Bounty hunters United we stand

[bison]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

That's the problem now a days, previously it used to be pretty less number of participants in a bounty campaign which ultimately lead to much higher returns per campaign and as the popularity grew to participate in bounty campaigns the reward per stake shrinked and now people are getting pennies for a month of work. You should try participating in campaigns which have a limit as you proposed but the fixed bounty allocation in USD won't be feasible for the project owners.

those are some of the risks that bounty hunters must face right now. maybe there used to be an aerys manager who always set limits on participants who could join in every campaign he held. but now there aren't many managers who make rules like that.

[1715601450]

1715601450

[1715601450]

1715601450

[1715601450]

1715601450

[1715601450]

1715601450

[1715601450]

1715601450

[1715601450]

1715601450

[omnik]

You have the right to complain or stop ar remove yourself as a bounty participants but you cAn’t force bounty managers and there teams to limit or put a higher amount for all bounty hunters because they mostly love a very crowded campaign to help them find investors.

The bounty managers have their own decision for this problem. The fact that if the managers will be putting the purpose of the bounty campaign as the main aim and that needs a lot of promoters.

That's a good suggestion but we know that the reality is too far from your suggestion to be considered by the managers.

[OrangeII]

I support this statement. however, I think it all depends on the developer's strategy. it's not just an individual problem, and I think everything is very clear in the rules and information provided before supporting a project from a bounty.
even IQ.Cash, I do not blame when getting paid that is not much, because it is a risk when I see that this bounty has no participant limits. however, a project only wants the project to be known and attracts investors. so I think they need as many volunteers as possible. Well, that might be the reason why they don't limit participants.

[South Park]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

It is not going to work, in order to pull off something like this you will need to create something like a syndicate and truth to be told most bounty hunters just want to do their own thing and earn a few dollars with their efforts, I know that the situation that we are seeing in the market is completely unfair to them but there is nothing you can do to change it, the huge number of scams and how easy it is to become bounty hunter suppress greatly the amount of profits that you could get.

[Guryon_master]

Sad to say but the thing is it will be hard for the bounty hunters to be united for that matter unless the developer itself will dive into that idea or the bounty manager is the one who will be or have that rules already like bountyhive.

[shaheer001]

I already give suggestions there must be a telegram channel or BTT group where we can ask from the project which pays in pennies to hunters for there hard works over months and especially the project which goes live in the market but did not want to pay the hunters of their hard work rewards in term of tokens.

[criket]

Sad to say but the thing is it will be hard for the bounty hunters to be united for that matter unless the developer itself will dive into that idea or the bounty manager is the one who will be or have that rules already like bountyhive.

the manager should have the rules themselves. The developer must make additional rules, but regarding bounty hunter, I think the bounty manager is more entitled to make the regulation. there used to be managers who had the same rules for all projects held. such as the limited number of participants and it does make participants get a fairly decent payment.

[maxreish]

I know where that emotions coming from. I am once a bounty hunter that experienced to join and participate one bounty for 3 months and  got $25-$30 I guess. Thats for three months. I never complained even they made the reward payments always delay because I know that the project I've joined can possibly be a success or not.
 
  You can look for a project's value before joining. Even you receive high rewards or huge allocation of token, if that token will cost no value then it will be useless

[Vishnu.Reang]

If there was unity among the bounty hunters, then a lot would have been achieved. But the problem is that there are too many of them around, and some of the bounty hunters (especially the inexperienced ones) are so desperate that they will agree to whatever terms and conditions, no matter how much exploitative they may be. So I don't think that unity can be achieved.. but bounty hunters can create groups to support each other.

[r32godzilla]

Keep action, but nobody really cares about it. The situation is now bad for both sides and even that, bounty hunters will promote ICO projects even for less money, so you can´t be the one who will dictate the terms.  

[bitcoin-shark]

in fact in recent times the rewards of the various bounty campaigns have been ridiculous or even unpaid all the bounty hunters present here on the forum should gather in an association and not accept jobs under a certain minimum limit is absurd to work for months for a profit of a few tens of euros

[CashbackLover]

The value of the tokens is what matters, do some calculations on the whole allocation first before joining any bounty campaign, many bounty hunters do research on the project and missed doing research on the token worth and bounty allocation Worth.

[Rafiqul]

It has always been difficult to assert their rights by bounty hunters. Indeed, participation in ICO bounty campaigns is not yet regulated by any normative acts. We only have the right to choose whether to join the campaign or not. However, if we see that our rights are being violated - unrealistically low pay, additional requirements are put forward that clearly do not correspond to the nature of the work we are doing, you can create a separate topic, website or something else where to discuss these problems and agree not to participate in certain projects ICO It’s okay even if some bounty hunters join in anyway. The effect will be all the same.

You are right. I totally agree with you on this and I am with you. So far no policy or appropriate authority has been created to protect the rights of bounty hunters. Many projects run away without honoring the bounty hunters.

[forexandcryptoauditor]

I see few bounty managers are already implementing it with their campaigns. The latest examples are BAL, Sheng World, and SPYCE, ludena protocol.
Having said so, it is the sole decision of the project team to have such a condition of limited participation.
If any project is having a $10K budget, with limited participants they are still spending $10K but the project reach will be limited than having unlimited participation. Within the same budget, if the project is reaching to more users or investors, then this is the way project wants to spend its budget. So from their perspective, it's right.
What we can do from our side is to get upgrade ourselves to stand out among all other participants and by joining more campaigns and so on.

[JasmineRose]

IQ cash yeah i hear that, when i check it, i leave that project because the time is limit.
i don't know how about it but i know what you feel.
all bounty hunter think like you and want to get nice paid but that is not real.

yeah we have to change this rules about bounty campain.

[BitSat19]

Keep action, but nobody really cares about it. The situation is now bad for both sides and even that, bounty hunters will promote ICO projects even for less money, so you can´t be the one who will dictate the terms.  

This is point right now no one can do any thing for this because this forum is only for link nothing else developers using many other methods as well and they are doing this all for their own sack no one care about bounty hunters and we cannot do any good and proper action against them.

[Lizzylove1]

I have now decided to be spending much of my time on trading and make some cool dollars rather than work for a project and pay peanut. Spend your time with profitable trades, do bounty at your leisure, when there is no leisure continue your core job.

[Marble777]

I also think about the exact same thing as you have said above, to be honest I strongly agree on the issue of bounty (Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants). if gift managers hear this complaint and can reconsider then the bounty hunter deserves to get the same reward again.

[ZincUnrated]

Unfortunately, this can only work if we have a group where all hunters can gather together, share ideas and agree on a united front. This is going to be difficult since everyone out there is fighting for their personal and often times, selfish interest. Some won't agree on this and will simply go about their normal way of doing things, making it almost impossible for others to have a say as to how they will operate going forward.

[Jocuserious]

Actually limited bounty participate is better instead rewards pool.
If there was Fixed bounty allocation then lots of members do participate everyday, so after end of the bounty then hunter will receive 1$-2$. Otherwise limited participate never entry duplicate member and comfortable good profits everyone'' who are accept in limited bounty.