Bounty hunters United we stand

[Odebowa]

sighs you are right, but is not the fault of the manager they shared what they have to participant, what i see is that they are many participant. in the first round they have over 600 participant in each campaign compared to the reward have. but considering the second round campaign they have 250 plus as participant in each participant which will somehow makes the rewards little bit meaningful.
but the first round reward is too small.

[1715175827]

1715175827

[jcpone]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

That is why on my own way criteria in joining campaign in the bounty, as long as it is one of the potential and legit project.
I am much preferable for the participants who are listed below 100 participants because once their total number of bounty hunters
is more than 100 I know the rewards most of the time is just a bit of token only for each hunters. That will depend too for each rank of the
participants also.

[LuciferMorningstar]

Does anyone have a real-time calculator for each stake of IQ cash? I think the stake will be variety since each IQ cash bounty has a different allocation fund. 20% for each Hacking Campaign, Blogs/Video, Signature Campaign, and - 10% for Twitter, 10% for Facebook and only 5%  for Telegram.

[Lantind]

TBH bounty hunters don't care, the moment you said you won't join a bounty because of too many participants or lack of limited participants rules from bounty manager many will still join the bounty, this will be so effective if bounty managers can become one but .........

Don't mind the hunters who don't care about this, maybe they still think their time is worthless, so they don't care about things like this, so look at the people who still care and support them so that there can be a change in the direction better, because things like this are also for the sake of mutual comfort.

[Ozero]

It has always been difficult to assert their rights by bounty hunters. Indeed, participation in ICO bounty campaigns is not yet regulated by any normative acts. We only have the right to choose whether to join the campaign or not. However, if we see that our rights are being violated - unrealistically low pay, additional requirements are put forward that clearly do not correspond to the nature of the work we are doing, you can create a separate topic, website or something else where to discuss these problems and agree not to participate in certain projects ICO It’s okay even if some bounty hunters join in anyway. The effect will be all the same.

[Golftech]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

You can express whatever you think is right for your judgement but it can't assure you that there would be changes that will happen since you mentioned that the campaign was already ended. It's all in the hands of the team who held the bounty and with how the project will proceed.

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

Joining this forum ain't assure you to be compensated it's just an additional rewards if you got lucky participating while learning more about this industry.

[skeleto88]

TBH bounty hunters don't care, the moment you said you won't join a bounty because of too many participants or lack of limited participants rules from bounty manager many will still join the bounty, this will be so effective if bounty managers can become one but .........

You are right and even if the bounty thread has an accusations of being a scam or whatever negatives issues it has bounty hunters still joining most specially newbies who do not care anything. And having fixed allocations for bounty participants don't guarantee hunters a profitable rewards cause it would still depends on the price value of the tokens.

[btccoffee]

You have a good points of view there and i understand your prostration about the bounty campaigns right now. But campaign managers and there teams want more participants as many as they could to help them spread there campaign to any social media platforms and forums. Most of them really dont care to bounty hunters if they earn 1$ for 8 months as long as there campaign is spread properly and earn a good reputation.

[Ifemini]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

You have stated good reasons, very good reasons, but the fact remains that you or any other bounty participants do not lay down the rules of any campaign.
You can only suggest words, advices to bounty managers.

And for every bounty manager, there is a need to understand that the more the crowd, the less the quality of the campaigns, because it will end up being spammish across different social media outlet.

Lesser participants, leads to quality work done, because you get to track and ensure non spammy post.

You can only join bounties you feel like you have higher chances of earning more.

[Davian144]

Does anyone have a real-time calculator for each stake of IQ cash? I think the stake will be variety since each IQ cash bounty has a different allocation fund. 20% for each Hacking Campaign, Blogs/Video, Signature Campaign, and - 10% for Twitter, 10% for Facebook and only 5%  for Telegram.

A few days ago I had calculated the IQ-Cash reward for the first round, and I saw the amount of the reward was very small and everyone seemed to be working in vain on the IQ-Cash campaign, because I personally also felt disappointed with the reward they gave in first round.

[CryptoWorld87]

You have the right to complain or stop ar remove yourself as a bounty participants but you cAn’t force bounty managers and there teams to limit or put a higher amount for all bounty hunters because they mostly love a very crowded campaign to help them find investors.

[Dpat]

The talking of this United only be successful in dream but if the reality is not impossible but very difficult to unite in one place. That would be required a proper platform here in the internet. Where every bounty hunters need to register and everybody should obey the admin.

[cryptogeek101]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

Yes, I support the suggestions your have made above by fixing bounty allocation or limiting bounty participants because this will go a long way of giving value to bounty hunter's efforts. Project managers and bounty hunters are supposed to be partners in progress

[Dart18]

First of all, not all of that 1000 bounty hunters are owner of one account.
I do believe some of them are using alt accounts in different bounties as long as they don't break a rule.

I say don't join them if you don't feel any profits coming out at a long span of helping them to advertise their campaign.
Just join those who you think is profitable.
The problem is some members still do join any ICO out there. They don't pick anymore.
1 facebook account, 1 twitter account joining 100 bounties.

[Slash61]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

Yes, I support the suggestions your have made above by fixing bounty allocation or limiting bounty participants because this will go a long way of giving value to bounty hunter's efforts. Project managers and bounty hunters are supposed to be partners in progress

You are right, right now the constraints of the project that pays are the small allocations and so many participants. so we will only see a little value that we will receive.

[popeye95]

How hard to restrict the number of participants once it crosses a certain threshold that each stake becomes unprofitable compared to the effort waste? Not that hard right so why don't they just cut off or have a limit on it?

[pragna]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

I feel lucky that i am not working in 2nd round of IQ.cash bounty. I hard too much in round 1 to promote this bounty but after round 1 when i calculate i was fully upset for my labor. Actually you are right that maximum campaign now doing same thing. After end of bounty we may not get tokens or got that kind of tokens is 10$ price. This is very panic situations for us. Yes i think limited bounty participants can be solutions here as fixed bounty allocation will not be accepted from team because of market situation.

thanks.

[stiffbud]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

That's the problem now a days, previously it used to be pretty less number of participants in a bounty campaign which ultimately lead to much higher returns per campaign and as the popularity grew to participate in bounty campaigns the reward per stake shrinked and now people are getting pennies for a month of work. You should try participating in campaigns which have a limit as you proposed but the fixed bounty allocation in USD won't be feasible for the project owners.

[tiang_tower]

didn't you see the allocation for the first round from the beginning? if you see participants who join, of course, get a small payment is very reasonable. now that certainly pays won't give much to bounty hunters.

Yes, what you said is very true, and I saw clearly the allocation of tokens in the first round was not much, but at that time I also did not have time to join because I was still bound by other projects, only when I saw the tokens that had been added to the the first round, I also felt sad even though I did not join the round, because the participants only got coins.

[cepot9]

This is true. It's time for bounty hunters to speak out for their rights, we need justice and regulations that truly protect our rights.

Bounty managers, especially those who come from the project themselves, treat us arbitrarily, change the rules and make it difficult for us to get paid from work done.

This is a job. All must work hard to find solutions to those who commit fraud. I don't think KYC is right for cryptocurrency.

What we need as bounty hunters are justice rights, we work, and they must pay it. Bounty hunters are always victims and are always blamed when the project experiences a dump.