taserz (OP)
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 800
Merit: 293
Created AutoTune to saved the planet! ~USA
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 29, 2020, 06:32:36 PM Last edit: April 30, 2020, 12:30:48 AM by frodocooper |
|
[...]
Thanks for checking that too. My pro also run much lower! Appreciated.
|
|
|
|
jacktman
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 9
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 29, 2020, 11:12:51 PM |
|
Bitmain doesn't publish the recovery files anymore and they want you to email them and request the exact recovery files you need, but you can get it here https://asic.to/download/s17-and-t17-sd-card-image-to-downgrade/ although that file contains more firmware than you need, it has S17+, T17+, S17, and T17, simply keep what you need and delete the rest. Thanks for your response, I have tried to download the file but the download stops without completing, I have tried from different browsers and with different ISP. will you have the file on another server? thanks
|
|
|
|
fyoung55
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 277
Merit: 70
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 29, 2020, 11:40:19 PM |
|
Thanks Phil, what watt meter do you use? I may look into getting one of those!
I have two identical meters like the one I posted. I'll swap and see what it turns up, also do you suppose the leg I have the transformer on matters? it shouldn't since this only pulls 220v unlike say a stove which also pulls 110v for the various electronics, in theory that would have a slightly higher leg amperage wise right?
|
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4228
Merit: 8375
'The right to privacy matters'
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2020, 02:00:34 AM Last edit: May 01, 2020, 12:23:39 AM by frodocooper |
|
Thanks Phil, what watt meter do you use? I may look into getting one of those!
I have two identical meters like the one I posted. I'll swap and see what it turns up, also do you suppose the leg I have the transformer on matters? it shouldn't since this only pulls 220v unlike say a stove which also pulls 110v for the various electronics, in theory that would have a slightly higher leg amperage wise right?
this meter https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00GMZRXE8wired into this cable https://www.ebay.com/itm/L6-30P-to-C19-Molded-Power-Cord-10ft-220V-250V-30A-Ships-Free/202904653534?it measures by the hour not instant time I like to take a 5 to 10 hour measurement say 0 hour 100.00 10 hours later 122.25 you did 22.25 kwatts / 10 = 2.225 kwatts an hour or 2225 watts more accurate then a cheap meter.
|
|
|
|
fyoung55
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 277
Merit: 70
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 30, 2020, 01:34:47 PM Last edit: May 01, 2020, 12:24:10 AM by frodocooper |
|
Thanks again! I swapped the meters, but unfortunately hooked the transformer up to line voltage and vice versa.... POP. UHOH, bad smells...that meter is not happy now ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) . Hooked up original and everything is ok with miner, but it still reads high. I went ahead and ordered one like yours and I will hook it up when it comes and report the results. I like the idea of wiring it right into the cord. I have an extra cord and will wire that one up while the miner runs then do a quick swap. Don't suppose you'd be willing to snap a pic of yours?
|
|
|
|
|
vr4dude316
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 03, 2020, 04:27:37 PM Last edit: May 04, 2020, 12:21:39 AM by frodocooper |
|
|
|
|
|
coxye
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 08, 2020, 12:10:36 PM |
|
philipma1957 has your hash rate returned to normal?
|
|
|
|
fyoung55
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 277
Merit: 70
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 08, 2020, 12:56:38 PM Last edit: May 09, 2020, 02:09:08 AM by frodocooper Merited by frodocooper (4) |
|
[...]
Meter installed yesterday, here is what I got: 62TH/s autotune: asic firmware = 2360 old wattmeter = 2550 NEW INLINE METER = 49.4 KWH/20 hours = 2.47 or 2470W Looks like firmware wattage reporting is still off by over 100w on this setting, but my old meter was indeed "hot" as suspected. I'm going to drop it down to 58TH and measure again and see how close that one is. taserz - The asic reading on your miner was 2532W - why is mine so much lower? freq are 650, 650, and 646.67. Autotune voltage is 18.0. Did yours tune to a higher voltage? 170W seems like a lot.
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4228
Merit: 8375
'The right to privacy matters'
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 08, 2020, 01:16:34 PM Last edit: May 09, 2020, 02:09:37 AM by frodocooper |
|
Four fans at 2 amps each and 12 volts = 8 x 12 or 96 watts
controller is about 10 watts so 96 + 10 = 106. which is just about equal to your 110 watt difference.
my guess is the asic firmware at 2360 watts is hash boards only.
@coxye. my bad t17+ is still bad 2 of three boards are good.
@vr4dude316
it is most likely a software glitch. you should always check pool rates on the miner gui and on the pool.
it would be nice if the pool gets those high readings like the miner gui shows.
|
|
|
|
fyoung55
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 277
Merit: 70
|
I can check that by running a low hash rate where the fans turn at 10% or so and then jacking the fans up to 100% and see what the watt meter reports. I'll try that later today too!
|
|
|
|
taserz (OP)
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 800
Merit: 293
Created AutoTune to saved the planet! ~USA
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 08, 2020, 05:19:47 PM |
|
I can check that by running a low hash rate where the fans turn at 10% or so and then jacking the fans up to 100% and see what the watt meter reports. I'll try that later today too!
Is this a pro unit?
|
|
|
|
fyoung55
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 277
Merit: 70
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 08, 2020, 07:23:13 PM Last edit: May 09, 2020, 02:10:15 AM by frodocooper |
|
Is this a pro unit?
yes s17 pro 50T.
|
|
|
|
rocky2020
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2020, 03:59:42 AM Last edit: May 12, 2020, 02:38:40 AM by frodocooper |
|
little question : i have a t17 with a hashboard with 3 defectives ASIC, 27 still ok but the original firmware turn off completly the hashboar. is you firmware can use the 27 asics and disable the 3 defectives one to continue working anyway?
|
|
|
|
mikeywith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 6495
be constructive or S.T.F.U
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 11, 2020, 09:02:23 AM Last edit: May 12, 2020, 02:39:16 AM by frodocooper |
|
I think disabling the hashboard due to a bad chip is not something the firmware does for no reason if you could technically mine with 1 chip why wouldn't they just allow you to do so? ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.ibb.co%2F9sZVZpj%2Funnamed.jpg&t=665&c=CB9xnDBQdHyBqw) Above is an image of T17 hashboard and how do "electrons travel", those Asics are connected to one another, every miner design is different, I remember S9s had some different domains of chips where some boards could run with few chips, I don't think the T17 will let you do that.
|
|
|
|
taserz (OP)
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 800
Merit: 293
Created AutoTune to saved the planet! ~USA
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 17, 2020, 07:46:16 AM |
|
Yeah I wish we could make it work with a dead chip but it takes out 4 with it.
|
|
|
|
taserz (OP)
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 800
Merit: 293
Created AutoTune to saved the planet! ~USA
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 18, 2020, 02:39:37 PM |
|
Hi,
I run an Antminer T17 with Asic.to firmware. I go on setup 45T and i got an average hashrate of 43T, that's not so bad but on my nicehash account it give me only 36T.
Do you know the reason of it?
Thanks
Let it run for 24 hours to get your average.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4578
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
May 20, 2020, 12:49:06 PM |
|
Reminder to those helping violate the cgminer license.
No one can distribute a firmware that includes any cgminer binary - called cgminer or bmminer or anything else - without providing the source code on request.
This is a requirement of the cgminer code. The code is free to use, you can read it, compile it, run it, distribute it, as long as you don't violate the license. Many people put YEARS more effort into developing it than these scumbags violating the license.
It is not some random request, it is specified clearly in every file of source code for cgminer.
The OP seems to think he can ignore this requirement. He also makes the bazaar claim that he has some dodgy lawyer who thinks he can ignore the license also. That's bullshit. He is wrong.
Using his firmware is simply supporting breaking the license and makes you just as bad as him.
|
|
|
|
favebook
|
Reminder to those helping violate the cgminer license.
No one can distribute a firmware that includes any cgminer binary - called cgminer or bmminer or anything else - without providing the source code on request.
This is a requirement of the cgminer code. The code is free to use, you can read it, compile it, run it, distribute it, as long as you don't violate the license. Many people put YEARS more effort into developing it than these scumbags violating the license.
It is not some random request, it is specified clearly in every file of source code for cgminer.
The OP seems to think he can ignore this requirement. He also makes the bazaar claim that he has some dodgy lawyer who thinks he can ignore the license also. That's bullshit. He is wrong.
Using his firmware is simply supporting breaking the license and makes you just as bad as him.
Not really condoning violation of licenses, but while you are on strike spree, would you mind contacting Bitmain so they can provide theirs?
|
|
|
|
|