iongchun
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
March 20, 2014, 04:03:00 AM |
|
There are some quirks in the Italian translation (and some text which hasn't even been translated).
Where can I report them?
The translations in 0.9.0 release is not the latest on Transifex. I don't understand why the release team don't pull the latest into the release, especially some strings are just replaced/updated several weeks before the release. It annoys me as a translator because it happens several times, and I see half-baked translations in a release. It could be better that the release schedule includes a period to call for translations, so developers have a deadline to update strings to be localized, and translators have a deadline to finish their work.
|
Bitcoin: 1NFMpJUW7sTKmnVKj12MxhPvCvzAKQ5gUV Namecoin: N5Tnt3JyMeizsoAFAZDr7CSxjzDtPSisK8 Mining with P2Pool. Graph. Blocks.
|
|
|
Maged
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
|
|
March 20, 2014, 04:05:34 AM |
|
are there any no longer used data files at %appdata%/bitcoin that are safe to get rid off for the sake of extra disk space?
i think i'm seeing 2 blockchains in mine, one in folder 'blocks' that is current and an older chain at the root of %appdata%/bitcoin that stopped updating over a year ago, around 6 gigs. is it safe to dump it?
Yes, you can get rid of that one, but it's just a hard link to a file in the blocks folder, so deleting it doesn't actually free up any space.
|
|
|
|
|
Equate
|
|
March 20, 2014, 05:26:08 AM |
|
Thank you
|
|
|
|
whatcoinorg
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 1
|
|
March 20, 2014, 06:47:19 AM |
|
Thank you for your hard work.
|
|
|
|
r3wt
|
|
March 20, 2014, 07:03:14 AM |
|
give us back the address pages.
|
My negative trust rating is reflective of a personal vendetta by someone on default trust.
|
|
|
dewdeded
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1011
Monero Evangelist
|
|
March 20, 2014, 07:39:32 AM |
|
I pulled the git, installed "automake", now it complains checking for Berkeley DB C++ headers... no configure: error: libdb_cxx headers missing ..although I have "libdb-dev" installed. Any hints? Ente locate db_cxx.h then you have different options: a) fixing directories with symlinks, so configure finds it within the default dirs (/usr/lib and /usr/include) b) using ./configure flags or BASH settings to specifiy where libs are searched/found (e.g. something like ./configure BDB_LIBS=/usr/local/db48/lib BDB_CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/db48/include)
|
|
|
|
Vort
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 79
Merit: 0
|
|
March 20, 2014, 08:36:07 AM |
|
give us back the address pages.
This pages are hidden within File menu
|
|
|
|
Ente
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2126
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 20, 2014, 09:05:05 AM Last edit: March 20, 2014, 09:27:31 AM by Ente |
|
I pulled the git, installed "automake", now it complains checking for Berkeley DB C++ headers... no configure: error: libdb_cxx headers missing ..although I have "libdb-dev" installed. Any hints? Ente locate db_cxx.h then you have different options: a) fixing directories with symlinks, so configure finds it within the default dirs (/usr/lib and /usr/include) b) using ./configure flags or BASH settings to specifiy where libs are searched/found (e.g. something like ./configure BDB_LIBS=/usr/local/db48/lib BDB_CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/db48/include) Thanks pal. It turned out I need "libdb++-dev" instead of "libdb-dev". One step closer now, next roadblock: checking for Berkeley DB C++ headers... default configure: error: Found Berkeley DB other than 4.8, required for portable wallets (--with-incompatible-bdb to ignore)
There is only v5.1 available on Debian edit: recompiling with "--with-incompatible-bdb" Ente
|
|
|
|
dewdeded
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1011
Monero Evangelist
|
|
March 20, 2014, 09:45:03 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Ente
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2126
Merit: 1001
|
|
March 20, 2014, 10:13:50 AM |
|
Thanks again for your help. In the meantime I compiled with: aptitude install automake libdb++-dev libboost-dev aptitude install libboost-{system,filesystem,chrono,program-options,thread,test}-dev
./autogen.sh ./configure --with-incompatible-bdb make
Works on Debian. Take care that your wallet files may be incompatible to other bitcoin-core installations because of the different berkeley db version. Which is no issue for me. Ente
|
|
|
|
Gummo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
March 20, 2014, 10:56:46 AM |
|
I've installed 0.9 on ubuntu 13.10 (copied the files in the archive to /usr/bin)
It's working fine. Though I thought the transaction fee's were lowered to 0.00001 btc. It's the same 0.0001 as before. Did I do something wrong?
|
|
|
|
alexeft
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 20, 2014, 11:44:01 AM |
|
Hey guys, the linux version doesn't work on centos 6.5 x64. It requires newer version of glibc I compiled a static version of bitcoind, but still get the same message.
Message is: -------------------------------- ./bitcoind: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind) ./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind) ./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./bitcoind) ---------------------------------
Can this be fixed in anyway?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
r3wt
|
|
March 20, 2014, 11:44:31 AM |
|
give us back the address pages.
This pages are hidden within File menu ah thanks. i'm happy now. little confused by the request payment feature, but the improvements are nice to say the least.
|
My negative trust rating is reflective of a personal vendetta by someone on default trust.
|
|
|
wumpus
|
|
March 20, 2014, 11:55:01 AM |
|
Hey guys, the linux version doesn't work on centos 6.5 x64. It requires newer version of glibc I compiled a static version of bitcoind, but still get the same message.
Message is: -------------------------------- ./bitcoind: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind) ./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind) ./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./bitcoind) ---------------------------------
Can this be fixed in anyway?
Thanks!
This is a known issue. Can you try the static builds here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3914 ?
|
Bitcoin Core developer [PGP] Warning: For most, coin loss is a larger risk than coin theft. A disk can die any time. Regularly back up your wallet through File → Backup Wallet to an external storage or the (encrypted!) cloud. Use a separate offline wallet for storing larger amounts.
|
|
|
alexeft
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 854
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 20, 2014, 12:17:23 PM |
|
Hey guys, the linux version doesn't work on centos 6.5 x64. It requires newer version of glibc I compiled a static version of bitcoind, but still get the same message.
Message is: -------------------------------- ./bitcoind: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind) ./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./bitcoind) ./bitcoind: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./bitcoind) ---------------------------------
Can this be fixed in anyway?
Thanks!
This is a known issue. Can you try the static builds here https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/3914 ? It works! Thanks
|
|
|
|
rmines
|
|
March 20, 2014, 12:20:19 PM |
|
Successfully upgraded to 0.9.0 I like the new receive window and the lowered tx fees, good work devs!
|
|
|
|
davidpbrown
|
|
March 20, 2014, 12:32:48 PM |
|
what is the easiest way to upgrade bitcoin-qt on ubuntu to this version?
I'm on Mint but expect it's the same for you. I couldn't just double run the bitcoin-qt as I coudl with 0.8.6 but it runs when started from the command line. So, cd ~/bitcoin-0.9.0-linux/bin/32 and ./bitcoin-qt &
|
฿://12vxXHdmurFP3tpPk7bt6YrM3XPiftA82s
|
|
|
btcpay86
|
|
March 20, 2014, 01:50:57 PM |
|
It's nice.
|
1. Jeunesse, Redefining YOUTH. 婕斯,重新定义年轻。| 该生病而不生病,该老化却很年轻,正是婕斯“沛泉菁华”的奥秘所在。 为了大家实现财务自由的梦想,敬请关注婕斯全球直销网站: http://haccp.jeunesseglobal.com2. 捐赠 Donations: BTC - 12QSDXfUq6B2ywer8xJeQYbiV7A7E8yB3H
|
|
|
rallasnackbar
|
|
March 20, 2014, 01:57:32 PM |
|
Dont download this, the receive bitcoin address list is missing. And you have to start over.
|
|
|
|
|