[BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action]

[LoyceV]

DT Change Log now shows this:

<user> has lost the ability to choose DT2 members

I suggest to add a line when a user (re)gains the ability to choose DT2 members.

Also, when someone moves from including to excluding, it gives 2 lines. I suggest just one line:

stopped trusting and started distrusting

Another suggestion: instead of using the wrods "trusts" and "distrusts", use "trusts ..'s judgement" or "distrusts ..'s judgement". This can help reduce confusion. I did this in my Trust list viewer too:

I'll take some time to think on it but my initial thoughts are referring to this as a "Persona Feedback Network" "inclusions" and "exclusions" would be fine with almost no negative connotation. What's the 4th category? I'm on mobile at the moment.

How about this:

Trust list for: LoyceMobile (Trust: neutral) (95 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-09-28_Sat_06.17h)
Back to index

LoyceMobile Trusts these users' judgement:
-

LoyceMobile Distrusts these users' judgement:
-

[1714493215]

1714493215

[Timelord2067]

Is there any way we can collapse entries such as this: https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?id=857883



Thanks for reading.


Have just spotted this glitch:

[TheBeardedBaby]

Have just spotted this glitch:

I suggested this before >

One suggestion for when you have time.
Those accounts that wake up in the security log, can be listed to be parsed as well, so accounts like this one below should not be marked as inactive while they were active just a few days ago.

Last Parsed: 46 days  (Planned for 43 days from now)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=123376



Maybe you can parse an account only when this account becomes active. If it gets banned during that time it will appear in the modlog together with the deleted posts by mods.
The merit data is reflected in the merit log.
The only thing that can be changed is the post count ( if a thread gets trashed or posts are deleted in a self-moderated thread).

[Timelord2067]

I suggested this before >

Yes that makes sense.  I couldn't recall the exact post, so thanks for reposting it.  I figured I'd post the example in case you needed more statistical data on the issue.

[TheBeardedBaby]

Small suggestion.
The hourglass for those inactive accounts which we have on the home page, is it possible to have it the sane on the lists with top 1000 users? Or maybe a way to sort out users in the lists based on the Last Active?

[LoyceV]

I'm curious: how did this happen?

[asche]

I'm curious: how did this happen?

Halab's nickname was changed to Habal.

Part of the april fool if I'm not mistaken.

[LoyceV]

Halab's nickname was changed to Habal.

Thanks, and it's changed back to normal, so the same thing happened again.

A year ago, I wrote this:

You had 222 replies deleted

Now, this link shows Posts deleted by moderators: 0". Was this data lost?

[suchmoon]

Halab's nickname was changed to Habal.

Part of the april fool if I'm not mistaken.

I'll wipe those out manually once I get to it. Unfortunately I'm busy dealing with the fallout from the real virus so it might take a while.

[asche]

Halab's nickname was changed to Habal.

Part of the april fool if I'm not mistaken.

I'll wipe those out manually once I get to it. Unfortunately I'm busy dealing with the fallout from the real virus so it might take a while.

Turns out it was Halab's very own april fool joke for us.

Sorry to hear that. Are you the sick one, or is your job health related?

[suchmoon]

Sorry to hear that. Are you the sick one, or is your job health related?

No, I'm not sick yet, and not even directly related to healthcare. But I have customers who either need extra support these days (increased sales volumes for the few businesses that are not shut down) or need extra help winding their businesses down. Also for some inexplicable reason some people refuse to work from home even though they were perfectly capable of working remotely before this, so I get to cover for them too, yay.

Plus the tax season, that's always fun even in a good year.

Stay safe everyone. Check on your elderly neighbors every day (while staying politely distant of course).

[hosseinimr93]

According to the picture below, I have received 466 merit and sent 224 merit. So, the merit ratio should be 0.48 not 1.07.
I had reported this on Vod's topic before. But since the bug still exists, I posted it here again.


Source: BPIP

[Timelord2067]

Is there any way to scroll past JollyGood's thousands+ distrusts?

https://bpip.org/r/dt1changes.aspx



(It just goes on-and-on...)


I also can't search any user name on that page.

[LoyceV]

Is there any way to scroll past JollyGood's thousands+ distrusts?

Those users without any DT1-inclusions can/should probably be omitted from the list entirely.

[asche]

Sorry if this question has been asked before, but since when does the most merited section count airdropped merits? And why so?

[hosseinimr93]

Sorry if this question has been asked before, but since when does the most merited section count airdropped merits? And why so?

You can still see the ranking based on earned merit using the link below.
https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=earnedmerit

Read this post

[asche]

Sorry if this question has been asked before, but since when does the most merited section count airdropped merits? And why so?

You can still see the ranking based on earned merit using the link below.
https://bpip.org/report.aspx?r=earnedmerit

Read this post

Thanks for your answer.

I know that, but it doesn't tell me why the change. "Most merited" rankings used to be based on earned merit.

[Vod]

"Most merited" rankings used to be based on earned merit.

New owners....

[asche]

"Most merited" rankings used to be based on earned merit.

New owners....

I got that. But it makes no sense. It's like a race where people don't start at the same point but have the same finish line 

[ibminer]

The rank represents what the forum sees as the merit count for a user. I have to assume that the forum (theymos) merited accounts initially for a reason, and so I feel it makes sense to be included. Most recognized uses earned merit rankings because I think it makes sense that a more recognized user, at any given time, should be based off of earned merit. This seems like the most objective approach.

If there is an issue with the fact that the forum supplied merit to accounts at the creation of the merit system, then that should be an issue addressed in another thread.

edit: and as I have already pointed out, I never made any change to the stats on the front page since we've taken over.