PrimeNumber7 is an alt of Quickseller, Take 2

[Quickseller]

Further there is no basis for saying anything I have recently done in years is "continued deceitful methods".

I would say accusing a signature campaign manager of theft with one account while sneaking into one of his campaigns with another is pretty deceitful.

What do you call it?

I mean really, who in their right mind does that kind of thing? People who care about money more than anything else in the world, I suppose.

I would suggest that you look up the definition of the word “deceitful” and come back. Or at the least, wait to be told what to say.

[1714600934]

1714600934

[1714600934]

1714600934

[nutildah]

I would say accusing a signature campaign manager of theft with one account while sneaking into one of his campaigns with another is pretty deceitful.

I would suggest that you look up the definition of the word “deceitful” and come back.

OK, so I did just that.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/deceitful

Definition of deceitful
: having a tendency or disposition to deceive or give false impressions:
a: not honest
// a deceitful child
// left her deceitful husband
b: DECEPTIVE, MISLEADING
// deceitful advertising

The behavior described above fits this definition perfectly.

[marlboroza]

Love how the accusers are all of a sudden pretending to be the voices of reason so they can project their own behavior on to everyone calling them out. This is of course as they have their proxies attack via trust ratings and spamming false accusations in other threads. How long is everyone going to put up with this kind of behavior?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=156113

And who that "well known member" will be?

@TECHARE all your other "opinions" are very well documented here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5214377.msg53534115#msg53534115.

Since the mods seem to think this post is on topic for some reason...

What does this rating have to do with the mobbing behavior regarding Quickseller? Am I creating several threads looking for Koshgel's alts and casting more accusations like is being done here? Do I have a years long vendetta with Koshgel, like the one that is being demonstrated here? Also, several of your pals tagged Koshgel before I even tagged him. These two things are no where near comparable. This is just more "NO U!" tactics designed to distract from criticisms of your friends you don't want to be too carefully considered.

Well, "likely alt of well known member" happened in 2019 and "probably alt of quickseller" happened in 2015:


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=557356

"not saying that you are mobbing quickseller since 2015. or anyone else here", just help me to understand, newtons1 registered account on 25. September 2015. and wrote 27 posts till 27. September 2015., which is the time you "accused" them of being Quickseller's alt account. Sorry, "probably" QS's account.

Based on what have you made those 2 connections?

There have been multiple examples in the past in which negative trust was removed after no-collateral loans have been repaid, and when stolen money has been returned to it's rightful owner. Often times a neutral rating replaces such negative rating, however this is nowhere nearly as detrimental as a negative rating.

I don't understand the logic that someone who has caused no monitory loss should be labeled a scammer when someone who took money and later returned it late is not.

- "monitory"

This sounds like a sure fire way to corrupt the merit sources and change merit from being a reward for making posts the forum needs more of to something with monitory value.  

Until this happens, it is most likely that deposits and withdrawals will not be processed due to the high risk of monitory loss.

 

[TECSHARE]

~

Let me know if you find anything good while you are digging through my shit looking for peanuts. I look forward to your future attempts at false equivalence, and whatever else you can come up with to "get me" in retribution for being critical of your friends.

[suchmoon]

At least we finally figured out who's the real Jedi here, hunting Quickseller's alts since 2015.

[TwitchySeal]

Nevermind. I shouldn't have said that.

[marlboroza]

~

Let me know if you find anything good while you are digging through my shit looking for peanuts. I look forward to your future attempts at false equivalence, and whatever else you can come up with to "get me" in retribution for being critical of your friends.

Lol, aren't you one narcissistic prick? I didn't even found this on your trust page!

It still doesn't address my question, how did you connect accounts? First I thought it was because of that "keyword", but I couldn't find where quickseller used it before that date, so it has to be something else.

[Vod]

Let me know if you find anything good while you are digging through my shit looking for peanuts. I look forward to your future attempts at false equivalence, and whatever else you can come up with to "get me" in retribution for being critical of your friends.

Let me know when you finish your udemy course on Psychiatry.  Then maybe you can provide this community an excuse for almost a decade of trust abuse, including the Administrator concluding you have no place where your trust abuse shows by default.

[TECSHARE]

Let me know if you find anything good while you are digging through my shit looking for peanuts. I look forward to your future attempts at false equivalence, and whatever else you can come up with to "get me" in retribution for being critical of your friends.

Let me know when you finish your udemy course on Psychiatry.  Then maybe you can provide this community an excuse for almost a decade of trust abuse, including the Administrator concluding you have no place where your trust abuse shows by default.

Seek therapy.

[LoyceV]

Nevermind. I shouldn't have said that.

Was that a joke meant for me? Well played!

[TwitchySeal]

Nevermind. I shouldn't have said that.

Was that a joke meant for me? Well played!

Figured I'd get a few people in a thread like this 

[marlboroza]

This is just funny, Mr. Fakecoin Isnotscam tried to teach me how to use trust system and previously tried to produce some sort of humor:

Astargath---didn't you know? if you are critical of the trust system, you must be a "sock puppet" and "alt" of someone else. this is very basic forum policy. are you sure you aren't new here?

Seems that "you must be a sock puppet humor" turned out to be "you are sock puppet":



So basically, whatever they said in this thread (and they made some laud posts about whole PN7 - QS), I just can't agree with. <-- edited and rephrased


Anyway, PM7 said something:

It might be a good idea to revise the later action to instead generate a report on the thread if any post on the thread has received any merit, so it can be manually reviewed to see if removing the thread really is appropriate.

I have no idea why the OP was nuked.

Thread received 2 merits, 1 from timelord and one from...quickseller.

Yes, I saw that[...]

PM7 "saw" that quickseller merited that thread, and it is really stupid situation, I should now take this as "PM7 saw quickseller did something" and say "OK, you saw QS did something"  
Well, no, PM7 didn't really address accusation post from page number 3:

BTW, I always had an inkling you two were one and the same as you just start to see these things when you spend so much time on the board, but it was all but confirmed for me when I noticed both you and QS reporting posts with the exact same phrasing. The odds of that happening between two random people is very rare and obviously not something someone else can mimic.

I have found only this reply on page number 5:

I have reported many posts, without the expectation of any kind of recognition or reward (unlike some other people who brag about their report count),  and for no reason other than to make the forum better and cleaner. I however will no longer be reporting posts as this has been ‘rewarded’ with information from this activity being used in a witch hunt. I would recommend others do the same if the official stance on disclosing this information is too bad, we have the right to disclose it when we wish. I don’t think many other people would feel this kind of disclosure is appropriate.

Reply deflects question, so:

@PM7, please explain how you and quickseller used exactly the same words to report posts?

[suchmoon]

@PM7, please explain how you and quickseller used exactly the same words to report posts?

Maybe some excuses can be borrowed from here:


Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken image

[marlboroza]

@PM7, please explain how you and quickseller used exactly the same words to report posts?

Maybe some excuses can be borrowed from here:

FTFY

[TECSHARE]

So much for giving Quickseller a break. This is why you never bend the knee to tyrants. They never stop until you destroy them.

[figmentofmyass]

This is just funny, Mr. Fakecoin Isnotscam tried to teach me how to use trust system and previously tried to produce some sort of humor:

Astargath---didn't you know? if you are critical of the trust system, you must be a "sock puppet" and "alt" of someone else. this is very basic forum policy. are you sure you aren't new here?

Seems that "you must be a sock puppet humor" turned out to be "you are sock puppet":



So basically, whatever they said in this thread (and they made some laud posts about whole PN7 - QS), the truth is extremely likely opposite.

marlboroza, your intellectual dishonesty is overwhelming.

all i did was make an innocent joke about the reputation board's culture of accusing everyone else of being alts/sockpuppets. i made absolutely no claim as to whether Astargath was an alt account, and that is obvious from reading the actual posts.

so please explain: i told a joke in may 2018 making fun of the entire reputation board. how does yahoo62278 tagging Astargath in september 2019 as an alt account (with no proof/reference at that) prove anything about my judgment?

i told an innocent joke 2 years ago and you believe this justifies claiming that everything i say is "extremely likely opposite the truth"?

you're making yourself look incredibly petty and vindictive. i criticized you one fucking time (which you obviously felt the need to bring up here) and now you are digging up years old posts trying to discredit me? is this really how you spend your time? you must be very proud of yourself.

[TECSHARE]

Show me the man, I will find you the crime. That is the default trust way comrade.

[figmentofmyass]

Show me the man, I will find you the crime. That is the default trust way comrade.

it is so exhausting trying to fight against this sort of blatantly deceitful behavior. they can't disprove what you're saying today, so they attack your words from years ago, hoping to distract and confuse everyone in the process.

[TECSHARE]

Show me the man, I will find you the crime. That is the default trust way comrade.

it is so exhausting trying to fight against this sort of blatantly deceitful behavior. they can't disprove what you're saying today, so they attack your words from years ago, hoping to distract and confuse everyone in the process.

And that is exactly the point. They hope to acheive their goals via attrition rather than a logical argument. It also has a bonus side effect of putting a chill effect on anyone even bothering to try.

[marlboroza]

So much for giving Quickseller a break. This is why you never bend the knee to tyrants. They never stop until you destroy them.

So you are saying that primenumber7 and quickseller are alt accounts?

If you read my post again, you will see that my question is directed to PM7, not quickseller, but thanks for your criticism anyway  

this is the second time you are unearthing posts of mine (going back to 2015!) in a pathetic attempt to malign and discredit me.

Ok, I'll bite. I don't remember "unearthing posts of yours from 2015." if you can remind me and how is it related to this thread? I am sorry, I edited post, it was actually about that "monitory" if you can read post again. I am not sure how you exposing scammer can discredit you  Wth?

all i did was make an innocent joke about the reputation board's culture of accusing everyone else of being alts/sockpuppets. i made absolutely no claim as to whether Astargath was an alt account, and that is obvious from reading the actual posts.

I know you didn't, you tried to make fun of something, that's why I mentioned it.
Why are you two now trying to hide my question?