ICO projects with very good rating

[BlackFor3st]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Right now, you cannot fully trust the platforms that gives a rating as most of them are giving a rating base on how much you are going to pay for your ratings. Everything can be bought right now so we cannot fully trust the websites that gives a ratings to any projects.

Genuine ratings will be base from their websites security,product,team,roadmap,whitepaper,softcap,hardcap,total supply and etc.

[skarais]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

In my opinion, ICO and IEO ratings are important things to know. Even though the rank given is high, it still cannot guarantee success. The quality of ICO and IEO will be obtained through the presentation of the project development team on the website and whitepaper. ICO ratings can only be used as a comparison as well as additional information to start investing. This website is paid for and ICO and IEO ratings can still be manipulated through the rankings given by experts. So what investors have to do to find out which projects are legitimate is to analyze the project itself.

[Doranile432]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Stay away from rating websites because they are misleading, websites like icobench, icodrops etc fooled me in the past and i don't belief in them anymore, for example miracle tele project is scam and icobench rated them 4.3

[Zeke_23]

The ICO rating companies are already tarnished and not a credible reference in choosing the right project. I think these companies should also undergo government regulations because we don't know who these people are, some of them might portray experts in the field but without a single diploma to show. The best rating site that I can recommend so far is this forum itself.  

In my own point of view, the reason why ICO projects have very good rating because some of them are paid for advertising or promoting those projects, which i suggest don't be fooled by those ratings because you might get scammed. Some comments and ratings in this forum are also not legitimate because they are also paid especially for low rank members, that is why you should only depend on members that has high rank because some of their comments are very informative and useful.

Yes, ico rating sites were just being paid by projects to give them good ratings and promote them to investors in the market. It's no wonder because they only did it because of their business. Trusting ico ratings is not sufficient anymore, we all have to make our own research to avoid projects with an intention to scam their investors and its whole community.

[qomariah95]

Don't believe all the crap about ranking for ICO.
This is really not an ICO success factor, ranks can be bought if the project has people. I am sure that many people here say the same thing about judging ICO ratings.

[tsaroz]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Some of them do mention the factors considered during the rating but still most of them are biased ones.
Almost all of the ICO rating sites are found to be taking money from projects to give them a higher rating regardless of their nature and status.
ICO rating sites has created more confusion than solutions for the ever confusing ICO markets.

[enhu]

There was a thread about ICO bench in the late 2018 which I think some of the advisors there were involve in this rating and they were paid to give ratings. I believe some of them are asking 3ETH  for reviewing and then giving rates. Really interesting how they can get money from teams just by having a website like of the ICO ratings.

Now that ICO has died down, which is why you can't find any good ICO projects with ratings. ICO ratings aren't real anyway. Those advisors could also find their way to IEO and ask money from the team again.

[BigBos]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

as far as I know about ICO ranking on the ICO website, that does not guarantee the success of the project. it only shows some of the information contained in the whitepaper. in addition, they also sometimes only explain how clear, or complete the project is. Well, from my experience, don't choose a project just because you see the high rating. in fact some of these sites have different values.

[Mighty_crypt]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Projects with good rating on rating websites are mostly bullshit, they are paid by project developers to rate up the projects to attract investors like you, if you invest a penny on them you will lose your money very fast, no matter how good a project seem to be always do research on them

[Katashi]

Don't believe all the crap about ranking for ICO.
This is really not an ICO success factor, ranks can be bought if the project has people. I am sure that many people here say the same thing about judging ICO ratings.

Agreed, almost all ratings sites are just getting paid to give you high ratings even though they did not study the project properly and because of them a lot of new crypto investor mislead to a crappy project. even the so-called ICO experts who give ratings and positive feedback can be bought so never rely your judgement on the ICO ratings.

[MonaLeeTracy]

I am no longer surprised by the ratings or ratings from the ICO review website. at this time it seems that it is no longer much talked about because ico is dead and changed to IEO. since a long time ago I saw websites like that didn't seem clear. due to the lack of transparency regarding valuations. but in 2018 it was revealed that had to pay in order to get a good rating

[zidanw]

I am no longer surprised by the ratings or ratings from the ICO review website. at this time it seems that it is no longer much talked about because ico is dead and changed to IEO. since a long time ago I saw websites like that didn't seem clear. due to the lack of transparency regarding valuations. but in 2018 it was revealed that had to pay in order to get a good rating

Institutions that are not transparent do raise many questions about how they can pay for operational needs of the company. the reality of bribery has indeed been revealed, but when the momentum was there, ico was no longer noticed by many people due to fraud that was so systematic

[DDante]

My research always comes first, even if the project is been rated 5/5 or 10/10 on rating websites i will still do my normal research on the projects, ICOBENCH is good because they allow external developers to rate projects too so you can read every thing these people are saying about the project, honestly the reviews aren't bad

[ufaiz50]

When i search i found ICO projects with very good rating, this rating posted buy ICO rating websites, how this rating works, websites did not mention about the factors use to rate this projects.

Don't easily trust ratings, most of them give high ratings because they have already been paid to put the project on their site. But to find information about the project, the rating site is very useful. Trust your analysis to dig up information and determine project rating with your analysis.

[qomariah95]

Don't believe all the crap about ranking for ICO.
This is really not an ICO success factor, ranks can be bought if the project has people. I am sure that many people here say the same thing about judging ICO ratings.

Agreed, almost all ratings sites are just getting paid to give you high ratings even though they did not study the project properly and because of them a lot of new crypto investor mislead to a crappy project. even the so-called ICO experts who give ratings and positive feedback can be bought so never rely your judgement on the ICO ratings.

Rightfully so.
Believe it is okay, but do not believe it completely. ICO ranking can be used as a reference to find new projects and you yourself are very right to analyze it and give a rating. If you think it's good, then determine also not to invest in the ICO project.

[biddicoin]

I found good article about ICO rating, it can explain to us that ICO rating is just a bullshit
This is link of the article : This Is How Easy It Is to Buy ICO Ratings — An Investigation
I shocked read the conclution in the article

It is frightening how easy it is to buy ICO ratings from supposed experts.

[jossiel]

Obviously those ratings were paid. And are you still investing to ICOs? the days are now dead for that investment scheme so you shouldn't bet your money with those projects anymore. It's been known for a while that many ICO are dead and scam.

I don't know how much they paid for each of those reviews that's why when you have read a very good review, it doesn't mean that the project itself is really like that.

[abel1337]

Obviously those ratings were paid. And are you still investing to ICOs? the days are now dead for that investment scheme so you shouldn't bet your money with those projects anymore. It's been known for a while that many ICO are dead and scam.

I don't know how much they paid for each of those reviews that's why when you have read a very good review, it doesn't mean that the project itself is really like that.

Same thought about the ICO reviews on ICO review websites, Most of them are paid as far as I know. It is based according to the threads and articles that I have read. It's also true that ICO today are not on the trend like the old times theirs a new way of investing in altcoins, IEO is far way better than ICO, Partnering on a exchange before launching a project can gain a trust from investor not worrying the exchange that they will trade after they got the coins from the crowdsale.

[Bezobraznike]

Obviously those ratings were paid. And are you still investing to ICOs? the days are now dead for that investment scheme so you shouldn't bet your money with those projects anymore. It's been known for a while that many ICO are dead and scam.

I don't know how much they paid for each of those reviews that's why when you have read a very good review, it doesn't mean that the project itself is really like that.

Same thought about the ICO reviews on ICO review websites, Most of them are paid as far as I know. It is based according to the threads and articles that I have read. It's also true that ICO today are not on the trend like the old times theirs a new way of investing in altcoins, IEO is far way better than ICO, Partnering on a exchange before launching a project can gain a trust from investor not worrying the exchange that they will trade after they got the coins from the crowdsale.

   I participated in VTOS bounty last year. That bounty had good rating on ICObench
and other rating sites. Somewhere at the end of bounty they just disappeared, their Twitter account is still there, like their other accounts, but without any activities for almost a year. 
   After that I learned to not trust this sites, in a hard way. I agree that IEO's are much
safer for investors and for bounty hunters. At least they can't start IEO if exchange team
doesn't check them.

[bigcash2011]

Please do not base your ico investment decisions on ico rating websites, you need to do your own thorough research and analysis about each project you are looking to invest and make your own decision to invest if it satisfies your due diligence in all the aspects.