Game-Protect.com did not refund my money and stopped replying to my emails

[BayAreaCoins]

...BayAreaCoins...
Please show the written contract?

[1715227311]

1715227311

[1715227311]

1715227311

[1715227311]

1715227311

[1715227311]

1715227311

[1715227311]

1715227311

[game-protect]

...BayAreaCoins...
Please show the written contract?

This email is not a written contract!

UK law is similar to the law in most commonwealth countries.

For contracts to be legally binding, five essential elements must be present. There must be:

1) An offer;
2) Acceptance of the offer;
3) Consideration (i.e., some form of payment);
4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract; and
5) Certainty as to what the parties have agreed.

https://businessadvice.co.uk/business-development/business-planning/are-emails-legally-binding/[/quote]

3) Consideration (i.e., some form of payment);

Does not exist!

Game Protect only takes donations without any legally binding agreement.

https://game-protect.com/donate/

If you appreciate our worldwide only real and unbiased online gaming consumer protection service, your donation is welcome!

Real world legal aspects: Donations are given without return consideration.

4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract

Does not exist!

Game Protect does not make contracts and therefore can not intent to be legally bound by such!

[BayAreaCoins]

You're a lying little turd.  Case closed bitch.

I wish people would just ignore you at this point.

[actmyname]

Donations are given without return consideration.

>or you will get the 210€ back 30 June 2019.

Something's not right here...Oh, and just saying that you don't make contracts will  not get you out of one. You are playing a game of semantics.

[game-protect]

Oh, and just saying that you don't make contracts will not get you out of one.

Saying that I do not make contracts will not get me into one!

4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract

Does not exist!

Game Protect does not make contracts and therefore can not intent to be legally bound by such!

But you are right, you can not get out of non-existing written contracts, because you are not in!

I think you can make more money as a clown than spamming your signature!

[nutildah]

Oh, and just saying that you don't make contracts will not get you out of one.

Saying that I do not make contracts will not get me into one!

4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract

Does not exist!

Game Protect does not make contracts and therefore can not intent to be legally bound by such!

But you are right, you can not get out of non-existing written contracts, because you are not in!

I've already explained it to you: the contract doesn't have to be legally binding to be acceptable evidence for the purposes of this forum. To us, it is a written contract that was violated. We don't care about what it is to you. Now that you've scammed get-paid of the whole jennirae case, there should be no doubt in anybody's mind that you are indeed a scammer, if there somehow was before.

[game-protect]

Oh, and just saying that you don't make contracts will not get you out of one.

Saying that I do not make contracts will not get me into one!

4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract

Does not exist!

Game Protect does not make contracts and therefore can not intent to be legally bound by such!

But you are right, you can not get out of non-existing written contracts, because you are not in!

I've already explained it to you: the contract doesn't have to be legally binding to be acceptable evidence for the purposes of this forum. To us, it is a written contract that was violated. We don't care about what it is to you.

Thank you for confirming that a written contract does not exist and is only a hallucination by extremely mentally ill and or brain dead bitcointalk accounts!

[TheBeardedBaby]

So email = binding contract (written) in variety of cases. If you have an agreement and you have your names on the bottom of the email, this email acts as a binding contract which = a written contract. If you have noted somewhere in the email that the separate written contract will be issued to confirm any agreement, then the email won't have the same weigh as a binding (written) contract.
Some food for thought.

When An Email Becomes a Binding Contract
July 10, 2010

In the span of just a few years, e-mail has become a primary means of communication in the business world, surpassing the phone and the now almost outdated written fax. The ease, informality and rapid response of e-mail matches the hurried pace by which day-to-day business matters are resolved. As a result, it is easy to forget that in the right set of circumstances an e-mail can unexpectedly create a binding contract.

The art of negotiation usually follows established patterns: terms are outlined, terms rejected, the parties reach compromise, terms are agreed. Sometimes there is an expectation that the transaction will be detailed in a written contract to be signed by the parties. But what if all of the above takes place via e-mail? Does a written contract already exist? Sometimes, the answer is yes.

In recent years, a number of courts have been required to resolve this issue. In Stevens v. Publicis, S.A., 50 A.D.3d 253 (2008), Arthur Stevens sold his public relations firm and entered into an employment agreement to continue as CEO of the company. When financial problems surfaced, Stevens was removed as CEO. Stevens and Bob Bloom, a former executive of the purchaser, then began a series of e-mails exchanges that described the terms under which Stevens might continue to provide services to the purchaser. Stevens eventually sent an e-mail to Bloom stating, ""I accept your proposal…,"" to which Bloom replied ""I am thrilled with your decision."" Each of the e-mails of Stevens and Bloom included the typed name of the sender. Stevens sent an additional e-mail to the Chief Operating Officer of the purchaser to reaffirm his unconditional acceptance of the new terms of service.

In that case, the New York court held that the series of e-mails set forth the terms of the modification of Stevens' employment agreement and constituted a ""signed writing"". This satisfied the requirement of the employment agreement that any modifications be signed in writing.

Amazon.com also found itself in the midst of a similar dispute that was resolved by a Massachusetts court in Basis Technology Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 71 Mass.App.Ct. 29 (2008). Amazon and Basis Technology were engaged in litigation. During trial, an e-mail from Basis Technology's counsel to Amazon set forth the terms of a settlement that the parties would ""memorialize in a written agreement, to be signed by individuals authorized by each party…."" Amazon's counsel responded in a one-word e-mail: ""Correct."" Subsequently, a dispute arose regarding certain of the terms, and the parties were unable to resolve their differences.

The Massachusetts trial court held that the e-mail exchange constituted an unambiguous agreement on all material terms, and therefore, found a contract to exist. The parties' plan to ""memorialize"" the settlement terms in a written agreement was merely intended to record the terms of the agreed upon settlement, and not to create new terms.

A New York court has also found in Al-Bawaba.com, Inc. v. Nstein Technologies Corp., 862 N.Y.S.2d 812 (2008) that an e-mail exchange complied with the Statute of Frauds requirement for a signed writing based upon the sender's intention to authenticate the e-mail by typing his name at the bottom of the e-mail.

How to Avoid an Unintended E-mail Contract

    Remember that e-mails, no matter how informal, are discoverable, producible and potentially binding contracts.

 

   If you do not intend to create a contract by e-mail, recite in the e-mail that there is no intention to create a contract, except pursuant to a separate written agreement.

 

    Recognize that a plan to ""memorialize"" an agreement is simply a recitation of what has already been agreed to by the parties.

 

Mary Wasik is a Partner at Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC in Chicago, Illinois, and Vice-Chair of the Corporate Practice Group. Mary can be reached at mwasik@lplegal.com or 312-476-7568.

Levenfeld Pearlstein's articles are intended solely for informational purposes. They are not and should not be relied upon or construed as legal advice. You should obtain legal advice from an attorney with regard to any specific issues you may have.

Source > https://www.lplegal.com/content/when-email-becomes-binding-contract

[game-protect]

@ extremely mentally ill and or brain dead

US laws are not applicable!

Despite of this, your brain is not able to understand the law you quoted!

For example, it says sometimes and not that emails are a legally binding agreement by default!

Despite of this, it depends on the circumstances if an email can be considered as a legally binding agreement!

For example, Game Protect does not make contracts by default and therefore it is by default excluded that a written contract was made!

UK law is similar to the law in most commonwealth countries.

For contracts to be legally binding, five essential elements must be present. There must be:

1) An offer;
2) Acceptance of the offer;
3) Consideration (i.e., some form of payment);
4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract; and
5) Certainty as to what the parties have agreed.

https://businessadvice.co.uk/business-development/business-planning/are-emails-legally-binding/[/quote]

3) Consideration (i.e., some form of payment);

Does not exist!

Game Protect only takes donations without any legally binding agreement.

https://game-protect.com/donate/

If you appreciate our worldwide only real and unbiased online gaming consumer protection service, your donation is welcome!

Real world legal aspects: Donations are given without return consideration.

4) An intention to be legally bound by the contract

Does not exist!

Game Protect does not make contracts and therefore can not intent to be legally bound by such!

[TheBeardedBaby]

~

You state you will give back the money, but you didn't . And It's written, fact. You lied that you will give the money back, fact. Lying your customers = you should not be trusted.
Broke a written agreement = written contract.
Misleading the customer to donate money = scam.
Totally busted - throwing sh!t on the others who pointed out the facts.

This is not a courtroom it's just a simple forum, everyone on the DT has its own way to interpret the situation, that is why we are soon many to balance around common sense.
You just crossed the ethical line and everyone just saw that.

What you think you gonna achieve by insulting the others? Nor respect for sure. You lost mine long ago, but I don't have you on my ignore list.

[game-protect]

@ extremely mentally ill and or brain dead

You are either sleeping or are too stupid to read text, but the BTC worth 210 were given back long time ago:

h4ns to GP 100,000€ current compensation demand for damages caused by his public defamation campaign - GP to h4ns 210€ = h4ns to GP 99,790€

[TMAN]

h4ns to GP 100,000€ current compensation demand for damages caused by his public defamation campaign - GP to h4ns 210€ = h4ns to GP 99,790€

Great stuff, finally getting somewhere here - so as you are admitting you owe the user €210 then you should pay that amount to him, once paid you will have your case for defamation of character as you will of fulfilled your end of the bargain and be in a far greater legal position to move forwards with your case against the user.

see some progress in this thread at last, pay the man what you owe - the sue him for what you believe he owes you. This isn't a used car lot where you get a discount of the total of the new car by bringing in an old banger for part exchange to discount the price.

[game-protect]

@ extremely mentally ill and or brain dead

If you would have the slightest idea about legal things you would not spam your Fortunejack signature for cents!

[TMAN]

@ extremely mentally ill and or brain dead

If you would have the slightest idea about legal things you would not spam your Fortunejack signature for cents!

legal things? not a term that any lawyer/solicitor/barrister I have ever spoken to has used.

but as above you have admitted to owing €210 to OP and you are claiming that OP owes you damages, should you pay OP then you will be well within your rights to sue OP if after payment he continues with your claimed defamation of character.

However you have not shown payment, OP has not posted that you have paid him either. Call me mentally ill if you wish, or brain dead - but as I am typing right now It is proof my brain isn't dead.

I will tell you a secret sweet cheeks, just because you do not agree with someone it does not make them mentally ill, in the same vein just because you think you are right it does not make it true.

BTW - if those pictures in investigations are actually true, I would say if we ever met it would only take me about 12 pints of beer to agree to tongue punch your fart box - looks wise you ain't that bad, mentality - well you are the one who needs the mental asylum

[game-protect]

I will tell you a secret sweet cheeks, just because you do not agree with someone it does not make them mentally ill, in the same vein just because you think you are right it does not make it true.

I do not think I am right, I know that I am right!

That is the huge difference between Game Protect and extremely mentally ill and or brain dead nonsense shit posters like you!

[hopenotlate]

I do not think I am right, I know that I am right!

Yet you are the least trusted member out of 2,706,088 as of today users of this forum....but maybe, as an old wise man I know uses to say, the important thing is to be convinced of what we say 

[game-protect]

I do not think I am right, I know that I am right!

Yet you are the least trusted member out of 2,706,088 as of today users of this forum....but maybe, as an old wise man I know uses to say, the important thing is to be convinced of what we say  

The trust of who did I breach and how?

How is brain wash nonsense shit related to the real world online gambling consumer protection entity Game Protect?

Game Protect acts based on real world laws and regulations and not based on brain wash nonsense shit!

[TMAN]

I do not think I am right, I know that I am right!
[/quote]

You could tell me that its raining, I wouldn't believe you.. even if I was getting wet I would assume you were just pissing up my back.

why does it not enter into your head that the majority of the forum is right and you are wrong? do you have issues admitting fault?

[hopenotlate]

I do not think I am right, I know that I am right!

Yet you are the least trusted member out of 2,706,088 as of today users of this forum....but maybe, as an old wise man I know uses to say, the important thing is to be convinced of what we say  

The trust of who did I breach and how?

How is brain wash nonsense shit related to the real world online gambling consumer protection entity Game Protect?

Game Protect acts based on real world laws and regulations and not based on brain wash nonsense shit!

And the real world doesn't trust you! As simple as that.
Evidence is your trust rating being the worst amongst more 2 million real world persons using this forum.

[HCP]

... and not based on brain wash nonsense shit!

And yet... that is all you spew in pretty much each and every post you make on this site. "Nonsense shit".

Your silly semantic games and "fingers in ears"-type denial of reality don't make you right... and you know it. But no doubt, you'll wait a few more days... give everyone another round of red trust for being "brain dead", claim you "don't make contracts"... and "only accept donations"... and that you "refunded h4ns" by ever so graciously deducting that 210 euro from the amount you're magically claiming as damages in your made up little defamation fantasy...

Here's some truth for you... that isn't a refund. It isn't even close to be being refund. Since you're so fond of definitions:

Refund
verb (used with object)
- to give back or restore (especially money); repay.
- to make repayment to; reimburse.

You didn't give it back or repay it... therefore... NO REFUND has been made. His claim is good... as is the flag.

So, stop making yourself look like a twat with all your stupid games and arguments and just give him his 210 euros like you promised you would in the email you wrote to him (which by the way... in spite of your protestations otherwise IS classified as a written agreement).

Don't bother repeating all your "nonsense shit" about contracts and donations and refunds... we've all seen it... multiple times... and it's still just as incorrect as the first time you posted it.