Wrong Accusation: Timelord2067 gave me wrong accusation

[irfan_pak10]

I would like to open a flag against this guy, As he tried to destroy my reputation and wasted my time, Still he is reluctant to understand the matter.

Here is his accusation

I don't normally post an alt report unfinished, but circumstances beyond my control have forced my hand.

Unfortunately, this means the scammer might be able to cover their tracks and delete evidence.

If anyone is able to continue on this investigation of these wallet addresses, I would appreciate it.  I'll be able to resume my investigations in a week or two, however I need to divulge certain information now to be able to use that in the other thread.

...oh ... and I implore anyone reading this (not just those on the DT) to give these UID's Red Paint ^TM for being scammers/alts of scammers.


20 Accounts Connected:

kabootar1234 ( +0 / =0 / -1 ), irfan_pak10 ( +6 / =1 / -0 ), superSTAR777 ( +2 / =0 / -0 ), BTCreward ( +0 / =0 / -1 ), Babba D ( +0 / =0 / -2 ), abduluk, neesa1124, superstar7777, Nauro ( +0 / =0 / -5 ), Nauro2, NxT Designs, DabbuDESIGNS, salilBH, moneynot, mallukhan, magiitr, temp_superstar777, VPScreator ( +0 / =0 / -5 ), MargonCreatives ( +0 / =1 / -5 ), margon2,

...and probably:

wangxinxi ( +0 / =2 / -1 )

Proof:

niktitan132 connects Babba D and superSTAR777 in this thread through their use of wallet address 1KeXEqj7GHFSxyZgDdE9HhnGRdmCkUPM82 part of Wallet [0523ba5fba] which has the following 54 wallet addresses:

Code:

1Juf6G2L6oWgjQTqM4bT6krCPPYU3PGgih	0.00001363 	72	587945
1KeXEqj7GHFSxyZgDdE9HhnGRdmCkUPM82	0.00001    	979	464122
19Vbc8gA7ZTdYizkhKMqDBvEQBkMSqiEEf	0.00000584 	157	420007
17F87TCKzxu9V5iNYyjauTUBWvj71nx3CG	0.         	28	358813
1AcRdQFYdEdsLDNHqPRHEHLoiDCpN9sufP	0.         	18	348339
1Bat7qkbWDjN3SqXYyYCmBqKNbTsnuZsVY	0.         	18	347449
1LNYLCkJsMnQYCcj4Dx9mwGCNgmB389rxX	0.         	14	338496
1yfMCD6XE4tEvG8LSgrM9XfDxjoXjiFgG	0.         	13	361676
1933FPwrpHAPTaUUY59RrsuzouX7oisJJ5	0.         	13	345633
15cJGGYeoHxsBe3akAt8DknjBgPdM1yMdW	0.         	12	345633
17kjJzuNdoyutwdrJyiebZgJV7kCBEt4Bq	0.         	12	323983
16ne9yU3Q5KArpu97Mc9kTzPgwxuM1eLUs	0.         	11	361676
1APTUJS9v84gxaUfzqqHfG2qWwcgrXewob	0.         	8	344726
19h9SRyoKbFZj9dGkZ9WYhkbZmxYk3yPNe	0.         	7	352375
1LSzVTVaz5eLDLJCEvzvfJaRydqCSr5yJK	0.         	7	345473
191DJNBYxAC94yogutSeXY55TNJe71UgCA	0.         	7	342464
1FhJi3Q9NoxkyttWVZ6UooLrTH58vjaLYp	0.         	7	336472
1Q33GgpmTng37UiRE7nvze6u3FDRn9Deip	0.         	6	352416
13erTG8f9f96czMnBHRSPv8R5DRbQ4JAEz	0.         	6	333508
1w7iurcnqQ6h65sQ7gmqxBuZeHzEYqpAi	0.         	6	326334
1Kg8tgFGG8jh2GnnzKRtx7oxhTYtWVGKHj	0.         	5	348526
18uKvhXy8Ghz3pQEJd4hAKUaDgMhdYLZhm	0.         	5	338656
1Ma2K2s2z5AyXwc4TRwfroDGQzcbzsWzUp	0.         	5	338656
1Eh3mke3WAPAaQ8QUaXJjtz6rR6fzGJ2i1	0.         	4	345633
19FkrvRMuP279WB7AZeQL5gHQ1NwHHqVJ4	0.         	4	343624
16rwDYA2R5D5MQf6h4FY2d6VhBB2ypxiA6	0.         	3	345633
1PGCvquzSeUubumpE5MSXdsFNcUU6NZ3Rb	0.         	3	338702
19QM1CCP8czbu8tu3hCQu93orLz2SHpRbN	0.         	3	335973
137miCXwB9CEu2yqpsEcvYxC4oZ1HgUvSf	0.         	3	333139
1Jbq3HMMoRQ6it5VBVsX1W6VrtAjfGrFoB	0.         	3	328180
11oEWmgBwmt4ipH6U8Cj7XLd74KxsVX9F	0.         	2	361214
1GLZQ5BD9HYk3mWZmnNrZ9U5TvZxhbjV7s	0.         	2	345633
1J7fQeagHBv5a6cirEPMqhQStB4DU5ANd4	0.         	2	345633
18LfvfSwpDDAWiiFCKH6PvQRYhXwysHRAy	0.         	2	342464
1D23D9zs17bKGmN7J3dqsVVfr11ttEMXo4	0.         	2	342464
1Ldqj6swBKJpwhaYKp1rNCKQyEvTPwnaKX	0.         	2	342464
13GxYst3EUx6iq9G511LQhiM5eMppT9W51	0.         	2	338327
1A5tdq8sdSHw28A1UK6E1Jd6tYJzSpXpbf	0.         	2	332166
17eZApNpqe1yR4v4pDkqNDmiHoeYHyNLoG	0.         	2	330764
1FQHw9271oXiKzyNcqrdbnoswCdu3PRt72	0.         	2	324424
1KxzLXhmzk89MhaJxsvV1TrrXf7GzButdM	0.         	2	312776
1NQ1excw8WDrTExeRcsvRzYySnQkGhrQ38	0.         	1	407950
16Jt2jyCB28tJdToJCaAPUZW5HNJUxcEAg	0.         	1	349631
12ov3nhTRcPpZ7jNHqgfaFzJxvB3wvivNM	0.         	1	345633
1D9bujEWAAj5ahLhVbfCTyNQzvicK95FVx	0.         	1	342464
1JqeqFU8zYFbPyXW1w6nqxET7bWx9imxUL	0.         	1	342464
1Pz625ZXXC7AnpxRhF73vWNmpTPtFsYMAx	0.         	1	342464
1MRSHFoqSxHamPTY3aRvKvKpVjtcFEiuxe	0.         	1	339266
1AbDs8CPf763eBDn1FjVgzYVGQWZ9XWASc	0.         	1	335962
1MnXFTk7nkcTbgkoPADeaPnJ6jEY6ycJH9	0.         	1	331172
1G1FLVQGa73dCQZMrFhqHY3XFXJfSxBLBJ	0.         	1	324409
1MTQ3FTkRidvTbMCa7j8pVKtk1yg665DQ3	0.         	1	312753
1F7BYHQMNn4BkeYscSA1ZV5wfN4h5jrgGw	0.         	1	312733
19UmoaGUbKTZHoLUPoC9XKoSFj7GQhKRxr	0.         	1	311569

In the same thread quickseller posts: (15 March 2015, 01:31:27 part of the overall post)

I recently sold an account to a brand new user and gave him the following address to pay me 1FTdAhi8V7ENw7pqovfVW5QNSQePi6qhUx. I received funds from 1KeXEqj7GHFSxyZgDdE9HhnGRdmCkUPM82 which is linked to Babba D and superSTAR777

Post #14 user DabbuDESIGNS is identified as also being an alt using wallet address 17F87TCKzxu9V5iNYyjauTUBWvj71nx3CG.

• 1Juf6G2L6oWgjQTqM4bT6krCPPYU3PGgih is used by
  
  • MargonCreatives here
    
    • [1] That said, margon2 promises to repay the loan and is therefore also an alt.
    • [1] and [2] are both signed messages.
    • [3] which has been "edited". Lutpin connects MargonCreatives to Nauro and superSTAR777.  In my investigation I've discovered a UID Nauro2 (activity zero) which was registered and last active in closely similar times to others, so am prepared to say is an alt.
• 1KeXEqj7GHFSxyZgDdE9HhnGRdmCkUPM82 is used by
  
  
  • superSTAR777 here: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]
  • Nauro here: [1], [2], [3], [4 (which he denies   ) ]
  • kabootar1234 here: [1]
  • temp_superstar777 here: [1]
• 19Vbc8gA7ZTdYizkhKMqDBvEQBkMSqiEEf is used by:
  
  
  • superSTAR777 here: [1], [2], [3]
  • Nauro here: [1]
    
    See note on wangxinxi here:
• 17F87TCKzxu9V5iNYyjauTUBWvj71nx3CG is used by:
  
  
  • superSTAR777 here: [1], [2]
  • Nauro here: [1], [2]
  • DabbuDESIGNS here: [1],
  • Babba D here: [1]
  
  
• 1AcRdQFYdEdsLDNHqPRHEHLoiDCpN9sufP is in the "top 100" list (without any UID connected to it) by wangxinxi
• 1Bat7qkbWDjN3SqXYyYCmBqKNbTsnuZsVY is used by:
  
  
  • superSTAR777 here: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5 (there's a certain irony that superSTAR777 and irfan_pak10 talk to each-other (ie deception)], [6], [7 (also uses the DOGE wallet address DTDw82WQempi7LEpP8WrckjWn67jHVoSZ1], [8], [9], [10],[11 when getting a loan from irfan_pak10], [12]
  • superstar7777 here: [1 (created when superSTAR777 was banned).]
  • irfan_pak10 here: [1]
    
    irfan_pak10 discusses a trade giving the above wallet address 1Bat7qkbWDjN3SqXYyYCmBqKNbTsnuZsVY in this post.  If you read the entire thread discussion here you will see irfan_pak10 then quotes the wallet address that Equinoxx has also just quoted, so there is no "mistake" in irfan_pak10 using the wallet address 1Bat7qkbWDjN3SqXYyYCmBqKNbTsnuZsVY
• 1LNYLCkJsMnQYCcj4Dx9mwGCNgmB389rxX is used by Nauro here [1] and [2]
• 1yfMCD6XE4tEvG8LSgrM9XfDxjoXjiFgG is used by:
  
  
  • VPScreator (Ponzi trust/feedback) here: [1]
    
    Post also has Twitter: @raiderhamara and Minter address: Mx6bfcc0e3d447db0f39087908500a654a684614a3
  • [Archive] ... and I quote:
    
    

    Amount required [IN BTC]: 0.025 btc
    Reason: have to buy something collecting money
    Interest rate: 10%
    Time frame: before 23rd march.
    Collateral [If applicable]: none sorry but i am a designer and check my services in service section, to see i earn enough to pay
    Address: 1yfMCD6XE4tEvG8LSgrM9XfDxjoXjiFgG
    

    Why would anyone ever consider lend to you? You defaulted on a $9 loan months ago despite having the funds to repay the loan.
    

    
    I already have talked to the guy and he agreed to get paid later and there was reason, anyways
    
    also check irfan_pak's thread , i have paid him his loan just some days ago, so i wont cheat, anyways thanks
    

    
    ranochigo at least can see through the smoke and mirrors...
  
  
• 1933FPwrpHAPTaUUY59RrsuzouX7oisJJ5 is used by:
  
  
  • Nauro here: [1 DabbuDESIGNS and NxT Designs post on 2 and 3 posts later], [2], [3],
  • Babba D here: [1],  
  • BTCreward here: [1 (Nauro, BTCreward and VPScreator all join one post apart. The OP cryptosx2 signs all three up quoting the same wallet address for 2/3 three)],
  
  
• 15cJGGYeoHxsBe3akAt8DknjBgPdM1yMdW is used by:
  
  
  • Babba D here: [1], [2],
  • NxT Designs here: [1],
  
  
• 16ne9yU3Q5KArpu97Mc9kTzPgwxuM1eLUs is used by salilBH here: [1]
• 1APTUJS9v84gxaUfzqqHfG2qWwcgrXewob is used by superSTAR777 here: [1]
• 19h9SRyoKbFZj9dGkZ9WYhkbZmxYk3yPNe is used by:
  
  
  • superSTAR777 here: [1] and [2]
  • magiitr here: [1]
• 191DJNBYxAC94yogutSeXY55TNJe71UgCA is used by moneynot here: [1]
• 1FhJi3Q9NoxkyttWVZ6UooLrTH58vjaLYp is used by:
  
  
  • Babba D here: [1]
  • abduluk here: [1]
• 1Q33GgpmTng37UiRE7nvze6u3FDRn9Deip is used by:
  
  
  • NxT Designs here: [1]
  • superSTAR777 here: [1]
• 1Kg8tgFGG8jh2GnnzKRtx7oxhTYtWVGKHj is used by:
  
  
  • superSTAR777 here: [1 note, superSTAR777 uses the user name "Lucky777" in this post - there are a handful of users who's profile contain the phrase "Lucky777" and their profile activity (registration/last active etc closely match up with these alts. ],
  • mallukhan here: [1]
• 1Ma2K2s2z5AyXwc4TRwfroDGQzcbzsWzUp is used by:
  
  
  • Nauro here: [1], [2]
  • Babba D here: [1 (also posts the DOGEcoin wallet address DBjgqD3XCu7saH7dki6WhdsGn1nBeFQrap], [2 (uses the user name "babbad"],
• 1Eh3mke3WAPAaQ8QUaXJjtz6rR6fzGJ2i1 is used by
  
  
  • neesa1124 here: [1], [2],
  • fanunder here: [1],
• Not mentioned on BCT:
  
  17kjJzuNdoyutwdrJyiebZgJV7kCBEt4Bq
  1LSzVTVaz5eLDLJCEvzvfJaRydqCSr5yJK
  13erTG8f9f96czMnBHRSPv8R5DRbQ4JAEz
  1w7iurcnqQ6h65sQ7gmqxBuZeHzEYqpAi
  18uKvhXy8Ghz3pQEJd4hAKUaDgMhdYLZhm
  19FkrvRMuP279WB7AZeQL5gHQ1NwHHqVJ4
  
  
  
  

Related Addresses:

facebook name : tushar bab
link - https://www.facebook.com/pages/Crypto-Humor-Hub/705940909479518 - BCT page [link] [Archive]

Facebook neesa1124 facebook link is https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100008411527128

Twitter:

https://twitter.com/raiderhamara
https://twitter.com/neesa1124 (??Vanessa??)

@abduluk1

Minter address: Mx6bfcc0e3d447db0f39087908500a654a684614a3 [Archive]

DOGEcoin wallet address DBjgqD3XCu7saH7dki6WhdsGn1nBeFQrap

Miscellaneous:

Post incomplete due to circumstances beyond my control.  Please pic up the trail and find the remaining alt/scammers.

Here is my proof:

-snip-
irfan_pak10 discusses a trade giving the above wallet address 1Bat7qkbWDjN3SqXYyYCmBqKNbTsnuZsVY in this post.  If you read the entire thread discussion here you will see irfan_pak10 then quotes the wallet address that Equinoxx has also just quoted, so there is no "mistake" in irfan_pak10 using the wallet address 1Bat7qkbWDjN3SqXYyYCmBqKNbTsnuZsVY[/li]
[/list][/li][/list]
-snip-

After going through your accusation, Just today I get some time to go in-depth of this accusation and found why I used the same address once which Superstar used. At that time I gave an order of designing some logos to Superstar and he created that for 0.002BTC (Proof ). Where in the meantime I was playing a game with the Equinoxx and I won that bet and I asked him to pay me 0.002BTC (Proof) in the same address that Superstar asked me to pay for his designing job.

If you like I can provide you Private convo made with Superstar.

Also, I'm not going to remove my negative feedback on your profile, you idiot. Learn some better ways to find alts.

His reply:

Also, I'm not going to remove my negative feedback on your profile, you idiot. Learn some better ways to find alts.

Your feedback is a retaliatory which @theymos has stated is no longer tolerated.

Who would you like to nominate as your intermediary to contact me via PM?

After going through your accusation, Just today I get some time to go in-depth of this accusation and found why I used the same address once which Superstar used. At that time I gave an order of designing some logos to Superstar and he created that for 0.002BTC (Proof ). Where in the meantime I was playing a game with the Equinoxx and I won that bet and I asked him to pay me 0.002BTC (Proof) in the same address that Superstar asked me to pay for his designing job.

If you like I can provide you Private convo made with Superstar.

Also, I'm not going to remove my negative feedback on your profile, you idiot. Learn some better ways to find alts.

Doesn't matter what time zone you are in there are three transactions that occurr on the 28th of February 2015 around the time of the dual postings of the 1bat... wallet address:

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1Bat7qkbWDjN3SqXYyYCmBqKNbTsnuZsVY?page=3



@irfan_pak10 admits to "incorrectly" posting 1Bat... as payment for a bet and @Equinoxx lists the TX https://blockchain.info/tx/7ff5b628dc2e770f6caf1b25fb84f57b3ca1772a5183365efe8dbc2eddf3aced as the payment to irfan_pak10 of the BTC 0.002 wager.

there are only two other transactions on that date, one prior and one after.

superSTAR777 asks for a payment of BTC 0.004 - yes?

The above even quotes the payment request amount: http://archive.ph/en81u#selection-7579.0-7581.28 there's no mistaking the payment irfan_pak10 TO 1Bat... for the amount of BTC 0.004

So, where is it?

the third payment on the 28th of February 2015 is FROM 1Bat to another wallet address...


In the text exchange between irfan_pak10 and superSTAR777

In post 33 @irfan_pak10 says he has made payment and quotes the TX https://blockchain.info/tx/7ff5b628dc2e770f6caf1b25fb84f57b3ca1772a5183365efe8dbc2eddf3aced for BTC 0.002

@irfan_pak10 has therefore undercut superSTAR777 out of 0.002 and then on the 5th of March 2015 (post 35) asks superSTAR777 for more to do more work.

But let's just back that up a little bit...

@Equinoxx uses https://blockchain.info/tx/7ff5b628dc2e770f6caf1b25fb84f57b3ca1772a5183365efe8dbc2eddf3aced to pay irfan_pak10 in their wager.

irfan_pak10 then uses the same TX to pay superSTAR777

Equinoxx pays irfan_pak10 http://archive.ph/lE0Df#selection-3089.0-3093.10

won the game please pay here: 1Bat7qkbWDjN3SqXYyYCmBqKNbTsnuZsVY

https://blockchain.info/tx/7ff5b628dc2e770f6caf1b25fb84f57b3ca1772a5183365efe8dbc2eddf3aced
Good game.

irfan_pak10 "pays" (half) to superSTAR777 http://archive.ph/TDC79#selection-5737.0-5753.6

Good work man best of luck

here is your money
https://blockchain.info/tx/7ff5b628dc2e770f6caf1b25fb84f57b3ca1772a5183365efe8dbc2eddf3aced

HAVE A GOOD TIME
Thanks

irfan_pak10 could argue that the 0.02 from Equinoxx was a part payment, but I don't think so.

The other 0.002 payment to 1Bat... on the 28th of February 2015 is not from irfan_pak10's wallet address 1ASavcpvS9JzQxRzmiVvgboxUwAD9cqYhs - it's a totally different wallet address.

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/ba86b130974d54773503459444b368adc0fe464803eba7e75da0dffb98d91284

So, who *did* use the TX ba86b130974d54773503459444b368adc0fe464803eba7e75da0dffb98d91284 ?

[Archive]

I have sent you the Bitcoins , thanks for your efforts . https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/ba86b130974d54773503459444b368adc0fe464803eba7e75da0dffb98d91284
I can add 0.004 BTC if you are willing to do some changes on that Global icon because I don't really like it . thanks

~ Madness

In creating a series of quick posts to give the illusion that superSTAR777 has customers irfan_pak10 has gotten himself confused who is paying whom and how much and used TX's which no one is likely to verify. Until now.

Yes?

You are correct. He is insane, and you are not connected until he can provide further substantiating evidence. I have left you a counter rating until Timelord either deletes your negative or explains to me personally the connection.

Am quaking in my boots...

Mine again:

-snip-
superSTAR777 asks for a payment of BTC 0.004 - yes?

The above even quotes the payment request amount: http://archive.ph/en81u#selection-7579.0-7581.28 there's no mistaking the payment irfan_pak10 TO 1Bat... for the amount of BTC 0.004

So, where is it?

-snip-

It was a misunderstanding, I asked him to create a single logo, and he thought it was two, so he asked me 0.004BTC but in PM's I corrected him and we agreed at 0.002BTC (Which I already mentioned I can prove you, Bring anyone intermediary). But you are being you which is idiot, egocentric and immature.

Also, I'm not going to remove my negative feedback on your profile, you idiot. Learn some better ways to find alts.

Your feedback is a retaliatory which @theymos has stated is no longer tolerated.

What about who wrongly accused someone? Is there anything that @theymos mentioned? I would like someone who can help me in flagging this guy of wrongly accusing me and wasting my time? 

Mine again:

Doesn't matter what time zone you are in there are three transactions that occurr on the 28th of February 2015 around the time of the dual postings of the 1bat... wallet address:

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/1Bat7qkbWDjN3SqXYyYCmBqKNbTsnuZsVY?page=3

I think you are on the wrong date here, all this transactions occurred on 27th of February 2015 not 28th of February 2015.

As per I see, all that was explained by irfan_pak10 looks genuine, and the transactions match as per the explanation. There is really no benefits in attacking good members of the community overall.

GMT +10 is where I am - the dates are reflective of that, hence the 28th/27th discrepancy.

That transaction occurred on 27th of February 2015

[Joel_Jantsen]

I would like to open a flag against this guy, As he tried to destroy my reputation and wasted my time

That is not the right reason to create a flag against someone. I mean if you check the type of supported flags,

   Due to various concrete red flags, I believe that anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money. (This flag will only be shown to guests/newbies.)
   This user violated a casual or implied agreement with me, resulting in damages.
   This user violated a written contract with me, resulting in damages.

your case doesn't fit any of the above-mentioned reasons.

[irfan_pak10]

I would like to open a flag against this guy, As he tried to destroy my reputation and wasted my time

That is not the right reason to create a flag against someone. I mean if you check the type of supported flags,

   Due to various concrete red flags, I believe that anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money. (This flag will only be shown to guests/newbies.)
   This user violated a casual or implied agreement with me, resulting in damages.
   This user violated a written contract with me, resulting in damages.

your case doesn't fit any of the above-mentioned reasons.

He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category.

[DarkStar_]

He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category.

Please post the casual/implied agreement made between you and Timelord2067.

[suchmoon]

He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category.

It doesn't. At best it's a flag for trolling, which I must oppose. You already posted a borderline-retaliatory neg-trust rating and you should leave it at that.

[irfan_pak10]

He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category.

Please post the casual/implied agreement made between you and Timelord2067.

It's an implied agreement, as there is no such written agreement between us.

[DarkStar_]

He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category.

Please post the casual/implied agreement made between you and Timelord2067.

It's an implied agreement, as there is no such written agreement between us.

Post the written aspect that implies an agreement of some sort. When did he state that he would exempt you from any "investigation"? Or when did he state that he would remove his negative trust? I'm not seeing any form of agreement, implied or not.

What exactly was this implied agreement about?

[DireWolfM14]

He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category.

Many have tried to damage reputations of others around here, and many have failed.  Timelord2067's review is not trusted, so it really doesn't mean much.  It would be pretty hard to justify the claim that it cost you potential income, and impossible to prove that any agreement was implied.  That's not proper justification for a flag, and if you create a flag under that premise then you are abusing the system.

I've read your justification for using that address, and I believe you.  The best thing to do at this point is for both you and Timelord2067 to remove your feedback.  You left feedback for retaliatory purposes, which I think is wrong in the first place.  Perhaps by rationally discussing the situation with Timelord2067 in PM you can convince him to remove his feedback.

[LoyceV]

He tried to damage my reputation, So I can say in that way it comes under the 2nd category.

It does not. Theymos is pretty clear about it:

For contractual violations only, a scammer flag can be created. This is the only thing which causes the "Warning: trade with extreme caution" warning to return. It also triggers a banner similar to the newbie-warning banner which is visible to all users. A scammer flag requires 3 more supporting users than opposing users to become active.

~snip~

Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements. If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed.

I've opposed the Flag because I think it's Flag abuse. Just yesterday, you were on DT2, but you're not anymore, which means you've been excluded by at least 2 DT1 users (suchmoon and DarkStar_).

You left feedback for retaliatory purposes, which I think is wrong in the first place.

Agreed. I've explained my position on this in LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.

My advice: withdraw this Flag, Oppose it, and make your arguments against the accusation without the drama.

[Timelord2067]

I would like to open a flag against this guy, As he tried to destroy my reputation and wasted my time, Still he is reluctant to understand the matter.

This is what's known as doubling down...

irfan_pak10 starts a thread Need 0.16 BTC [Archive]

Post #1: 25 October 2014, 03:15:40

Wanted to buy 0.16 BTC for skrill USD

Post #3: 25 October 2014, 04:00:24

Trade done with niktitan132

https://blockchain.info/tx/39fe9aef735ffc7d431e9bb5f2f80430303c699bb914b7d7e03b6357f652fb6f

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/39fe9aef735ffc7d431e9bb5f2f80430303c699bb914b7d7e03b6357f652fb6f

Wallet Address 1MbhYTsw7orqD3ZtC9Geak7CGQ2jVntvu1 receives the BTC 0.16 is part of the Wallet BTC-e.com series of wallets... I'm keen to hear how the wallet address was used by two different users? Because...


Wallet Address 1MbhYTsw7orqD3ZtC9Geak7CGQ2jVntvu1 is used by aNtiClocK here: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6 (with irfan_pak10 also posting)], [7], [8],


Let's just back up just a little bit:

23 June 2014, 17:33:12 Date Registered:    imranskfuuast                          (see below)
02 July 2014, 01:28:13 Date Registered:    irfan_pak10
05 July 2014, 05:39:53 last actual post    imranskfuuast



25 October 2014, 04:00:24         irfan_pak10 posts a TX with the wallet address 1MbhYTsw7orqD3ZtC9Geak7CGQ2jVntvu1 in thread Need 0.16 BTC ...

21 December 2014, 23:29:25 Date Registered:    aNtiClocK
22 December 2014, 00:06:57 first use of wallet addess 1MbhYTsw7orqD3ZtC9Geak7CGQ2jVntvu1 by aNtiClocK http://archive.ph/lSNd1#selection-1835.19-1835.53

03 July 2015, 06:15:34 last actual post     aNtiClocK

02 September 2015, 01:17:57 Last Active:    aNtiClocK

16 July 2017, 05:26:08 Last Active:       imranskfuuast


As I indicate in this post:

Are you tagging account sellers too?

chronicsky was selling accounts here: aNtiClocK was keen to buy...

In this ponzi thread (started and being promoted by irfan_pak10) in post 39 irfan_pak10 wants to buy LPCBTC 's account therefore it is possible LPCBTC was sold to irfan_pak10. aNtiClocK posts in this ponzi thread started by irfan_pak10 saying they have joined.  Notice how aNtiClocK is mentioned *before* posting?

irfan_pak10 also sells accounts in this thread: [Archive]

irfan_pak10 uses the code imranskfuuast ( http://archive.ph/Q2vi3#selection-549.29-549.42 ) in their ponzi thread - coincidentally, there is a user imranskfuuast here on BCT as indicated above.

irfan_pak10 also uses the name imranskfuuast here: [Archive]

irfan_pak10 and aNtiClocK both post in the ponzi thread started by irfan_pak10 - plus they jointly post in #6 numbered archive above for wallet use.

So...

3 Accounts Connected:

imranskfuuast, irfan_pak10, aNtiClocK,

[fratoshi]

The same thing happened to me, this user nutildah https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=317618  
wrongly accused me of something, i confronted him and he continue with the same sociopath pathological behavior towards me, as i was new and did not understand well this trust system i follow his steps and wait for him to support a scam, and when i found out that he was supporting VIVA-e scam i put a negative trust on nutildah profile, because if the rule apply to me because i was apparently supporting the scam exchange tradesatoshi then nutildah deserve the negative review i left on his profile, we are all the same under the forum rules. Misteriusly later the post where he was supporting the scam got deleted, but i was able to archive it with a nice tool i found on google.

So my advice is, wait for that person to support a scam and then flag him as supporter of the scam as i did with the scammer nutildah

[Timelord2067]

...
So my advice is, wait for that person to support a scam and then flag him as supporter of the scam as i did with the scammer nutildah

I'm sorry to hear that happened.  Yes, from my own experiences with that person I have them on ignore as they tend to high-jack threads with their obsessive startling rants.  As you can see, they hadn't posted in this thread prior to your mention of them, so they are either stalking references to their own name, (if they aren't stalking your posts).

When did your encounter with this person occur?  As you can see from this quote:

Have just recalled that user nutildah offered their own account for sale a while ago as recently as the 23rd of July, 2017. BPIP is inconclusive as the change of password ten times in 77 days didn't occur until 2018.

for a ten month period that account was up for sale by the owner.  Take some advice - just ignore the tossers and don't feed the Trolls.

[fratoshi]

The same thing happened to me, this user nutildah https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=317618  
wrongly accused me of something, i confronted him and he continue with the same sociopath pathological behavior towards me, as i was new and did not understand well this trust system i follow his steps and wait for him to support a scam, and when i found out that he was supporting VIVA-e scam i put a negative trust on nutildah profile, because if the rule apply to me because i was apparently supporting the scam exchange tradesatoshi then nutildah deserve the negative review i left on his profile, we are all the same under the forum rules. Misteriusly later the post where he was supporting the scam got deleted, but i was able to archive it with a nice tool i found on google.

So my advice is, wait for that person to support a scam and then flag him as supporter of the scam as i did with the scammer nutildah

I never once said I supported that exchange you fucking retard. Furthermore its already been explained to you multiple times why your supporting post "misteriusly" disappeared.

and i am not denying what i said, is there in the history, any one can see, not like this post from you that mysteriously got removed https://archive.md/C0XaV#selection-2387.0-2439.35

There's no "mystery" behind why it got removed. Suchmoon already explained it to you.

It's you spamming the forum and the trust system with useless garbage. And using threads posted by a known troll as references, so they disappear when the troll gets nuked. Create your own threads and archive them.

The person who wrote the thread you referenced was evading a ban for spamming. They got caught and their posts were deleted. Basically, you were relying on the words of a banned spammer to make your point. Congratulations.

Next time you open a flag, make your own thread instead of relying on that of a ban evading spammer, so that way it won't be removed by mods.

YOU are the Timelord in this situation, fuckbeans.

Edit: Here's an example of what it means to "be a Timelord":

In this ponzi thread (started and being promoted by irfan_pak10) in post 39 irfan_pak10 wants to buy LPCBTC 's account therefore it is possible LPCBTC was sold to irfan_pak10.

You're referencing an account for the Ponzi scheme, not a Bitcointalk account. Do Bitcointalk accounts hold BTC balances? 

I have This account With $2.52 Balance ( Must deposit To withdrawal )
If you wan I sell $1 Worth bitcoin
Escrow accept

I wanted to buy your account please PM me if you are still selling. I can pay you good amount for this

Of course Ponzi schemes and account sales aren't good, but all this happened 4-5 years ago, so I doubt any tagging will come of it by DT members.

There is no need to call me fucking retard Mr nutildah, i also explained to you that i did not support that tradesatoshi scam exchange and i did not call you a fucking retard, i even ask you to reconsider your negative trust but you are acting with an evil spirit, always insulting me and calling me things like invertebrate.
Why not do peace with me, we can be friends, i am nice person if you get to know me better.
Love!