Bounty Managers and Shit projects

[lobo13hf]

I have participated in so many projects and until now they have not been paid for ... almost the average project is now a scam ... ??  whether the bounty manager is wrong in doing research on the project that they take care of before they make a bounty ... I think before making a bounty, the bounty manager should ask for a guarantee or payment for their bounty first ...because the project is now mostly scam ... at the end of the hunter who will lose trust and be labeled negative trust ... this is a very bad thing for hunters ..

indeed they will pay the bounty campaign participants but you must know that the exchange value must be high because if you are distributed tokens but the exchange value is not high and do not get support from the developer will be disappointed because the results you get will be very little.

I think it is difficult to find a project that has a high value in the market, at the moment the average prize yields get a little unless you follow the payment in USD or Ehterium and BTC then the value has been determined, only to follow must meet the rules that I feel not everyone can

At least there are some projects that have already listed on the exchange site and that brings us more chance to get legit project. It's about how you can find the best one that gives you more guarantee based on the fundamental support to the price. To be listed on the exchange site can be considered as a fundamental support too.

[Baoanhbmt]

The burden was on the participant side thats why it is better to check properly any bounty campaigns that we want to promote. don't just join like it was no tomorrow we must responsible for our own actions.If we find the project is good to join, we won't waste our time by joining a good campaign.
There are a number of very good bounty campaign managers here  to study the project to the smallest detail before providing it to other forum participants to participate

[Python Master]

Since bounty managers receive payment in ETH or BTC or USDT, I think most of them will not care whether it is a real project or not.
Doing research before joining a bounty campaign is necessary, it help us reduce the ratio of participating a shit project. When not all of bounty managers have good research skills, and free time to do that, we can't blame all bounty problems on bounty managers.

[criket]

Since bounty managers receive payment in ETH or BTC or USDT, I think most of them will not care whether it is a real project or not.
Doing research before joining a bounty campaign is necessary, it help us reduce the ratio of participating a shit project. When not all of bounty managers have good research skills, and free time to do that, we can't blame all bounty problems on bounty managers.

Last season was like that. even some bounty managers get a lot of projects. because they think the most important thing is getting money. but now I think everything is better. I'm sure some bounty managers are thinking about the projects they are going to handle.

[shinratensei_]

Since bounty managers receive payment in ETH or BTC or USDT, I think most of them will not care whether it is a real project or not.
Doing research before joining a bounty campaign is necessary, it help us reduce the ratio of participating a shit project. When not all of bounty managers have good research skills, and free time to do that, we can't blame all bounty problems on bounty managers.

Last season was like that. even some bounty managers get a lot of projects. because they think the most important thing is getting money. but now I think everything is better. I'm sure some bounty managers are thinking about the projects they are going to handle.

They were thinking if with the quantity of the project and they can get a lot of money while at the same increase their reputation. The project will matter a lot when it comes to the quality of the project and it's not about the quantity of the project. It looks like that more managers have been putting strict rules before thei can start to run a new campaign again.

[Davian144]

Since bounty managers receive payment in ETH or BTC or USDT, I think most of them will not care whether it is a real project or not.
Doing research before joining a bounty campaign is necessary, it help us reduce the ratio of participating a shit project. When not all of bounty managers have good research skills, and free time to do that, we can't blame all bounty problems on bounty managers.

Yes, but for managers who are already very trustworthy they will always take the time to do research on the projects that they will handle, because they also don't want their names to be polluted in the public because they hold bad projects, because if managers don't make research on projects, then that's a very reckless name in making decisions.

Last season was like that. even some bounty managers get a lot of projects. because they think the most important thing is getting money. but now I think everything is better. I'm sure some bounty managers are thinking about the projects they are going to handle.

True, we can see that managers who have been holding the project for a very long time, are different from the new manager who is sometimes deceived by the project, so that it can affect the reputation of his own trust.

[awik p]

Since bounty managers receive payment in ETH or BTC or USDT, I think most of them will not care whether it is a real project or not.
Doing research before joining a bounty campaign is necessary, it help us reduce the ratio of participating a shit project. When not all of bounty managers have good research skills, and free time to do that, we can't blame all bounty problems on bounty managers.

Last season was like that. even some bounty managers get a lot of projects. because they think the most important thing is getting money. but now I think everything is better. I'm sure some bounty managers are thinking about the projects they are going to handle.

They were thinking if with the quantity of the project and they can get a lot of money while at the same increase their reputation. The project will matter a lot when it comes to the quality of the project and it's not about the quantity of the project. It looks like that more managers have been putting strict rules before thei can start to run a new campaign again.

the managers are also careful in choosing projects, so that their good name will be maintained, and there are always many interested people. therefore it is natural that the rules set are more specific, so that bounty hunters also work seriously, to jointly develop projects

[Ifra24]

It's no more news that many of us would have had some horrible experiences participating in some resources wasting projects. However, my opinion is that, do bounty managers just accept hook line and sinker to manage bounty campaigns for any project without taking some time to look at the prospects of such project?  

There are some managers like you said and many also very detailed. I participate the bounty in 2017 until now. There are several projects that I have participated and many succeeded and some have failed. And a manager becomes his name as a bet for the project he manages. For that every good manager must analyze clearly about the project.

[amonymous]

Actually some unprofessional bounty manager still here although there no have good enough knowledge for searching real project. There are just promoting a project for making money, so we need avoid those manager who managed scam bounty.

[fortunecrypto]

I think it is difficult to find a project that has a high value in the market, at the moment the average prize yields get a little unless you follow the payment in USD or Ehterium and BTC then the value has been determined, only to follow must meet the rules that I feel not everyone can

Even projects that you think has a good potential in the market, is not showing their potentials, investors would have to wait and also bounty hunters for the market to get better, but this is still the right time to acquire coins than dump it, I don't see things getting worse, we can get to where we use to be, we just have to believe.

[bussybuddy]

Actually some unprofessional bounty manager still here although there no have good enough knowledge for searching real project. There are just promoting a project for making money, so we need avoid those manager who managed scam bounty.

I see a lot of new bonus managers coming up recently. But most of them are new and low ranking members in this forum, they have managed a few new projects but it seems that they are shit and scam projects. These managers are also fraudsters because they use multiple accounts to bounty fraud they manage.

[jahepahit]

when I read your article about a bounty manager who didn't care about the success of the project, it made sense. but the question is, can a bounty manager know about the project he manages to have a real product ?? . whereas, as far as I know, the bounty manager only sees the concepts provided by the project owner. and we all know that if possible the concepts they write down result from other project concepts

[FLHippy]

When I look backward, 9 from 10 bounty campaigns didn´t bring me profit even I did a deep research, it is due to bad situation in the market. In 2017 every bounty campaign was profitable due to big ICO hype, so keep working, profit will come in the future.

[Gayong88]

This abaout concerns saleries will pay to a manager who will assist a project. As long as it is appropriate, all task managers do it and reporting to the supervisor. Related to the proper punishment for the manager, if I'm not mistaken, maybe team DT really understands the mechanism.

[Avirunes]

To wrap it up, a bounty manager once told me when I called his attention to some unrealistic plans of the project he was managing, he said he is not concerned about the success of the project, once he gets his weekly payment from the team. I want to know if there are some levels of punishment for bounty managers that manage unworthy projects apart from negative trust?

That would be someone incompetent and new in business. There are lot of competent managers around who are experienced and capable of properly handling the bounty campaigns. They also carefully research project before taking the job. It doesn't matters how much they pay , they will always choose projects which have potential and good team behind it.

There aren't any but some members give feedbacks if a manager continues to promote such shitty projects which indicates they are just money minded.

[Coin BTC]

It's no more news that many of us would have had some horrible experiences participating in some resources wasting projects. However, my opinion is that, do bounty managers just accept hook line and sinker to manage bounty campaigns for any project without taking some time to look at the prospects of such project?  

I think there should be some experienced members of this forum apart from moderators (because moderators' works might be too enormous) that should be in charge of reviewing projects before bounty managers are allowed to create bounty and/or announcement threads for such projects.  If this can be done effectively, I think the advent of these unworthy projects can be mitigated.

To wrap it up, a bounty manager once told me when I called his attention to some unrealistic plans of the project he was managing, he said he is not concerned about the success of the project, once he gets his weekly payment from the team. I want to know if there are some levels of punishment for bounty managers that manage unworthy projects apart from negative trust?

There is no real punishment here. This is a virtual world forum. Redtrust is one of the most severe punishments and blows for bounty managers. With Redtrust people can see their reputation, and rarely will anyone who participates in the campaign he manages.  In addition, forums can prohibit members from participating with Redtrust managers.

[RabbiTANK]

Giving a bad bounty manager a red trust or more is the best punishment I can think of but some bounty managers are just a victim even if they do deep research, presently bounty detective seem like the only BM that wants to reshape bounty campaigns since they now guarantee payments

[WalkerIVIV]

Actually some unprofessional bounty manager still here although there no have good enough knowledge for searching real project. There are just promoting a project for making money, so we need avoid those manager who managed scam bounty.

It looks like the bounty section has already dominated by the trusted managers. I know that there were always be the chances even for trusted managers to get the scam project but i do agree if we must only follow the managers that have a good reputation but we shall try to do our own research.

[naikturun]

not all managers do such a thing, some see or review the project first before accepting the project and many refuse if he thinks the project is unfit to be promoted, come on don't equate all managers unilaterally.

[Vishnu.Reang]

not all managers do such a thing, some see or review the project first before accepting the project and many refuse if he thinks the project is unfit to be promoted, come on don't equate all managers unilaterally.

Nowadays you can even find campaign which are being managed by users of full-member or Sr. Member rank. Obviously many of these people don't care about their reputation and they may engage in scams. There are two factors in play here. First of all, bounty campaign management is a very risky job. There is a real risk of getting a red trust, which can make your account useless, even if you do everything honestly. And secondly, bounty campaign managers become the scapegoats very often, as a result of scams done by the project team.