University Study Finds Fire Did Not Cause Building 7's Collapse on 9/11

[Spendulus]

The university model talked about in the OP, is a peer reviewed study that shows that fire didn't bring Building 7 down.

the university done 2 models
one where the whole building tumbled over like a tree.. (never gonna happen even in natural disaster) and THEY said thats what happened in non explosive situation... but that has been disproven by science and architects.. and even by badecker himself by saying building suppose to be built to withstand certain things.

the other model was just a fall flat model. but it was not a model that resembled the actual fall of the building seven..
and THEY said this model was(facepalm) and then said it can only happen in a explosive used scenario.. again wrong

the models didnt accurately show actual events. and the summary of how the results of the models occured were not realistic either

.. sorry badecker. but try to actually do some research and compare info you find to actual events and other info available

WELL, WHAT ABOUT THOSE HUGELY MASSIVE BEAMS THAT GOT TOSSED 500 FEET LIKE NOTHING, HUH? THAT COULDN"T POSSIBLY HAPPEN WITHOUT EXPLOSIVE LEVELS OF EXPLOSIVELY EXPLOSIVE EXPLODERS.

 YOU KNOW I'M RIGHT BECAUSE, HUGHLY HUGE, AND EXPLOSIVELY EXPLOSIVE. BECAUSE, SHUT UP.

[1714977212]

1714977212

[1714977212]

1714977212

[1714977212]

1714977212

[BADecker]

The university model talked about in the OP, is a peer reviewed study that shows that fire didn't bring Building 7 down.

the university done 2 models
one where the whole building tumbled over like a tree.. (never gonna happen even in natural disaster) and THEY said thats what happened in non explosive situation... but that has been disproven by science and architects.. and even by badecker himself by saying building suppose to be built to withstand certain things.

the other model was just a fall flat model. but it was not a model that resembled the actual fall of the building seven..
and THEY said this model was(facepalm) and then said it can only happen in a explosive used scenario.. again wrong

the models didnt accurately show actual events. and the summary of how the results of the models occured were not realistic either

.. sorry badecker. but try to actually do some research and compare info you find to actual events and other info available

You are forgetting that the model showed that it wasn't fire that brought the building down. This means that we have fire out of the way as a cause.

So, what's left. Wind, bulldozers, and explosives. Oh yeah! Explosives.

[BADecker]

WELL, WHAT ABOUT THOSE HUGELY MASSIVE BEAMS THAT GOT TOSSED 500 FEET LIKE NOTHING, HUH? THAT COULDN"T POSSIBLY HAPPEN WITHOUT EXPLOSIVE LEVELS OF EXPLOSIVELY EXPLOSIVE EXPLODERS.

 YOU KNOW I'M RIGHT BECAUSE, HUGHLY HUGE, AND EXPLOSIVELY EXPLOSIVE. BECAUSE, SHUT UP.

You are so funny, lol. "So he huffed, and he puffed, and he puffed, and he huffed, and at last he blew the house down."

[franky1]

You are forgetting that the model showed that it wasn't fire that brought the building down. This means that we have fire out of the way as a cause.

So, what's left. Wind, bulldozers, and explosives. Oh yeah! Explosives.

the models dont show anything. because the models did not even come close to what happened in reality

plus it was not fire.
it was physical debris hitting the building from the twin towers

if you think it was just fire.. then you have just made an error for yourself

thats like me slapping you in the head with a basball bat. u falling to the ground. i then say it must have been fire or a granade that caused you to collapse
now heres a video of your head tilting first due to delayed concussion.. and then you falling on ur ass.. but ignore that

instead heres is two computer models. one not showing the head not tilting first. and other u just falling sideways on your face

neither models suggest reality neither suggest truth. but are just meaningless distractions to keep a troll entertained

[BADecker]

You are forgetting that the model showed that it wasn't fire that brought the building down. This means that we have fire out of the way as a cause.

So, what's left. Wind, bulldozers, and explosives. Oh yeah! Explosives.

the models dont show anything. because the models did not even come close to what happened in reality

plus it was not fire.
it was physical debris hitting the building from the twin towers

if you think it was just fire.. then you have just made an error for yourself

thats like me slapping you in the head with a basball bat. u falling to the ground. i then say it must have been fire or a granade that caused you to collapse
now heres a video of your head tilding first and then u falling on ur ass.. but ignore that
instead heres is two computer models. one not showing the head tilting first. and other u just falling sideways on your face

neither models suggest reality neither suggest truth. but are just meaningless distractions to keep a troll entertained

Anybody who thinks that a little bit of physical debris can bring down a building like Building 7, so that it falls at nearly free-fall speeds, into its own footprint...
... and then advertises that he believes this, doesn't know anything about construction, common sense, or gravity...
... and is essentially a waste of time.

But if he gets into a position of authority, he could easily be dangerous.

[Spendulus]

...

So, what's left.

Everything except what paid Chinese and Iranian disinformation agents would want to assert was the cause. That rules out explosives and your inside jobbers.

[BADecker]

...

So, what's left.

Everything except what paid Chinese and Iranian disinformation agents would want to assert was the cause. That rules out explosives and your inside jobbers.

If there really was a pay-off, prove it. But if there really was, anybody who could pull off an inside job like 9/11 would easily cover their bases by paying off some jokers that could be accused of lying.

So, still an inside job.

[franky1]

so if i slapped u with a baseball bad. .. and hours later due to concussion u fell..
you would not link the cause to the baseball bat hit you took earlier?
instead you would say someone must have burned you?

well you would. thats your illogical theory

the fire seen on the east side of wtc7 was not the damaging factor. that was just fire
the debris hit on the south side was the damaging factor

when u see the video footage. you see the south side fall first and then the rest goes down in response

here
note the black gap down the middle where the debris hit the building and went down through many floors

[BADecker]

so if i slapped u with a baseball bad. .. and hours later due to concussion u fell..
you would not link the cause to the baseball bat hit you took earlier?
instead you would say someone must have burned you?

well you would. thats your illogical theory

the fire seen on the east side of wtc7 was not the damaging factor. that was just fire
the debris hit on the south side was the damaging factor

when u see the video footage. you see the south side fall first and then the rest goes down in response

That's the point. It WASN'T fire that brought B-7 down.

The video is inconclusive. You can use your imagination this way or that.

My though is that the whole inside of the building was collapsing from the demolition. We saw the corner collapse the way it did, because it was falling inward... part of the strategy for demolitioning it to fall into its own foot-print.

[Spendulus]

...

So, what's left.

Everything except what paid Chinese and Iranian disinformation agents would want to assert was the cause. That rules out explosives and your inside jobbers.

If there really was a pay-off, prove it

Says the guy who has blurted out a dozen miracle cures for coronovius while simultaneously claiming it doesn't exist.

[BADecker]

...

So, what's left.

Everything except what paid Chinese and Iranian disinformation agents would want to assert was the cause. That rules out explosives and your inside jobbers.

If there really was a pay-off, prove it

Says the guy who has blurted out a dozen miracle cures for coronovius while simultaneously claiming it doesn't exist.

Just reporting on what works. The idea that 9/11 wasn't an inside job doesn't work.

[Spendulus]

...

So, what's left.

Everything except what paid Chinese and Iranian disinformation agents would want to assert was the cause. That rules out explosives and your inside jobbers.

If there really was a pay-off, prove it

Says the guy who has blurted out a dozen miracle cures for coronovius while simultaneously claiming it doesn't exist.

Just reporting on what works. The idea that 9/11 wasn't an inside job doesn't work.

What doesn't work is your blurting that insane crap, and what also doesn't work is the miracle cures.

[BADecker]

...

So, what's left.

Everything except what paid Chinese and Iranian disinformation agents would want to assert was the cause. That rules out explosives and your inside jobbers.

If there really was a pay-off, prove it

Says the guy who has blurted out a dozen miracle cures for coronovius while simultaneously claiming it doesn't exist.

Just reporting on what works. The idea that 9/11 wasn't an inside job doesn't work.

What doesn't work is your blurting that insane crap, and what also doesn't work is the miracle cures.

Thank you. Since my blurting of insane crap doesn't work, like you said, my stuff is what really happened.



EDIT: I'm starting to feel a little sorry for you with all your pathetic responses.

[Spendulus]

....
the fire seen on the east side of wtc7 was not the damaging factor. that was just fire
the debris hit on the south side was the damaging factor

when u see the video footage. you see the south side fall first and then the rest goes down in response....

Wait, the wtc7 was OVER THREE HUNDRED FEET AWAY!!!! How could falling debris hit it?

Oh, I forgot. Those MASSIVE 22T BEAMS THAT FELL OVER 500 FEET AWAY!

But really heavy stuff from the towers coming down couldn't have been the cause of WTC7 being weakened even though really heavy stuff traveled twice as far, because SHUT UP.

[BADecker]

....
the fire seen on the east side of wtc7 was not the damaging factor. that was just fire
the debris hit on the south side was the damaging factor

when u see the video footage. you see the south side fall first and then the rest goes down in response....

Wait, the wtc7 was OVER THREE HUNDRED FEET AWAY!!!! How could falling debris hit it?

Oh, I forgot. Those MASSIVE 22T BEAMS THAT FELL OVER 500 FEET AWAY!

But really heavy stuff from the towers coming down couldn't have been the cause of WTC7 being weakened even though really heavy stuff traveled twice as far, because SHUT UP.

Right! Everyday happenings for thousands of years.
Buildings being hit by planes or debris from other falling buildings...
and falling down into their own footprint at almost free-fall speeds...
all neat and cozy-like...
happens all the time, right?

Oh wait. This never happened before. Why did it happen now?

Must be a hyper-spatial vortex in the area of the World Trade Center, and just to prove how good construction really is, it only happened to 3 of the major buildings in the area.

That must be it. A hyper-spacial vortex in New York! One with all the luck in the world so that it got 3 buildings, all within the same little period of time on the same day. Wish I had lottery-winning abilities like that. I'd be richer than a thousand Gate's combined.

[franky1]

im gonna give it 3 years before badecker flip flops his theories.
he will read all the scripts that been debunked years ago. but based on the delay. im giving badecker 3 years before he catches up

we tried to help him out a bit. but it seems he is re hashing old scripts yet doesnt realise how old they are. he thinks he is saying new stuff..
so not just an idiot or deluded but also ignorant

so last chance to speed badecker up with all the conspiracy theories based on the area you seem stuck at in the script
next ou will come across the buildings owner took out large insurance policy
then you will later come across all the actual science and studies where actual facts come out of what happened. where building 7 was not just a random office fire started for no apparent reason
nor was it explosives causing the fire or causing the whole collapse

but it was physical damage from debris hitting it. mixed in with fire that got to the exposed(due to debris damage) columns and expanded them due to heat. which further weakened the columns.

but i feel it will take you 3 years of jumping through all thee scripts your reading before you have the lightbulb moment

[BADecker]

Notice that franky1 is so steeped in "movie" views, that he can't even recognize what reality is any longer. For him, it will take a collapse of the whole money system of the world before he wakes up. Why might he wake up then? Because of the "pain" in literally having to plant a garden, or hunt with bow and arrow, just to provide himself with his daily food.

If his physical is anything like he shows through his posts that his mentality is, he very likely won't have the strength to farm or hunt, and will die along with the many masses.

[franky1]

badecker thinks everything is a movie

its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else

[Spendulus]

badecker thinks everything is a movie

its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else

Notice the attempts to misdirect the conversation from hard-to-argue-facts?

I said, "Wait, the wtc7 was OVER THREE HUNDRED FEET AWAY!!!! How could falling debris hit it?

Oh, I forgot. Those MASSIVE 22T BEAMS THAT FELL OVER 500 FEET AWAY!

But really heavy stuff from the towers coming down couldn't have been the cause of WTC7 being weakened even though really heavy stuff traveled twice as far, because SHUT UP."

[franky1]

badecker thinks everything is a movie

its like he is stuck watching the matrix, not realising there are other things in the world. but he just wants to watch the first matrix movie over an over and want to review the first movie.
having no clue about anything else

Notice the attempts to misdirect the conversation from hard-to-argue-facts?

yea. badecker doesnt understand anything beyond the scripts he has read. he comes back with the same old stuff repeated over and over. not an original thought of his own.