[BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action]

[logfiles]

Keeps saying my flag is active when bitcointalk says the opposite.

It's because it is. Look again carefully



A type 1 flag needs at least 1 DT member to support it in order to be active. The one on your profile is being supported by about 7 DT members
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1260

[andulolika]

Keeps saying my flag is active when bitcointalk says the opposite.

It's because it is. Look again carefully



A type 1 flag needs at least 1 DT member to support it in order to be active. The one on your profile is being supported by about 7 DT members
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1260

It shows to me it is inactive, I wonder if my trust settings have anything to do with it. I'm positive 2 here.

[logfiles]

It shows to me it is inactive, I wonder if my trust settings have anything to do with it. I'm positive 2 here.

Well that's weird. For the ratings I understand that how they appear to you depends on your exclusions and inclusions in the custom trust list. I never thought this could affect the flags too. I always thought the Type 1 flag would become active once at least one DT member supports it regardless of one's custom trust list.

I used a brand-new account that doesn't have any custom trust list to view your profile and I see the flag is active with 6 DT members supporting it. I guess that's what BPIP is basing on.

[andulolika]

It shows to me it is inactive, I wonder if my trust settings have anything to do with it. I'm positive 2 here.

Well that's weird. For the ratings I understand that how they appear to you depends on your exclusions and inclusions in the custom trust list. I never thought this could affect the flags too. I always thought the Type 1 flag would become active once at least one DT member supports it regardless of one's custom trust list.

I used a brand-new account that doesn't have any custom trust list to view your profile and I see the flag is active with 6 DT members supporting it. I guess that's what BPIP is basing on.

I didn't imagine either it would work like this, but i'm okay with it. This is how it looks here .
I'd merit you but I'm not merit farmer so i has no merits.

[examplens]

.

.

It's because of your trust list. You distrust all members which support flag against you, It is not a solution. it’s like you just close your eyes and don’t see the problem even if they still exist to all other people.
Here is how your trust list looks https://loyce.club/trust/2020-09-26_Sat_05.08h/223200.html

andulolika Distrusts these users' judgement:
1. ~TECSHARE (Trust: +37 / =6 / -2) (936 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ~Vod (Trust: +26 / =1 / -2) (1671 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ~Foxpup (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! ( 1019 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. ~TMAN (Trust: +27 / =0 / -1) (1305 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. ~Lauda (Trust: +35 / =3 / -2) (1643 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. ~Timelord2067 (Trust: +9 / =6 / -0) (DT1 (-14) 490 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. ~yogg (Trust: +32 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (18) 1610 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. ~hilariousandco (Trust: +19 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (33) 836 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. ~mindrust (Trust: neutral) (DT1 (-4) 1082 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. ~joksim299 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (12 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. ~suchmoon (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (33) 4602 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. ~owlcatz (Trust: +43 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (23) 376 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. ~nutildah (Trust: +8 / =0 / -0) (2643 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. ~zazarb (Trust: +20 / =0 / -0) (DT1 (-1) 498 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. ~LFC_Bitcoin (Trust: +10 / =0 / -0) (2737 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. ~bones261 (Trust: +3 / =0 / -0) (823 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. ~Last of the V8s (Trust: +7 / =0 / -1) (3665 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. ~AlexSimion (Trust: neutral) (109 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. ~IconFirm (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (64 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. ~TheUltraElite (Trust: neutral) (466 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. ~blurryeyed (Trust: +2 / =5 / -1) (18 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. ~nullius (Trust: +4 / =3 / -0) (DT1 (-6) 1751 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. ~JollyGood (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (5) 729 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
24. ~Parodium (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (226 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
25. ~GazetaBitcoin (Trust: +2 / =0 / -0) (933 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
26. ~NotATether (Trust: neutral) (455 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Also, I am not sure what you see on BPIP https://bpip.org/Profile?id=223200 but It seems everything clear there, you have one flag against you which is active

[LoyceV]

I used a brand-new account that doesn't have any custom trust list to view your profile

Easier solution: add ";dt" to the URL, like this to view any page as seen by DefaultTrust. See Trust flags for details:

Only users in your trust network count as supporting or opposing flags. For guests, the default trust network is used.

[Timelord2067]

Also, I am not sure what you see on BPIP https://bpip.org/Profile?id=223200 but It seems everything clear there, you have one flag against you which is active

Technically, if @andulolika were to lock the thread, the flag becomes invalid (not the least of which because the thread wasn't started by the one who first flew the flag)

[ibminer]

No, something like this. But not only for last 30 days and not limited to 50 users.

This might be a bit complicated. I'll run some tests when I have time. If it can be calculated on the fly without hogging up a lot of CPU we can probably implement it, but if it needs an aggregation then it would be a lower priority.

It seems like this would just be adding a date/time range to the earned merit report?.. at least to get the list of users. If we need the ranking on the profile page, that might add a bit more to the query but the tests should help gauge this.

Makes sense. I know ibminer is busy with other stuff but I can try to fix it unless he objects.

No objections here. Yes.. I apparently used date instead of datetime.  



Thanks, suchmoon.

...

And.. ^^ it looks like I've got an issue on the mobile view edit: with safari/iOS devices, in relation to the table header of the new flags & merit area dropping to the bottom due to, I think, an overflow css setting (you should be seeing the 'inactive' info in the screenshot as well). Will take a look at this as soon as I can.

[suchmoon]

Makes sense. I know ibminer is busy with other stuff but I can try to fix it unless he objects.

No objections here. Yes.. I apparently used date instead of datetime.  

This has been fixed. The 30/90/120/150 day merit counts should be accurate to the second and the links to the sent/received merit list reflect that as well.

@LoyceV

[LoyceV]

@LoyceV

Test: Merit earned in the last 120 days: 617 (sent: 3599). Confirmed!

[Veleor]

Bug probably ~

Profile https://bpip.org/Profile?p=telcobert

Pay attention to the large number of "Profile woke up" records on the 1/1/2020.
But in the Seclog archive there is only one note that the telcobert account changed it's password and there is not a single record that this profile "woke up" on the 1/1/2020.

[LoyceV]

I'm (once again) making a request on linking to my Trust list viewer. It's always bugged me that users such as margon3 don't show a link to their last Trust list records.

I know BPIP uses https://loyce.club/trust/latestversion.txt to get https://loyce.club/trust/2020-09-26_Sat_05.08h/user_ids.txt to update it's weekly links, but that doesn't work for users who had a custom Trust list before, but don't have one now.
It also leads to incorrect links on users such as Furfuraceous: the Trust list link gives a 404, because it should link to last week's Trust list.

By my math, BPIP should add or correct the Trust list link on 542 profiles.
I made a list of the last known version of each user's Trust list: https://loyce.club/trust/latesttrustlist.txt (currently 476KB).
This file gets updated right after latestversion.txt, and should be done after a minute delay.

[BlackHatCoiner]

I would like to report a bug. On most merited posts in the last x hours the links to the profiles lead to a wrong url.

The right one is: https://bpip.org/Profile?p=BlackHatCoiner
Although, it redirects me to https://bpip.org/r/Profile?p=BlackHatCoiner which is wrong.

So a solution would be to redirect any /r link to /

[logfiles]

While using the extension, have seen a couple of profiles marked as archived though I can't recall the names at the moment.
Question is what does archived on a profile mean? I always knew that if the account is inactive, we would see Inactive and If it was banned we see Banned on the profile.

[LoyceV]

Question is what does archived on a profile mean?

See BPIP, hover the ?:

Inactive profiles that have no posts and no trust OR profiles that have been banned or nuked by the staff.

[Vod]

So a solution would be to redirect any /r link to /

Wouldn't that break most reports?

[ibminer]

And.. ^^ it looks like I've got an issue on the mobile view edit: with safari/iOS devices

I would like to report a bug.

These should be corrected now.

.. also added some additional favicon/icon images for better device compatibility. (using https://realfavicongenerator.net/)

Bug probably ~

Will have to take a closer look at this.

[Timelord2067]

Hi guys, just a quick heads-up.

You have a user profile: https://bpip.org/Profile?p=crypto_trader#43xzEXrP which is labeled as "crypto_trader" and the visit profile links to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=151153

Code:

Name: 	crypto_trader
Posts: 	1
Activity: 	1
Merit: 	0
Position: 	Newbie
Status:	INACTIVE
Date Registered: 	19 September 2013, 15:39:46
Last Active: 	26 September 2013, 10:39:33

However, there is a user crypto_trader#43xzEXrP https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1105573 / https://bpip.org/Profile?id=1105573

Code:

Name: 	crypto_trader#43xzEXrP
Posts: 	1010
Activity: 	784
Merit: 	184
Position: 	Full Member
Date Registered: 	13 August 2017, 05:44:50
Last Active: 	03 October 2020, 22:48:42

See also this post on the LoyceV thread concerning the overlap of user information.

[BlackHatCoiner]

Wouldn't that break most reports?

Can you report bitcointalk members through bpip?

Anyway here's the mistake:


You're linking us to a "Profile" directory/page when we already are on a folder named "r". Thus, you're redirecting us to /r/Profile

One simple solution is to add a "/" before "Profile":

These should be corrected now.

Same to me.

[ibminer]

These should be corrected now.

Same to me.

Hmm.. well, it works locally in VS when debugging.  Not sure what's going on there, the path in the code looks correct to me now ("../Profile?p"), it had been just "Profile?p" .. I'll have to look closer tomorrow on why the published/compiled copy didn't reflect this.

edit/update:
OK should be fixed this time.
I didn't fully figure out the relative path issue, but I just made it an absolute URL.

edit #2:
So after looking at the initial link you posted, the issue was we were looking at different pages. "mostmerited.aspx" was renamed to mostemerit.aspx, but the old 'mostmerited.aspx' file was still lingering. I've deleted the old file and setup a redirect to redirect it to the correct page. I'd do another 'DOH' meme but I'll refrain.