he never say public that Wright is not satoshi, and Matonis.

it was actually nick szabo trace mayer that introduced wright.
well before the media drama of the australian tax fraud stuff happened wright(then a stranger to the community)
made a remote videocall(skype).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdvQTwjVmrE
wright then doxxed himself to press to raise his profile and then moved to the uk to start the satoshi fraud.. it was not until he was in the uk did the gavin/ matonis stuff occur

Isn't it rather, that the judge confirmed CSW as Satoshi Nakamoto, because CSW has to pay half of Satoshi's Bitcoins?

i thought the same thing. that it was craigs plan win or lose it would be used somehow to his benefit. but i need to read a court transcript to know more as media currently reads it as craig owing 50% of any coin mined before 2014 rather than a specific list of source

[jseverson]

What if Kleiman decide to sell those btc's? Actually he is going to sell, time to another bear market? I dont like this.Zeus hellp us.

Can't sell Bitcoins you don't own. It's highly unlikely that CSW is currently (at the very least) holding anywhere near that much, so this settlement isn't even set in stone yet. Also worth noting that Dave Kleiman is dead -- his relatives are the ones taking CSW to court.

i thought the same thing. that it was craigs plan win or lose it would be used somehow to his benefit. but i need to read a court transcript to know more as media currently reads it as craig owing 50% of any coin mined before 2014 rather than a specific list of source

I don't think Satoshi's identity is involved at all, but we might need better sources:

Either way, as far as the legal system is concerned, Wright and Kleiman's jointly-owned business held a lot of assets on its books at the time Kleiman passed away in 2013 and his brother, Ira Kleiman, should have inherited his fair share of it.

Their business apparently had to (publicly, at least) do with mining, which might explain the wording of the ruling.

[Slow death]

No doubt Craig Wright is not satoshi, he is Faketoshi, but I have a doubt. This condemnation that he had, he cannot appeal against this sentence handed down by this judge Bruce Reinhart? The only information I see is about this condemnation. but they don't talk about whether he can still appeal to another higher court or not. these bitcoin-related news channels have to start giving more details when posting news

[Kakmakr]

Craig Wright will find a way to talk himself out of this one, but the court judgement will cast a shadow over his future ventures and people will always point back to that, when he wants to launch something new. 

He can also not lodge deformation of character court cases against people that call him a fraudster now, because the court pointed that out. 

OP, Gavin did not expose him as a fraudster, because even Gavin fell for his claims and actually supported him in the beginning, when he fist claimed that he was Satoshi. 

[AGD]

...

Isn't it rather, that the judge confirmed CSW as Satoshi Nakamoto, because CSW has to pay half of Satoshi's Bitcoins?

i thought the same thing. that it was craigs plan win or lose it would be used somehow to his benefit. but i need to read a court transcript to know more as media currently reads it as craig owing 50% of any coin mined before 2014 rather than a specific list of source

Possible that Ira Kleiman is involved. He can sell risk shares of this billion dollar claim and make a few millions with it.

[acroman08]

saw an article regarding this topic earlier and I wasn't surprised about the result of the case. it's about time CSW shut his mouth up.
I just can't believe the length people will go to just to get money.