[Flag] Bruno AKA Phinnaeus Gage, Gleb Gamow, YuTü.Co.in, Bitcoin 100 & ???

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Phinnaeus Gage  -  Flag:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1911

Gleb Gamow  -  Flag:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1912

YuTü.Co.in  -  Flag:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1913

Bitcoin 100  -  Flag:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1915

Phinnaeus Gage account is clearly hacked or overtaken or the F. This is clear that Bruno died (RIP brother) and this MF whoever he is, now in control of this account. I already left a neg to this account with my statement but I can not support this flag on Phinnaeus Gage account.
It says:

Phinnaeus Gage violated a written contract, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. Phinnaeus Gage did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around April 2020. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

The real Bruno never did that to us. Supporting this flag for me is hurting the real Bruno. Sorry, I can not do that. The wording of this flag really do not go in a way to oppose it too.

P.S: I have opposed flag for Gleb Gamow, YuTü.Co.in since there are no evidence that those accounts are compromised. I have do not have much idea about this Bitcoin 100 account so no comment for it.

[1714142944]

1714142944

[1714142944]

1714142944

[1714142944]

1714142944

[1714142944]

1714142944

[1714142944]

1714142944

[1714142944]

1714142944

[Pffrt]

Phinnaeus Gage account is clearly hacked or overtaken or the F. This is clear that Bruno died (RIP brother) and this MF whoever he is, now in control of this account. I already left a neg to this account with my statement but I can not support this flag on Phinnaeus Gage account.

I think you should support the flag on Phinnaeus Gage account. Flag has been created so that the account can't scam anyone and other user can see what's wrong with the account.
Since Bruno is dead, you are supporting flag against the account owner, I uunderstand your point although.

[Hueristic]

Support Nutildah's flag.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=24792

[Timelord2067]

Phinnaeus Gage account is clearly hacked or overtaken or the F. This is clear that Bruno died (RIP brother) and this MF whoever he is, now in control of this account. I already left a neg to this account with my statement but I can not support this flag on Phinnaeus Gage account.

I think you should support the flag on Phinnaeus Gage account. Flag has been created so that the account can't scam anyone and other user can see what's wrong with the account.
Since Bruno is dead, you are supporting flag against the account owner, I understand your point although.

Thank you for your comment @Pffrt - I'm not sure how we can convince BitcoinGirl.Club as the evidence is very clear: The scammer has control of the funds as well as the account.  Those funds have not been used as intended to cover funeral/transportation expenses.

It saddens me to say that @Hueristic is Trolling this tread trying to entice people to support a near identical thread while being indecisive in neither supporting nore opposing this Flag.

I have do not have much idea about this Bitcoin 100 account so no comment for it.

Bitcoin 100 has been identified as an alt of Bruno and has been discussed already.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Phinnaeus Gage account is clearly hacked or overtaken or the F. This is clear that Bruno died (RIP brother) and this MF whoever he is, now in control of this account. I already left a neg to this account with my statement but I can not support this flag on Phinnaeus Gage account.

I think you should support the flag on Phinnaeus Gage account. Flag has been created so that the account can't scam anyone and other user can see what's wrong with the account.
Since Bruno is dead, you are supporting flag against the account owner, I understand your point although.

Thank you for your comment @Pffrt - I'm not sure how we can convince BitcoinGirl.Club as the evidence is very clear: The scammer has control of the funds as well as the account.  Those funds have not been used as intended to cover funeral/transportation expenses.

It saddens me to say that @Hueristic is Trolling this tread trying to entice people to support a near identical thread while being indecisive in neither supporting nore opposing this Flag.

I have do not have much idea about this Bitcoin 100 account so no comment for it.

Bitcoin 100 has been identified as an alt of Bruno and has been discussed already.

Sorry Timelord2067 and Pffrt. I really want to protect Bruno's intellectual asset but not this way which interprets wrong to me. I just can't make up my mind. But nutildah's flag looks better and the reference is also somehow excusable. I supported nutildah's flag and I want to move on that way brothers.

I will wish theymos to lock his account so that no other shithead get access of any of his account unless anyone proves that they are from family and possible next of kin.

[Hueristic]

It saddens me to say that @Hueristic is Trolling this tread trying to entice people to support a near identical thread while being indecisive in neither supporting nore opposing this Flag.

Maybe you need to understand what the term "mutually exclusive" means as they are not.

[Timelord2067]

It saddens me to say that @Hueristic is Trolling this tread trying to entice people to support a near identical thread while being indecisive in neither supporting nore opposing this Flag.

Maybe you need to understand what the term "mutually exclusive" means as they are not.

Enlighten me.

[Hueristic]

It saddens me to say that @Hueristic is Trolling this tread trying to entice people to support a near identical thread while being indecisive in neither supporting nore opposing this Flag.

Maybe you need to understand what the term "mutually exclusive" means as they are not.

Enlighten me.

One "can" be a subset of the other.

[Timelord2067]

One "can" be a subset of the other.

So who has the most to gain from destroying Bruno's reputation?

[Hueristic]

One "can" be a subset of the other.

So who has the most to gain from destroying Bruno's reputation?

I have no clue but its pretty fucking shitty.

[Timelord2067]

So who has the most to gain from destroying Bruno's reputation?

I have no clue but its pretty fucking shitty.

We all agree on that, so let's not bicker splitting infinitives.

At this point, given the Bruno Hacker has knowledge of BCT and Bitcoins, who's writing style does the hacker remind you of?

Where did the donated funds for the Plead go to nearly a week ago?

[Hueristic]

So who has the most to gain from destroying Bruno's reputation?

I have no clue but its pretty fucking shitty.

We all agree on that, so let's not bicker splitting infinitives.

At this point, given the Bruno Hacker has knowledge of BCT and Bitcoins, who's writing style does the hacker remind you of?

Where did the donated funds for the Plead go to nearly a week ago?

/Enlighten me

[Timelord2067]

/Enlighten me

You don't know??  The thread you posted a link here doesn't know either?  Goodness gracious me oh my!


Getting back to reality though, what efforts have you made to track the bitcoins that have been stolen?

[teeGUMES]

Getting back to reality though, what efforts have you made to track the bitcoins that have been stolen?

You can't donate to a man on his death bed and call them stolen. Besides nutildah claimed here and here that they had some sort of higher knowledge and assured everyone that a relative would receive the funds.
Hopefully it was actually Bruno speaking with nutildah and not the hacker/compromised account pegging them as an easy mark for their upcoming bitcoin100 scam attempt.

TECSHARE has provided sufficient proof that everyone should believe Bruno has passed on. Bruno stated he had to dictate his posts through a voice to text generator.. do you really think he would be able to get onto an exchange, 2FA, password, email confirmation and everything else involved with trading BTC to USD and then log into his bank account and accept a deposit.. all with Google Voice to Text? There should have been a trustworthy intermediary that was dealing with this, not a severely disabled man nearing certain death. Any coin sent should have been considered burned, not once did Bruno say that family had access to his keys.
Luckily somebody did and lets hope that this somebody wasn't the same person involved with the post mortem scam attempt otherwise the funds probably weren't used for the reason they were donated.

The flags only serve to show that nobody should be dealing with these accounts as there is a bad actor on the other end of the Phinnaeus Gage account/mobile now.

[Timelord2067]

Getting back to reality though, what efforts have you made to track the bitcoins that have been stolen?

You can't donate to a man on his death bed and call them stolen.

Stolen... by whom?  A scammer?  The scammer has no right to them, don't you think?

TECSHARE has provided sufficient proof that everyone should believe Bruno has passed on.

Would that be the same Tecshare that I just caught out lying in this thread?

No one's thought to phone Bruno's number to find out who answers the phone?

The flags only serve to show that nobody should be dealing with these accounts as there is a bad actor on the other end of the Phinnaeus Gage account/mobile now.

That much is true.  I'm looking forward to you supporting the Flag.

[teeGUMES]

Stolen... by whom?  A scammer?  The scammer has no right to them, don't you think?

Besides nutildah claimed here and here that they had some sort of higher knowledge and assured everyone that a relative would receive the funds.

Ask nutildah.

The flags only serve to show that nobody should be dealing with these accounts as there is a bad actor on the other end of the Phinnaeus Gage account/mobile now.

That much is true.  I'm looking forward to you supporting the Flag.

There was no written contract. You donated to a man that could have died minutes after posting with no proof that anyone else in this world had access to the private keys. Due to your negligence in not confirming this you should have considered these coins burnt. I have however supported the other flag against the account as it is the proper flag type. Your reference is to a link that claims he is alive and kicking.. which I do not believe as I have no reason to doubt multiple obituaries and TECSHARE's claim to have phoned the funeral home (A post from a compromised bitcointalk account is not proof of life).

Thanks for feeling the need to strikethrough the s in my "flags" post. There is actually two flags so you're immediately wrong there and shouldn't be changing the text in my quote to something that is easily proven false.
FLAGS:
Yours - not correct format
Not yours - the correct format and I have supported it

From what I've seen you're actually quite an investigator and I'm very surprised you were caught with your pants down on this one. Unfortunate really. To be fair I voted No in your poll whether funds from the alt thread should be donated.

[Timelord2067]

Ask nutildah.

Let him come here.

From what I've seen you're actually quite an investigator and I'm very surprised you were caught with your pants down on this one.

Thanks, but what was my end-game?

Unfortunate really. To be fair I voted No in your poll whether funds from the alt thread should be donated.

But didn't feel the need to voice an opinion to save the Known Alts donation funds from oblivion.  I appreciate you sharing your thoughts in this thread.


(and it's one flag - against Phinnaeus Gage as the other three that I created don't have the necessary support to become active, hence Flag singular)

[teeGUMES]

But didn't feel the need to voice an opinion to save the Known Alts donation funds from oblivion.  I appreciate you sharing your thoughts in this thread.

Because that helps hey?

What's funny is I explicitly told you that sending your Known Alts donations funds was NOT a good idea, but you did it anyway.

You scammed yourself. A fool and his money are easily parted. Several people told you not to send the money but you did it anyway. Even if it was Bruno that posted that address you didn't know whether anyone had access to it so it was stupid to do so.en it could have been someone trying to imitate him using photos he sent them to them for whatever reason.

Wut? Not objected to what? I voted absolutely not and told you several times why it was a stupid idea.

(and it's one flag - against Phinnaeus Gage as the other three that I created don't have the necessary support to become active, hence Flag singular)

My whole statement was about the Phinnaeus Gage account in general as it is the only one with activity post mortem. Two flags currently (hence Flag plurality). Your OP should be updated to include the more proper flag and include the link to the one started by nutildah. Probably also shouldn't be editing others' quotes without understanding the world doesn't revolve around just you.

[Timelord2067]

My whole statement was about the Phinnaeus Gage account in general as it is the only one with activity post mortem. Two flags currently (hence Flag plurality). Your OP should be updated to include the more proper flag and include the link to the one started by nutildah. Probably also shouldn't be editing others' quotes without understanding the world doesn't revolve around just you.

Not withstanding there are actually three flags just against Phinnaeus Gage [Link] [Link] AFAIK there are no other Flags other than the (so far) four I have created that link to this thread.  

The rules on Flag creation are quite specific - You can't have duplicate flags for the same occurrence - same goes for a thread being locked invalidates a flag.  I'm sure @theymos can confirm that one for you.  This thread is to discuss the four flags that I created, not to give running commentary on other flags in other threads.  You seem to be fence sitting on these four flags.

[teeGUMES]

You seem to be fence sitting on these four flags.

Not at all Timelord2067, I believe that in your Flag against the Phinnaeus Gage account that each supporter may have also been a donator and each feels they entered into some sort of agreement whilst donating, hence your use of a written contract would be correct for these supporters (even though he jokingly called it his final exit scam which it very well could have ended up being). I did not donate and I feel no need to support it as my funds are safu for a properly done donation thread in these sorts of cases. If I opposed it then I feel I would be taking away from these donator/supporters that feel they were wronged so I will not be doing that either to honor their voices on the matter.

Your other three flags for his known alts have insufficient support as other DT1 members have opposed them and that is the joy of having 100 DT1 members, not every single one needs to come to the table and put their name down on every single flag. Its more of a collective effort to shut down flags that are improperly set out and as they have and will remain with insufficient support I feel fine not also opposing them. If this changes in the future then I may very well add my name to support the opposition due to the improper type/reference.

Nutildah's flag was posted after yours and it links to a more appropriate thread with information on the flagged subject.. instead you wanted some sort of hero cookie and linked yours back to this shitbag/low quality thread with close to zero actual information in it. Fail on your part. You could have made your reference link the archived page of the [Plead] agreement but ya know.. maybe daddy @theymos can give you some tips.

Its alright to feel jaded that you made the wrong decision with the funds that were in your possession and I truly am sorry that nobody did their due diligence beforehand to make sure this money actually got to somebody that could provide us with complete proof that it was used for its intended purpose.

In my experience with death or jailed members of the bitcoin community there has always been a foundation or someone close to the family that ensures the funds get to where they need to be. NOTHING about how this [Plead] thread played out instilled any confidence in someone that could look a little further past blind compassion and/or pity.

RIP Bruno. Fuck whoever is in control of the account now. This is my last response here as I've said all I have to say.