Not all projects are bad

[gaston castano]

not all, but because of the many project failures that arise, leaving investors a little hesitant and this reduces the funds that will be allocated to new projects, to be honest, no matter how good the current project is it is difficult to obtain complete funds when collecting at the ICO / IEO.

[bussybuddy]

not all, but because of the many project failures that arise, leaving investors a little hesitant and this reduces the funds that will be allocated to new projects, to be honest, no matter how good the current project is it is difficult to obtain complete funds when collecting at the ICO / IEO.

Absolutely agree with you, I see a lot of good projects in the past but they still can't complete ICO / IEO because investors are scared of new projects. They lose a lot when investing in new projects so they ignore new projects at the moment. It has caused a lot of difficulties and made new prospective projects stop working because of lack of funding

[nutriagrigia]

Most people have a narrow perspective so it's easy to say it's a scam, it's a scam, especially the one I see most often is uneducated bounty hunters. Even though there was only a delay in the distribution of rewards, uneducated said it was a scams, even though the project showed good progress. Be patient and understand what we support well, everyone will want to immediately benefit, but that must also be based on knowledge and not in a hurry.

I used to think so too sometimes ago. I thought that everything was fine and this was just a small delay, but according to statistics, it turned out that 90 percent of projects that are starting to delay payment for bounty hunters turn out to be a scam. these are just statistics.

[alan2here]

Most people have a narrow perspective so it's easy to say it's a scam, it's a scam, especially the one I see most often is uneducated bounty hunters. Even though there was only a delay in the distribution of rewards, uneducated said it was a scams, even though the project showed good progress. Be patient and understand what we support well, everyone will want to immediately benefit, but that must also be based on knowledge and not in a hurry.

I used to think so too sometimes ago. I thought that everything was fine and this was just a small delay, but according to statistics, it turned out that 90 percent of projects that are starting to delay payment for bounty hunters turn out to be a scam. these are just statistics.

At this time, no bounty projects have paid for hunters and certainly with the current situation, any project is in trouble and there are not many investors during this time.

I have done a lot of different projects but there is only one project that helps me make money during this time. Most of this is a general situation and we need to work harder because covid-19 is making things worse.

[luckyflop]

Most people have a narrow perspective so it's easy to say it's a scam, it's a scam, especially the one I see most often is uneducated bounty hunters. Even though there was only a delay in the distribution of rewards, uneducated said it was a scams, even though the project showed good progress. Be patient and understand what we support well, everyone will want to immediately benefit, but that must also be based on knowledge and not in a hurry.

I used to think so too sometimes ago. I thought that everything was fine and this was just a small delay, but according to statistics, it turned out that 90 percent of projects that are starting to delay payment for bounty hunters turn out to be a scam. these are just statistics.

Agree with you on this issue, bounty distribution delay projects are scam projects. It's funny to hear that they are afraid that the bounty hunter will dump the token and will decide to lock the token within 6 months or 1 year, I don't understand why they can make ridiculous notices like so

[Chuky92]

If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations

I agree with you but to an extent. Yes it is not easy to be a developer as it comes with a lot of responsibilities and obligations, but yet there have been successful projects which contributed to this space, so the question is, what did the developers did differently? The answer is, they are after success which they went after till it's gotten. So any upcoming project struggling can take a leaf from the successful ones and meet up with what's expected of them especially when public sale was successful.

[Perfect35]

Most people have a narrow perspective so it's easy to say it's a scam, it's a scam, especially the one I see most often is uneducated bounty hunters. Even though there was only a delay in the distribution of rewards, uneducated said it was a scams, even though the project showed good progress. Be patient and understand what we support well, everyone will want to immediately benefit, but that must also be based on knowledge and not in a hurry.

I used to think so too sometimes ago. I thought that everything was fine and this was just a small delay, but according to statistics, it turned out that 90 percent of projects that are starting to delay payment for bounty hunters turn out to be a scam. these are just statistics.

Agree with you on this issue, bounty distribution delay projects are scam projects. It's funny to hear that they are afraid that the bounty hunter will dump the token and will decide to lock the token within 6 months or 1 year, I don't understand why they can make ridiculous notices like so

In my opinion, they should be see as scam if they are able to complete their sales, list on an exchange and at they decide not to pay, but for a project that fails, what does he want to pay, but a shitcoin with no iota of value.
Sometimes i see bounty hunter ask for payment, even when a project did not succeed. It is quite funny. If they eventually get paid, the token will be useless, because you are not sure if the developer will continue with it or not.

[LbtalkL]

You are right but we are on 2020 now and not 2017. Even legitimate projects fails because there are no investors, and they are very picky and cautious on which projects to invest. Some successful projects does not conduct ICO anymore, they just get a private firm to back them up and list to a reputable exchange an have an IEO.

[KimmyF]

If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations

Keep working ultimately failed, were used to it from 2018. This year something changed. All projects can never be failed if you have a good team and good partnership. For scam situation, funds rise never isn't easy with legitimate all information.

[crzy]

You are right but we are on 2020 now and not 2017. Even legitimate projects fails because there are no investors, and they are very picky and cautious on which projects to invest. Some successful projects does not conduct ICO anymore, they just get a private firm to back them up and list to a reputable exchange an have an IEO.

The year now is totally different and since last year most of the project failed once they get into the market. Many new projects are just a scam and very few who offers the real one and yet didn’t get enough investor. Private entities are the target now for some project, and that makes more successful compare to the ICO.

[DevilSlayer]

You are right but we are on 2020 now and not 2017. Even legitimate projects fails because there are no investors, and they are very picky and cautious on which projects to invest. Some successful projects does not conduct ICO anymore, they just get a private firm to back them up and list to a reputable exchange an have an IEO.

In this 2020 the projects are now different unlike the year 2017 where it is the  year where the success of the projects are on its peak. I do not participate in projects anymore like ieo and ico because it is too risky for me. It is better for me to trade than to make investment in shit projects that can make me to have losses. Be careful especially for thosw who want to put their money in todays projects.

[cahbagus555]

You are right but we are on 2020 now and not 2017. Even legitimate projects fails because there are no investors, and they are very picky and cautious on which projects to invest. Some successful projects does not conduct ICO anymore, they just get a private firm to back them up and list to a reputable exchange an have an IEO.

In this 2020 the projects are now different unlike the year 2017 where it is the  year where the success of the projects are on its peak. I do not participate in projects anymore like ieo and ico because it is too risky for me. It is better for me to trade than to make investment in shit projects that can make me to have losses. Be careful especially for thosw who want to put their money in todays projects.

Investing in new projects is indeed quite risky, apart from many scams and also unfavorable market conditions. The projects that in my opinion are worthy of investment are projects that undertake IEO in large exchangers because most of the projects have increased prices after the initial listing

[Japinat]

Investing in new projects is indeed quite risky, apart from many scams and also unfavorable market conditions. The projects that in my opinion are worthy of investment are projects that undertake IEO in large exchangers because most of the projects have increased prices after the initial listing

Unfortunately not all investors are given a chance to invest in big exchange, like for instance in Binance, so some of you might just wait until the price will dump and buy it cheap as eventually it will rise if it's indeed a great project.

Don't invest just because of the hype alone, try to evaluate the whole purpose of the project and especially the team behind the project.
Not because it's traded in big exchanges it would be successful, sometimes devs are just investing on big exchanges for the hype they'll get and just leave the project afterwards.

[ShowOff]

-snip-

ICO, IEO are two things we often hear when a project collects funds that will be used to develop the project and carry out project objectives. The condition of the sale of tokens or coins made by many teams from various projects has so far experienced a setback, this is closely related to market conditions and the direct impact of many projects that end in fraud. Investment is quite risky and of course many investors experience it.

Not all IEO or ICO are bad, there are still some of them that attract investors so they succeed. But it is difficult for the team to maintain price stability when the product is traded on the market, for this reason some investors may discourage investing in ICO or IEO and they may turn to trading and investing in well-known and reputable tokens or coins.

[TitanGEL]

We should change the term "not" into "most" because not all of current projects are bad but most of it is bad. Projects nowadays are too risky for me and that is why I keep ignoring it because I do not want anymore to invest my money into something that is too risky. I prefer to invest my money in gambling than to participate in projects in this current year because I have more control over my money.

[Emilyearl]

You know when the crypto community pressurises the developers, some will become frustrated and dump their projects. I believe every transparent project will get the support of the community provided there's a relationship between the team and the people and also developers should be proactive in the project development.

[BRODIN]

yes, from what you say it might be true that not all projects are bad and vice versa. but in most cases in the ICO project almost the entire ICO project is fraudulent. if there is a good project but fails for several reasons., now the important concern is how the developer works and is serious in developing the project.

[AliceWood21]

If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations

Go and take a look at ilcoin, not yet bull  but this means you can still buy at low with high possible roi.

[FrozenBit]

yes, from what you say it might be true that not all projects are bad and vice versa. but in most cases in the ICO project almost the entire ICO project is fraudulent. if there is a good project but fails for several reasons., now the important concern is how the developer works and is serious in developing the project.

I have never seen any good ICO project but failed. Most ICO projects are lies and scams, since 2018 until now I have not seen any successful ICOs. They ended the ICO with a huge amount of money from investors but they did not continue to develop the project. They ran away with all the money and left the investor with a useless project

[Polar91]

If you are a developer and you develop a new project and build a good team and after several months of promoting the project you don't met your expectations yet you never give up won't others say bad thing about the project and the teams? This is happening with few good projects in crypto space but many failed to understand, they want their half cake quickly e.g bounty hunters, to say the truth it's not easy to be a developer, not all projects that failed are bad, they might not just meet their expectations

Unofortunately in this field, we are output based. If the output didn't met in a given time frame regardless of the reason, it's already considered as failure or bad project. That's why some developers are reconstructing the purpose, vision, and marketing of their projecg thus they can atleast benefit the idea they come up from the previous one. However the danger in this thing is that it's more difficult to gain investor's trust. Getting rid of this determines your skills and intellegence.