Bounty hunters United we stand

[Gab20]

Nah! Bounty Hunters aren't going to be United on this one, some bounty hunters are so satisfied with the results they are getting from bounties, while you walk away from projects others don't mind joining

Yes because most of the bounty hunters are satisfied already once the bounty campaign paid them, they find it much better than not being paid. Aside from the said reason, I don't think that this will reach anyone. No one is responsible to filter the bounty projects and their allocation for the bounty participants.

The reason some people are not getting satisfied is that they are putting in much effort into what they do. In stated of stay there and be complaining that they are not getting enough from bounty, they should widen their tentacles, get engaged in more activities and commit more time, they will see the result. There will even be an improvement. You might have a all account here, but there are other things you can do that would get you more pay. Develop yourself, get more skills and you will be fine.

[1714984763]

1714984763

[1714984763]

1714984763

[Mahanton]

Nah! Bounty Hunters aren't going to be United on this one, some bounty hunters are so satisfied with the results they are getting from bounties, while you walk away from projects others don't mind joining

Yes because most of the bounty hunters are satisfied already once the bounty campaign paid them, they find it much better than not being paid. Aside from the said reason, I don't think that this will reach anyone. No one is responsible to filter the bounty projects and their allocation for the bounty participants.

The reason some people are not getting satisfied is that they are putting in much effort into what they do. In stated of stay there and be complaining that they are not getting enough from bounty, they should widen their tentacles, get engaged in more activities and commit more time, they will see the result. There will even be an improvement. You might have a all account here, but there are other things you can do that would get you more pay. Develop yourself, get more skills and you will be fine.

Actually, earning money doesnt really only limit out with bounties yet there are other things which are outside on the scope of this field
on where it do talks about skills and knowledge just like on what we have seen on services section.It doesnt really limit out people since
they can do task aside from bounties.In topic answer about taking actions then its pretty useless because no matter how hard you do fight
for your right, only the project team behind would have to decide in the end of the day.

[flagpara]

They require more posts but have a much lower budget than before. Now that the budget allocation of the signature campaign is only 10-20%, I still remember that in 2018 2019 the bounty budget of signature would be 30-50% depending on the different campaigns.

Again I started my work at the wrong time but I noticed that the signature budget was huge compared to now. Now the bounty budget is very low even though all investors think that bounty hunters dump the price. Fixed bounty allocation or limited bounty participation won't help the United stand. Wait for a market pump or next year.

[AmoreJaz]

My advice should start more carefully in participating in the campaign, the reason is that the payment can be more balanced with the work we do. Actually the manager has also informed that there is no compulsion when they will follow the campaigns they provide. But at least we can know more about which bounty managers who really provide proper payment for the work we do, and vice versa we as bounty hunters can provide good quality work in order to get decent payments.

i think by now those who have been in this forum for quite a while already know those BMs that are really doing their job and only accepting quality projects. if you follow them, the chance of getting paid is always high. because guess what? most of these reputable BMs in this forum are only accepting BTC paying campaigns.
so there's no need for the bounty hunters to be united because it is useless. every project has their own rules and they can do what they want. so the decision is left to the bounty hunter. stick to those reputable BMs or join those token paying campaigns that mostly ended up trash!!!

[Xxmodded]

I think is not important about limited participants but how trusted of bounty campaign manager publish their campaign and give good reward for bounty participants, most important thing bounty campaign manager could guarantee with their bounty management and how trusted will listed on exchange market and have value.

[Fatimahcrypto]

It's quite unfortunate that issues pertaining to payment for bounty hunters have been ongoing for a long time without any sign of review by projects. Its much more ridiculous when after participants are promised payments after a very long period and at the end of the day are sent out without any compensation for job done. I've been bitten severally by these projects and would love to see a change. Bounty hunting is getting worthless by the day and it's not a good idea.

[aioc]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

Bounty hunters of ICO are treated cheap, these developers and bounty managers  can because people still join bounty that are already full with  so many participants and the allocation is just to small, as loan as bounty hunters accepts and joined campaign that are already full the cheap price in bounty will go on, because bounty hunters  want to receive token however small, hoping that the price will be better in the market.

[Ochakemaput]

Bounty hunters of ICO are treated cheap, these developers and bounty managers  can because people still join bounty that are already full with  so many participants and the allocation is just to small, as loan as bounty hunters accepts and joined campaign that are already full the cheap price in bounty will go on, because bounty hunters  want to receive token however small, hoping that the price will be better in the market.

but in reality, the token consideration obtained by the bounty hunter will be cheaper than the initial price on the market. at present, there are very few projects that pay participants in their campaigns handsomely.

[Dr.Osh]

I think is not important about limited participants but how trusted of bounty campaign manager publish their campaign and give good reward for bounty participants, most important thing bounty campaign manager could guarantee with their bounty management and how trusted will listed on exchange market and have value.

to be honest, I feel that the rewards given are quite large. however, the problem is when the price of a token does not match the initial price. this makes the reward that initially $ 300k worth $ 50k or even less than that. one of the solutions to this is the dev that keeps the price of the coin.

[Gorosden]

I understand you, right now we have less bounty projects and many bounty hunters, unlike 2017 when we have many bounty projects with less bounty hunters, limited participants can't hurt a project but I'm no so sure that many BMs will accept this, some will still say 'No' and there is nothing we can do to change this.

[MUG1WARA]

one of the solutions to this is the dev that keeps the price of the coin.

no one can keep the price of coins in the market, because the one who has an important role here is a trader. Dev and the team can only develop products well

[Fatimahcrypto]

There's a great need for bounty hunters to unite and see an end to this issue of repression by project owners. Payment for task carried out are based on luck because we aren't sure of payment until it comes to our wallet. Most times, hunters are made to work for several months and after the task are being carried out, the project owners starts shifting tables on when payment would be made. I personally waited for over 6 months for XDB (Digitalbits) only for my hopes to be dashed.

[Ararbermas]

Actually joining bounty campaign to earn massive profits is not trustworthy... especially those campaign who have a bunch of participants like there's no limit . .
 In fact in the first place if you really cares about the efforts you always put in such work , probably you will always notice it that it's not worth it to join such overload campaign  .   And for sure there's already a doubts in your self before joining,, Wherein "if they can really guarantee such award each participants at the end of the day? ".  Will for me that's impossible .. It's possible only but not the exact amount what they promised since the very first start... You know find some real work where you can gain real money instead relying in bounties cause its just wasting time.  Since mostly bounty nowadays wants more participants to join in there campaign..  just to save their projects from drowning . Lol

 Imagine 5$ in 8 months?  Wtf is that!!?.  Lmao

[MCobian]

It is absolutely right that there must be an improvement to the bounty campaign, if it continues like this it will continue to harm
the bounty hunters. There are so many bounties that I have follow, and end up with a very low payment. If fixed bounty allocation
seems difficult to realize, that makes more sense with limited bounty participants. So the amount of payment received by bounty
hunters can also be feasible. Hopefully the bounty manager can start immediately limited participants from joining the bounty campaign.

[pungopete468]

to be honest, I feel that the rewards given are quite large. however, the problem is when the price of a token does not match the initial price. this makes the reward that initially $ 300k worth $ 50k or even less than that. one of the solutions to this is the dev that keeps the price of the coin.

that's because many new projects don't have a strong market. will be different when they are listed on a large exchange with high trading. of course, they must be supported by marketing and large events to continue to maintain the price of their tokens in the market.

The main thing that must be improved is the trust of an ICO. because right now ICO itself is no longer attractive to people. if we see that people like ICO there should be a lot of projects developing, but in fact what happens is the opposite right now so many scam projects

[Chato1977]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

No one will save your stupidity,You are the one who's letting yourself to be scammed and fooled.

You already know that they are scammer yet advertising their project and if you did not received payments you will cry.

[bukham88]

now the cost we get from the bounty project is very little compared to 2017-2018 due to various factors caused by scammers, so the bounty project is now less and the bounty hunter is increasing.

[gundala]

now the cost we get from the bounty project is very little compared to 2017-2018 due to various factors caused by scammers, so the bounty project is now less and the bounty hunter is increasing.

We all know that bounty campaigns are not as good as before. There are lots of drama, rules are suddenly changed, distribution is delayed, allocation is cut, reward is locked, and so on. Before deciding to join the campaign, we should know that this is a risk, and protesting is just a waste of energy and is useless.
We should be more tolerant, because the situation is like this. Projects that look good can end up being scams, projects that look just plain, turn out to be of great benefit. Sometimes I think that the luck factor plays a big role.
The only way we can make peace with this situation is to accept all failures as a risk, if you don't want that then don't join.
Or choose a project that gives BTC rewards, weekly payments, like those managed by Hhampuz, it gives guarantees. The rest we bet on two possibilities, paid and not.

[homhay]

I am a bounty hunter too, we cannot expect good results to every bounties we are joining. Infact joining this forum is free. So to avoid getting $5 for the 3months work. Examine the bounty, do not join an over crowded bounty. Checkout their bounty allocation, it must be 3% to 5% of their ICO.

Your suggestion is very good, where we can avoid the bounty project that is crowded with participants because the more crowded the participants, the allocation of funds we get will also be less and we also have to see bounties that have a chance of success later

[southerngentuk]

Limiting participants will be the best way to protect bounty hunters. Currently there are too few good projects but too many bounty hunters in operation, and this situation makes every good campaign have a lot of participants. And at the end of the campaign each person receives only $ 5-10 for many months of work, because the number of participants is too crowded. So the new bounty needs to limit the participants to ensure the benefits of the bounty hunter