Is it just me or there are others who have same thoughts?

[adzino]

Is it just me or others think same way? I mean are listed bounties intentionally using bounty campaigns to create hype and before the bounty is over they dump part the tokens making it lose value and make bounty hunters share what's left??? I'm kinda confused with bounty projects that are trading

Yes, this is how it work. Shit project emerges. They start paying people with their own shit token to advertise for those shit project and some what creates a hype by proposing a mind blowing but impossible (by their fake team to be more precise) idea. And then there are naive (and some stupid) investors who invests on those project and tokens.
Once they get investors money, they dump their tokens for extra profit and are never to be seen (but comes back with a new look and project).

[suzanne5223]

Is it just me or others think same way? I mean are listed bounties intentionally using bounty campaigns to create hype and before the bounty is over they dump part the tokens making it lose value and make bounty hunters share what's left??? I'm kinda confused with bounty projects that are trading

That's not what it is but it a vice-versa circumstance because there are some project owners whose purpose was to scam investors and the process they used is what you said while there are some project owners which lack the better management knowledge which will positively influence the right of their coin.
Thats why it important for bounty hunter and investors to also study the teams knowledge and how deeply they really want the project to flourish.

[daniahya]

Listed projects are still risky, don't be fooled just because they are available on exchanges, some might not even have good volume and some might be listed on bad exchanges like p2pb2b, the ball is in your court, choose wisely

Yes, choosing projects wisely is a very good thing for every bounty participant to do, because at the moment it is very difficult to know which are good and which are not good, even those that have already been linked in the market are also not necessarily good , because all that still depends on the applicant and also the number of requests to buy on the token.

yes, sometimes projects that have entered the market, their buy orders do not exist, there are only selling orders, projects like this must be avoided because they will not be able to make money, if they follow the bounty they hold, surely it will be difficult to develop also because there are many sell their tokens

[joshua123]

Tokens can lose value anytime but it still depends on how good the use case of the token is, look at Cartesi bounty campaign, the project is good enough that its stable at 0.033$ to 0.04$ area, it's been months already, unlike many bounty projects that loses all value in days right after trading starts

Cartesi is listed on Binance hence other bounty projects are struggling to even get listed on low market exchange. Maybe there's really difference when it comes to quality of bounty campaign and the project we are promoting. But the idea is actually common, some campaigns are just abusing the participants or even using them, they will only distribute during the time the project worth is near zero. These people are wise to do that.

[ahmia39]

joining campaign already listing is actually not a guarantee that you will get a lot of money but at least joining campaign already listed guarantees that you can sell immediately. for pump and dump it all depends on the quality of the project. so always doing the research well

Yes, the opportunity to get a lot of money is not a guarantee on the projects that have been registered, but it can help the campaign participants when he wants to sell tokens directly from the campaign at the price requested by traders in the market.

[michellee]

Tokens can lose value anytime but it still depends on how good the use case of the token is, look at Cartesi bounty campaign, the project is good enough that its stable at 0.033$ to 0.04$ area, it's been months already, unlike many bounty projects that loses all value in days right after trading starts

If the token can stable at some level price, maybe it because there are not many people who have interest with the token or the and the team try to keep the price to that price level. We don't know about that, and I think we can move to the next token list to find the potential coin which can give us a chance to make a profit.

[Novatech8]

Many bounty hunters are attracted to listed bounty campaigns, this makes them lose their senses of doing better research, they relax thinking they will see good reward since the tokens are trading, little did they know that some tokens are bad even if they are listed and trading on exchanges.

1. They failed to check how demanding the tokens are.
2. They failed to check market cap and volumes of the listed exchanges

[Lantind]

Tokens can lose value anytime but it still depends on how good the use case of the token is, look at Cartesi bounty campaign, the project is good enough that its stable at 0.033$ to 0.04$ area, it's been months already, unlike many bounty projects that loses all value in days right after trading starts

Basically, each project is not in the same condition, so do not equate one project with another project, Cartesi is in great demand by everyone, so it is very reasonable if the Cartesi token price is always stable at $ 0.033 to the $ 0.04 area.

[kayvie]

Tokens can lose value anytime but it still depends on how good the use case of the token is, look at Cartesi bounty campaign, the project is good enough that its stable at 0.033$ to 0.04$ area, it's been months already, unlike many bounty projects that loses all value in days right after trading starts

Basically, each project is not in the same condition, so do not equate one project with another project, Cartesi is in great demand by everyone, so it is very reasonable if the Cartesi token price is always stable at $ 0.033 to the $ 0.04 area.

Yes, because the outcome of the whole project including the price will always depend on how the project team will handle it. They are all different from one another, just like the given example, Cartesi, it is one of the great project nowadays, that's why its price does not drop to the lowest when it was launched in the market.

[dhemasm]

(but comes back with a new look and project).

Yeap, Always back with same scheme. Just different "Use-case" and almost same team too, Really hard to find real project with real use case right now, We need more be careful and also if possible joining through IEO on reputable exchange, Atleast it's positive point and we can do other research. Just need to be more careful and do deep research before investing, Cheers mate!

[leea-1334]

Yes, choosing projects wisely is a very good thing for every bounty participant to do, because at the moment it is very difficult to know which are good and which are not good, even those that have already been linked in the market are also not necessarily good , because all that still depends on the applicant and also the number of requests to buy on the token.

Here is a good tip for you, and you can thank me later,,, consider ALL projects to be bad, not good, terrible etc.

Does not matter what is listed, what has a good team, what has a good whitepaper. Consider all of them bad and do not invest or join to make money.

But if you find a app/service/product you like? Ah, this is where you go and support it!

[Surrapatt]

yes, sometimes projects that have entered the market, their buy orders do not exist, there are only selling orders, projects like this must be avoided because they will not be able to make money, if they follow the bounty they hold, surely it will be difficult to develop also because there are many sell their tokens

Now there are lots of tokens from new projects like that, so we also have to check them first when we want to promote them, because things like you said have happened very often in new tokens on the market.

[ralle14]

paying bitcoin campaign have limit to its participants amount , and also not all rank or member could not participate cause its very restrict.  usually this campaign will require merit , and this is be main problem for several member.

There's more requirements because the payments are fixed and they only accept some participants because running a bitcoin campaign could cost a lot depending on the rates per rank. Merit isn't always a requirement on all bitcoin campaigns sometimes there are managers looking for certain posters that are very active on specific boards.

That's how they give their investors a head start in trading, back then it was a free for all whoever is the first one to sell gets the most profit.

[ije07]

Yes, not only you but almost all crypto users, especially gift hunters, also have the same thoughts as you. this is a form of the project team's own scenario to attract investors. don't be surprised if the bounty project is complete and the bounty hunter gets the project token at a low price.

[xZork]

Is it just me or others think same way? I mean are listed bounties intentionally using bounty campaigns to create hype and before the bounty is over they dump part the tokens making it lose value and make bounty hunters share what's left??? I'm kinda confused with bounty projects that are trading

Bounty campaigns are a cheap way of advertising. All they promise in most cases is worthless tokens that have no value or very little value in exchange for your time and bandwidth.

By now you should have figure out this already. Always participate at least in bounties that pay in Bitcoin or a few other valuable top altcoins

It would be great if we always had projects that were willing to pay with bitcoin or valuable altcoins, but such projects were few and had difficult regulations.

[Hellkas]

The best tome for bounty hunters was in 2016-2017 years when there were a lot of projects which can easily pay you more than 1k$ for your work, but now most bounties just promise a lot and very often break their promises, so bounty hunters feel deceived. I faced it too and it`s sad.

[ameliana]

I think that has been set by the project developer itself, that's why we have to be more careful before making a decision about investing in crypto or taking part in it. The coin hype often occurs before the bounty project is completed and can certainly endanger investors and prize hunters.

[witbla]

Such a strategy for sure makes sense, but you know, what I would also say - it is not easy to find multiple solutions that meet requirements. What I mean is evaluating the factors. From my point of view, platform must be advanced, reliable and, of course, bring real and practical value

[hwteeer]

Such a strategy for sure makes sense, but you know, what I would also say - it is not easy to find multiple solutions that meet requirements. What I mean is evaluating the factors. From my point of view, platform must be advanced, reliable and, of course, bring real and practical value

Absolutely so and I fully agree with you that it is not easy to find several tokens that widen the horizons and set new standards on the industry. Talking about you, are there many solutions you can recommend in general?

[witbla]

Absolutely so and I fully agree with you that it is not easy to find several tokens that widen the horizons and set new standards on the industry. Talking about you, are there many solutions you can recommend in general?

Nope, I wouldn't say so. I am only having 2 or 3 most attractive ones I am following. And latest discovery I would definitely recommend everyone to have a look at - Centric Foundation. Have you already heard of such a solution? Cause you know, in here guys are setting entirely new standards on the industry