[Poll]Timelord2067 ad hominem, trolling, fud, accusations, fake flags, lies NSFW

[marlboroza]

He is either become sick throughout the years which would be very unfortunate, or he was always actually quite morally evil and has only recently shown his true face. You can choose which version you wish to believe.

I have no clue what happened to Timelord. For example, Nutildah said he is in contact with Bruno's family.
Timelord said this:

Irony:

I knew Bruno personally and have been in contact with a family member.

You want us to take your word that you've spoken to Bruno's family, but tell us not to believe another user who makes the same claim.  

Nutildah said: "YES"

And Timelord said:

Yes.

Thank-you for voting "yes" to the Poll topic.

Next.

I mean, WTF happened here? I am not sure which version to pick.

[1714882410]

1714882410

[1714882410]

1714882410

[1714882410]

1714882410

[1714882410]

1714882410

[1714882410]

1714882410

[suchmoon]

I mean, WTF happened here? I am not sure which version to pick.

Oh there are so many choices:

1) A few marbles short of a full deck.
2) Not the brightest knife in the chandelier.
3) As sharp as a bag of wet hammers.
4) All of the above.

[marlboroza]

I mean, WTF happened here? I am not sure which version to pick.

Oh there are so many choices:

1) A few marbles short of a full deck.
2) Not the brightest knife in the chandelier.
3) As sharp as a bag of wet hammers.
4) All of the above.

I was thinking about something and I thought timelord was joking in howeycoins topic but I am really not sure any more. I think he really investigated it!

edit: here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3920469.msg41736089#msg41736089

He is either become sick throughout the years which would be very unfortunate, or he was always actually quite morally evil and has only recently shown his true face. You can choose which version you wish to believe.

...this investigation happened 2 years ago, maybe he was always like this and eventually he showed his true face?

[nutildah]

I was thinking about something and I thought timelord was joking in howeycoins topic but I am really not sure any more. I think he really investigated it!

edit: here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3920469.msg41736089#msg41736089

Holy fuck, that is hilarious. Thanks for sharing.

I apologize for going severely OT, but I wonder what ever happened to MagicSmoker. He was an up-and-comer, and I remember him fondly because he nominated me as one of Bitcointalk's most entertaining personalities.

~snip

Timelord2067 clearly doesn't get what is special about HoweyCoins - just look at how quickly it has garnered >39 pages of positive posts, mainly from that stalwart supporter of so many projects here on btct, Haiku Bot®. So the Fry you really want is:

Maybe he quit because his Activity reached 420?

Speaking of that, my account is officially 6 years old today! I say "my account" because as we all know I bought it from the real nutildah in 2016, who was kind of a jerkoff. I'm so much better than that guy.

(that's sarcasm, you fucks)

[suchmoon]

(that's sarcasm, you fucks)

You wish. Timelord2067 will use this as a red trust reference, and I'm sure TECSHARE will find ways to be a humorless prick about it too.

[marlboroza]

(that's sarcasm, you fucks)

You wish. Timelord2067 will use this as a red trust reference, and I'm sure TECSHARE will find ways to be a humorless prick about it too.

Nutildah placed disclamer so no red trust, but he might get another neutral feedback because of off topic parts, something like this:

"Reference: bitcoin forum -> Nutildah can't stay on topic (archive, web archive, archive of web archive)"

[nutildah]

From the ChipMixer sig campaign thread:

You might have given them *three* positives, but they haven't given you anything.

To be fair, Bit_Happy didn't say that the compliment was in the form of trust feedback. It would be quite weird to use the trust system to compliment someone on posting quality.

Pardon?




Weird to complement, but ok to run them down?

Really?

...

suchmoon was just pointing out that Timelord was saying something that was incorrect, and of course Timelord's response is to troll them with stupidity. Not really upping his chances of getting accepted to the campaign.


A few weeks ago I realized that the first interaction I ever had with Timelord was when I was trying to tell him that Bruno wasn't the same person as cryptohunter, even though his trust feedback for cryptohunter (still) reads:



Like his most recent engagements with me, his reaction at the time was to be a hostile dick.

Something that Timelord is incapable of saying:

Oh, you're right. My bad, or let me fix that.

[marlboroza]

^ obviously, timelord is always right.

I have recently sent counter to timelord and lauda and timelord created crazy theory. I have tried to explain him why I have sent that feedback, and, instead of reading, timelord went full retard so I gave up and I just told him that he is idiot and I linked my post. His last reaction was this(of course, once again timelord tried to hide something, in this case, link from my post):

Nice deflection.  Now cry me a river.

You are idiot.

The correct English usage is: "You Sir, are an idiot!"

Or, you can get away with:

"You are an idiot!" or the contracted: "You're an idiot!"  (Note also the punctuation in the form of an exclamation mark).

In every case please note how you have omitted the word AN

Most important when you are trying to insult someone to get it right.


Your hostile reaction over the last few posts is proof positive that you haven't changed, you are still as hostile as ever and your glowing positive trust was only a method to attack mhanbostanci using myself as collateral damage.

I've moved on.  I didn't say I'd forgiven, or forgotten.  Just that I've moved on. Marlboroza is going to have to work out whatever daemons are burning him up on his own.

Now cry me a river.

 

[marlboroza]

This guy is complete lunatic. It seems that I am not allowed to respond in topics started by fake newbie accounts, if I do, according to timelord, I am automatically their alt account:

Instead of replying off topic can you tell us on what trust and deals you added rohang to your trust list? Please give one example why rohang should be trusted and I'll never message on forum again.

Are you sure you know which alt you're using to make these idle threats that mean nothing from?

Well, Mr. Moron2067, it's not me.

(ARCHIVED --> http://archive.is/lJlUA#selection-9535.0-9907.95 <--)

[nutildah]

Well, Mr. Moron2067, it's not me.

You mean your first instinct after making an alt account isn't to quickly give it some merits so it can level up? Which sig campaign are you planning on entering it in eventually? Hope its not Chipmixer.

[marlboroza]

You mean your first instinct after making an alt account isn't to quickly give it some merits so it can level up? Which sig campaign are you planning on entering it in eventually? Hope its not Chipmixer.

Damnit, you got me 

[marlboroza]

~
Perhaps marlboroza should practice what they preach.

Ekhem...lets not forget your "neutral-feedback-bumps".
I know that you, timelord2067, can't remember things lately so little reminder for you to read few posts in this thread again. I promise I won't remove your post if you write something meaningful (no trolling/out of context/similar thingies).

[nullius]

The following is is off-topic on a thread that that I don’t want to keep bumping with Timelord’s nonsense.

What the hell is he even trying to say?  I ask for somebody who is not Timelord to interpret this.  Is he implying that my account was acquired as the alt of an alt account that I myself had acknowledged with bidirectional neutral feedbacks?  Is he actually psychotic?  Or is he just trolling?

Oh, yes, I just tagged him again for the reasons thereby referenced.

Are you able to read the bold title which says in large letters, “Trust summary for Trade Runner”, and bold subtitle which says, “Sent feedback”?  I directly quoted from Trade Runner’s trust page, with a link thereto.

Your post, its title, and its insinuations are defamatory of me.  Your sabre-rattling about “for future reference” is ridiculous, in the sense of inviting ridicule of you.  Also, you do not know how to spell “misleading”.

I have tagged you accordingly.

Where do I start:

You trust feedback abuse of me:

Or, that you in turn can't read:

Next you will tell me I can't spell colour. 

[marlboroza]

^
I am giving my best not to read timelord's posts as I have no clue what the hell he talks about, unfortunately, I can't ignore him when I am not logged in and reading forum. Let's just call it "another off topic timelord's rant".
Heey! I have an idea! Theymos should invent something like "ignore button for forum guests"!