|
crypto-dude
|
|
March 17, 2014, 07:14:02 AM |
|
Yes we need an explanation from cryptorush!
|
|
|
|
comecoin21
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
March 17, 2014, 07:27:11 AM |
|
Good question, I also want answers.
|
|
|
|
strasboug
|
|
March 17, 2014, 07:54:03 AM |
|
Good question, I also want answers.
Same here...
|
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 17, 2014, 03:29:45 PM |
|
Guys, better vote for Mintpal, there was fair Zeitcoin approval.
|
|
|
|
linkandzelda
|
|
March 17, 2014, 04:02:25 PM |
|
Hi, just thought I'd answer this. There's a bug that shows incorrect vote counts for the coins that won the voting. RealStackCoin definitely did not get that many votes. I can assure you that the voting process is 100% fair.
Regards, LaZ CryptoRush
|
|
|
|
strasboug
|
|
March 17, 2014, 04:46:35 PM |
|
Hi, just thought I'd answer this. There's a bug that shows incorrect vote counts for the coins that won the voting. RealStackCoin definitely did not get that many votes. I can assure you that the voting process is 100% fair.
Regards, LaZ CryptoRush
Then why not put the real winner, which is ECC, to the exchange?
|
|
|
|
strasboug
|
|
March 17, 2014, 04:48:44 PM |
|
Hi, just thought I'd answer this. There's a bug that shows incorrect vote counts for the coins that won the voting. RealStackCoin definitely did not get that many votes. I can assure you that the voting process is 100% fair.
Regards, LaZ CryptoRush
Since it is a bug, why not correct it??
why RSC still trading there: https://cryptorush.in/index.php?p=trading&m=RSC&b=BTC
and not the real winner of the vote, which is ECC?
|
|
|
|
linkandzelda
|
|
March 17, 2014, 04:53:32 PM |
|
ECC was not the winner, we refreshed on the dot of the count down and RealStackCoin was the winner. That's how we decide the winner, what the system says at the time the clock hits 0. As for the bug, that bug only shows at the bottom of the list, not the top half (the correct half). The other 2 top contenders were 1-2 mins late with winning, sorry about that.
|
|
|
|
Camilio
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Geister?! Geister?! Geister???!! Weißbroooot!
|
|
March 17, 2014, 04:56:41 PM |
|
Hi, just thought I'd answer this. There's a bug that shows incorrect vote counts for the coins that won the voting. RealStackCoin definitely did not get that many votes. I can assure you that the voting process is 100% fair.
Regards, LaZ CryptoRush
take realstackcoin from the exchange and put ecc into otherwise its been proven that cryptorush manipulated the voting procedure. That is unacceptable. There are serious guys sending btc to your exchange in hope to get their coin forward and then this shit happens.
|
|
|
|
crypto-dude
|
|
March 17, 2014, 04:59:38 PM |
|
ECC was not the winner, we refreshed on the dot of the count down and RealStackCoin was the winner. That's how we decide the winner, what the system says at the time the clock hits 0. As for the bug, that bug only shows at the bottom of the list, not the top half (the correct half). The other 2 top contenders were 1-2 mins late with winning, sorry about that.
Give the proof that RSC is the winner, you still say the last seconds they voted 140000 votes? This is completely bullshit. The credibility of cryptorush is serious a problem now, if it can not be done in a fair way the vote system, then it is simply cheating there!
|
|
|
|
hostmaster (OP)
|
|
March 17, 2014, 05:04:58 PM |
|
Hi, just thought I'd answer this. There's a bug that shows incorrect vote counts for the coins that won the voting. RealStackCoin definitely did not get that many votes. I can assure you that the voting process is 100% fair.
Regards, LaZ CryptoRush
Do you have an official address where we can sent a letter?
|
|
|
|
strasboug
|
|
March 17, 2014, 05:06:18 PM |
|
ECC was not the winner, we refreshed on the dot of the count down and RealStackCoin was the winner. That's how we decide the winner, what the system says at the time the clock hits 0. As for the bug, that bug only shows at the bottom of the list, not the top half (the correct half). The other 2 top contenders were 1-2 mins late with winning, sorry about that.
Give the proof that RSC is the winner, you still say the last seconds they voted 140000 votes? This is completely bullshit. The credibility of cryptorush is serious a problem now, if it can not be done in a fair way the vote system, then it is simply cheating there! This is incredible what linkandzelda said, even with modified counts, in the last few seconds cast more than 10000 votes? I voted many times, I know how your voting system reacts, you can't vote fast, unless to do cheats with programs. Explain to us, how these 10000+ votes are cast in the last seconds of the vote? You think people can be easily fooled here? This looks to me a real scam exchange. I can't believe it.
|
|
|
|
linkandzelda
|
|
March 17, 2014, 05:41:59 PM |
|
ECC was not the winner, we refreshed on the dot of the count down and RealStackCoin was the winner. That's how we decide the winner, what the system says at the time the clock hits 0. As for the bug, that bug only shows at the bottom of the list, not the top half (the correct half). The other 2 top contenders were 1-2 mins late with winning, sorry about that.
Give the proof that RSC is the winner, you still say the last seconds they voted 140000 votes? This is completely bullshit. The credibility of cryptorush is serious a problem now, if it can not be done in a fair way the vote system, then it is simply cheating there! I never said they voted 140000, they won with 19494 votes only. I said the display on the bottom half of the page was incorrect. It's corrected now.
|
|
|
|
hostmaster (OP)
|
|
March 17, 2014, 05:47:45 PM |
|
ECC was not the winner, we refreshed on the dot of the count down and RealStackCoin was the winner. That's how we decide the winner, what the system says at the time the clock hits 0. As for the bug, that bug only shows at the bottom of the list, not the top half (the correct half). The other 2 top contenders were 1-2 mins late with winning, sorry about that.
Give the proof that RSC is the winner, you still say the last seconds they voted 140000 votes? This is completely bullshit. The credibility of cryptorush is serious a problem now, if it can not be done in a fair way the vote system, then it is simply cheating there! I never said they voted 140000, they won with 19494 votes only. I said the display on the bottom half of the page was incorrect. It's corrected now. If they won with 19494 votes. Then it's still wrong. We had more than +22.000 Votes when counter hit 0. Please bring us your logs that proves how much we had votes at that time! Also i need you pay back those funds original senders! I see you no delivering service and keeping money with you.
|
|
|
|
linkandzelda
|
|
March 17, 2014, 05:48:10 PM |
|
ECC was not the winner, we refreshed on the dot of the count down and RealStackCoin was the winner. That's how we decide the winner, what the system says at the time the clock hits 0. As for the bug, that bug only shows at the bottom of the list, not the top half (the correct half). The other 2 top contenders were 1-2 mins late with winning, sorry about that.
Give the proof that RSC is the winner, you still say the last seconds they voted 140000 votes? This is completely bullshit. The credibility of cryptorush is serious a problem now, if it can not be done in a fair way the vote system, then it is simply cheating there! This is incredible what linkandzelda said, even with modified counts, in the last few seconds cast more than 10000 votes? I voted many times, I know how your voting system reacts, you can't vote fast, unless to do cheats with programs. Explain to us, how these 10000+ votes are cast in the last seconds of the vote? You think people can be easily fooled here? This looks to me a real scam exchange. I can't believe it. There's nothing wrong or scammy about our voting system. We update the votes every 2 mins and we even list votes even with 0 confirmations to give people more time to make votes right at the last minute, without waiting for confirms. Me and the rest of the team refreshes when the clock hits 0 to determine the winner. To secure BTC votes in the future, leave at least 5 mins before the time runs out. We also only allow users that traded to vote, so it cant be abused by bots. I would appreciate if you can refrain from these kinds of allegations in the future towards our system.
|
|
|
|
linkandzelda
|
|
March 17, 2014, 05:50:44 PM |
|
ECC was not the winner, we refreshed on the dot of the count down and RealStackCoin was the winner. That's how we decide the winner, what the system says at the time the clock hits 0. As for the bug, that bug only shows at the bottom of the list, not the top half (the correct half). The other 2 top contenders were 1-2 mins late with winning, sorry about that.
Give the proof that RSC is the winner, you still say the last seconds they voted 140000 votes? This is completely bullshit. The credibility of cryptorush is serious a problem now, if it can not be done in a fair way the vote system, then it is simply cheating there! I never said they voted 140000, they won with 19494 votes only. I said the display on the bottom half of the page was incorrect. It's corrected now. If they won with 19494 votes. Then it's still wrong. We had more than +22.000 Votes when counter hit 0. Please bring us your logs that proves how much we had votes at that time! Also i need you pay back those funds original senders! I see you no delivering service and keeping money with you. We don't keep logs that extensive unfortunately, we log when users vote with buttons and which times they voted. It would take a long time to build a report to proove this. There's nothing to prove here. We're adding ECC tonight anyway.
|
|
|
|
hostmaster (OP)
|
|
March 17, 2014, 05:53:36 PM |
|
ECC was not the winner, we refreshed on the dot of the count down and RealStackCoin was the winner. That's how we decide the winner, what the system says at the time the clock hits 0. As for the bug, that bug only shows at the bottom of the list, not the top half (the correct half). The other 2 top contenders were 1-2 mins late with winning, sorry about that.
Give the proof that RSC is the winner, you still say the last seconds they voted 140000 votes? This is completely bullshit. The credibility of cryptorush is serious a problem now, if it can not be done in a fair way the vote system, then it is simply cheating there! I never said they voted 140000, they won with 19494 votes only. I said the display on the bottom half of the page was incorrect. It's corrected now. If they won with 19494 votes. Then it's still wrong. We had more than +22.000 Votes when counter hit 0. Please bring us your logs that proves how much we had votes at that time! Also i need you pay back those funds original senders! I see you no delivering service and keeping money with you. We don't keep logs that extensive unfortunately, we log when users vote with buttons and which times they voted. It would take a long time to build a report to proove this. There's nothing to prove here. We're adding ECC tonight anyway. I want you add ECC ALL BTC - LTC and DOGE markets. Because we had enough stress and bad times and shock. It's only thing can calm us tonight!
|
|
|
|
linkandzelda
|
|
March 17, 2014, 06:06:31 PM |
|
ECC was not the winner, we refreshed on the dot of the count down and RealStackCoin was the winner. That's how we decide the winner, what the system says at the time the clock hits 0. As for the bug, that bug only shows at the bottom of the list, not the top half (the correct half). The other 2 top contenders were 1-2 mins late with winning, sorry about that.
Give the proof that RSC is the winner, you still say the last seconds they voted 140000 votes? This is completely bullshit. The credibility of cryptorush is serious a problem now, if it can not be done in a fair way the vote system, then it is simply cheating there! I never said they voted 140000, they won with 19494 votes only. I said the display on the bottom half of the page was incorrect. It's corrected now. If they won with 19494 votes. Then it's still wrong. We had more than +22.000 Votes when counter hit 0. Please bring us your logs that proves how much we had votes at that time! Also i need you pay back those funds original senders! I see you no delivering service and keeping money with you. We don't keep logs that extensive unfortunately, we log when users vote with buttons and which times they voted. It would take a long time to build a report to proove this. There's nothing to prove here. We're adding ECC tonight anyway. I want you add ECC ALL BTC - LTC and DOGE markets. Because we had enough stress and bad times and shock. It's only thing can calm us tonight! What the fuck man. Quit complaining alright? You lost fair and square, CryptoRush added RSC. Now they're doing YOU a massive favor by adding ECC too. Seriously, you got what you wanted, but you keep asking for more. Wtf? I have to agree here, every time we add a coin this happens. The second best claims they won at the last moment. I'm going to make this selection automatic in the future, no room for error.
|
|
|
|
strasboug
|
|
March 17, 2014, 06:07:00 PM |
|
ECC was not the winner, we refreshed on the dot of the count down and RealStackCoin was the winner. That's how we decide the winner, what the system says at the time the clock hits 0. As for the bug, that bug only shows at the bottom of the list, not the top half (the correct half). The other 2 top contenders were 1-2 mins late with winning, sorry about that.
Give the proof that RSC is the winner, you still say the last seconds they voted 140000 votes? This is completely bullshit. The credibility of cryptorush is serious a problem now, if it can not be done in a fair way the vote system, then it is simply cheating there! I never said they voted 140000, they won with 19494 votes only. I said the display on the bottom half of the page was incorrect. It's corrected now. If they won with 19494 votes. Then it's still wrong. We had more than +22.000 Votes when counter hit 0. Please bring us your logs that proves how much we had votes at that time! Also i need you pay back those funds original senders! I see you no delivering service and keeping money with you. We don't keep logs that extensive unfortunately, we log when users vote with buttons and which times they voted. It would take a long time to build a report to proove this. There's nothing to prove here. We're adding ECC tonight anyway. This is scam, it is simply not possible vote 10000 in the last seconds, your system is fraud, and you still try to deny it. You made a mistake listing the scam one and you don't want to correct your mistake. Make sure the future all these holes are fixed so at least there are some fairness of your system.
|
|
|
|
|