Exclusion reason of Royse777

[eddie13]

If I see any retaliation here it is retaliatory exclusions by the mentioned trio and starting this thread...

[1714721762]

1714721762

[1714721762]

1714721762

[1714721762]

1714721762

[truth or dare]

If I see any retaliation here it is retaliatory exclusions by the mentioned trio and starting this thread...

Yes,  I clearly said this earlier. This thread is backfiring on the original postrr once you start to dig a little deeper.

Do people here really expect their words taken at face value. All claims, statements and assertions must be thoroughly scrutinized and analyzed to extract the possible fragments of truth they mutate into misleading traps.

Royce for admin position based on careful evalution of this drama.

[hacker1001101001]

There is literally no need to announce your exclusions unless the person who you excluded cares about it. I don't think Royse777 even mentioned about your exclusions anywhere around, yet you are trying to suggest users to exclude him by creating a whole fucking thread in reputation based on, nothing but an bold move of him to let know others that straight away tagging is not always good if the crime is not proven otherwise. I think that was the reason for his counter on Best Change.

If you want to play political mobbing games better take them to PMs. Good for your repo here @Coolcryptovator.

[erikalui]

The fact that Royse777 removed a controversial positive feedback is enough to say that the user is ready to correct their sent feedback and it doesn't mean that the user lacks knowledge of how the trust system works. Earlier we have seen many DTs doing mistakes while leaving negs and they worked on their ratings too and still are on DT1 so that's not a negative factor against them. Excluding someone from a trustlist too doesn't make them unworthy nor including someone (unless that person is a known scammer). Only thing that matters is their positive/negative ratings that are incorrect.

[AB de Royse777]

The fact that Royse777 removed a controversial positive feedback

It was just a counter feedback which are still practiced by a lot of users in here despite in some of the users opinion is that counter feedback does not weight any value. Now opinions aren't meant to be the same.

If I see any retaliation here it is retaliatory exclusions by the mentioned trio and starting this thread...

Visual is always better if there is option.


I will keep Yoshie aside though but noticed Coolcryptovator and his pal TalkStar. Coincidentally both of them noticed it in the same evening/night.

fact will not change based on our beliefs.

And what facts we are talking about here Mr. Smarty pant?

This must be the fact you were talking about Mr. cool playing guy? /reputation sucker
And what about these topics:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5225907.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5226189.0
You do not see anything wrong that comes from your masters?
I don't see you to talk about it. (Oh Yeah, you did not notice these topics.)

Let me give you two friendly advise:
Learn to have your own voice.
Be fearless¹.

¹. Don't tell me that you were fearlessly hunting scammers in the past. You had nothing to lose in the past but to find a niche to gain reputation and earn merits to rank up.

[The Cryptovator]

I can play game all the day if you insist me. But please don't. I am happy to hangout with a small community I like, just around the corner of the forum.

Due to that point I have been ignoring you replies, don't have enough time to reply same questions again and again. All the answers are on the main post.

You born not very long ago when all those merit suckers and trust suckers has started hanging around in the meta and reputation board with some useless merit begging threads and activities to get attention of the other forum members to have personal gains. Now see why I distrusted you and your pal?

So according to you everyone around reputation and meta are just hunting merits then you should exclude all of them. As per your logic who joined on this forum after you they are not contributing anything, they are just hunting merits.

I don't see you to talk about it. (Oh Yeah, you did not notice these topics.)
 

Who are you to ask me? I will reply wherever and whenever necessary.

¹. Don't tell me that you were fearlessly hunting scammers in the past. You had nothing to lose in the past but to find a niche to gain reputation and earn merits to rank up.

Please don't insult all the scam hunters just because of me. Scam hunters just not hunting scams for merits or reputation. Because there is some scam hunters still hunting scams (including me), even they have earned more than 1000 merits. Its enough for Legendary ranks, also they have gained enough reputation. So why they are still hunting?

You are excluding multiple scam hunters means you indirectly support that scammers to whom we left negative feedback since you are on DT1.


I noticed you multiple time mention my pal, yes all scam busters are my pal. I won't mind it we have communication each others even out of forum. I like them and always try to support and I will support them.

And please stay on topics, seems you are going out of topic.

[AB de Royse777]

Due to that point I have been ignoring you replies, don't have enough time to reply same questions again and again.

Thought so, very easy excuse. Yeah?

All the answers are on the main post.

Your answers were not clear that is why we are in 2nd page so far Mr. Smarty panty.

So according to you everyone around reputation and meta are just hunting merits then you should exclude all of them.  

Let's play political. Am I obliged to give you an explanation?

But since I am not playing obliged game here unlike you:
Those I believe falls in your category are already in my trust list, don't you see your pal there?

As per your logic who joined on this forum after you they are not contributing anything, they are just hunting merits.

Why are you thinking I am talking about everyone?

I don't see you to talk about it. (Oh Yeah, you did not notice these topics.)
 

Who are you to ask me? I will reply wherever and whenever necessary.

In this particular case (quoted) I do not see any question I was asking but you are asking me. I see you need to seek help from Google again and this time to understand punctuation.  

You have a chance to prove your statements, ignoring is not going to bring much weight for you:

1. Royse777 doesn't have enough knowledge about trust system

Can you find a feedback left by me which does look very inappropriate please?
Can you find a user who I have distrusted or trusted does look very inappropriate please?

update

¹. Don't tell me that you were fearlessly hunting scammers in the past. You had nothing to lose in the past but to find a niche to gain reputation and earn merits to rank up.

Please don't insult all the scam hunters just because of me. Scam hunters just not hunting scams for merits or reputation. Because there is some scam hunters still hunting scams (including me), even they have earned more than 1000 merits. Its enough for Legendary ranks, also they have gained enough reputation. So why they are still hunting?

Excuse me, where am I talking about all? Are you in drug?

You are excluding multiple scam hunters  

What am I missing here? Is there categories of users like cock suckers, tampon suckers and so on!
And you tell me who to include and who to exclude?

means you indirectly support that scammers to whom we left negative feedback since you are on DT1.

Is this a political meaning that you came up with?

I noticed you multiple time mention my pal, yes all scam busters are my pal. I won't mind it we have communication each others even out of forum.

Again you have this all fever here.
You, smarty pant, cool playing guy (don't get fool by thinking that I am complimenting you) =/= All
Yeah, could be: You == your pal TalkStar

I like them and always try to support and I will support them.

So you are saying you became a master now? This sound all other users who are genuinely hunting for scams are your pupils. LOL

And please stay on topics, seems you are going out of topic.

Which part is off topic?

more update
Your master here just done something.
If leaving a counter feedback and removing it later makes all these drama from you against me then what about this?
Oh yeah! You are not obliged. /reputation sucker

[lovesmayfamilis]

I read this drama for several days. I don’t understand why it was so much noise. Every day, someone trusts and someone ceases to trust. On my list, there are weekly pros and cons, but few people come to the reputation with the proceedings.
Coolcryptovator, if you didn’t like something on the Royse777 trust list, you can do the same. Just put him a tilde and not wage war with even more people against him. I think you understand what I'm writing.
I respect the opinions of many people who are on my trust list. But if I see that people will cease to trust me, I will not involve the community in this matter.
Maybe I offended someone, but believe me, I will always prefer a bad peace than a big war.
Do not interact with each other anymore. The forum is great, and there are always people here who can understand and support everyone.

[AB de Royse777]

Do not interact with each other anymore. The forum is great, and there are always people here who can understand and support everyone.

A simple PM would not create all these drama.

But when someone starts pointing to you and starts accusing you for something you never thought of then you just do not stay silent. I am still trying to understand the beef here against me. Are all these just because I excluded smarty pant and his pal?

Please anyone help me to understand.

Cheers,

Edit:
And have you guys noticed the timing of creating this topic? Not long after I created this topic: daddy issue or schooling?
Coincident or planed?
After all it was against his master.

[YOSHIE]

I will keep Yoshie aside though but noticed Coolcryptovator and his pal TalkStar.

So you want to get rid of me.... that's a written threat to me.

You need to know, I have a permanent job (outside this forum), working in government.
I do not work in your house, as your slave, you want me to obey everything you say and suck your saliva, <<<no it's disgusting>>>.

You know this forum......don't need to explain if you know....save your stupidity you don't need to be published in this forum.

You talk too arrogant and too stupid in your arrogance, repeating the same words every day, boring.

I judge you too close to your own destruction from your emptiness.
Do not be like a child who whines for ASI, a little adult, we deal with adults.

Do I need a passport to meet you in person, then (we) talk about "get rid of.
Sorry @Coolcryptovator is a bit off topic, he's fishing.

[AB de Royse777]

I will keep Yoshie aside though but noticed Coolcryptovator and his pal TalkStar.

So you want to get rid of me....

You need to know, I have a permanent job (outside this forum), working in government.
I do not work in your house, as your slave, you want me to obey everything you say and suck your saliva, <<<no it's disgusting>>>.

You know this forum......don't need to explain if you know....save your stupidity you don't need to be published in this forum.

You talk too arrogant and too stupid in your arrogance, repeating the same words every day, boring.

I judge you too close to your own destruction from your emptiness.
Do not be like a child who whines for ASI, a little adult, we deal with adults.

Do I need a passport to meet you in person, then (we) talk about "get rid of.

Huh!
Am I reading you are working in government and you will come to me with your passport to meet in person and will show me something?
Is this a written threat to take me to the court when come to meet me in person? Or you will come to me to attack me physically?

All those about me in the quote were really unnecessary because  "I will keep Yoshie aside" does not mean getting rid of you. It meant that I am dealing with the Smarty pant and his pal TalkStar.

Hit the ignore button if you think I am boring, have arrogance and repetitive. So far I have nothing to learn from you I guess. How old are you anyway?

I do not work in your house, as your slave, you want me to obey everything you say and suck your saliva, <<<no it's disgusting>>>.

This sounds really disgusting. Please quote the posts where I asked you to obey my saying and suck my saliva? And why would I give a JakeShit about your work?

update

Sorry @Coolcryptovator is a bit off topic, he's fishing.

I see you are having hard time seeing Mr. Smarty panty is getting roasted here. His pal TalkStar left the ground though.

[YOSHIE]

Is this a written threat to take me to the court when come to meet me in person? Or you will come to me to attack me physically?

I have never threatened anyone in the real world and here.
Life is not complicated, life is easy if you know how.

I should actually ask you: "get rid of Yoshie" what is the threat to me.

My education has never brought something to court "if something is wrong or threatening we will solve it on the spot". That's our work system.

Personal: if you want it.

I don't like physical ... no need to explain.

Hit the ignore button if you think I am boring,

I'm also the most lazy of dealing with women.

How old are you anyway?

my age is enough to make you unconscious,ladies' room

[AB de Royse777]

Is this a written threat to take me to the court when come to meet me in person? Or you will come to me to attack me physically?

I have never threatened anyone in the real world and here.
Life is not complicated, life is easy if you know how.

I should actually ask you: "get rid of Yoshie" what is the threat to me.

My education has never brought something to court "if something is wrong or threatening we will solve it on the spot". That's our work system.

Personal: if you want it.

I don't like physical ... no need to explain.

Hit the ignore button if you think I am boring,

I'm also the most lazy of dealing with women.

How old are you anyway?

my age is enough to make you unconscious.

Quoted for reference.

8. No threats to inflict bodily harm, death threats.

[The Cryptovator]

I read this drama for several days. I don’t understand why it was so much noise. Every day, someone trusts and someone ceases to trust. On my list, there are weekly pros and cons, but few people come to the reputation with the proceedings.
Coolcryptovator, if you didn’t like something on the Royse777 trust list, you can do the same. Just put him a tilde and not wage war with even more people against him. I think you understand what I'm writing.
I respect the opinions of many people who are on my trust list. But if I see that people will cease to trust me, I will not involve the community in this matter.
Maybe I offended someone, but believe me, I will always prefer a bad peace than a big war.
Do not interact with each other anymore. The forum is great, and there are always people here who can understand and support everyone.

Thanks for your honest reply. Appreciated.

I think its enough whatever discussed here.

I am going to lock threads to avoid further arguments.