Bounty hunters United we stand

[ROB18]

As a hunter, I do not tend to join on bounties that I know will not reach my expectations, Most of the bounties out there doesn't really give me that satisfaction. So I tend to really do my research until I found a decent one. But, This doesn't mean that bounties should not change. Well if there's something you learned about this is that Bounties should raise their stakes if they don't, Hunters will get tired on doing labor for the for of an hour in McDonalds.

[1714749186]

1714749186

[1714749186]

1714749186

[tiang_tower]

Your suggestion is very good, where we can avoid the bounty project that is crowded with participants because the more crowded the participants, the allocation of funds we get will also be less and we also have to see bounties that have a chance of success later

In general, a good campaign is always a lot of followers, because every bounty hunter is obviously always looking for a good bounty campaign not a bad one, so in this case what must be considered is the number of token allocations given to the campaign, apart from the number of participants, because many bounty campaigns whose followers are lonely because they are not qualified, do you want to follow a campaign that is not qualified ?

[radjie]

one of the solutions to this is the dev that keeps the price of the coin.

no one can keep the price of coins in the market, because the one who has an important role here is a trader. Dev and the team can only develop products well

all of that is indeed very influential on traders who can move the price of the coin where the coin is listed on the exchange market itself. but investor interest also has an important role so the success of promoting related projects can influence the amount of investor interest so that they are interested in putting their money into the projects they have chosen that have been run by the project developer itself, and the role of the developer and prize manager must certainly be able to maximize the program promotion, so that later it can attract more investors and people who will sell related tokens so that the price of tokens can be maintained after entering the exchange market

[takana212]

the allocation to the bounty hunter has been determined from the first, and the bounty conditions now are also different, where there are more participants than the ongoing project, so we can only choose and follow the bounty that meets our expectations.

[Mpamaegbu]

It's really sad and disheartening that these project owners and their bounty managers keep getting away with all these time wasting of a thing. But sometimes I really don't blame them, I blame the hunters who will always rush to register in any campaign they see without even bothering to peruse the project. My advice to hunters is to avoid any bounty with a duration longer than 8weeks. Secondly, look at the payment structure. Thirdly, they should check the BM before participating in their bounties.

[cytpoway121]

The most prominent thread i have noticed about bounty hunting is usually about payments, number of participants; or perhaps number of exited bounties. When are we going to address the influx of participants into fraudulent bounty programs? We need to indulge and educate all bounty hunters to do the most minimum basics before joining any bounty program. Do your research, figure out the principles of the program, and make it tick.

After which, we can then worry about the no of participants or allocated token.

[slaman29]

In general, a good campaign is always a lot of followers, because every bounty hunter is obviously always looking for a good bounty campaign not a bad one, so in this case what must be considered is the number of token allocations given to the campaign, apart from the number of participants, because many bounty campaigns whose followers are lonely because they are not qualified, do you want to follow a campaign that is not qualified ?

Not the number but the quality, always, always, always.

You want to see bounty campaign type with bounty hunters? Go look at the bounties threads and join Telegram. 30k per channel filled with ppl asking "wen distribution"?

I've seen channels with 50 people and everyone's so active and knowledgeable. I want that one.

[cryptoknightt]

previously the hunters had to estimate the total prize to be received, not just join and not know how many prizes were allocated and ultimately blame the project for the incident.
the total participation received by stakeholders and others, I think that is the basic thing that must be considered.

[Mianae]

I agree with you when it comes to having a cap or fixed payment for bounty hunters not because it's our right but because our efforts should be worth something because we're working for it and should gain a better payment from months of work done. If bounty managers can hear us and cap their campaigns it will be to our own interest and those who found the project on time because many late comers will not have any campaign to join.

[doctor877]

sometimes it happens that some project will not bring the expected reward, as hunters its more of the reward after much effort but for the project its more of the work for little little payment. not all projects will want to cap their participants because its of more benefit to them for much crowd and also with respect to the BM handling the campaign. it will be good to see more capped project nevertheless, some good projects will still pay no matter the crowd of participants.

[poodle63]

previously the hunters had to estimate the total prize to be received, not just join and not know how many prizes were allocated and ultimately blame the project for the incident.
the total participation received by stakeholders and others, I think that is the basic thing that must be considered.

Dude, you can't know how exactly and the amount that you will be received it consider about all of the result depends on the how much price for each of token after it has already traded on the exchange site.
That means if all are still random.

[JoMarrah Iarim Dan]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

Yes this is true. Well, on their part they want to have thousands of participants because they want to spread their project widely. But due to so many of the participants, it cannot be truely monitored. Some are not worth it to receive stakes which is unfair to dedicated participants. I agree to limited bounty paticipants. Well I am already seeing a campaign that have limited participants in signature campaign. Yes it is a good thing. I just hope that is applicable in every allocation of a campaign.

[Sourhearrt]

Too many participants will definitely ruin the reward from a bounty campaign and there is nothing you can do about it if the bounty manager decides to keep allowing people to join the bounty, larger quantities of bounty hunters is exactly what many project team wants

[Gayong88]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

We all hope that there is a small policy that can help Bounthy Hunter in obtaining their rights. I am sure the parties in this forum will also sit down to discuss your questions.

[miklesm]

It is true that Bounty campaigns become less and less profitable with time and the only solutions are fixed bounty allocation or limited bounty participants, just as you said. Unfortunately, the most projects are not interested in Bounty hunters earnings, they just want to get an advertisement for as cheap as possible.

[restuibu]

It is true that Bounty campaigns become less and less profitable with time and the only solutions are fixed bounty allocation or limited bounty participants, just as you said. Unfortunately, the most projects are not interested in Bounty hunters earnings, they just want to get an advertisement for as cheap as possible.

not all projects mate. because some projects have decided to limit participants from joining, in fact, it is the job of the bounty manager to negotiate with the team before running the bounty. I mean the bounty manager must say if participants will be limited. if the team agrees then proceed with the launch of the campaign

[Lantind]

Too many participants will definitely ruin the reward from a bounty campaign and there is nothing you can do about it if the bounty manager decides to keep allowing people to join the bounty, larger quantities of bounty hunters is exactly what many project team wants

Actually it is not damaging the bounty campaign if there are many bounty participants, only the number of rewards received by bounty participants will be less, so this becomes a complaint from bounty participants and the solution is clear to the manager, namely by limiting the participants who enter the bounty campaign.

[Iyeman]

Too many participants will definitely ruin the reward from a bounty campaign and there is nothing you can do about it if the bounty manager decides to keep allowing people to join the bounty, larger quantities of bounty hunters is exactly what many project team wants

If the price will be the same like what already promised and the hunters will actually received a good amount of reward but that depends on the manager because the manager will be focusing to reach the main aim to create a bounty campaign to create a massive awareness to the public.

[someone703]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

We all hope that there is a small policy that can help Bounthy Hunter in obtaining their rights. I am sure the parties in this forum will also sit down to discuss your questions.

It all depends on the project and the manager. If they want to ensure the rights of participants, I believe they will set the appropriate rules. But until now I don't see such projects, they are only interested in how to get more people involved and promote their projects.

[Vishnu.Reang]

It is true that Bounty campaigns become less and less profitable with time and the only solutions are fixed bounty allocation or limited bounty participants, just as you said. Unfortunately, the most projects are not interested in Bounty hunters earnings, they just want to get an advertisement for as cheap as possible.

All that is true. But for the new projects, there is no other options available. If they want to advertise to the investors, then there should be a good bounty campaign. Cash rich projects can opt for advertising using Google AdSense or similar services. But how many of the projects can afford to do that? With the bounties, they are getting advertisement almost for free.