HOLY FUCK !!!! THE SCAMMER IS ALSO A PLAGIARIST OF GIANT MAGNITUDE - SIG BAN NO

[bonesjonesreturns]

after years of lauda calling people to be banned or punished for copy and paste.. this scammer lauda has been deliberately and sneakily grafting copy and paste into his own paragraphs??

Lauda was supporting nullius giving a red tag to CH because ch dared to show empathy to some legends who had copy and paste years ago. Such is the evil of plagiarism says lauda that even showing them empathy is reason enough for a red tag.

Look at this sneaky deliberate plagiarism from lauda... not just accidentally not referencing evidence of a huge scam this member lauda was pushing on members.

Lol so this proven scammer, extortionist, and trust abuser who was calling for people to be banned for presenting evidence he was lying to promote a scam is now also a deliberate and sneaky plagiarist??

Could one member be more fucking net negative.

2 year sig ban minimum but this should be a clear ban when you consider all the other scamming,  trust abusing , extorting and double standards. What a disgusting double standards piece of lying shit.  

Read this

Username: Lauda
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101872
Evidence

Post 1:

Your English levels are under those of a 5th grader. Consider taking a course, because you complicate things and usually make no sense.
I never said that SHA256 for a normal computer wasn't SHA128 for a quantum one. You didn't explain it because it can't be explained well i.e. what you said effectively makes no sense. A quantum computer can't beat SHA 256 (i.e. SHA 128). Actually if SHA gets broken the problem will be on a much larger scale where Bitcoin will be irrelevant (unless globally adopted). A lot of things use SHA, for example banks.

What I'm trying to say is:
For SHA256, it effectively becomes SHA128 to a Quantum computer. Now the question remains, can a Quantum search for SHA128 faster than a classical computer search through SHA256?
With out current technology and for the near future, we still can't build a real Quantum computer that can even begin to tackle this problem, let alone solve it.

http://web.archive.org/web/20160204084145/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1026125.0

Shor's Algorithm applies to prime factorization, which SHA256 doesn't use.
What you're looking for to crack SHA256 is Grover's Algorithm. Basically under classical models of computation the optimal way to find a matching hash is to simply search through the entire space yielding O(n). Under Quantum Computing the optimal time is O(n^0.5), which means effectively you have halved the key-length.
For SHA256, it effectively becomes SHA128 to a Quantum computer. Now the question remains, can a Quantum search for SHA128 faster than a classical computer search through SHA256?
With our current technology and for the foreseeable future, we still cannot build a Quantum computer that can yet begin to tackle this problem, let alone solve it in a time within our lifespan. Thus SHA256 is considered "secure enough" for now.

http://web.archive.org/web/20190105172604/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=78693.0


Post 2:

I see no information about 128 bit keys being broken. Any information found on stackexchange has no guarantee to be correct. It confirms what I said. SHA can't be reversed; it has to be brute forced.
It clearly indicated that quantum computers are more powerful than the computers of today, which is logical. There is no information on there internet about this. You're talking out of a hat.
Yes 128 bit security is 18446744073709551616 times faster to bruteforce than 256 bit. This doesn't mean that it is vulnerable when used.
It's obvious that people are commenting without proper knowledge in quantum related technology. The computers are not nowhere near ready to do any complicated jobs.
The main challenge in a Qcomputer is to make sure that the qubits are entangled (if you're familiar with Schrödinger’s cat you will know what I'm talking about; look that up). The computer must stay in this state (for the cat - it can't be simultaneously dead or alive) long enough to perform calculations and get results. The ones that we have can keep the state for miliseconds or maybe a couple of seconds. That's not long enough to do something useful. To break encryption these computers must have 500-2000qubits. Existing quantum computers operate with 14 qubits at maximum.
I have not forgotten about D-wave though. The company D-Wave claims that it has produced a 512 qubit Qcomputer. That is not a real quantum computer because it uses quantum annealing effect and can't demonstrate full properties of one. It is basically set to do a few specific tasks and represents no danger to encryption.
To summarize: You're wrong. Existing implementations have not shown that they can beat 128bit encryption. They aren't even close. That's the current situation. I'm not saying that in 5 years we won't have better technology. We might operate with 1400 qubits or be stuck at 140. Nobody really knows.

http://web.archive.org/web/20160204084306/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1026125.40

Quantum computers don’t reside on the desktop of every other teenage hacker wishing to eavesdrop on his classmates’ Facebook sessions for good reason. Creation of a full-scale quantum computer involves many engineering challenges that some specialists consider to be impossible to accomplish.
The main challenge is making sure qubits are entangled, because each quantum system tends to collapse into a classical state, lacking valuable undetermined properties. We can’t avoid mentioning the long-suffering Schrödinger’s cat here, which eventually can’t stay both dead and alive simultaneously – a quantum computer, however, must maintain this miraculous state for a long enough time to perform calculation and measure results. Modern prototypes can keep this state for milliseconds, and in some cases, a couple of seconds. The task becomes more and more complicated when the qubit count rises too. To break cryptosystems, computers must have 500-2000 qubits (depending on the algorithm and key length), but existing quantum computers operate with 14 qubits at maximum.
That is why today’s quantum computers are not usable for breaking your SSL certificate, but the situation may change in 5 years.
Against this background, Canadian company D-Wave brassily claims that it produces 512-qubit quantum computers. Moreover, these devices are available for sale. Many experts say that the D-Wave computer is not “real,” because it utilizes a quantum annealing effect and can’t demonstrate full properties of a quantum computer.

http://web.archive.org/web/20190507194853/https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/quantum-computers-and-the-end-of-security/2852/


Post 3:

Exactly how is spreading FUD related to retardation?
Fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) = is generally a strategic attempt to influence perception by disseminating negative and dubious or false information.
At least he is not spreading any FUD about Bitcoin. The altcoins matter no less. How about you take a look at OP? Those 2 threads in Bitcoin Discussion truly amazed me.  

http://web.archive.org/web/20160225063655/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=729053.140

People say all is fair in business - win at all costs. One strategy some competitors use is to confuse the buying/selling process through infusing fear, uncertainty, and doubt into the buying/selling decision.
FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt) is generally a strategic attempt to influence perception by disseminating negative and dubious or false information. FUD is a manifestation of the appeal to fear. (Wikipedia).

https://web.archive.org/web/20200520044610/https://www.ideateinc.com/blog/2013/08/fear-uncertainty-doubt-in-buying


Post 4:

Well this is actually an advanced view of the matter. This is what I expect from people who aren't from Bit-X and DaDice. You've written this very nicely. It is making them reject reasoning and critical thinking.
Religions such as Christianity are absurd. This is an objective opinion.  Just think about it. How would it be if you had never heard of any religion till you were grown up and actually though for yourself? If we take Christianity for an example; you believe in an invisible man who allegedly lived over 2000 years ago. He was killed by religious zealost and then he magically raised from the dead just after three days. In addition to that, they believe in other invisible being such as angels and demons. Meanwhile, another invisible Spirit (the Holy Spirit) is constantly at work behind the scenes around the earth, keeping the whole thing straight and intervening whenever he can. The words 'whenever he can' have been specifically used because since he exists why should he save the little children from abuse and rape?  

http://web.archive.org/web/20160202021047/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1054513.40

From an outside observer’s standpoint, Christianity is kind of absurd. Think about it. We believe in an invisible man who lived over 2,000 years ago in a series of backwater towns in the Middle East, was killed by some religious zealots, and then was magically raised from the dead three days later, after which he floated up into the sky and disappeared, thus becoming the invisible man we now believe in and pin all our hopes to. Oh, and on top of that, we believe in other invisible beings: angels and demons — who are all around us, helping and influencing us. Meanwhile, another invisible Spirit (the Holy Spirit) is constantly at work behind the scenes around the earth, keeping the whole thing straight and intervening whenever He can. When put that way, even I think it sounds crazy.

https://web.archive.org/web/20200518082744/https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2015/02/06/a-conservative-christian-finally-admits-his-faith-makes-no-sense/


Post 5:

Is this supposed to be a real discussion or some troll thread? You can't really find scientific proof for something like this to not to exist. If there is no proof that it exists then it should be assumed that it does not.
What one can do is explain how the Bible and whole religion is messed. As an example take praying.
We pray sincerely, knowing that when God answers this prayer, it will glorify God and help millions of people in remarkable ways. What will happen when we pray? Nothing.
I'm not exactly sure from which part this is but I know that it exists "Ask and it will be given to you". If we all ask for cancer to be cured it definitely will.  

http://web.archive.org/web/20160205222449/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1035211.0

What would happen if we get down on our knees and pray to God in this way: Dear God, almighty, all-powerful, all-loving creator of the universe, we pray to you to cure every case of cancer on this planet tonight. We pray in faith, knowing you will bless us as you describe in Matthew 7:7, Matthew 17:20, Matthew 21:21, Mark 11:24, John 14:12-14, Matthew 18:19 and James 5:15-16. In Jesus' name we pray, Amen.
We pray sincerely, knowing that when God answers this completely heartfelt, unselfish, non-materialistic prayer, it will glorify God and help millions of people in remarkable ways. Will anything happen? No. And the fact that nothing happens proves to us that God is imaginary. Here's why: Jesus makes specific promises in the Bible about how prayer is supposed to work. Jesus says in many different places that he and God will answer your prayers. The fact that those promises are untrue tells us that God is imaginary.

http://web.archive.org/web/20181017072746/https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/why-wont-god-heal-amputees.70716/page-32


Post 6:

This was not easy to understand for someone who's not native to English. People believe in something because they need to, hence hope exists. This doesn't affect it being true or not.
We used to think something(X) was caused by physical cause and effect, but now we understand that it's caused by God, or spirits, or demons, or the soul.

http://web.archive.org/web/20160205222449/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1035211.0

Now. The number of times that a natural explanation of a phenomenon has been replaced by a supernatural or religious one? The number of times humankind has said,
“We used to think (X) was caused by physical cause and effect, but now we understand that it’s actually caused by God, or spirits, or demons, or the soul”?

https://web.archive.org/web/20190331065516/https://the-orbit.net/greta/2008/09/15/the-ten-main-reasons-i-dont-believe-in-god/

Combined with this ..

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5249969.0

And this

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1764757.0

And  now threatening to red tag any turkish member that applies for and is accepted to chipmixer?

Wtf is theymos doing with this scamming,  extorting,  trust abusing, racist  double standards scumbag?

Now some sneaky obviously deliberate plagiarism too.

This is getting funny now.

Is there anything deliberately dishonest or dangerous this piece of shit has not done yet.

Screaming for others to be banned or sig banned for the crime of telling the truth about his scamming.

This is sneaky as fuck plagiarism not just leaving some quotes off of something you are posting 100x to warn people about scammers that happend to be lauda and the project he was pushing.

Still his DT colluders are trying to prop up the illusion lauda is not a scamming and dangerous piece of shit.


Net negative scamming extorting trust abusing racist and plagiarising scum. Aka " suboptimal "

[1714660020]

1714660020

[mindrust]

What the fuck? People got banned for a lot less than these.

[bonesjonesreturns]

What the fuck? People got banned for a lot less than these.

I don't think any member has ever been busted for


1. Proven scamming
2. Highly probable serious extortion
3. Super shady looking escrow
4. Undeniable racist threats and persecution
5. Using red flags to silence people whistleblowing on him
6. Using red flags as a bargaining chip for mutual red flag removal between him.and other proven scammers so they get a clean trust sheet
7. Supporting and colluding to protect other proven scammers
8. Deliberate and super sneaky plagiarism


What's not net positive about all that then DT pals ask?

This is excellent work. I mean to be busted for all this and be floating around here with clean positive trust rating, in and out of default trust with a high paying sig lecturing and calling others to be punished for far lesser evils on just one of his offenses...he has racked up 8 big ones. Haha

I bet the conniving cat will just get a sig ban for a couple of years and carry on with milking the board via other rev streams and punishing others for reporting his crimes.

Ban the scamming extorting trust abusing racist double standards greedy cunt and all of his ardent supporters and protectors.
At least blacklist everyone of the scum enabling these dirt bags.

Where is nullius that pervy old creep. I have heard him screaming about the evils of plagiarism and there being no greater evil since that scumbag awoke and red tagged the only person to stand up to this scamming piece of shit lauda since it joined here ...for having empathy.

Why so quiet in here? Where is the plagiarism bingo now?

I love it , lauda and his zillion to 1 bullshit lies that only his punked out biatch quicksellout7 would support

" must have been a few things I read somewhere that stuck in my mind that I accidentally paraphrased word for word in large paragraphs"  or sneakily grafted into his own crap.

Hahahahhah

Lies upon lies upon lies upon lies...

Is there a conceivable dirty greedy dishonest untrustworthy crime this scum bag has not committed and got busted for?

Where are all his DT pals screaming for any plagiarist to be banned.

Where does the ... I must have a photographic memory that I have no recollection  or control of go on the plagiarism bingo lol?

To the true legend that located these ( and perhaps a few others) you are a super achiever in the context of the dregs here.
Instant legendary vip status if we were in a real meritocracy.


Where is lauda? Cat got your tongue scammer?

[TECSHARE]

Its ok, Lauda has plenty of socks and minions to do their bidding on the off chance the rules are equitably applied here.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Its ok, Lauda has plenty of socks and minions to do their bidding on the off chance the rules are equitably applied here.

I don't know about the socks, minions, or how much theoretical power they wield if they do exist, but I am very curious as to what the outcome of this is going to be, and I've expressed some of my thoughts about it in the report plagiarism thread. 

If nothing is done and Lauda suffers no consequences, can you imagine how many banned members are going to start crawling out of the porous, rotten woodwork to complain that they weren't given the same chance to rectify what a lot of them claimed to be mistakes?  True, some of them are just serial plagiarists doing it in the name of earning money through sig campaigns (and Lauda does not fit in that category), but there might be a small but significant number of them who would have a valid argument.

[eddie13]

Do these proofs check out?

If so.... .. ... ...    .  . . .. . . . . .  .. . . .. .. . .... .. . . . . .. ..

it is plagiarism

We have a happening folks..

[JaredKaragen]

Im gonna need a metric ton of popcorn to watch this all play out....

[Lauda]

Awaiting response for Lauda.

For or from? I have responded in the other thread. I do not think I need to respond twice to the same thing.

[PrimeNumber7]

Awaiting response for Lauda. This is going to be really spicy.

He already responded. He gave an explanation for 3 of the 6 instances referenced in the OP. I don't know if his explanation passes muster, I will let others debate that.

It appears someone went to fairly great lengths to look for plagiarism, not that this makes any of the plagiarism okay.

I am unable to think of any argument against instituting a two-year signature ban. Others who were caught plagiarising years ago also received a 60 day ban.

[mindrust]

What I really wonder is, what the plagiarism bot was doing? It found lots of people with that offense but somehow skipped lauda which had multiple offenses.

Is the bot dumb or was it because the data was too big (26k posts) so it said "fuck it im skippin it"

[PrimeNumber7]

What I really wonder is, what the plagiarism bot was doing? It found lots of people with that offense but somehow skipped lauda which had multiple offenses.

Is the bot dumb or was it because the data was too big (26k posts) so it said "fuck it im skippin it"

Checking every post for plagiarism is not scalable. The more posts the userbase writes, the more processing power is required to check the next post against all other posts for plagiarism. It is also expensive to check someone's posts against all other posts in the forum, and the costs go up if you are checking if parts of posts are plagiarized. As a result, targets of plagiarism investigations need to be targeted.

To demonstrate the cost of checking for plagiarism:
If you check every group of 5 consecutive words in each post in a user's post history against every group of 5 consecutive words in every other post that exists:
Assuming the userbase has made 50 million posts, 40 million of which (80%) has at least 5 words, and the average post length is 15 words.
Each post you check for plagiarism would cause you to make 11 queries, and each query would check against 440 million rows in your database. So each post you check would need to be compared against 4.84 billion rows.

You can do some things to speed up searching, but this can only do so much. You can also randomly skip rows you are looking at, and skip queries against the rows you do look at, but this will make it less than certain you will find all instances of plagiarism.

None of this would detect the majority of the plagiarism referenced in the OP when posts are copied from external sources.

[SaltySpitoon]

Thank you for reporting these. I must have unknowingly repeated and paraphrased text that I had previously read and remembered. It was not intentional. I am making explicitly marked corrections, with appropriate citation of sources, and links to the earliest available archived versions of my edited posts. I will not remove any posts, or try to hide anything.

Not that I have a cat in this fight, but at least a few of those examples don't seem to fit the bill for paraphrasing. Its a little iffy but somewhat reasonable if an uncommon phrase sticks in your head, but it'd appear to me that the likelihood of of it being a simple memorable phrase decrease when your sentence structure is the same and there are sort of uncommon bits of stylization

can a Quantum search for SHA128 faster than a classical computer search through SHA256?

where you'd expect it to say

can a Quantum search for SHA128 faster than a classical computer can search through SHA256?

or

can a Quantum search for SHA128 faster than a classical computer searches through SHA256?

example 4 is full of the signs of plagiarism that sort of sticks out in people's coursework. Stuff like putting the ö in Schrödinger’s is fairly uncommon unless you are copy and pasting, as not many people know how to type a ö. Consistencies in stylistic/ideological capitalization, like Spirit, and other little things like (the Holy Spirit). Though at least you didn't plagiarize the colon

I wouldn't call any of that conclusive evidence for failing someone, but you look for other patterns from there.

[Lauda]

Stuff like putting the ö in Schrödinger’s is fairly uncommon unless you are copy and pasting, as not many people know how to type a ö.

Think again. Quite the common letter depending on where I am from.

example 4 is full of the signs of plagiarism that sort of sticks out in people's coursework.

I do not know what happened there. The only difference that I could find was 'he' vs. 'He' in the source, the topic or the source do not sound like something I would read.

Thank you for reporting these. I must have unknowingly repeated and paraphrased text that I had previously read and remembered. It was not intentional. I am making explicitly marked corrections, with appropriate citation of sources, and links to the earliest available archived versions of my edited posts. I will not remove any posts, or try to hide anything.

Not that I have a cat in this fight, but at least a few of those examples don't seem to fit the bill for paraphrasing. Its a little iffy but somewhat reasonable if an uncommon phrase sticks in your head, but it'd appear to me that the likelihood of of it being a simple memorable phrase decrease when your sentence structure is the same and there are sort of uncommon bits of stylization

Remembering events of 5 - 6 years ago with this post count is rather difficult. I've already spent a lot of time looking into what happened there and I am missing some key historical dates that I can not access.

[TECSHARE]

What I really wonder is, what the plagiarism bot was doing? It found lots of people with that offense but somehow skipped lauda which had multiple offenses.

Is the bot dumb or was it because the data was too big (26k posts) so it said "fuck it im skippin it"

Or perhaps the bot is being used in a more targeted way as an automatic peanut hunting machine.

[Teleman]

ban lauda! Is he a god here? why moderators and staff can't ban lauda? It's clearly a plagiarism.

No reason should be accepted, all the other members are ban because of plagiarism, now we have lauda and the moderators and staff can't do shit.

[LoyceV]

To demonstrate the cost of checking for plagiarism:
If you check every group of 5 consecutive words in each post in a user's post history against every group of 5 consecutive words in every other post that exists:
Assuming the userbase has made 50 million posts, 40 million of which (80%) has at least 5 words, and the average post length is 15 words.
Each post you check for plagiarism would cause you to make 11 queries, and each query would check against 440 million rows in your database. So each post you check would need to be compared against 4.84 billion rows.

It's madness to check everything against everything. If I'd be chasing this (which I'm not), I'd create a checksum for each string of text, sort all checksums, search for duplicates, and use those to check back the original posts. This way you don't have to iterate through all posts, but catch them all at once in a very fast process.
Of course there'll be many false positives and the slightest change in a word would be missed, but this cause would have been caught.

[Hovarda]

haahahahahhaa:)


There is undeniable plagiarism here. and I look forward to the decision of the moderators. Justice requires treating everyone equally.

[babo]

Im gonna need a metric ton of popcorn to watch this all play out....

me too dude

i love bitcointalk drama


I have often also been accused without reason and without possibility of reply
it's not right
wait for the person to reply (I read in the appropriate thread) and then the staff will decide what to do

i take a big popcorn bucket

[ScumBuster]

Quick reminder that OP is also a plagiarist of giant magnitude and hasn't been banned.

User cryptohunter - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=92110



Copies -
https://archive.fo/L5no3#60%

Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.

https://archive.fo/Bl2dL#65%

Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.

https://archive.fo/dN1PN#40%

Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.

Original -

Let's take a look at the first 5 h of Darkcoin (XCoin at that time)...
<...>
...and block reward 100 times what it is now.

Copy -
https://archive.fo/nbYV2#10%

1. Dash is centrally controlled. This is a fact.
<...>
And yes this is all true, and no I'm not trolling, just thought with all this Dash hype we could have a dose of reality.

Original -

1. Dash is centrally controlled. This is a fact.
<...>
And yes this is all true, and no I'm not trolling, just thought with all this Dash hype we could have a dose of reality.

[hackerplace]

lauda plagiarism? BAN

no sorry: PERMABAN

as others are banned, he too must be banned