[BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action]

[irfan_pak10]

Hello

I believe there is an error with bpip extension, It does not show Hhampuz ban status, Or it only shows ban status of those guys who are perm ban?

[1714900713]

1714900713

[LoyceV]

Or it only shows ban status of those guys who are perm ban?

Temporary bans aren't shown in modlog, and in my opinion shouldn't be held against users after the ban. That's probably why they're not publicly announced.

[Timelord2067]

Hi again,

have found another glitch:

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Timelord2067 returns a valid page.

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=Timelord2067 does not:

Server Error in '/' Application.
Error converting data type nvarchar to int.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.

Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Error converting data type nvarchar to int.

Source Error:

An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.

Stack Trace:


[SqlException (0x80131904): Error converting data type nvarchar to int.]
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection, Action`1 wrapCloseInAction) +3306108
   System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj, Boolean callerHasConnectionLock, Boolean asyncClose) +736
   System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.TryRun(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj, Boolean& dataReady) +4061
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.TryConsumeMetaData() +90
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.get_MetaData() +99
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.FinishExecuteReader(SqlDataReader ds, RunBehavior runBehavior, String resetOptionsString, Boolean isInternal, Boolean forDescribeParameterEncryption, Boolean shouldCacheForAlwaysEncrypted) +604
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReaderTds(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, Boolean async, Int32 timeout, Task& task, Boolean asyncWrite, Boolean inRetry, SqlDataReader ds, Boolean describeParameterEncryptionRequest) +3303
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method, TaskCompletionSource`1 completion, Int32 timeout, Task& task, Boolean& usedCache, Boolean asyncWrite, Boolean inRetry) +667
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method) +83
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior behavior, String method) +301
   System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteReader() +137
   Website.Profile_page.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) in C:\Users\bpip\source\repos\BPIP\Website\profile.aspx.cs:66
   System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +106
   System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +68
   System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +3785


Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET Version:4.7.3429.0

[TheBeardedBaby]

Hi again,

have found another glitch:

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=Timelord2067 returns a valid page.

https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=Timelord2067 does not:

The second link is wrong, should be :
https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=131361

The id prefix should cointain your Bitcointalk ID not Username. Where did you find that link, on bpip?
So when you see p= be sure there is a username
p=Timelord2067
When you se id= then there should be an Bitcointalk ID.
id=131361

[Timelord2067]

What is the methodology being to used to calculate recognition?  Why I ask I was at 30th place with a score of 791.667 and then around the time my post count started dropping without explanation (as discussed in the original BPIP thread) now my recognition score is a dozen points lower while the other users with scores around mine are all fairly static.

At the time it was suggested that the posts were very old in threads that had been nuked, now I'm not so sure as the evidence suggests manipulation by mods to push my BPIP score down with very targeted deletion of posts.

[TheBeardedBaby]

What is the methodology being to used to calculate recognition?  Why I ask I was at 30th place with a score of 791.667 and then around the time my post count started dropping without explanation (as discussed in the original BPIP thread) now my recognition score is a dozen points lower while the other users with scores around mine are all fairly static.

At the time it was suggested that the posts were very old in threads that had been nuked, now I'm not so sure as the evidence suggests manipulation by mods to push my BPIP score down with very targeted deletion of posts.

The score is calculated differently, referring to this post from 2018 back then the recognition score was calculated based on this formula.

Recognition = (Activity Rank + Trust Rank + Merit Rank) / 3

Today we have just a little change - the actual result of the above equation is extracted from 1000.

So you have the following formula:
Recognition = 1000 - ((Activity Rank + Trust Rank + Merit Rank) / 3).

In your case:  1000 - ((285 + 152 + 229) / 3) = 778

You can check wich of your scores are droping or who is above you.

[Timelord2067]

Thank you for your reply,

So you have the following formula:
Recognition = 1000 - ((Activity Rank + Trust Rank + Merit Rank) / 3).

In your case:  1000 - ((285 + 152 + 229) / 3) = 778

You can check which of your scores are dropping or who is above you.

Just a nit-picking bit of clarity, should that be

152, 229 then 285??


I think that was a part of a discussion I was reading with Vod trying to figure out formula.  I never ended up finding a similar formulae that was using square roots of values that'd been squared and added (multiplied) together.  It's a convoluted piece of formula and mostly works (never re-found it and put looking for it to one side)

[suchmoon]

~

Of all posts to copy you chose THE SPAMBUSTER GANG LEADER's post? LOL

Bye now.

[ibminer]

Bye now.

I reported it a few hours ago... but it is still here.    Mods be slackin'   

[LoyceV]

Would you be interested to add a link to my archived unedited posts for each user? If so, I can make a list of included userIDs. I currently only have data for the past 7 months, but it's a start.

Examples:
ibminer: http://loyce.club/archive/members/8/84866.html
suchmoon: http://loyce.club/archive/members/23/234771.html
Anara22 (a Nuked user): http://loyce.club/archive/members/276/2762486.html

I have a terrible user interface (read: no user interface ), BPIP can make accessing this data a lot easier.

[Vod]

I love love love how the new DT inclusion log shows the strength after the action - keeping a log to show what actions precipitated the inclusion.

Could you please put back the actual number instead of having to hover for it?

[Timelord2067]

I love love love how the new DT inclusion log shows the strength after the action - keeping a log to show what actions precipitated the inclusion.

Could you please put back the actual number instead of having to hover for it?

Agreed - that would be a great re-addition.

~

Of all posts to copy you chose THE SPAMBUSTER GANG LEADER's post? LOL

Bye now.

Don't worry, I archived it... 


How is the "most trusted" feature calculated?

My score dropped from 229 to 277 when just one of my positive trust feedbacks went from being DT1/2 to DT/??3/4??  (it's still there, just not a DT1/2 any-more). Have just noticed Hhampuz has drastically modified his trust list in the last couple of days, but still the question remains.

You can check which of your scores are dropping or who is above you.

Another glitch in your system: Vod, LoyceV, PrimeNumber7, suchmoon, ibminer, theymos and not forgetting iasenko

https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostmerited - 117 (not 287) Archive [1a], [1b]




(117+152+277) = 546

546/3 = 182

1000 - 182 = 818 which would be 30th place - which is where I was until a week or thereabouts.


if we used the 227 value the end result would be 834 or ~24th place on most recognised.


There's definitely something not right with the calculations. (not on my end mind)

[LoyceV]

I have another suggestion, see this:


My suggestion is to not show DT2-exclusions for users who were already not on DT2. JollyGood (nothing against him, but he's in my example) has excluded 1517 users, and considering most of them were never anywhere near DT2, their exclusion doesn't add anything to the list.

[suchmoon]

Could you please put back the actual number instead of having to hover for it?

Agreed - that would be a great re-addition.

Will think about it. I prefer a quick visual clue of who's in or out (red "x") so perhaps we'll come up with some sort of combination.

My suggestion is to not show DT2-exclusions for users who were already not on DT2. JollyGood (nothing against him, but he's in my example) has excluded 1517 users, and considering most of them were never anywhere near DT2, their exclusion doesn't add anything to the list.

That's a good point. I'm thinking to not show users who don't have at least one DT2 inclusion.

[dkbit98]

I posted this in other topic, but I am doing it here also, as I am not sure if other topic is active.


One suggestion/request/question:

Is it possible to add something like personal notes feedback for members in BPIP extension?

(For example, if I want to have private feedback note for specific member, I can write short text that only I can see.)


PS
My feedback so far using new extension:
It is working great for me, and I had no bugs to report.
Only thing I noticed is slower loading information time for some members

[TheBeardedBaby]

I posted this in other topic, but I am doing it here also, as I am not sure if other topic is active.


One suggestion/request/question:

Is it possible to add something like personal notes feedback for members in BPIP extension?

(For example, if I want to have private feedback note for specific member, I can write short text that only I can see.)


PS
My feedback so far using new extension:
It is working great for me, and I had no bugs to report.
Only thing I noticed is slower loading information time for some members

No need to double post, both threads are active and monitored by the BPIP team
I would love to see that implemented in the forum instead made trough third party setup,  ut it won't happen.

I think the BPIP it's more like a better sorting and user friendly GUI of the already publicly available information, i do not think they will implement any "private" features like your suggestion, but that's up to the BPIP team.

[asche]

I would love to see that implemented in the forum instead made trough third party setup,  ut it won't happen.

His request is interesting tho, and you're not answering it

Is it possible to add something like personal notes feedback for members in BPIP extension?

He is not talking anywhere about adding this feature to the forum.

[suchmoon]

I responded in the extension thread, sorry about the delays, we've been discussing 2 or 3 other things with ibminer over the last few days.

[Timelord2067]

I responded in the extension thread, sorry about the delays, we've been discussing 2 or 3 other things with ibminer over the last few days.

I would appreciate it if you could acknowledge receipt of my report of a glitch in BPIP as reported a couple of days ago:

...
Another glitch in your system:

https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=mostmerited - 117 (not 287) Archive [1a], [1b]
...

[ibminer]

Would you be interested to add a link to my archived unedited posts for each user? If so, I can make a list of included userIDs. I currently only have data for the past 7 months, but it's a start.

Thank you LoyceV, it contains useful information but we're looking into some privacy aspects of this before we commit to anything.

There's definitely something not right with the calculations. (not on my end mind)

Thank you Timelord2067, there is an issue on the profile page also related to this, and potentially some confusion which I may have caused when trying to clear up the confusion that Quickseller's (likely) alt had previously , I'm looking into this and will have an update done soon to hopefully clear up any confusion!