I'm not even involved in the thread that you're distracting away, nor involved with anyone that is objectively trying to figure out the history of it all, thus any points that you have against me in relation to that case are instantly invalidated. You should actually be thanking me for not flagging you, because there is more than enough grounds for it (given a reasonable thread summarizing it). You're not worth my time to do this, but maybe you are to someone else or they just feel generous.
Oh you aren't involved? Interesting, I suppose the fact that you left this rating for me today for something that happened months ago as I have become active drawing attention to the lack of evidence to support the accusations against OGNasty is just a coincidence is it? Is that just like the coincidence that your referenced link of
accusations against me claiming to know my state of mind and motivations just so happened to be made right after I helped
resolve a dispute with the members of the Turkish community and regained my place on the default trust list? It seems odd so many coincidences are being stacked atop of one another and being used to justify each other.
It is almost like a pattern of abusive behavior is being established in the form of baseless accusations, much like in the case of the accusations against OGNasty. I suppose it is just another coincidence that all the same people making accusations there are making accusations against OGNasty, and once again here against myself. You certainly are above abusing the trust system to protect the positions of your pals on the default trust now aren't you? Oh wait, I forgot you were blacklisted from the default trust list, but I am the real abuser right?
Techy - don't abuse trust and maybe others won't either?
Hypocrite.
You are dead last on the list of people who should be making accusations of trust system abuse. I would ask you to clarify exactly what I did that was abusive but you will just make an accusation and then fail to substantiate it as you always do as you use it as an opportunity to topic slide.
That is the reason more people haven't tagged OG. They'll wake up tagged by OG AND Techy. :/
Again, would love to see some substantiation of this claim of retaliatory negative ratings but we both know they don't exist. Your retaliatory ratings however come by the dozen.
I wouldn't worry about it too much TS..
Personal vendetta tags by lauda are just a badge of honor..
Oh I am not at all worried. I am just establishing this pattern of behavior in public so that every time they lose control and lash out like this they take a hit to their own reputations.
The usual mob of perpetrators is at it again, this time taking retribution for daring to defend one of their targeted individuals.
That's not the reason. It's because you are being dishonest in your defense and unwilling to consider evidence in a rational fashion. You have a renowned habit of doing this. Please ask me to point to specific examples.
The referenced event happened some time ago, but the trust rating was only left now.
I wonder why that is! Apparently putting people on my trust list Lauda doesn't approve of makes me dishonest.
Its not that Lauda doesn't approve of those people (is there any proof they disapprove of them?). Its because of the apparent rationale behind why you added them to your trust list. Again, you have a habit of including and excluding people from your trust list for less than honorable reasons. I think its a travesty that you're on DT1 now given your past behavior when it comes to DT-related issues.
This is a blatantly obvious pattern of abuse of anyone who dares to question this targeted abusive behavior.
FWIW I've had Lauda excluded for some time now, so... you were saying? Why haven't I been targeted? There's ways of conducting yourself in a civil and decent manner, but you are always in such a hurry to attack everybody. You can't be surprised when this eventually catches up with you.
And you get to decide what an "honest" defense is do you? What could go wrong negative rating people for submitting a defense you don't approve of? That certainly wouldn't create a chilling effect on people trying to defend themselves and others from baseless accusations now would it? After all, you get to decide who is guilty, and who gets to have a defense, and if people oppose your conclusions, well then they are guilty too! Of course the rating left supposedly has nothing to do with the OGNasty accusation thread according to the references, but you like to have your cake and eat it too as you claim it is for a deceptive defense but then on the other hand not retribution for exposing the lack of basis for such an accusation in that thread.
Apparent rationale, according to who, you and your all encompassing psychic skills? As covered above your accusations were little more than yet another act of retribution for defending targets of trust system abuse, and a transparent attempt to make sure I was removed from the default trust. You don't have any basis for these accusations, just lots of speculation, just like all these other accusations I am refuting. I am standing in the way of your ability to impugn the character of people here without basis, and for that I have become an object of obsession with these abusers. You don't want a system that requires proof for accusations, because that makes it much harder for you to simply invent a story that sounds believable but in reality has no basis in fact in order to target those you are perusing vendettas against. All I am doing is demanding proof to back up accusations, if you perceive that as an attack, then you are the one with the problem, not me.
