ICO projects with very good rating

[ongkok87]

I don't trust any ratings online anymore. Most of them are paid and not real.

What I'm looking in an ICO is see MVP, live and working product. Something that could really make a change. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

Just like you that rating or whatever it is now no longer a concern. people can already observe that ratings can actually be bought and can also be manipulated. when things happen like this do we still believe in rating? I think it's better just to do personal analysis to know whether the project is good or not

[1715243027]

1715243027

[1715243027]

1715243027

[angrybirdy]

They are mostly paid, so do not pay attention to ratings. In general all rating websites are paid, so you can create whatever rating you wish, if you have enough money. Do your own research and do not trust such websites.

Do you mean it is  fake rating ?

Yeah most of the rating is fake. Project team pay some money to achieve good rating. I saw few people working on this area.if you search there you will find that top rated ico turned to scam. So don’t believe in rating. Better to find out good ico or ieo project yourself.or there is high possibility to scam or you may loss your money.And i don’t believe in rating now.   

It's natural for them to pay websites for fake ratings, it has been done by so many projects even before.

It has never been accurate, ico ratings are just for a display to deceive investors and attract them to invest in a project.
Ico ratings have been trusted before, but ever since that even scam campaigns are being advertised, it is not good to trust their ratings anymore.

[Obito]

They are mostly paid, so do not pay attention to ratings. In general all rating websites are paid, so you can create whatever rating you wish, if you have enough money. Do your own research and do not trust such websites.

Do you mean it is  fake rating ?

Yes to boost up their appearance. Usually those who lack in experience and new comers are just looking for trust rating platforms whenever they are about to make a decision. But definitely those platforms are just a business and no way an independent one. It is very dangerous to make a decision from a controlled trust rating platforms. It is still safe if you had your own research towards the project, and make an independent decision.

[aomakun]

They are mostly paid, so do not pay attention to ratings. In general all rating websites are paid, so you can create whatever rating you wish, if you have enough money. Do your own research and do not trust such websites.

Do you mean it is  fake rating ?

Yes to boost up their appearance. Usually those who lack in experience and new comers are just looking for trust rating platforms whenever they are about to make a decision. But definitely those platforms are just a business and no way an independent one. It is very dangerous to make a decision from a controlled trust rating platforms. It is still safe if you had your own research towards the project, and make an independent decision.

yes a ranting site cannot be trusted completely in the rating given. the best is that you have to do your own research so that you understand the techniques when doing research and also the projects that you research. but the ability of research for new investors may still be a little ability and therefore new investors still think that ratings are pure results from a site's research

[DabsPoorVersion]

They are mostly paid, so do not pay attention to ratings. In general all rating websites are paid, so you can create whatever rating you wish, if you have enough money. Do your own research and do not trust such websites.

Do you mean it is  fake rating ?

Yes to boost up their appearance. Usually those who lack in experience and new comers are just looking for trust rating platforms whenever they are about to make a decision. But definitely those platforms are just a business and no way an independent one. It is very dangerous to make a decision from a controlled trust rating platforms. It is still safe if you had your own research towards the project, and make an independent decision.

yes a ranting site cannot be trusted completely in the rating given. the best is that you have to do your own research so that you understand the techniques when doing research and also the projects that you research. but the ability of research for new investors may still be a little ability and therefore new investors still think that ratings are pure results from a site's research

Indeed, because its actually every individuals responsibility to have do research when it comes to the legitimacy of the project.
Using ICO ratings as a reference won't help since they are just being paid to promote a certain project without knowing if this is legit or not.

[spadormie]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Don't depend on ICObench, ICOrating and etc. Most of them are paid sites in which they will rate the ICO on a higher rate and then it will just bait investors to invest in ICO. Most of these people that pays ICO rating sites to boost their project most likely ending up as a scam. Because if your project is true, there's no need for you to bribe ICO rating sites just for you to boost your project.

[lobat999]

TBH, I think gone are the days that ICO's with good ratings can influence a crypto investor's perception towards a particular project and this is evident from the ICO failures and the market slump of 2018 until now! I understand there were so many projects that conducted ICO's were either an exit scam or have become disabled for many unknown reasons - leaving the crypto-community in total disappointment and disbelief! Now this problem has become more compounded because most or if not all, these ICO ratings sites don't have credibility and will give good ratings to projects in exchange for monetary considerations which put crypto investing in a very bad light.

But now, I guess there have been lessons learned and experiences gained  by these incidents and so far I think it will be harder for any ICO's to convince the community to support the project even if we assume that project core team are developing it in good faith! THB, the community, except for those scumbags are altogether sick and tired of this frauds and are finding ways to change the system!

Lastly, before we try to partake in any crytpo project, we just make sure to conduct a due diligence first and always be vigilant and suspicious as much as possible. Imho.

[max6575]

different customs on work as appealing offers from developer as investors to manage with least on waste with the decision as releasing uses with expensive on tasks as referring decision to gains with chance on closing as the terms of plan with works on crypto trading.

[joinfree]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Rating sites like ICObench, kickico etc. all use different parameters in rating ICOs but the general ones that i know is that, they look at some of the parameters below:
1. The experience of the team members
2. the feasibility of the project's use case
3. The token economics
4. Established partnership with relevant companies
5. Any developed product already working
  
This together with other intricate details are what some of these ICO ratings consider when rating crypto projects.

[SaidNurs]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Stay alert, unscrupulous scams always provide information with lure that is profitable but for clarity of the project or the team is not convincing, and ends with a scam. Stay alert and always do research

[barnes13]

I have discussed this issue before in a similar post. All you need to underline about the project scores on several ICO Rating Websites is don't trust
them too much, because the project can pay a high price just to make the project have a high rating on the platform. You should rely more on yourself in doing
research and assessing whether this project is good or not.

[knuckey]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

A rating site is a marketing place for a new project that wants to get interest from potential investors and it's definitely not free or paid. All analyzes and reviews on rating sites are not objective and often do not correspond to facts. I think it's good for you to be more active in discussions here or also in your local community to get the best project.

[btcdie]

most of it is only predictive and not really real. because the website is paid for by the ICO project and others. so my advice if you are an investor or just a bounty hunter do your own research / analysis. discuss if you have a community in your area, because that is quite helpful.
_____
that's what I have done so far to minimize being caught up in the ICO scam project.

[ATSgrowth]

If ICO has a good rating it is a good sign, but that is not all, I have seen many ICOs that scammed people even they had 5.0 rating on ICOBench. Some people even think that they are buying good rating on such sites to attract more investors, be careful and always do your own research.

[zeze18]

I have discussed this issue before in a similar post. All you need to underline about the project scores on several ICO Rating Websites is don't trust
them too much, because the project can pay a high price just to make the project have a high rating on the platform. You should rely more on yourself in doing
research and assessing whether this project is good or not.

At least we can use those websites as a reference but we can't rely on them.
Do own analysis and compare the projects from many ICO rating sites is the best way of choosing ICO to invest.

[Rodeo02]

I don't trust any ratings online anymore. Most of them are paid and not real.

What I'm looking in an ICO is see MVP, live and working product. Something that could really make a change. Not just empty words with fancy pictures.

Just like you that rating or whatever it is now no longer a concern. people can already observe that ratings can actually be bought and can also be manipulated. when things happen like this do we still believe in rating? I think it's better just to do personal analysis to know whether the project is good or not

You should check the project individaully and not to base on a websites ratings. There are many project before that  pay any amount just to increase thier ratings.  This ratings can help them to make more investors so project owner  wont hesitate to pay for it.
Owner of that website can only be benifited with that ratings since they get paid for it.

[Genemind]

They are mostly paid, so do not pay attention to ratings. In general all rating websites are paid, so you can create whatever rating you wish, if you have enough money. Do your own research and do not trust such websites.

Do you mean it is  fake rating ?

Definitely yes, it also involves money. Some websites are faking ICO ratings in exchange for a certain payment to attract more investors. We shouldn't trust even reviews because these things could be manipulated and might being control of either bounty hunters or the developers. Do your own research and analysis but don't be deceived by fake information.

[ecnalubma]

The ICO rating companies are already tarnished and not a credible reference in choosing the right project. I think these companies should also undergo government regulations because we don't know who these people are, some of them might portray experts in the field but without a single diploma to show. The best rating site that I can recommend so far is this forum itself.  

[xiboothrezi]

Rating sites like ICObench, kickico etc. all use different parameters in rating ICOs but the general ones that i know is that, they look at some of the parameters below:
1. The experience of the team members
2. the feasibility of the project's use case
3. The token economics
4. Established partnership with relevant companies
5. Any developed product already working
  
This together with other intricate details are what some of these ICO ratings consider when rating crypto projects.

These parameters are often manipulated because it has become a public secret if most of the ico rating websites receive payment to promote a project well. There is even one project that gets an almost perfect assessment but it turns out the development team is fake (using someone else's profile and edited in such a way). In my opinion, it is more effective to assess the quality of a project than the discussion process with several members here, there are many who are open, and are happy to provide information if there are projects that indicate scams in here.

[Colt81]

The ICO rating companies are already tarnished and not a credible reference in choosing the right project. I think these companies should also undergo government regulations because we don't know who these people are, some of them might portray experts in the field but without a single diploma to show. The best rating site that I can recommend so far is this forum itself.  

In my own point of view, the reason why ICO projects have very good rating because some of them are paid for advertising or promoting those projects, which i suggest don't be fooled by those ratings because you might get scammed. Some comments and ratings in this forum are also not legitimate because they are also paid especially for low rank members, that is why you should only depend on members that has high rank because some of their comments are very informative and useful.