Personally, I do not support this topic appearing here
Although there were a few issues surrounding the campaign he was launching, there were no significant losses
running a campaign without escrow is sometimes not the fault of the manager, it is also the personal opinion of the head of the project, the choice was made by the manager, he can take the risk and accept it, anyway, that campaign is okay.
This time, he was in a hurry, but objectively, the signature was not provided, so the participants did not need to change the signature and suffered no losses. Participants only take a moment to post the application, no problem at all.
This happened due to his inexperience, but not too bad to be called stupid
EDIT:
I wrote a post with longer time than yahoo and it seems like I'm repeating what he said LOL