Bounty hunters United we stand

[semobo]

Limited bounty participants is way better than fixed rewards and obviously it is going to give fixed amount when a bounty has limited participants and capped at it.And also expecting the rewards in bitcoin will be a good choice so all hunters have to get united and make demand for yourselves.

But in reality it is not going to happen, sadly.

[1714134498]

1714134498

[1714134498]

1714134498

[hahay]

That is a risk that should have been realized from the start, no one can guarantee you to get big profits only from the bounty because even events like this I feel have been around for a long time and not only now. What's more, you promote the project when it's not in the crypto season but at least you still receive tokens by having a sale price I think that's good because it could be that holding it will be good in the future or more precisely when the crypto season returns, because even there is something worse than that where after a few months they worked but no tokens were even received by the participants and at least I experienced something bad like that in the past.

[Kasabus]

Limited bounty participants is way better than fixed rewards and obviously it is going to give fixed amount when a bounty has limited participants and capped at it.And also expecting the rewards in bitcoin will be a good choice so all hunters have to get united and make demand for yourselves.

But in reality it is not going to happen, sadly.

This is everyone's hope that bounty campaign should only have limited bounty participants for them to get higher rewards once a legit campaign is over. But this is not the scenario right now. We have to be more careful in joining bounty projects as scammed projects are flooding rapidly in the market. DYOR could be very helpful not to fall again in scammed projects.

[kingzpro]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

You are right, there should be a minimum fixed reward amount for each task performed just like we get in real life jobs, it is really rediculous and unethical when these projects ask us to work daily, do our tasks daily with daily reports and after months of work they send us pennies, this should never be acceptable there should be minimum amount for each task otherwise it is not worth to participate or if a project has limited budget they should also limit the number of participants per campaign so that everyone ends up with decent reward for their time and efforts.

[BuNga_cute]

It is true that I participated in many bounties but only paid a few dollars, it was frustrating but that's the reality. And I support limiting
the number of participants to bounties, so bounty hunters can be paid more properly. Hopefully the new projects developers and bounty
managers hear this, I'm sure if Limited bounty participants are implemented signature campaigns can be of higher quality.

[Upgate]

Before joining a bounty campaign, you as a bounty hunter is expected to read about the bounty details and distribution. Each bounty campaign always state out the total amount of tokens they will distributing in percentage to each campaign you joined. With the percentage you'll be able to know what will be given to the campaign you joined. Most importantly try and find out how long it will last and their exchange rate. With that you'll be able to know what your reward would be at the end of the bounty campaign

[TopT3ns]

It is true that I participated in many bounties but only paid a few dollars, it was frustrating but that's the reality. And I support limiting
the number of participants to bounties, so bounty hunters can be paid more properly. Hopefully the new projects developers and bounty
managers hear this, I'm sure if Limited bounty participants are implemented signature campaigns can be of higher quality.

indeed currently there is no bounty campaign that can provide large allocations but you should be grateful if there are still bounty campaigns that can still provide some money because it is very difficult to find money from a bounty campaign, at least we all should be able to try to take advantage of the bounty campaign or airdrop.

[BChydro]

~
We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

What actions you are going to propose . No one is forcing anyone to promote anything here and if you want to add a signature or promote a project then you are free to do so and that is not a promise that they will pay you and it is the risk you take if you are hunting down bounties. Look for good projects where you are planning to invest and then consider this as a bonus and everything will be fine rather than thinking of this as a gold mine to make money .

[Teraboy]

I have now decided to be spending much of my time on trading and make some cool dollars rather than work for a project and pay peanut. Spend your time with profitable trades, do bounty at your leisure, when there is no leisure continue your core job.

Me too. I just think to get more chance to earn more money from the market and i was using bounty as a side job only and i personally putting more effort into the trade caused by that gives more guarantee to get profita rather than bounty.

[Republikcoin.com]

problems like this can indeed be overcome by limiting participants. however, as much as whatever the allocation, but if the participants are not limited, it will only make everyone get a small fee. it's just that there is no compulsion in supporting a project through bounties, so I don't think we can blame a project on things like this. however, it is natural that a good project has the support of many people.

[Jawhead999]

Yet another bounty hunters suggestion aim to get more money. Your suggestion is oppositing from the developers/team project goals, because they don't want to limited the bounty participants for get more traffic/promoters. Most campaign have limited participants if the project is succesful, popular and pay with valuable coin (e.g. BTC, ETH).

OP, since you're think participate in bounty campaign is not worth it and wasting your times. I suggest you to find a real job in your country or become freelancer on many online jobs platform (e.g. Upwork).

[shoreno]

but didnt they fix the pay before they proceed on thier bounty ? i thought the payout structure was based on stakes and stake amount will also be based on your forum level .  also no matter how they fix the payment , that still not guarantee that you will get your desired amount based on your calculations because price do fluctuates too . about the limited participants ,this does not related to thier payment because even if they limit thier participant they can still be able to provide same payment . so what else do you want to know ?

[ElmedoRator]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

You should protect yourself, conduct research and evaluate campaigns your way. If they have too little budget or too many participants, you can leave it. IQ cash is a good project so they have attracted a lot of participants. That is good for their project

[vermigerous]

I definitely agree with this. Since bounty campaign now isn't profitable as three years ago, i think there should be a limitation od participants in order to have a good reward in this bounty forum. Past bounties has only less participants such that they have a good value with their rewards.

[LazerPanther]

I definitely agree with this. Since bounty campaign now isn't profitable as three years ago, i think there should be a limitation od participants in order to have a good reward in this bounty forum. Past bounties has only less participants such that they have a good value with their rewards.

It all depends on the decision of the bounty manager and the project. And I believe that they will not want to limit the participants because it makes their projects less likely to receive attention and it is difficult for their projects to succeed. And they cannot raise their budgets because, like you said, the market is not profitable like it was three years ago

[rodskee]

but didnt they fix the pay before they proceed on thier bounty ? i thought the payout structure was based on stakes and stake amount will also be based on your forum level .  also no matter how they fix the payment , that still not guarantee that you will get your desired amount based on your calculations because price do fluctuates too . about the limited participants ,this does not related to thier payment because even if they limit thier participant they can still be able to provide same payment . so what else do you want to know ?

The value will surely fluctuates once the rewards being distributed, the early birds will liquidate the share stakes and
if there are no real supports expect that it will fall hugely.
In terms of limiting participants it's another discussions and different opinions since each developers and BM have
their own views reaching more potential investors.


Most of the time bounty hunters who experienced this kind of situations simply move forget about it and move to another
project, do more deeper research before participating.

[kceekcee]

How about Bounty hunters avoid such Bounties.
If you see an overcrowded Bounty, the best you can do is just avoid it.

Instead of doing free marketing for projects here and there.
Also, chat up Bounty admins and suggest ways to make Bounties better

[Zazzu]

How about Bounty hunters avoid such Bounties.
If you see an overcrowded Bounty, the best you can do is just avoid it.

Instead of doing free marketing for projects here and there.
Also, chat up Bounty admins and suggest ways to make Bounties better

Exactly if that bounty had too many participants. You should avoid it and participate in other bounty, it all depends on your decision and no one can give specific rules in this forum. The opportunity is for everyone and it's very fair

[gabbie2010]

How about Bounty hunters avoid such Bounties.
If you see an overcrowded Bounty, the best you can do is just avoid it.

Instead of doing free marketing for projects here and there.
Also, chat up Bounty admins and suggest ways to make Bounties better

Exactly if that bounty had too many participants. You should avoid it and participate in other bounty, it all depends on your decision and no one can give specific rules in this forum. The opportunity is for everyone and it's very fair

A bounty hunter is expected to make through research part of which by trying to avoid bounties with many participants with a small budget of course such bounties will pay less at the end of their promotion however a lot of newbies never bothered they kept on joining as many bounties as they can to ensure that at least they will earn as much as they can not minding how worthless some of tokens will priced when listed in an exchange.

[southerngentuk]

A bounty hunter is expected to make through research part of which by trying to avoid bounties with many participants with a small budget of course such bounties will pay less at the end of their promotion however a lot of newbies never bothered they kept on joining as many bounties as they can to ensure that at least they will earn as much as they can not minding how worthless some of tokens will priced when listed in an exchange.

now you can see, when there are a good project and the likelihood of success and paying participants will be filled by bounty hunters. we cannot avoid that, especially if there are no rules on limiting participants from the bounty manager.

As for the bounty listed in the exchanges, I think they should limit the participants to make it possible for the bounty hunters to get a good amount of money from the campaign. I recently saw the IQ cash campaign, they listed at major exchanges and made bounty. But their budget is too low and there are so many participants, eventually each person only receives 2-3 $ for 1 month of work