Bitcoin Forum
November 04, 2024, 12:46:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 3 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: XMR-STAK-RX - Free RandomX miner (0% dev fee)  (Read 1619 times)
RyoCurrency (OP)
Copper Member
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 195
Merit: 1


View Profile WWW
November 16, 2019, 11:06:29 AM
Last edit: February 03, 2020, 01:19:49 PM by RyoCurrency
Merited by JaredKaragen (1)
 #1


Free RandomX miner v1.0.4 (0% dev fee) for RandomX algorithm family

  • Current latest version: 1.0.4
  • Supported backends: CPU + GPU (amd + nvidia, but gpu is useless in RX mining)
  • Supported RandomX variants: Monero (randomx) / Wownero (wow) / Loki (randomx_loki) / Arqma (randomx_arq)
  • Dev fee: 0%
Download link on Github: github.com/fireice-uk/xmr-stak/releases/tag/1.0.4-rx
Herry Toms
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 236
Merit: 1


View Profile
November 16, 2019, 01:13:28 PM
 #2

I appreciate your efforts in providing us a good mining software like XMR-STAK-RX for free. I'm currently mining Loki (Randomx) and it is working really good, I'm getting far better results with XMR-STAK-RX as compare to other mining software.
Keep up the good work.
karim_hassan777
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 16, 2019, 01:16:17 PM
 #3

what is the profit for loki with you?
sech1
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 116
Merit: 66


View Profile WWW
November 16, 2019, 02:00:08 PM
 #4

I appreciate your efforts in providing us a good mining software like XMR-STAK-RX for free. I'm currently mining Loki (Randomx) and it is working really good, I'm getting far better results with XMR-STAK-RX as compare to other mining software.
Keep up the good work.
Haha, how can you get better results if this miner's RandomX code is a direct rip off from XMRig? It can at best give the same hashrate.
lncm
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 388
Merit: 13


View Profile
November 16, 2019, 02:31:44 PM
 #5

Great. How to benchmark?
RyoCurrency (OP)
Copper Member
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 195
Merit: 1


View Profile WWW
November 16, 2019, 04:13:27 PM
 #6

Great. How to benchmark?
run it and give a try. Like a guy did here
Quoting: "(Xmrig 5 with default donation  of 5%, min - 1) vs Xmr-Stak-RX on a cpu without OC (i5 3570k)"
RyoCurrency (OP)
Copper Member
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 195
Merit: 1


View Profile WWW
November 16, 2019, 06:20:45 PM
 #7

Quote
Haha, how can you get better results if this miner's RandomX code is a direct rip off from XMRig? It can at best give the same hashrate.
end user will get 1%(minimum)-5% (default) more revenue due to miner fee difference.
CryptoBuzzerd
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 188
Merit: 2

In Blockchain we trust!


View Profile WWW
November 18, 2019, 12:05:38 PM
 #8

Any compares, checks for that miner with others?

Your own crypto exchange in your pocket - buy/sell BTC, LTC, ETH for USD/EUR, no KYC or any docks (https://t.me/AnyCashBot?start=promo-jump61)
RyoCurrency (OP)
Copper Member
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 195
Merit: 1


View Profile WWW
November 18, 2019, 01:03:20 PM
 #9

Any compares, checks for that miner with others?
yes, people already tested and shared various screenshots like here and here for example showing that there is zero displayed hash difference and difference for miner rewards will be 5% more for xmr-stak-rx if he uses xmrig with default fee, or 1% if he uses Xmrig with min fee.
RyoCurrency (OP)
Copper Member
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 195
Merit: 1


View Profile WWW
November 27, 2019, 09:23:36 PM
 #10


[UPDATE] XMR-STAK-RX 1.0.1
Bugfix and minor update of Xmr-Stak-RX free RandomX miner.

Quote
- Correct authors of RandomX mining code #2551
- fix hwloc warning #2556
- fix ignored tls on first start #2558
- fix miner benchmark mode #2561
- NVIDIA: fix auto adjustment #2567

Download link: github.com/fireice-uk/xmr-stak/releases/tag/1.0.1-rx
Subscribe on Youtube channel: youtube.com/c/xmrstak
anatolikostis
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2026
Merit: 1005



View Profile
November 27, 2019, 11:36:49 PM
 #11

recent comparision:
xmr-rig-b (5.0.3) - 525 h/core
xmr-stak (1.0.1) - 450 h/core
keep trying to improve, RyoCurrency
rafikichi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 28, 2019, 08:19:58 AM
 #12

Will you modify it to work with Epic's randomx implementation?
openxbmc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 30, 2019, 08:44:52 AM
 #13

I have tried XMR-STAK-RX for 1 more weeks

I use R7 1700 can get 4000H/S at 3.8G
But when I use "-t 16" hashrate will drop to 1200H/S
By the way I have R7 2700 and 2700X,same problem.
I found other guys that use 3600 with all threads ("-t 12) can get 6000H/s
Why use all threads hashrate drops a lot forR7 1700/2700? But not affect R5 3600/3700X.

I have tried SRBMiner and XMR-STAK,same problem.
lncm
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 388
Merit: 13


View Profile
November 30, 2019, 09:22:02 AM
 #14

I have tried XMR-STAK-RX for 1 more weeks

I use R7 1700 can get 4000H/S at 3.8G
But when I use "-t 16" hashrate will drop to 1200H/S
By the way I have R7 2700 and 2700X,same problem.
I found other guys that use 3600 with all threads ("-t 12) can get 6000H/s
Why use all threads hashrate drops a lot forR7 1700/2700? But not affect R5 3600/3700X.

I have tried SRBMiner and XMR-STAK,same problem.



Because it has 16 Mb L3 cache, 3600 and 3700 have 32 Mb.
If you run more than 8 threads, you'll get out of L2/L3 cache (2 Mb per thread), that's why it outputs less hashrate.
openxbmc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 30, 2019, 04:53:06 PM
 #15

I have tried XMR-STAK-RX for 1 more weeks

I use R7 1700 can get 4000H/S at 3.8G
But when I use "-t 16" hashrate will drop to 1200H/S
By the way I have R7 2700 and 2700X,same problem.
I found other guys that use 3600 with all threads ("-t 12) can get 6000H/s
Why use all threads hashrate drops a lot forR7 1700/2700? But not affect R5 3600/3700X.

I have tried SRBMiner and XMR-STAK,same problem.



Because it has 16 Mb L3 cache, 3600 and 3700 have 32 Mb.
If you run more than 8 threads, you'll get out of L2/L3 cache (2 Mb per thread), that's why it outputs less hashrate.

Oh...Thanks a lot!
lncm
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 388
Merit: 13


View Profile
December 01, 2019, 08:29:14 AM
 #16

I have tried XMR-STAK-RX for 1 more weeks

I use R7 1700 can get 4000H/S at 3.8G
But when I use "-t 16" hashrate will drop to 1200H/S
By the way I have R7 2700 and 2700X,same problem.
I found other guys that use 3600 with all threads ("-t 12) can get 6000H/s
Why use all threads hashrate drops a lot forR7 1700/2700? But not affect R5 3600/3700X.

I have tried SRBMiner and XMR-STAK,same problem.



Because it has 16 Mb L3 cache, 3600 and 3700 have 32 Mb.
If you run more than 8 threads, you'll get out of L2/L3 cache (2 Mb per thread), that's why it outputs less hashrate.

Oh...Thanks a lot!

A little help here.

I have a Ryzen 7 1700 machine and I can't get it to mine Random X. It says virtualmem aloc failed or something like that, connects to pool, it submits 1 share or so and it exits. Same behaviour witb XMrig.

It has 16 Gb of Ram, virtual mem is 32-64000 Mb, I enabled large pages (it was running fine with cryptonight r, memory was "pinned").

What I'm I missing here?
RyoCurrency (OP)
Copper Member
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 195
Merit: 1


View Profile WWW
December 13, 2019, 09:04:48 PM
 #17


Xmr-Stak-RX 1.0.3: Free RandomX miner (0%).
This release improves the hashrate for windows, linux and fixes a few bugs.
Under linux it is possible to increase the hashrate by using 1 GiB pages
ArQmA can now be mined by choosing the currency arqma or the algorithm randomx_arqma

  • Linux 1GiB page support #2627
  • fix windows huge pages #2624
  • optimize hash calculation #2623

Release link: Xmr-Stak-RX 1.0.3
RyoCurrency (OP)
Copper Member
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 195
Merit: 1


View Profile WWW
December 29, 2019, 10:07:04 PM
 #18


[UPDATE] XMR-STAK-RX - Free Monero RandomX Miner 1.0.4
Release Notes
This release implements better NUMA and config support, as well as MSR setting capabiltiy.

Changelog:
Implement Windows WRMSR #2635 / #2637 / #2638 / #2644 / #2645

Download link on Github version 1.0.4

Quote
Q: Are you just stealing from xmrig?
A: It is a popular Monero propaganda line. Xmr-stak has been around for much longer than xmrig. They copied xmr-stak code [ 1 ]. We didn't complain - that's the point of free and open source software. Xmrig developer actively pushed free xmr-stak versions - and when we made xmr-stak-rx free, he decided it has a virus =D [ 2 ]. If you feel that this kind of guy deserves your financial support, we are nice enough to put the link on the front page.

Q: Why is my "friend" saying that I shouldn't be using free Xmr-Stak-RX or faster RagerX, but instead - go through extra steps to get free xmrig?
A: This is cryptocurreny world. Everyone is looking out for themselves. What your "friend" is trying to do is advance his social position by giving you bad financial advice. Think with your wallet, don't put yourself at a financial disadvantage to please a guy you have never seen.

Q:
Why guys that say that want decentralisation want everyone to use one miner?
A: Because just like privacy it is just an empty marketing slogan, with no relation to what community leaders actually want.
Herry Toms
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 236
Merit: 1


View Profile
January 14, 2020, 05:28:57 PM
 #19

what is the profit for loki with you?

I've tried mining Loki with RagerX, hashrate is far better than any other mining platform almost 10% extra.
Herry Toms
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 236
Merit: 1


View Profile
January 17, 2020, 06:39:28 PM
 #20

Is it 100% free, I mean there must be some hidden fees? XMrig has 1% but it is actually 2%. So wanna confirm if it is not the same as these fees.
Pages: [1] 2 3 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!