FEAR OF DUMPING

[kodtycoon]

agree, when they are afraid of dumping then at least they must be willing to do other alternatives such as changing coins to be distributed or payment to all participants, then by using other alternatives to avoid dumping i think it is the right choice and wise. but when they are not willing to, then at least they must have a certain strategy to avoid the fear of dumping but not by slowing down or delaying payments because it will adversely affect their own project

[1715237659]

1715237659

[1715237659]

1715237659

[1715237659]

1715237659

[1715237659]

1715237659

[1715237659]

1715237659

[OneCoinMan]

Everything is very simple, they are afraid to distribute the received ETH and BTC from investors, as the market situation is not stable now. It’s easier for them to distribute their currently useless token, which essentially does not cost anything yet. And they need ETH and BTC in order to support the life of the project in difficult times, because good projects have staff that work for salaries. The salary, while the project has not brought profit, is taken from the money of investors.

[Shepard777]

Everything is very simple, they are afraid to distribute the received ETH and BTC from investors, as the market situation is not stable now. It’s easier for them to distribute their currently useless token, which essentially does not cost anything yet. And they need ETH and BTC in order to support the life of the project in difficult times, because good projects have staff that work for salaries. The salary, while the project has not brought profit, is taken from the money of investors.

This is not only a matter of fact, since most of the projects are scammers and they don’t want to share earnings with participants of advertising companies, they just pour these tokens onto the participants, make a very cheap listing on a bad exchange and disappear with funds in an unknown direction and once a month give signs life news that doesn't get any easier. They release news so that they would not be sent to prison.

[dimonstration]

agree, when they are afraid of dumping then at least they must be willing to do other alternatives such as changing coins to be distributed or payment to all participants, then by using other alternatives to avoid dumping i think it is the right choice and wise. but when they are not willing to, then at least they must have a certain strategy to avoid the fear of dumping but not by slowing down or delaying payments because it will adversely affect their own project

They can portion the distribution of bounties if they feared that it will be easily dump. But in today's market there are only few markets who are able to succeed after their crowd sourcing and even they don't distribute yet the bounties upon listing their value lowered. It should not be blame to bounties hunters alone. They need to determine a good project development and tactics to keep their investors holding.

[Ridwan Fauzi]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

This kind of situation will approach to the teams who didn't have a good preparation. I mean, they are too impose to launch their project quickly where as they have many things that hasn't been resolved yet.

As you may thinking, to launch a project is extremely simple. Just make an announchment and held a bounty campaign and there will be many people who will ready to promote their project and seems like they didn't have to spend much money to pass this phase.

Just my opinion, their project will still be deemed as potential project by bounty hunter or their investor with a note they are always keep to give a good news such as make a corporation with big companies and etc.

[el kaka22]

It is not really easy to forget the time when you were in a dump, I have been in one for example, the coin was Nano and the price was around 34 dollars at its peak, it fell down to 17 dollars and I bought some thinking it won't go down any further, then it went down to 8 dollars so I bought even more thinking that would be the end and bottom.

Right now, it is 0.82 cents, thankfully I sold a lot of mine at around 1.2 dollars and I did made a huge loss but I am thankful since it went down even further then 1.2 dollars (not too much but anyway). So long story short when you are in a dump once, it is normal to fear something like that happening once again. I personally have hard time investing into unknown coins anymore, because I fear that maybe it could get a dump.

[awik p]

agree, when they are afraid of dumping then at least they must be willing to do other alternatives such as changing coins to be distributed or payment to all participants, then by using other alternatives to avoid dumping i think it is the right choice and wise. but when they are not willing to, then at least they must have a certain strategy to avoid the fear of dumping but not by slowing down or delaying payments because it will adversely affect their own project

They can portion the distribution of bounties if they feared that it will be easily dump. But in today's market there are only few markets who are able to succeed after their crowd sourcing and even they don't distribute yet the bounties upon listing their value lowered. It should not be blame to bounties hunters alone. They need to determine a good project development and tactics to keep their investors holding.

besides that in one project also distributed rewards in full, but unlocked the tokens gradually. I think this is a good thing to do if you anticipate a dump. but it all depends on the development of the project itself to carry out its objectives

[mrdeposit]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

It is possible to encounter such bounties, but very few. It should be done in order to counter the price decrease after listing. On the other hand, I cannot remember any of them who succeeded. Can someone show me one of those bounties that have been successful?

[OasisDre]

Its a shame that we have too many new developers that have no good idea how to control or avoid dumps, there are few ways to avoid this e g split bounty rewards to few rounds, can be paid thrice or even more

[Bananington]

I remember Probit bounty that paid in USDT and some other bounties which paid in BTC, ETH, XLM, TRX, XRP especially. There was no blame on the hunters with regards price dump as always and this strategy is usually very efficient. However, considering some teams which haven't raised enough funds for project development, most likely their token will be distributed for bounty even though everyone is aware of benefits of paying hunters with BTC and other top cryptocurrencies.

[Ken_terrance]

If you heard from any project teams that they don't want to list because of fear of dumpers do not invest in such project, they have no good plans for the project and they only want the profits

[jekanmasin]

A good projects will never scared on dumping cause they know a valuable projects will not easily died. i can see peoples blamed bounty hunter for dumping the token after the release. i was not true at all. it was a good time to buy it cheap if only the projects are really good. No one want to end bad and the projects became shit tokens anyway.

[r32godzilla]

Bounty managers are trying to find a solution how to prevent dumps, for example they divide bounty payments into batches, or lock coins for a period of time. But the reallity is that bounty hunters do not cause dumps, dumps are caused by whales that bought tokens with a huge bonus. Thats all.

[bitvalak]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

In fact, almost all prize hunters do dumpers when they have received the payment they get.
They were afraid that prices would soon fall, so they dumpered it so that it could immediately be turned into FIAT money.
I think the project makers have analyzed this before they decided to hold a bounty campaign.

[adzino]

They should feel fear especially if they don't have a budget to pay the bounty hunters.
It is already given that bounty hunters are there to make money out of their services so why not give them what they need after a few month's work?
They should have a budget for promotions, so there's no space for fear of dumping.

They do have the "budget" to pay the bounty hunters. Why wouldn't they have it in the first place when all they have to do is give them their shit tokens? Having no budget makes no sense at all since they don't pay them with bitcoin or other crypto currencies. You are asking why they don't give them what they need? Lol. Read what others have written. They don't want the bounty hunters to make any profit. They want to be the first people to dump the tokens before anyone else!

[Rick-C-137]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

I see exactly what your talking about. I have noticed teams being liberal with their coins. I truly believe most teams out there have very little mental value of their own coin thus throwing it away on pointless bounties. Best project ever launched had ZERO bounty. The more successful project often gave very sparingly with bounty . A penny given is a penny dumped

[bigcash2011]

That is because they are themselve greedy and they are selling you something that has only a promised value while they are taking from you brc or eth that has solid cash value, also the supply of their own coin or token is in their control so it is like free for them to giveaway that is why we should only promote serious and solid projects with professional teams who know how it all works.

[zhengqi]

Still, it is much cheaper to pay with your tokens than with bitcoin or ether. Therefore, teams often resort to this method. In addition, not everyone can afford to pay with bitcoin or ether, because all the money they spend on the development of the project.

[cytpoway121]

The fear of dumping often makes the project team fear or avoid the payment of hunters until sometimes after the exchange listing. I wonder why the team make themselves restless on an easy thing like that when they can easily conduct their bounty with bitcoin or ethereum for payment. That will safe them of the fear that the bounty hunter will dump after the exchange listing.

There is nothing like fear of dumping
This is just another justified excuses as to why projects don’t pay bounty hunters
How can 1% or 0.5% of your total supply cause dump ?

[soramon]

I think dumping always happen when the team send the tokens to hunters. But nowaday team make that excuse to delay the distribution. Sometimes they lock the token for a year to "maintain" the price. For some reason paying hunter with their own tokens much cheaper than paying with eth/btc.