How can ICOs come back in the game?

[shakesbear]

Why would they go back to the game? Now some projects use the ICO model, there are just a lot of alternatives, it's good.

[1714997370]

1714997370

[1714997370]

1714997370

[1714997370]

1714997370

[Divinespark]

Why choose an ICO at the present time? There are so many scammer and they are creating fake projects to deceive investors. IEO will be much safer and more profitable for investors, I just hope IEO will exist for a long time to help me make a lot of profit with it.

[Reatim]

As crypto gets exposed to the world gradually, new and more convenient features enter the market.Initial Exchange Offerings are taking over with their planned and well structured activities which put the whole project on checks and make sure investors get their holdings after making the buy orders.Again, the coin gets the opportunity to be listed on that exchange which facilitate immediate trading if not planned otherwise by the team.
In my opinion, if ICOs are to come back in the game, then there should be regulations and structures set aside in order for it to meet the standards set by IEOs.What other way do you think can lift up ICOs again?

I dont think ICO still has a place here in this market,After all that abused happen from scammers and Fraudsters?
What i  believe is even IEO have the same structure and soon will also take advantage of the system.


For me why need to invest in those risky way when there are tons of cryptocurrency existing  now?
and also there are tons of tokens in the market to choose.

check this article and you'll see why we not need to entertain ICO again.

https://news.bitcoin.com/icos-are-dead-but-ico-scammers-are-immortal/

The initial coin offering may have all but died, but the ICO scammer marches on regardless. Whereas legitimate projects have to wrangle with all kinds of challenges including the strength of the market, generating value for investors, creating a real product and actually delivering on the promises they make, the soulless scammer is unencumbered by technical constraints, work ethic or any sense of decency

[bbcolex]

Ico's been abused last time, it was all the hype. Lot's of people who were crypto savvy that time earned alot while most of new investors that time Lost A LOT. It was a gateway for some to quick buck, some project failed to thrive and lost interest since they're not into the adaption but rather than the money they could get from the hype. Ico's long dead and gone.

[Eddyc]

To return to the game, the ICO system must show loyalty and commitment to its objectives and principles. Unfortunately many projects surfed the wave promising many things and did not even deliver on what was promised, tarnishing the image of the ICO projects. Therefore, in order to regain credibility, projects must be executed and worked on.

[wozzek23]

In my opinion, if ICOs are to come back in the game, then there should be regulations and structures set aside in order for it to meet the standards set by IEOs.What other way do you think can lift up ICOs again?

It seems like Initial coin offerings are already back in the game. The new ICO launched by AVA labs called Avalanche (AVAX) raised around 42 Million dollars in just 4.5 hours during the public sale. That’s a huge amount considering the present scenario of the market and the time it took to raise that kind of funding. So, I would say, if the project has potential, it can grow in any market and get funding in any situation with right marketing and promotion. Also, ICO’s should be regulated by the government in order to eliminate scam projects and help make crypto environment a safer place.

In some deep thoughts, if high level forum members start some initiative to study the new projects and declare their opinion in a way to alert this community then we can easily support "right" ICOs by filtering the rest of ICOs out. But, for them it would be too much of works hence they must deserve compensation for that. Compensation should be paid by ICO devs and by this community as well.

[royalfestus]

The sentiment in the space is improving and profit taking will be attractive to all investors but I think ICO may not come the same way it was in 2016/2017. The important thing about most project is the credibility followed by the exchange listing. Even if we see reliable partners support a project we need to be sure that we can trade the token, We still have some project since 2018 that are yet to hit exchanges, holding the fund of prospective investors.

[Saisher]

What other way do you think can lift up ICOs again?

The only way is the team reputation and the platform they are bringing to the community, people are scammed in ICO because those who are holding ICO has bad characters and their only intention is to scam people, second is the platform, investors do not support an ICO because they see the platform as of no use or there is already existing platform in the community, like the exchanges platform.

[Dhoe]

IMO, Maybe their project must be registered in government law, So the Scammers do not dare to scam investors because they will face with police. Indeed to compete with the IEO project I think it will be very difficult at this time, Because investors already comfortable to invest in IEO project.

[Dr.Osh]

if the system is better than IEO, I think it's open ICO as we know it again. however, there must be a guarantee between the investor and the team in the matter of the sale. At present, we are looking for investments that can make our trust increase for the team. IEO has that, but currently, ICO doesn't have that. if the ICO develops new conditions, then it becomes a new model ICO

[cabron]

What other way do you think can lift up ICOs again?

The only way is the team reputation and the platform they are bringing to the community, people are scammed in ICO because those who are holding ICO has bad characters and their only intention is to scam people, second is the platform, investors do not support an ICO because they see the platform as of no use or there is already existing platform in the community, like the exchanges platform.

If there is someone reputable enough who will back the project up and openly tells the public he invest to it. Lets say Elon Musk openly endorse it and the project needs the funds which they are doing ICO. I think people will try investing but then the SEC will likely try to interfere again with this.

In the form of IEO, there were trying to revive the crypto economy but gradually fail because its just that more scams are doing it thru the scam excahnges as well. This time its DEFI and collateralization.  

[bluebit25]

IMO, Maybe their project must be registered in government law, So the Scammers do not dare to scam investors because they will face with police. Indeed to compete with the IEO project I think it will be very difficult at this time, Because investors already comfortable to invest in IEO project.

What investors are interested in is profit, if the ICO cannot bring them profit when investing, I believe they will never care about it. The good times of ICOs have passed and we already have an IEO at the moment, which is the only way for investors to make a profit by investing in new projects.

[bgaf]

What investors are interested in is profit, if the ICO cannot bring them profit when investing, I believe they will never care about it. The good times of ICOs have passed and we already have an IEO at the moment, which is the only way for investors to make a profit by investing in new projects.

Thats the point of investment profit. Do you actually think or believe that there are ICO investment that only look on the greatness of the product? Maybe there are few but majority will only focus on profits. Whales are just playing with the market. ICO investors in this new era usually gain profits probably like what happened on avalanche raises 42million USD thats amazing. But since other ICOs are not like this, better always watch out.

[bittick]

Why would they go back to the game? Now some projects use the ICO model, there are just a lot of alternatives, it's good.

As long as that comes from the trusted team and then whatever kind of model that already used is fine. We didn't care so much about that but we must try to see in fact the ICO model is not yet dead.
People just realize it right now. I hope there will be more projects will come.

[cryptoknightt]

I think that if ICO is really needed then it will return gradually, but what we see here, IEO is much easier and trusted by some projects for now when it will raise funds, so most will still use IEO to sell their tokens and register on the exchange the.
some projects are also still conducting ICOs and only succeeded in being less interested.

[BountyFriendly]

The popularity of ICO has really been broken and destroyed because of the many ICO Projects that are SCAM. And this makes investors really angry about this ICO sales system. Therefore there is no need for improvements or rules regarding the ICO project because there is now an IEO sales system which has advantages when compared to ICO. And if ICO gets up again, there will be few investors who will trust and participate in it, I'm sure of that.

[xOdiumNostrumx]

I am not sure if the ICOs as a concept can make a return, but right now you just have to market yourself properly, throw some buzzwords in like DeFi, decentralized etc. and your pre-sale will be oversubscribed 500%. On the other hand, DYCO from DAO Maker is an exciting new rendition of the ICO concept, the first project that tested it (Orion Protocol) has had a major moonshot, partly because of the DYCO and partly because of their DeFi tech.

[darewaller]

Promising people and developers that have an actual experience of running a project.

They must dedicate to that project so that the investors will believe again to them because if they don't, ICOs are good to say as a dead crowdfunding.

Not all about promises but with actual application.

Many teams hire freelance developers these days for their project and not someone renowned with a good history.
Freelance developers cannot be trusted as they have the right to leave the project whenever they want to and, in that scenario, the project remains hanging.

A team of experienced developers, advisors and technical staff is what most of the people look for in a project.

If a project is launching an ICO, investors should be smart enough to carry out all the research and background check before investing their hard earned money into it.

[Kocret02]

Maybe implementing standards like IEO is realistic, but there are other factors that must be done including selecting ICO candidates who will launch publicly, where there must be one team that provides close supervision so there is no more ICO that scams and destroys the market. so the most important thing is the formation of teams for each forum in order to avoid an ICO that is indicated as a scam

[torrantz]

Why would they go back to the game? Now some projects use the ICO model, there are just a lot of alternatives, it's good.

it caused by the fact that some icos are still worthy to be considered a game-changer. Did you remember what happened with the DYCO, STO and various things that tried to copycat the ico model? those models have become a failed model.