DigiByte (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051
Official DigiByte Account
|
|
March 22, 2014, 11:27:48 PM |
|
With all the recent Scrypt ASIC news we are strongly considering switching DigiByte to a more ASIC resistant algorithm to ensure a more fair mining opportunity for everyone. Our goal since day one is to make sure there is not centralization of hashing power or technology with DigiByte.
Please explain the reason for your vote and if you voted yes please list and provide a link to the algorithm you support.
Also, if anyone has any case studies of a coin hard forking and switching algorithms please post a link.
|
|
|
|
maardein
|
|
March 22, 2014, 11:31:53 PM |
|
Don't you think it is actually good that scrypt asics are coming? This can only make your network more secure, if you manage to maintain a high hashrate that is.
|
BTC: 1788UegKXGXXicfPcbZ1bmSUJ99ZWRCF7p LTC: LZ2rCcoxK4X8wRRynqdxoimd4d3TDNk7Lk PMP: PApSSdorQds5tQysymwDXPAN3viJLFTUs8
|
|
|
DigiByte (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051
Official DigiByte Account
|
|
March 22, 2014, 11:33:32 PM |
|
Don't you think it is actually good that scrypt asics are coming? This can only make your network more secure, if you manage to maintain a high hashrate that is.
We have thought about this and we do see some positives to this in the long run. Securing the block chain is very important. We wanted to open this up to the community and see what everyone's consensus was on this.
|
|
|
|
bigc1984
|
|
March 22, 2014, 11:38:31 PM |
|
With all the recent Scrypt ASIC news we are strongly considering switching DigiByte to a more ASIC resistant algorithm to ensure a more fair mining opportunity for everyone. Our goal since day one is to make sure there is not centralization of hashing power or technology with DigiByte.
Please explain the reason for your vote and if you voted yes please list and provide a link to the algorithm you support.
Also, if anyone has any case studies of a coin hard forking and switching algorithms please post a link.
switch to X11 algo
|
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 22, 2014, 11:41:10 PM |
|
Undecided, because I'll accept any change which can help to rise the price and nothing more. BTW, It's simple to switch to Scrypt-N, but keccak (from maxcoin) will keep rigs cold, summer is coming.
|
|
|
|
DigiByte (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051
Official DigiByte Account
|
|
March 22, 2014, 11:44:18 PM |
|
Undecided, because I'll accept any change which can help to rise the price and nothing more. BTW, It's simple to switch to Scrypt-N, but keccak (from maxcoin) will keep rigs cold, summer is coming.
Yes, cooling and electrical savings could be a huge selling point. We are trying to work out the summer cooling issue for our miners as well. We are looking at potentially modifying Scrypt-N, maybe calling it Scrypt-D or even DigiScrypt?
|
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 22, 2014, 11:54:44 PM |
|
Undecided, because I'll accept any change which can help to rise the price and nothing more. BTW, It's simple to switch to Scrypt-N, but keccak (from maxcoin) will keep rigs cold, summer is coming.
Yes, cooling and electrical savings could be a huge selling point. We are trying to work out the summer cooling issue for our miners as well. We are looking at potentially modifying Scrypt-N, maybe calling it Scrypt-D or even DigiScrypt? I don't think it's wise. Scrypt-N already well known, tested, accepted by miners. It's good enough to fight ASICs. Necessary and sufficient. WTB, sgminer will support scrypt-n out of the box soon.
|
|
|
|
MP5KU
|
|
March 22, 2014, 11:59:38 PM |
|
Voting for x-11 GPU's are cooler, very hard for asics.
|
|
|
|
DigiByte (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051
Official DigiByte Account
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:01:44 AM |
|
Undecided, because I'll accept any change which can help to rise the price and nothing more. BTW, It's simple to switch to Scrypt-N, but keccak (from maxcoin) will keep rigs cold, summer is coming.
Yes, cooling and electrical savings could be a huge selling point. We are trying to work out the summer cooling issue for our miners as well. We are looking at potentially modifying Scrypt-N, maybe calling it Scrypt-D or even DigiScrypt? I don't think it's wise. Scrypt-N already well known, tested, accepted by miners. It's good enough to fight ASICs. Necessary and sufficient. WTB, sgminer will support scrypt-n out of the box soon. Very good point Sammy, having mining software that works is important!
|
|
|
|
DigiByte (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051
Official DigiByte Account
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:02:18 AM |
|
Voting for x-11 GPU's are cooler, very hard for asics.
Does x-11 work with CGMiner? Or is there special mining software required?
|
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:06:06 AM |
|
Voting for x-11 GPU's are cooler, very hard for asics.
What about botnets?
|
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:06:49 AM |
|
Voting for x-11 GPU's are cooler, very hard for asics.
Does x-11 work with CGMiner? Or is there special mining software required? There is a fork of sgminer. sph-sgminer https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=516349.0
|
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:08:19 AM |
|
I am afraid price drop. I am holding like a special kind of idiot, just missed high prices.
|
|
|
|
MP5KU
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:12:13 AM |
|
Voting for x-11 GPU's are cooler, very hard for asics.
Does x-11 work with CGMiner? Or is there special mining software required? It uses Sgminer. x11 uses the following for hashing, blake, bmw, groestl, jh, keccak, skein, luffa, cubehash, shavite, simd and echo.
|
|
|
|
DigiByte (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051
Official DigiByte Account
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:12:27 AM |
|
Voting for x-11 GPU's are cooler, very hard for asics.
What about botnets? GPU botnets, or CPU botnets with x-11?
|
|
|
|
DigiByte (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1051
Official DigiByte Account
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:16:04 AM |
|
What sort of hash rates to you see with X11 & Scrypt-N is it about the same as Scrypt? Or is their a reduction in hash output?
|
|
|
|
MP5KU
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:16:25 AM |
|
Voting for x-11 GPU's are cooler, very hard for asics.
What about botnets? GPU botnets, or CPU botnets with x-11? High end CPU's get the same average return as GPU's. Not sure about low end CPU's though, never tried it.
|
|
|
|
MP5KU
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:17:24 AM |
|
What sort of hash rates to you see with X11 & Scrypt-N is it about the same as Scrypt? Or is their a reduction in hash output?
Never bothered with Scrypy-N, But with x11 I get the following: 1.8 mh/s on an Asus 7970 1.24 mh/s on a R9-270
|
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:20:49 AM |
|
Voting for x-11 GPU's are cooler, very hard for asics.
What about botnets? GPU botnets, or CPU botnets with x-11? CPU. Probably I fall asleep...
|
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 23, 2014, 12:21:26 AM |
|
What sort of hash rates to you see with X11 & Scrypt-N is it about the same as Scrypt? Or is their a reduction in hash output?
Never bothered with Scrypy-N, But with x11 I get the following: 1.8 mh/s on an Asus 7970 1.24 mh/s on a R9-270 it doesn't matter
|
|
|
|
|