== Bitcoin challenge transaction: ~1000 BTC total bounty to solvers! ==UPDATED==

[WanderingPhilospher]

If anyone feels they know where the private key is for #64, feeling lucky, or just want to know if your hunch is correct, I can scan the range (limit to 44 bits). If interested, we can work out details.

[fxsniper]

Could you give more detail?

Produced Keys,
I saw that a machine was produced at a certain interval, by chance.
Like the example Baby Step - Giant Step event, the machine did not generate the same proportional numbers. When you calculated the average of each previous generated numbers as you wanted, I saw that each got different results.
Example: Currently searched HEX range 8000000000000000 - FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

Well, the average numbers of the remaining 63 wallets do not match, but they are closely followed.
I give a value of 1 to the first wallet for the average calculation. Because there is no precedent, the beginning.

The picture maybe tells shorter!

Thank you a lot both explain and image


Personal I think very hard to guess because puzzle read from first post again text description tell something about puzzle, this puzzle not pick address by formula, algorithm  no calculate or any method can repeat for protect some one can think like creator and then can crack it and get all bitcoin by one person who can crack idea it so that mean puzzle pick by random and human pick manual this one make challenge very hard because not a series number. method can search is only brute force all rank puzzle that have only address is very hard more that puzzle have a public key for reference calculate

may be you excel will be correct, everything Nothing wrong Nothing right, everything can possible

[fxsniper]

If anyone feels they know where the private key is for #64, feeling lucky, or just want to know if your hunch is correct, I can scan the range (limit to 44 bits). If interested, we can work out details.

very hard to directly brute-forcing

I don't know I calculate wrong or not try check correct

NVIDIA Tesla V100 GPU still very very small a little dot power to search
puzzle #64   
rank = 2^63 - 2^64   
hex 8000000000000000 to ffffffffffffffff    
8000000000000000 = 9223372036854775808
ffffffffffffffff = 18446744073709551615


18446744073709551615-9223372036854775808
=9223372036854775807
9 Quintillion

if use people help to scan Trillion per one person
9223372036854775807/1000000000000
=9223372.0368547756224871

that use people 1 million person to scan it


I think idea POOL scan is very good idea
BUT software pool scan is not  easy to use, that require to install bitcrack
software pool need to new develop to ONE CLICK use

may be need use bitcrack fork do open source pool bitcrack that use only one click
require open code on GitHub for can trusted program is not malwares
and promote to people to join to use
but reward may be change to use method split two between create and user two person  only not share to pool
because bitcoin very small if share with pool may be got a little and that make people not interest

pool create need to have server to record scan
if record all generate key may be use very large storage to record so system will not record and not keep it all every thing
scan use method split to very small slot for each user can scan complete by easy and use time not much and program sent to record already scan
server will work with function distribute scan slot to user  and program for user just one click use only no install

if found key program will be split automatic by generate two bitcoin address and sent transaction to split automatic and save key for user one that is rewards and other one is sent to pool creator may be store on server

have only one person user who get small slot to scan and found it got rewards

other job is need to promotion to people to join
now bitcoin is high price I think is easy to

small slot compare with lotto ticket, may be spilt one slot scan for 1 hour or may be count at 1,000,000 key per slot this is lotto ticket
I think count key is better every one do same use time may be up to CPU or GPU that user use

9223372036854775807/1000000
=9223372036854.7753906250000000

may be call this pool scan is lotto method
Can any one develop solution like this ?

if you can coding and develop one both server duction and program may be help to solve puzzle by easy

but we have 9223372036854 ticket (9 Trillion slot) to have all sold need people to buy all ticket sold out

if can do like this and very easy to use, many people in this work who interest bitcoin price value for now can join by easy
by easy just download software and run it done now just waiting for lucky
may be great if can split 3 for me one give an idea and solution many thinks LOL.

[fxsniper]

Do anyone know who owner/create this pool  http://ttdsales.com/64bit/

64bit address Cracking Pool created for this challenge - http://ttdsales.com/64bit/

I would like to tell them to try develop new one software for join

require to easy to use NO SIGNUP and NO INSTALL bitcrack

SIGNUP make people not join because use time

require install bitcrack it is make complex to use program not easy
may people lazy
many people do wrong , make it can not works

make program easy to run is helpful

some people want to try will be help to
some people who give up help to finish job many slot

if still running software got ticket lotto unlimited
got ticket and got result immediately after finish scan key

I don't know this pool method still count on puzzle challenge or not. but it same  pool method and better with attractive people to join

promote get free lotto ticket  with rewards
ืnothing free in the world require to run program

puzzle 64 = 0.64016564 BTC
split 2 = 0.640/2 = 0.320 BTC
bitcoin price (for now) = 49,706.00 USD
0.320 BTC = 15905.92 USD

win rewards = 15905.92 USD (0.320 BTC)

What do you think this idea?
How many people want to join program?
Idea it work or not, anything wrong ,What should be change?

I got idea from free bitcoin program click advertising and get free bitcoin

this puzzle is challenge right?
challenge need to do challenge millions people to join pool by easy

[WanderingPhilospher]

Do anyone know who owner/create this pool  http://ttdsales.com/64bit/

64bit address Cracking Pool created for this challenge - http://ttdsales.com/64bit/

Sign up and contact him via discord. He is easy to get in touch with and responds quickly.

Also, it is like a lottery where you have a 1 in 134,000,000 chance each range you search. He has the #64 range broken down into 134 million subranges.

[nioctib.co]

Hi friend,

There is a tip for 64 wallets,

The beginning starts with the letter B. The next most likely is the number 2.

The highly probable start starts with B2, possibly with B25 or B26.

We have pretty similar results of search area, maybe because using average. I got the range of between B3C - BD4, but still it take ages for me to complete this range with 90 mkey/sec. LoL

[fxsniper]

Do anyone know who owner/create this pool  http://ttdsales.com/64bit/

64bit address Cracking Pool created for this challenge - http://ttdsales.com/64bit/

Sign up and contact him via discord. He is easy to get in touch with and responds quickly.

Also, it is like a lottery where you have a 1 in 134,000,000 chance each range you search. He has the #64 range broken down into 134 million subranges.

Thank you

I signup and found contact him already.
lotto method may be answer for collection small power to large power

I think pool is power but pool for now is not power because not much to have contributor
only 287 contributor and active only 2-3 online may be not enough result is same 1 person individual like you or me work
pool need power to million power like 1,000,000 people

but for individual must be have technic like kangaroo but more advance and sharp
other way is bitcoin vulnerability  but still very hard to use it to find private key directly

[Azzabazza]

https://ibb.co/mhqh5zH

Somebody please explain how it’s possible to get 200000Mkeys/s ?
I was fiddling around with the coding for cubitcrack which was stopping at “error misaligned address” so I ran cuda-memcheck cubitcrack to find the source of the error and first two times didn’t run
Then third time whilst it was compiling on the GPU simultanisously I ran the same cubitcrack in visual code debug and the cuda-memcheck started running but at excessive speed
Iam up to 360 868 335 716 192 in 30 mins... someone please explain how this is possible?
Only running one 3070 rtx.... help

[fxsniper]

https://ibb.co/mhqh5zH

Somebody please explain how it’s possible to get 200000Mkeys/s ?
I was fiddling around with the coding for cubitcrack which was stopping at “error misaligned address” so I ran cuda-memcheck cubitcrack to find the source of the error and first two times didn’t run
Then third time whilst it was compiling on the GPU simultanisously I ran the same cubitcrack in visual code debug and the cuda-memcheck started running but at excessive speed
Iam up to 360 868 335 716 192 in 30 mins... someone please explain how this is possible?
Only running one 3070 rtx.... help

I don't know about programming much
but I guess possible on photo that not search with bitcoin private key
may be modify bitcrack for some search may be search password or some thing
Mkey/s may be mean keyword not bitcoin private key

[fxsniper]

Now all brute force method bitcrack, kangaroo, BSGS all stuck with high rank of very very large keyspace

if scan all it use a time too much

We need to find the way and method to can calculate or guest right keyspace 
may be an help reduce from 1000 area to scan 100 area

use pubkey to caclulare direction of keyspace  and then use  bitcrack, kangaroo, BSGS

if can fine keyspace  low than 2^30 to 2^40 may be better ot less 1 days scan complate (Max 2^50)

(2^ 60 too high)

other puzzle no pubkey  still no idea what to do?

Anyone have any idea use pubkey to calculate keyspace  ?

To do brute force all area of keyspace in range it is not good idea?



Anyone an expert with python language please advice. Can you do Ai. on python?

I think about used version python scripts with all AI. api
it can possible to generate private key with address to as dataset and train Ai.
and do brute force by random with use call AI. model to give multiply value. something like that
just learn to read a lot about AI. deep learning.

[bigvito19]

Anyone have any idea use pubkey to calculate keyspace?

To do brute force all area of keyspace in range it is not good idea?

Kangaroo so far is the only way to calculate keyspace with pubkey.

Brute forcing all area of the keyspace is a bad idea and a waste of time. Do you know about distinguished point (DP) method with kangaroo?

[albert0bsd]

if scan all it use a time too much

Depent of your speed, i made some calculations based on the speed, the time is for scan all the range in that bit space:

Code:

Puzzle 120 @ 1 Terakeys/s :     21074771622667996 years
Puzzle 120 @ 1 Petakeys/s :     21074771622667 years
Puzzle 120 @ 1 Exakeys/s :      21074771622 years
Puzzle 120 @ 1 Zettakeys/s :    21074771 years
Puzzle 120 @ 1 Yottakeys/s :    21074 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Terakeys/s :     23171956451847141650870193314 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Petakeys/s :     23171956451847141650870193 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Exakeys/s :      23171956451847141650870 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Zettakeys/s :    23171956451847141650 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Yottakeys/s :    23171956451847141 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Terakeys/s :     1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612197318060720 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Petakeys/s :     1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612197318060 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Exakeys/s :      1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612197318 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Zettakeys/s :    1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612197 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Yottakeys/s :    1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612 years

I know there is no puzzle 256, but that is the exact time for the real wallets.

if can fine keyspace  low than 2^30 to 2^40 may be better ot less 1 days scan complate (Max 2^50)

(2^ 60 too high)

I also implement BSGS in C, in my tool Keyhunt, is not so fast, but the puzzle 63 can be solved in one hour or two. Also in minutes is you have some luck with  Random mode.

other puzzle no pubkey  still no idea what to do?

Puzzles without publickey are more slow, that is why puzzle 64 is stll not found.

Regards!

[nioctib.co]

if scan all it use a time too much

Depent of your speed, i made some calculations based on the speed, the time is for scan all the range in that bit space:

Code:

Puzzle 120 @ 1 Terakeys/s :     21074771622667996 years
Puzzle 120 @ 1 Petakeys/s :     21074771622667 years
Puzzle 120 @ 1 Exakeys/s :      21074771622 years
Puzzle 120 @ 1 Zettakeys/s :    21074771 years
Puzzle 120 @ 1 Yottakeys/s :    21074 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Terakeys/s :     23171956451847141650870193314 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Petakeys/s :     23171956451847141650870193 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Exakeys/s :      23171956451847141650870 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Zettakeys/s :    23171956451847141650 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Yottakeys/s :    23171956451847141 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Terakeys/s :     1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612197318060720 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Petakeys/s :     1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612197318060 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Exakeys/s :      1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612197318 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Zettakeys/s :    1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612197 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Yottakeys/s :    1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612 years

I know there is no puzzle 256, but that is the exact time for the real wallets.

if can fine keyspace  low than 2^30 to 2^40 may be better ot less 1 days scan complate (Max 2^50)

(2^ 60 too high)

I also implement BSGS in C, in my tool Keyhunt, is not so fast, but the puzzle 63 can be solved in one hour or two. Also in minutes is you have some luck with  Random mode.

other puzzle no pubkey  still no idea what to do?

Puzzles without publickey are more slow, that is why puzzle 64 is stll not found.

Regards!

I use my old GTX 960 and it literally solve 63 in less than a minute. If I want to use it to hunt 120, average 300 years. LoL. I guess if 64 with known public key and I use GTX 3060, I guess it can be solve in less than 15 seconds. That's also reason why if by chance you found 64, someone recommend to pay higher on transaction fees or otherwise once known public key, I believe those bot will attack in less than a minute.

[bigvito19]

if scan all it use a time too much

Depent of your speed, i made some calculations based on the speed, the time is for scan all the range in that bit space:

Code:

Puzzle 120 @ 1 Terakeys/s :     21074771622667996 years
Puzzle 120 @ 1 Petakeys/s :     21074771622667 years
Puzzle 120 @ 1 Exakeys/s :      21074771622 years
Puzzle 120 @ 1 Zettakeys/s :    21074771 years
Puzzle 120 @ 1 Yottakeys/s :    21074 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Terakeys/s :     23171956451847141650870193314 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Petakeys/s :     23171956451847141650870193 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Exakeys/s :      23171956451847141650870 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Zettakeys/s :    23171956451847141650 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Yottakeys/s :    23171956451847141 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Terakeys/s :     1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612197318060720 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Petakeys/s :     1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612197318060 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Exakeys/s :      1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612197318 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Zettakeys/s :    1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612197 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Yottakeys/s :    1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612 years

Is this speed based upon bitcrack or kangaroo?

[WanderingPhilospher]

I use my old GTX 960 and it literally solve 63 in less than a minute. If I want to use it to hunt 120, average 300 years. LoL. I guess if 64 with known public key and I use GTX 3060, I guess it can be solve in less than 15 seconds. That's also reason why if by chance you found 64, someone recommend to pay higher on transaction fees or otherwise once known public key, I believe those bot will attack in less than a minute.

Look at it this way, 50% of brute force on #64 = 2^63 operations while #120 only requires 2^60 operations with kangaroo.
If people aren't pooling resources for either brute or kangaroo or bsgs, then it will be a long wait unless you have Zielar's equipment then #120 is doable within 2 months +/-

There is a pool for #64 and I have tried to get people to pool resources with bsgs and kangaroo but I guess everyone thinks they can solve on their own.

And I believe you are correct, whoever finds #64 must pay high trans fee to get in into a block before someone else attacks it with kangaroo.

[WanderingPhilospher]

if scan all it use a time too much

Depent of your speed, i made some calculations based on the speed, the time is for scan all the range in that bit space:

Code:

Puzzle 120 @ 1 Terakeys/s :     21074771622667996 years
Puzzle 120 @ 1 Petakeys/s :     21074771622667 years
Puzzle 120 @ 1 Exakeys/s :      21074771622 years
Puzzle 120 @ 1 Zettakeys/s :    21074771 years
Puzzle 120 @ 1 Yottakeys/s :    21074 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Terakeys/s :     23171956451847141650870193314 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Petakeys/s :     23171956451847141650870193 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Exakeys/s :      23171956451847141650870 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Zettakeys/s :    23171956451847141650 years
Puzzle 160 @ 1 Yottakeys/s :    23171956451847141 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Terakeys/s :     1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612197318060720 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Petakeys/s :     1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612197318060 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Exakeys/s :      1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612197318 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Zettakeys/s :    1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612197 years
Puzzle 256 @ 1 Yottakeys/s :    1835871531540401373407708412745559168131740612 years

Is this speed based upon bitcrack or kangaroo?

It's based off of his BSGS version written in C# which is slower than JLPs version. Everyone who comes up with meet in middle or baby step giant step always claims high numbers, meanwhile, JLPs BSGS just keeps on being the fastest, with no hype 

[albert0bsd]

Is this speed based upon bitcrack or kangaroo?

Is just based on the speed that you get with any of those programs.

I just divide the Total of keys in each range between the speed by seconds.

By example the 120 bit space have 664613997892457936451903530140172287 total keys. Just divide that amount between you current speed the result are the seconds tha you will take, divide that bewteen 31536000 to get the numbers of years.

Is not based in my program or anything is just math.

Please if im wrong tellme, im open mind.

My program just reach some 1 to 8 petekeys/s in highend server and that is no hype.

Best regards!

[WanderingPhilospher]

Is this speed based upon bitcrack or kangaroo?

Is just based on the speed that you get with any of those programs.

I just divide the Total of keys in each range between the speed by seconds.

By example the 120 bit space have 664613997892457936451903530140172287 total keys. Just divide that amount between you current speed the result are the seconds tha you will take, divide that bewteen 31536000 to get the numbers of years.

Is not based in my program or anything is just math.

Please if im wrong tellme, im open mind.

My program just reach some 1 to 8 petekeys/s in highend server and that is no hype.

Best regards!

It does depend on the program and how you are calculating the speed/s

Kangaroo versus a brute force with same amount of speed in key/s; it's not even close...Kangaroo would be finished smoking a victory cigar, started a family, grew old, and died long before brute force finished finish line

[albert0bsd]

Yes that is rigth Kangaroo is the fastest one. I'm still learning the Pollard rho algorimth.

[nioctib.co]

I use my old GTX 960 and it literally solve 63 in less than a minute. If I want to use it to hunt 120, average 300 years. LoL. I guess if 64 with known public key and I use GTX 3060, I guess it can be solve in less than 15 seconds. That's also reason why if by chance you found 64, someone recommend to pay higher on transaction fees or otherwise once known public key, I believe those bot will attack in less than a minute.

Look at it this way, 50% of brute force on #64 = 2^63 operations while #120 only requires 2^60 operations with kangaroo.
If people aren't pooling resources for either brute or kangaroo or bsgs, then it will be a long wait unless you have Zielar's equipment then #120 is doable within 2 months +/-

There is a pool for #64 and I have tried to get people to pool resources with bsgs and kangaroo but I guess everyone thinks they can solve on their own.

And I believe you are correct, whoever finds #64 must pay high trans fee to get in into a block before someone else attacks it with kangaroo.

There is a pool already running. I think someone did the math for 64 and still 1 out of 800,000 to find the key  after breaking the shares if I am not wrong. The pool is running less than 20 people, not sure about it. I don't think it's plausible to find 64 alone, unless someone is really lucky hitting a jackpot by using random. I have my own rig for Ethereum but far from enough to run Kangaroo. Even if I have enough to go for it, I prefer to choose safer path continue mining Ethereum because if you do the math, it has no difference putting 2 months for 120 and it's not a guarantee you will hit the jackpot. Just doing some fun things on puzzle, who knows I might be the lucky to hit jackpot since my old GPU can't mine anymore.

Just for your reference. Let's say you have 256 RTX 3080 with current price, you are going to get about USD 7.50 nett daily on each.

1 RTX 3080 = USD 7.50 nett daily
256 RTX 3080 = USD 1,920 nett daily
USD 1,920 x 60 = USD 115,200 2 months

The award not even near even if you just need 128 RTX 3080