ICO projects with very good rating

[fotomask]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

[confreslamp]

They are mostly paid, so do not pay attention to ratings. In general all rating websites are paid, so you can create whatever rating you wish, if you have enough money. Do your own research and do not trust such websites.

[Stanlo]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Rating websites do take money from developers to rate up their projects, its not a reliable way of knowing solid projects if you ask me, most times they are so misleading, do better research instead on relying on rating websites

[fotomask]

They are mostly paid, so do not pay attention to ratings. In general all rating websites are paid, so you can create whatever rating you wish, if you have enough money. Do your own research and do not trust such websites.

Do you mean it is  fake rating ?

[Javi_Anibarro]

Do you mean it is  fake rating ?

Yes mostly are, this rating can change at any time. I have encountered a few projects that were rated as 5 stars but after the project failed to meet up their softcap or proven as a scam project, the rating went back to 3 or 2 stars. Some raters on rating websites are charging for money if your project wants to get rated as a good project, not only that you can request the context that will be posted on review too.

[fotomask]

Do you mean it is  fake rating ?

Yes mostly are, this rating can change at any time. I have encountered a few projects that were rated as 5 stars but after the project failed to meet up their softcap or proven as a scam project, the rating went back to 3 or 2 stars. Some raters on rating websites are charging for money if your project wants to get rated as a good project, not only that you can request the context that will be posted on review too.

This mean this rating websites changes the rating whatever they want, but way it is popular ?

[Beparanf]

Do you mean it is  fake rating ?

Yes mostly are, this rating can change at any time. I have encountered a few projects that were rated as 5 stars but after the project failed to meet up their softcap or proven as a scam project, the rating went back to 3 or 2 stars. Some raters on rating websites are charging for money if your project wants to get rated as a good project, not only that you can request the context that will be posted on review too.

Some rating sites are simply own by a bounty hunter, I don't know yet the owner of ICO rating but most rating sites are paid or only few people give rates and we wonder if they really do check it or find some analysis that will determine certain factors. Better do our own research so we will not regret in the end. I only used ICO rating before for checking of new projects to search if they have bounties, but now I don't visit the site anymore.

[Javi_Anibarro]

This mean this rating websites changes the rating whatever they want, but way it is popular ?

Yes they are, unless someone intervened in giving an honest review about the ratings that affects the review and can not be changed as their wish. They did something shady in the back but it does not mean they are completely useless because on their exchanges we can gather information regarding the project or important links about the project without searching it. And we can find the detail about their tokenization on their exchanges too, this is why it is very popular. This is a good place to get information regarding the project you are looking for, of course besides the rating.

[Serco]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Rating websites do take money from developers to rate up their projects, its not a reliable way of knowing solid projects if you ask me, most times they are so misleading, do better research instead on relying on rating websites

its time for us to forget review from any site.they just review based on money that they received.analisys not be subjective again based on quality.the only way was we should to improve our own  knowledge that maybe will be more accurate and  profitable for us.we've see many projects that its quality not suitable with its rating on site,

[Dingdongjl]

There are some websites that are just promoting their coins with this kind of technique so mostly I dont believe on unknown websites ratings, there are also a legitimate ratings those on the trusted websites.

[randa2000]

Some of this rating websites charge more than 1 BTC, for just listing you and give you good rating, do not trust any ICO rating websites, all looking for money, all do business and make profit.

[clickerz]

They are mostly paid, so do not pay attention to ratings. In general all rating websites are paid, so you can create whatever rating you wish, if you have enough money. Do your own research and do not trust such websites.

Probably, because some of the ICOs project having a good ratings till failed. There are many factors why a project failed, according to study  I read, almost  80% of projects failed. When value suddenly drops means there is someone dump their holding, and what happens next is domino effect until it cannot recover or developer abandon the project.

[Fappanu]

Don't believe in ICO ratings because they can only be based on what they see and don't have enough analysis on whether or not they are true.

Most of the scam campaigns I have been involved with have raised that they have high ratings, but have also become scams in the middle of the campaign or if they have reached their target price they suddenly become inactive. So don't rely on this website, much better if we analyze the campaign we want to join.

[Kersh768]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

The rating are simply votes of the viewers of that particular websites which means rating sites are based on the opinion of the majority on which project they think is having huge potential. But it won't change the fact that those ratings are only assumptions, therefore, not having assurance. Things could possibly go the exact opposite knowing the market is quite unstable nowadays.

[bassbity]

I don't trust ICO devices anymore. I don't think it's accurate like ICObench, ICO rating, ICO Holder. They just add warning as they like. In fact, I often see in ICObench there are projects that reach the target funding but the project is not successful, so from there I do not trust anymore.

At present many ICO projects fail but I am sure you will find the best ICO project.

[gunhell16]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

They will not put the quality on how they rate an ICO project. If they will put there how much they got from the team then it will a mess for them.
ICO rating websites are not trustable now as they are not the ones like 2017. they are into money now and most of them are paid.
The more they get from the team (payment) the better the ratings they will give!

[strunberg]

Don't believe in ICO ratings because they can only be based on what they see and don't have enough analysis on whether or not they are true.

Most of the scam campaigns I have been involved with have raised that they have high ratings, but have also become scams in the middle of the campaign or if they have reached their target price they suddenly become inactive. So don't rely on this website, much better if we analyze the campaign we want to join.

ico site review has different view with our analisys.they just look from site, whitepaper and team.but they forget some important thing that usually be the success.bounty hunter in my opinion has better analisys based on their experience.many developers team left their projects when already collect money and listing token in shit exchanges.

[LbtalkL]

Personally I don't trust this rating site most of them are paid or have fake ratings. They usually hire some people to give them 5 stars and good reviews, of course, they will pay for that so the quality of these ratings is not accurate or false ratings. It always better to review and rate it for yourself. I usually look for team profiles if not fake, project uniqueness, real partnerships. etc.

[BigBoy89]

I don't trust any ratings online anymore. Most of them are paid and not real.

What I'm looking in an ICO is see MVP, live and working product. Something that could really make a change. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

[iamaruf]

They are mostly paid, so do not pay attention to ratings. In general all rating websites are paid, so you can create whatever rating you wish, if you have enough money. Do your own research and do not trust such websites.

Do you mean it is  fake rating ?

Yeah most of the rating is fake. Project team pay some money to achieve good rating. I saw few people working on this area.if you search there you will find that top rated ico turned to scam. So don’t believe in rating. Better to find out good ico or ieo project yourself.or there is high possibility to scam or you may loss your money.And i don’t believe in rating now.