Bounty hunters United we stand

[OrangeII]

Too many participants will definitely ruin the reward from a bounty campaign and there is nothing you can do about it if the bounty manager decides to keep allowing people to join the bounty, larger quantities of bounty hunters is exactly what many project team wants

as far as I think, we might be able to demand payment, but before making a project, they have written allocations and participants at the limit or not. we can't sue after that. other than that, you are free to join the project or not. Well, we all want to be paid using coins that are already on the market. but, I think, it's a difficult thing especially since it's been pushed for a long time.

[bakasabo]

All that is true. But for the new projects, there is no other options available. If they want to advertise to the investors, then there should be a good bounty campaign. Cash rich projects can opt for advertising using Google AdSense or similar services. But how many of the projects can afford to do that? With the bounties, they are getting advertisement almost for free.

You know what is the best part of cryptocurrency - be anonymous. Not all of the of the investors wants to be anonymous, but some definitely do. Using Google AdSense was never anonymous (as your connect your bank account/card to it and verify it). It might be not obvious, but insiders could spread the info about all the transactions and money movement to others.

If a projects announce that "Company A" is their investor, this company's competitors could also invest in this project. For the project is not bad, but for investors means loosing possibility to get more profit or control.

Imagine that you know that Apple stocks will go up next week, you buy some and plan to buy more, but your neighbor finds that out and buys all available stocks

[Goldada]

I think the days are still very fr when bounty hunters will unite to fight any course or project on payments. The way they fight each other is just something else. If only we can remove envy of seeing others prospers, then we will have one mind to fight.

[angrybirdy]

This is right, however, there is no one who can demand the project team to do what bounty hunters want. Even bounty manager are just following the instructions/orders from the team because they are the one who gives us the payment. They are free to choose token for the payment of bounty participants even if we don't want to, they are also the one who make rules, not us.

[slashz9]

The actions you take should follow the project and read the rules first. Many projects have different rules, some projects have also implemented participation limits for each campaign.so you just choose to follow it or not.

[atjiat]

I believe that today there is no working method to influence the management and project developers, to fix the real reward for bounty hunters. In addition, Bounty Hunters themselves must act accordingly and not advertise all those projects that are not even worth a cent, and subsequently deceive all Bounty participants by the company.
I also want to note the fact that in most cases, limiting the number of Bounty Hunters in a certain Bounty company will not have the desired effect, since in most cases developers from the air think over the initial cost of their token, and in fact after listing this token has a thousand-fold price less and may never rise to the value that the team claimed.

[Furious 7]

Too many participants will definitely ruin the reward from a bounty campaign and there is nothing you can do about it if the bounty manager decides to keep allowing people to join the bounty, larger quantities of bounty hunters is exactly what many project team wants

as far as I think, we might be able to demand payment, but before making a project, they have written allocations and participants at the limit or not. we can't sue after that. other than that, you are free to join the project or not. Well, we all want to be paid using coins that are already on the market. but, I think, it's a difficult thing especially since it's been pushed for a long time.

The project always pays the bounty with their own coins so that more and more holding or investing in allocations is not a problem as long as the coins are already in the market so the hunters will feel happy if the coins are worth the results of the promotion.

[Vishnu.Reang]

The project always pays the bounty with their own coins so that more and more holding or investing in allocations is not a problem as long as the coins are already in the market so the hunters will feel happy if the coins are worth the results of the promotion.

Most of the projects have a fixed allocation for bounty, and this can range from 0.4% to 2%, depending on the project. I don't think that they are going to increase it significantly, as there is no shortage of bounty hunters right now. However, my suggestion is to pay 10% to 20% of the bounty in either BTC or ETH. This can boost the morale of the bounty hunters, and in turn the project may get good exposure and advertisement.

[Reatim]

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

What about campaigning for your co Bounty Hunters to Stop joining them?
You have already idea how this company runs Business,and i'm sure these projects are run by same company continuously .

They have been doing this for long time,Knowing some managers aren't care about the Hunters meaning all
 they care is the payments given by the Dev,so even if the first project scams,they
 will still managed the next one and the other next.

[rahmathidayat93]

The actions you take should follow the project and read the rules first. Many projects have different rules, some projects have also implemented participation limits for each campaign.so you just choose to follow it or not.

Actually this is something that does not need to be told, because basically every participant who has joined the campaign will definitely follow the rules, and for those who do not participate, obviously they do not have to follow the rules of the campaign.

[Malam90]

A bounty should limit its participants otherwise too manay participants participate but payment is too low. Every bounty should be paid in escrow before start so that participants will get their payments after the bounty end. Now maximum project don't pay to the hunters after the bounty ended.

[bakasabo]

A bounty should limit its participants otherwise too manay participants participate but payment is too low. Every bounty should be paid in escrow before start so that participants will get their payments after the bounty end. Now maximum project don't pay to the hunters after the bounty ended.

Or Bounty Manager should be more selective who he selects for campaign. Just imagine what will be the total response from campaign, if all the signature campaign slots will be taken by Jr. Members-Members (dont want to offend these ranks, there are people who makes good posts even in low rank) and all the social media campaign slots are filled with bots with 100-500 friend/followers, who are also bots.

But I agree that funds must be escrowed from project to BM or other trusted person. This will be the first bridge of trust to these project.

[lienfaye]

A bounty should limit its participants otherwise too manay participants participate but payment is too low. Every bounty should be paid in escrow before start so that participants will get their payments after the bounty end. Now maximum project don't pay to the hunters after the bounty ended.

Its an advantage for the project to have many participants it means many hunters will spread awareness for their project to be known not just here in the forum but in social media platforms as well. In return, the rewards are low for months of participating its not worth it but much better than having nothing at all or ended up in scam projects. Paying upfront is good but I think the dev wont do it.

[Lagduf]

The actions you take should follow the project and read the rules first. Many projects have different rules, some projects have also implemented participation limits for each campaign.so you just choose to follow it or not.

that's true and this is not a problem that can be solved instantly. There just be solid cooperation between the manager to deal with the team but it will never happen if the team has a really harsh hand with their opinion to keep all in their hand, .

[Kvalentine]

Bounty hunters have no reputations to protect themselves, while they are been treated unfair why can't we just come together and make decisions before promoting useless valued bounty campaigns? Anyway using limited participants should work fine but still not all bounty managers and project teams will accept this.

[trauchot]

Unfortunately, it’s hard to get a good payout for bounty hunters, because companies dont care about bounty hunters and they use them till the maximum, so we just need to turn a blind eye to such companies and move on or gather a huge number of people and start spamming in social networks about such companies, that they are cheaters, scammers and so on like that.

[Mighty_crypt]

I think it's time for bounty hunters to start claiming their right on this forum, I'm talking about bounties that wants hundreds to thousands participants on their spreadsheet but plan to pay bounty hunters 5$ each for their 8month work, this is getting more ridiculous every day, IQ cash bounty is over and with the current price per token you will be lucky to earn 10$ to 20$, if no one is ready to stand by me I will stand for myself, what I want is

Fixed bounty allocation or
Limited bounty participants

We can't keep helping new projects for pennies, we should take actions

I like the fact that you are trying to motivate bounty hunters to start standing for themselves, I respect that but honestly not all bounty hunters cares about their lost reputation, its like they are satisfied with the pennies they are making

[Davian144]

Bounty hunters have no reputations to protect themselves, while they are been treated unfair why can't we just come together and make decisions before promoting useless valued bounty campaigns? Anyway using limited participants should work fine but still not all bounty managers and project teams will accept this.

It is difficult to gather bounty participants to make a decision before promoting a bounty campaign, because each bounty participant has different thoughts in terms of promoting bounties, even though the aim is to get paid more, but to unify the thoughts of bounty participants is certainly not easy and very difficult to do by anyone.

[cabron]

Bounty hunters have no reputations to protect themselves, while they are been treated unfair why can't we just come together and make decisions before promoting useless valued bounty campaigns? Anyway using limited participants should work fine but still not all bounty managers and project teams will accept this.

It is difficult to gather bounty participants to make a decision before promoting a bounty campaign, because each bounty participant has different thoughts in terms of promoting bounties, even though the aim is to get paid more, but to unify the thoughts of bounty participants is certainly not easy and very difficult to do by anyone.

Some of them just come here and post whatever is being asked by the team and they keep doing it without reading what the project is actually about and whether it is feasible. In the end, they were doing things without getting paid for it because the project end up as a scam. There is more to investigate than just grabbing more bounty coins.

[rodskee]

Unfortunately, it’s hard to get a good payout for bounty hunters, because companies dont care about bounty hunters and they use them till the maximum, so we just need to turn a blind eye to such companies and move on or gather a huge number of people and start spamming in social networks about such companies, that they are cheaters, scammers and so on like that.

Without doing further investigations regarding to project/bounties that you'll going to participate, your
chances is slim expecting decent value of rewards.
There are so many available projects and the team are all competition with investors, they wanted to
maximized the promotions / advertisement
to the point that they'll going to accept everyone, with such kind of mentalities it will results to a lesser
amount of money if the project succeed being listed.