That is egregiously dishonest on ibminer’s part.
ibminer has displayed a pattern of not accepting the consequences of his actions and blaming others for his mistakes.
Thanks for reminding me of this. There is so much trash on this forum that sometimes, I am lamentably absentminded about sweeping some of it up. This is one of at least a score of threads that met that fate. Eh. If I don’t keep up with forum threads about large-scale frauds and major political upheavals, then you may understand that however bad ibminer is, he simply slipped to the bottom of my priorities.
I will forthwith tag ibminer for the baseless, scurrilous, abysmally dishonest defamation which he has made against me, and which he chose to worsen in this thread (
archive). This also reminded me to catch up on some other tagging previously promised... Tags take too long to make since theymos imposed a short and undocumented length limit; I prefer to craft a meaningful summary that fits within the feedback text, but I am falling back to low-effort tag text because it’s not worth my time.
Now, it seems that ibminer got himself into some other controversy. I have no time to review the evidence about a user who is beneath my attention, other than tying up loose ends here; thus, I cannot now express an opinion about that either way. I do request that this thread remain on-topic. Other accusations against ibminer are tangential, albeit probative insofar as they go to character; if there are other threads were these accusations are evidenced and discussed, I ask that you please link thereto.
Did you actually ask ibminer via polite 1-2 sentence PM to reconsider that post
Yes, everyone needs to kiss the ass of ibminer or suchmoon will use the lack of politeness as an excuse to defend his wrongdoing.
Damn straight. The forum
the world would be a better place if moral cowardice, groupthink, peer pressure, and the herd mentality were not all so fashionable.
—Actually, scratch that: The world would be a better place if not for modern democratic thinking, which
by design puts the lunatics in charge of the asylum. The herd mentality works just fine, when the sheep obey a proper shepherd.
This thread looks like a setup for one of your "I don't like what you said" red trust ratings.
As I said before, I did not
want to tag ibminer. But no sinister “setup” is involved: When I open a topic in Reputation accusing someone of dishonest and untrustworthy behaviour, it does not take Sherlock Holmes to deduce that I am considering a tag. Also, as you are aware, you are permabanned from my self-moderated threads (unless I open one against you). Ban evasion will not be tolerated—not yours, and not nutildah’s.
I have done some cleanup of ban evasion, plus extremely low-value troll posts; pre-cleanup archives:
archive.is,
archive.org (seems to be flaking out right now, but I will link to it anyway).
where art thou, nullius?
I have been busy. Unlike some users who sit on the forum 24/7 posting
animated GIFs and no-value one-liners, I am not on-call to address the latest forum drama; and sometimes,
if I have a few spare moments for the forum,
I may prefer to talk about Bitcoin (!). Perahps I may be building an important project—or perhaps I may be busy taking a nap; that would be more productive than wallowing in Reputation. If you want my attention, get in line and wait your turn.