Etherscan or Ethplorer

[andycarrol]

Etherscan platform is indeed very good for monitoring all wallet assets owned but you have to know sometimes Etherscan has an inaccurate asset estimation value while ethplorer in my opinion is still good because it is not as bad as Etherscan even though etherscan can monitor the wallet to the maximum limit of 25 ethereum purses or erc20 wallet.

[jcpone]

I'm using Ethplorer to check my wallets and track my tokens if the token I waited coming from bounties have finally arrive in my wallets, I have so many shit tokens in my wallet that are sitting in my wallets for years but I notice that some coins do not have value in Ethplorer whereas in Etherscan they have value, did you also notice that, which of the two are you using to check your wallet.   

Etherscan and Ethplorer are still both useful in terms of monitoring transactions.
This was being used for a couple of years now since I started here in cryptocurrency.
I don't see any wrong with these two of course.

[Python Master]

I prefer Etherscan because it has better UI design. They are not much different in functions. You can use both to track your wallet because these 2 websites get data from different sources.

[Oppo57]

Etherscan and etherpolar They are both part of ethereum wallet. But they are both different. A coin publishes the price on an individual site. It's not a problem. Best wishes for all coin and token.
.

[Kong Hey Pakboy]

I'm using Ethplorer to check my wallets and track my tokens if the token I waited coming from bounties have finally arrive in my wallets, I have so many shit tokens in my wallet that are sitting in my wallets for years but I notice that some coins do not have value in Ethplorer whereas in Etherscan they have value, did you also notice that, which of the two are you using to check your wallet.   

I only used Etherscan since I started to have an interest in crypto to track my transactions and tokens that I got from the bounties that I participated in. I also have a lot of shitcoins in my wallet or coins that don't have any good value. It is the reason why they mostly get stock in my wallet for years now.

[romero121]

Both are almost similar in its functioning. The usage of etherscan and ethplorer were low compared to the previous years. Once I was much into bounty participation. During those days quite often I check myetherwallet, later the value of my holdings were worth nothing. Maybe once again will start accumulating more and more tokens.

[sayam]

Most of the time I use Etherscan. I don't know why it seems easy to me. But sometimes I have to use Ethplorer to see details about my Tokens. So basically I use both Etherscan & Ethplorer.

[levyashin]

Once i liked ethplorer better than etherscan but those days are over. Etherscan dominated the market and i am not entering ethplorer for a long time. But right now i will check just to be sure if any of my tokens i am not aware of has some value which etherscan doesn't show, just to be sure

[yohananaomi]

Once i liked ethplorer better than etherscan but those days are over. Etherscan dominated the market and i am not entering ethplorer for a long time. But right now i will check just to be sure if any of my tokens i am not aware of has some value which etherscan doesn't show, just to be sure

maybe just the familiarity of how to use, then there will be differences in perception that will occur. like the colleague above used etplorer and now is more etherscan, I think it's usefulness that might be able to distinguish.

I used both of them and until now I found it helpful to both. I use etplorer only to look for new tokens that might not yet exist in the market if they are already registered there and see the contract number. but if I use etherscan to see the tokens that I get on my wallet.

when viewed because of factors alone, which results in people more pleased with etplorer or etherscan. and that factor makes it habitual and doesn't seem to be able to move to another, even though it might be renewable.

[Em00n01]

Both are same. But etherscan is widely used. I saw most of the exchange and sites redirect to etherscan also it seems to be friendly to me. So i will suggest etherscan.

[mace15]

Both are same. But etherscan is widely used. I saw most of the exchange and sites redirect to etherscan also it seems to be friendly to me. So i will suggest etherscan.

I tried ethplorer before but I’m convenient using and viewing all of my token in etherscan. Etherscan is best for me without exploring others this gives a one go viewing all of our tokens. As long this gives you the needed Data and information anything can use.

[shakesbear]

I have for a long time developed so that I use both, quickly went to check what you need. I don't see anything complicated about it.

[Pecunia non olet]

If you are used to using Etherscan, there is no reason to use the Ethprorer website instead of Etherscan. Both has same features and both shows same tokens in the wallet. Not like other services that shows only supported tokens. Ethplorer and Etherscan show all received tokens no matter the websites support them or not.

[wozzek23]

I have been using both of these explorers for different purposes. In the initial days, etherscan was not supporting ERC tokens as far as I could remember. So, at this times I needed ethplorer for tracking my all ERC tokens. And then I started making use of these two explorers interchangeably for some requirements. Whenever I do get transaction links from exchanges, they are providing etherscan tx links alone. But, I am not too comfort with them.

But, ethplorer is seeming like too organized to show up both ETH and token balance in my eyes (not sure how other people are viewing it). When you are comfortable to something for some reasons then you may not change that for sure suddenly. I still look for more convenient and eth fork traceable explorer for all my ethereum related needs .

[libert19]

I use etherscan, if I have to check value of my tokens I just use deltabalances, it shows estimated value of all tokens instead of just cmc listed ones.

[ice18]

Im using both but ethplorer seems more fast updating erc20 assets I usually monitor my new tokens via ethplorer but sometimes it takes time to load if you have too many shitcoins in your wallet.

[TastyChillySauce00]

Most of the time I use Etherscan. I don't know why it seems easy to me. But sometimes I have to use Ethplorer to see details about my Tokens. So basically I use both Etherscan & Ethplorer.

Anyone used based on what their needs. People must aware if there's no perfect platform and when platform A is less accurate and there was another choice that much more accurate like platform B but the design was not so good like platform A. that's also happening on etherscan and ethplorer

[ShakilTaj35]

I like ethplorer because i feel comfortable with it. It always shows the value of token of that time when you make any transaction. This is the plus point.

[InwardContour]

I use etherscan, if I have to check value of my tokens I just use deltabalances, it shows estimated value of all tokens instead of just cmc listed ones.

I thought deltablances show value of tokens wrt forkdelta, etherdelta and IDEX are there added exchanges? Well, etherscan and ethplorer still show value of tokens and both are similar and also unique in their own ways. Major reason why I use ethplorer is to display value of my tokens in descending order. Etherscan is cool since it shows exchanges where you can trade tokens. Both etherscan and ethplorer are valid, but etherscan has more unique features.

[ife2020]

I think it is hard to choose the best between etherscan.io or ethplorer because to my understanding, etherscan.io shows token value of tokens that is not reflective on ethplorer, while ethplorer shows value for tokens not reflective on etherscan.io too.

My suggestion is that you use both ethplorer and etherscan.io to complement one another seamlessly for a better result