Bitcoin is breaking the law and will be sued by Craig Wright

[Slow death]

I would like one day people make a statistic of how many people really care about what faketoshi talks about bitcoin, I believe the results would make us laugh a lot. Today everything that faketoshi does, nobody cares. the guy is simply putting himself in a position where people will think he is crazy and obsessed with controlling bitcoin.

Honestly my advice (if faketoshi ever read this post) Is that he should take a vacation to take care of his life and accept the reality that he is not satoshi, continuing on this path will only turn him into a crazy person

[franky1]

Database Regulations law of 1997
"Acts permitted in relation to databases.
d50D.—(1) It is not an infringement of copyright in a database for a person who has a right to use the database or any part of the database,"

MIT give right to everyone

case over CSW loses

[pixie85]

He would have a chance in court if he could prove that he's Satoshi.
Nobody is breaking any of his rights because he's not the creator of Bitcoin and he can't prove otherwise.

Saying that you own something doesn';t make you the owner. All sane people know it.

[franky1]

He would have a chance in court if he could prove that he's Satoshi.
Nobody is breaking any of his rights because he's not the creator of Bitcoin and he can't prove otherwise.

Saying that you own something doesn';t make you the owner. All sane people know it.

his game is not to win cases
his game is to cause legal delays.
this is so that while case B,C,D is active. case A cant proceed

case A is the Australian government wanting their tax back.
he is just trying to delay it until its out of statute of limitations.
he did not realise that what he done in case A is actually criminal not contractual. so statute of limitations does not apply
so his next game is to scam people to get money. to then pay back the first scams (run a ponzi to pay off his past scams)

this is where he makes fake patents and tries suing people. making them think that he will keep them wrapped up in expensive lengthy legal stuff, where he hopes people will just pay him to stop.

this is a well known scam thats been going around for ages its called patent trolling

its people like his best friend calvin ayres that first invested into CSW. and then realised he wont get any returns as there is no bitcoin hoard.. however instead of calling it out and just treating it as a loss.. he joined in and wants CSW to scam more and double down, do patent trolling, book deals, try to extort settlements.etc

[ServerWhere]

I am shaking my head. This person is one of the most annoying people that I have seen in the cryptospace. Is he paid to do this? Who is paying him?

The guy looks arrogant and annoying on the picture let him sue the Bitcoin... let him sue everyone.

[Twentyonepaylots]

I would like one day people make a statistic of how many people really care about what faketoshi talks about bitcoin, I believe the results would make us laugh a lot. Today everything that faketoshi does, nobody cares. the guy is simply putting himself in a position where people will think he is crazy and obsessed with controlling bitcoin.

This guy is simply a crap taking attacks on bitcoin, I don't know what his intention is, if he really wants it to pull bitcoin down or just spreading FUD so he can take advantage of it. There is only one thing in my mind, I know and he looks so scared of what bitcoin is capable of changing things that he has right now on which a case that he wants to stay the way it is in his hands.

Honestly my advice (if faketoshi ever read this post) Is that he should take a vacation to take care of his life and accept the reality that he is not satoshi, continuing on this path will only turn him into a crazy person

If he is really Satoshi then why he claims bitcoin when it is only inflating? Coz if he really does then he should've come up as early as 2010.

[Sendoku]

Mi scusi, but how the fck is he gonna sue Bitcoin if he claims to be its creator? Is he gonna sue himself? lol

[johnyj]

His latest claim: https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/satoshi-never-posted-on-bitcointalk/

[BitcoinFX]

His latest claim: https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/satoshi-never-posted-on-bitcointalk/

Already debunked (+ Jimmy Nguyen served) ...

Craig's latest blog post, claiming that Satoshi never posted on Bitcointalk because the domain wasn't registered until 2011: hxxps://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/satoshi-never-posted-on-bitcointalk/

The obvious truth is that the forum was originally hosted on bitcoin.org and was moved to the Bitcointalk.org domain in 2011. Here is an archive link from 2009 to the original forum: https://web.archive.org/web/20091215005450/http://bitcointalk.org/

The archive link shows post made Satoshi, which again shows how terrible Craig is at fabricating this nonsense.

"Just wow! Beyond the pale. Not even an April fools joke ... more lies by CSW, that will be easily debunked ..."
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1245110710012706817

...

"Excerpt from CSW's blog post ... 100% lie ...

"What people are failing to understand is that Bitcointalk was only registered in mid-2011: https://whois.com/whois/bitcointalk.org."

See: "Welcome to the new Bitcoin forum!" - satoshi, Founder, November 22, 2009.

- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.0"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1245121949698793479

...

"Exactly.

Plus the most damning evidence against Craig's claim here can include any (used or mined to) BTC addresses posted by early users of http://BitcoinTalk.org prior to the 2011 date.

These addresses have timestamps of transactions in the BTC, BCH and BSV blockchains ..."
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1245293506396073985

...

"Again, partly what I'm demonstrating by signing and verifying messages from my own 'old' BTC wallet addresses here:

  https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1245301788678422529

No problem whatsoever in signing 'old' wallets with new code and/or updated software releases.

Craig Wright has signed nothing valid."
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1245833193871343621

...

"So, to Craig, Calvin and the BSV lot ...

This is how identity works in Bitcoin !

Not your lies, hearsay, fabrications or falsehoods ...

Hard cryptographic proof linked to historical evidence trails !

Craig Wright is NOT satoshi and BSV is NOT Bitcoin.

#Bitcoin = #BTC

End."
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1245353304743436289

...

"@CryptoAmerican
Do you enjoy writing badly researched (paid?) articles containing untruths, lies and FAKE NEWS ?

https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1245121949698793479

Craig is NOT satoshi and BSV is NOT Bitcoin.

#Bitcoin = #BTC"
- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1246448394937102338
...

I don't know why I bother really, nothing beneficial will ever come of it !?

...

Oh, are you being served ...

"Jimmy Nguyen, who normally tweets almost on a daily basis, went totally quiet after this. Is he taking "social distancing" to the next level? "
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1246404801891569664

...

"Jimmy - we've been trying to serve you with a subpoena in Kleiman v. Wright.  We tried your house and your email. Will you accept service via Twitter? https://tinyurl.com/st2z2gv  @KyleWRoche"
- https://twitter.com/VelvelFreedman/status/1244322484679315461

Basically, Craig Wright has proven beyond doubt that he is NOT Satoshi.

The BSV 'gang' have tried to 'hijack' the Bitcoin (BTC) project and they are failing, badly ... even the BS patents are 'worthless' ...

- https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1222936773581594624.html

[John (John K.)]

Not sure why this nutcase is still relevant around. He's desperate for attention to further his scams.

[eaLiTy]

I am shaking my head. This person is one of the most annoying people that I have seen in the cryptospace. Is he paid to do this? Who is paying him?
He also said that the lightning network users are thieves hehehe. He is clearly only paid to annoy everyone.

There is no doubt that he lacks social skills and he irritates everyone and he speaks on doing things and i am yet to see those things fulfill. As mentioned above he is paid by Calvin and how long he will be able to do that is to be seen .

Not sure why this nutcase is still relevant around. He's desperate for attention to further his scams.

After almost two years of absence you are back again  . There is one or the other topic starting every now and then regarding what Craig said and even though how much you report it pops up as he is releasing something every now and then to capture the headlines.

[hatshepsut93]

Even if for the sake of argument we imagine that he somehow succeeds, it won't change much, Github might be forced to take some action with the Bitcoin repo and maybe some exchanges will have to rebrand their listing of Bitcoin, but CWS and the court are powerless to do anything to Bitcoin users. But it's more likely that tomorrow we'll have a zombie apocalypse than Craig Wright winning a case in court, with all these outlandish claims that he makes.

[Harlot]

I posted this earlier on a topic where another member has linked this topic and generally I don't feel that this news has really worth anything at all. After him pretending to be Satoshi Nakamoto now he is planning to destroy his own creation with a legal action which I think for a guy who is claiming to be him is really such a dumb move. Aside from that with all the years we have seen him talk about empty threats and lies I don't think this is a man to believe in all the things he is saying right now. At this point he will choose a path right now where he sues Bitcoin and drop the "I am Satoshi Nakamoto" act or just continue his case in court claiming the BTC he still haven't receive yet.

[White Christmas]

Even if for the sake of argument we imagine that he somehow succeeds, it won't change much, Github might be forced to take some action with the Bitcoin repo and maybe some exchanges will have to rebrand their listing of Bitcoin, but CWS and the court are powerless to do anything to Bitcoin users. But it's more likely that tomorrow we'll have a zombie apocalypse than Craig Wright winning a case in court, with all these outlandish claims that he makes.

That's right we can't deny the fuck that mr Craig Wright was really somehow succeeds in life and many people are currently believing him especially those people who doesn't have any further knowledge about the cryptocurrency or the bitcoin, They are believing that Craig Wright was the real Satoshi Nakamoto.
Github or where technical people are into are the one who is kind of world that is full of people that are knowledgeable about the internet world and this is one of the reason why the bitcoin reputation succeeds also.

[rexxarofmoknathal]

This man is not paid to do this annoying thing. He makes a sensation that will be very useful for him, more talked about people who will make him more known. Many claims have been made.

Many people have started to be profiled by it. An advantage to advertise his shitcoin to stay alive.
All the claims he made could not be proven by valid data.

That's right!!! This person is only doing it to get publicity and cover even if that in the eyes of many is negative. Such a low-living person and it is despicable of him to threaten a community such as this. I hope at least that many people do realise he is but only a bad pawn in a long game. That said, I hope the damage is kept to a minimum.

[kemoglo]

in short: desperation as time goes by and he starts being forgotten and becoming more and more irrelevant, he will make more outrageous claims to provoke people to keep talking about him nonstop.

That's exactly it, and by giving him the pleasure of discussing his silly claims we're kinda falling into his game, just ignore and move on, that dude is a cancer to the community and should be treated as such. Though I do wonder how far he can take it with these claims

[franky1]

he has to in his mind sty relevant because he soon wants to write a biography and some other books about his life and try to have enough relevance for people to actually buy it so that he can add a few more pennies into his scampot to hope it can pay back ones he previously scammed.

best way to think about is is anyone that believes CSW, are hoping/waiting to get paid by him
calvin ayres is the biggest example of someone wanting returns on his investment and will never just drop the act and call it a loss and distance himself from it

[stompix]

Grabbing some popcorn and waiting for the moment Craig Wright will sue Satoshi for not being Craig Wright!
I stopped following his rambles a while ago but now that I checked the links...has he gone beyond full retard?

Nodes and miners are thus subcontracting in accordance with the initially constructed set of rules that I created. That is, they are following a set of rules and acting as my agents.

People need to move away from the concept of “Bitcoin is decentralised” as a political goal. The registry is distributed, but the property rights remain mine (through trusts and companies I created and the structure I set up to enforce such rules).

Anyhow, the halving for shitvision is in 4 days, it has around 2.4 exahash, maybe after the drop in reward, we will see somebody putting it out of its misery.

[Wind_FURY]

Not sure why this nutcase is still relevant around. He's desperate for attention to further his scams.

Or what OP said, he's paid to troll.

This also from OP's link,

All Bitcoin And Lightning Users Are Thieves

The next blog post from Wright is a real legal reach. Wright essentially says that if a Bitcoin (BTC) is stolen, then it is considered stolen property even if it is transacted 1,000 times after that.

Therefore, if Bitcoin (BTC) is stolen and ends up in the Lightning Network eventually, then everyone who passed it along within the Lightning Network is committing theft, and would be subject to a court order and criminal penalties.

Wright actually goes on to say that any Bitcoin (BTC) miners which take transaction fees from stolen Bitcoin (BTC) are committing criminal acts as well. By this logic, if anyone out there ended up receiving a Satoshi of a stolen Bitcoin (BTC), even if it was stolen years ago, they are a criminal.

In a nutshell, Wright is saying that everyone who uses Bitcoin (BTC) and the Lightning Network, including miners, are trafficking stolen goods.

There are many more crazy Craig Wright blog posts than the few covered in this article. It is not necessary to analyze them though, the general summary of any of Wright’s articles is that he hates the crypto space and really wishes he could destroy it, and then replace it with Bitcoin SV (BSV). Perhaps in some dystopian parallel universe this has already happened, but hopefully in this universe Wright loses his big lawsuit with the heirs of Dave Kleiman and becomes a harmless fugitive.

Isn't that the same as cash? If stolen money was laundered through a bank, and everyone made a withdrawal of the stolen fiat from that bank, then we are all criminals?

[kecha1]

The crypto community will soon be suing Craig because he is only hindering the development of the crypto industry.