Not all projects are bad

[Reatim]

If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations

being a developer you must be ready in all instance to not bringing your investors down,the problem is those you called Developer just running a project easily without being that ready and obviously just to gain and from investors and gone away.admit it or not this is what really happens nowadays and even in past.there are too many ICO/IEO that only seek profit and don't really care about their project in future.and another thing is most of them are just creating project that has been in the circulation for long no new ideas and not really a new project afterall.

[mbakruroh]

they might not just meet their expectations

This is why many project fails, they expect too much and never calculate with the risk. Have realistic target and back up plan are really important, from there developer have guide how to face market in different situation. Running slowly but survive is better than scam, I agree project should survive to get position in market. Prepare for the worst, that's the key.

[Fesatmas]

there are too many ICO/IEO that only seek profit and don't really care about their project in future.and another thing is most of them are just creating project that has been in the circulation for long no new ideas and not really a new project afterall.

Yeah, now many projects have sprung up just for oneself, not thinking about future projects, even with successful sales they are not growing anymore and developers are taking off investors' money because they only think about profits.

There are many new ideas in the project, but all this is just nonsense.

[leea-1334]

This is the fact that not all projects are bad so in every project we must rely check if it's good before investing. Yes Ico did not last and many users become a victim of this kind of project because it turns out failed. So it is really important to assess first a project before we invest.

ICO was never meant to last, and I think most people who used their sense told them this, but most of us even though sensible decided to go in (myself included) and we got burned. But let us remember that it was not just all this ICO business but the general greed that did it. They can have different names now but they are all ending up the same!

[sulendra12]

This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations

That is what I thought of Exscudo, it's been 3 years since they finished their ICO at that time. But until know they are still under development on their exchange, even though the ICO was a huge success AFAIK. I mean, it's not bad but I think that they are just postponing the exchange with slower update but I don't know since I am not a developer yet.

[NewRanger]

This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations

That is what I thought of Exscudo, it's been 3 years since they finished their ICO at that time. But until know they are still under development on their exchange, even though the ICO was a huge success AFAIK. I mean, it's not bad but I think that they are just postponing the exchange with slower update but I don't know since I am not a developer yet.

this is the legend project that unfinished till now on but still have an update about their developtment. many people have big hope to exscudo but unfortunately the fact very different. we know its not easy to developt exchanges, but another developers could do the same thing why they dont.

[vin1103]

its depends what your mean about bad in this case, im agre not all projects are bad, maybe the idea of that project is great but the team is make this wrong to inform, sometimes we got great team but not enough good for idea project.

[Ailmand]

If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations

Investors define a good project as a project that brings them profit. Face the truth that none of these investors invested in a project due to technical aspect, everyone is after profit. There are a lot of good projects out there but due to limited budget were not able to survive the market.

[michellee]

I agree that not all projects are bad, but the problem is many of them don't continue the project and abandon the project without any attention to come back rerunning the project. We can see there are many examples that we already saw so far, and that makes many people sad about promoting the project. We don't know the real reason why they cannot continue the project because many of them only say that they don't get any investors to supports their projects, so they decide to delay their project temporarily.

[DabsPoorVersion]

not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations

I don't think so,

They failed because their project is not good enough to find enough investors and it is not their time yet. It only means that the project is bad because they can't attract or they don't do their research to find a suitable product for their target market or the target consumer.

[ArIMy11]

If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations

Conducting a project requires a lot of effort, and so much dedication to be able to make others see that it is a good and profitable project and to attract investors. In working with a project, of course you want to work with people you trust so you can assure yourself that your team is really working for the project.

[kaneki007]

I know it's not easy to be a project developer because everything takes a long time for them to achieve their goals, maybe dev or team should provide information about their project process to the point where investors or bounty hunters know if the development process is not short. Also, I don't like a project to give false hope to the community so they don't keep asking about it.

[strunberg]

I know it's not easy to be a project developer because everything takes a long time for them to achieve their goals, maybe dev or team should provide information about their project process to the point where investors or bounty hunters know if the development process is not short. Also, I don't like a project to give false hope to the community so they don't keep asking about it.

ofcourse its very difficult to build good projects. developers team must build best team which is have experience and good skill blockchain skill. mostly now dev team did not have solid team that able deliver good product that accepted by crypto community. transparency will be obligation to keep investors trust , monthly update must deliver to them  so they will understand the process.

[sana54210]

"Bad" project doesn't always reflect the code the project has, nor the team, nor whitepaper basically nothing they have done has to be considered bad. However, if you build a "good" project but didn't get any decent traction or didn't even get proper funding, that does make you a "bad" project for the investors since you are not going up neither.

You can build the best project in the history of crypto world but as long as you do not get funding or volume or basically spark interest amongst the community that will result with you labeled as bad. On contrary you can be as horrible as XRP which has a centralized printing of xrp any time the owners want and it is still a third ranked currency with that much crooked scams going on inside it.

[calandra78]

I know it's not easy to be a project developer because everything takes a long time for them to achieve their goals, maybe dev or team should provide information about their project process to the point where investors or bounty hunters know if the development process is not short. Also, I don't like a project to give false hope to the community so they don't keep asking about it.

ofcourse its very difficult to build good projects. developers team must build best team which is have experience and good skill blockchain skill. mostly now dev team did not have solid team that able deliver good product that accepted by crypto community. transparency will be obligation to keep investors trust , monthly update must deliver to them  so they will understand the process.

even with the best concepts now it's really difficult for new projects to get full support from investors. Not all projects are bad, but most of the projects die and cannot survive in the market after some time. if you are in 2018 then you will see several projects making success statements in sales with 100% achievement but after a while, they disappear. That makes the reason how investors no longer pay attention to new existing projects because in the market there are assets that are more promising to them with very little risk of losing money.

[TemTum]

Meetings with the Angullia government and premier of Angullia is showing how temtum is the leader in being the chosen cryptocurrency architecture for a country’s aim to deploy their own digital currency !

Why invest in companies that only have a white paper or an idea - pick one that has real contracts with the potential of millions of users 

https://twitter.com/wearetemtum/status/1235231478893727746

[witbla]

You are right and I share your views here. From my point of view, focus is going to change a bit. What do I mean? Investors are now a bit tired of similar and simple tokens. So as I understand, the switch will happen towards more technological and valuable solutions. And there are already some that are coming with entirely new opportunities even on traditional industries

[hwteeer]

You are right and I share your views here. From my point of view, focus is going to change a bit. What do I mean? Investors are now a bit tired of similar and simple tokens. So as I understand, the switch will happen towards more technological and valuable solutions. And there are already some that are coming with entirely new opportunities even on traditional industries

Sounds rational and I absolutely share your views here. But you know, I wouldn't say that I am aware of many solutions that are bringing some new standards onto the market and wouldn't even say that there are many I can call advanced. So if you have such, I would definitely be interested to hear

[witbla]

Sounds rational and I absolutely share your views here. But you know, I wouldn't say that I am aware of many solutions that are bringing some new standards onto the market and wouldn't even say that there are many I can call advanced. So if you have such, I would definitely be interested to hear

You mean advanced solutions I am following? I also cannot say that there are many advanced. But my latest discovery and one of the most interesting is Carnomaly, heard of it? In few words, Carnomaly will become the first company ever to offer a worldwide rebate for an automotive purchase. Both new and used vehicles will apply, as long as they are purchased from a verified legal dealer anywhere in the world. Upon completion of our consumer platform, Carnomaly will begin buying back tokens to replenish the rebates. And I also recommend you to have a closer look at their website to have a better understanding of the idea, cause it definitely sounds interesting

[hwteeer]

You mean advanced solutions I am following? I also cannot say that there are many advanced. But my latest discovery and one of the most interesting is Carnomaly, heard of it? In few words, Carnomaly will become the first company ever to offer a worldwide rebate for an automotive purchase. Both new and used vehicles will apply, as long as they are purchased from a verified legal dealer anywhere in the world. Upon completion of our consumer platform, Carnomaly will begin buying back tokens to replenish the rebates. And I also recommend you to have a closer look at their website to have a better understanding of the idea, cause it definitely sounds interesting

Hmm, agree with you, from your words sounds pretty attractive and interesting and sounds familiar. Probably I have heard of it. But will have a closer look and get back with own thoughts, thank you