[Discussion] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆

[Bitcoin SV]

Wow, this guy look likes a Vod. Cool shirt

[1714671925]

1714671925

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

I was checking the mentions and this is how I see. A troll is asking me to respond his nonsenses so he can continue with more nonsense.



For FatFork, Rikafip, TheBeardedBaby and many others from the search result of last few days. Let's not feed the troll. Every time you will mention him he will poke you.

[Bitcoin SV]

Let's not feed the troll

LOL. The main troll is you BitcoinGirl.Club

[Rikafip]

I was checking the mentions and this is how I see. A troll is asking me to respond his nonsenses so he can continue with more nonsense.

Rikafip and many others from the search result of last few days. Let's not feed the troll. Every time you will mention him he will poke you.

Yeah you are right, that's exactly what he wants, attention, and he is using this community award thing to try stirring some shit but as we can see, he is not very successful as noone cares much about his drivel.

For some reason I didn't have that fool on my ignore list yet but that is sorted now.

[Bitcoin SV]

Let's not feed the troll. Every time you will mention him he will poke you.

Wow, sportsbet gang member & trust spammer BitcoinGirl.Club calls other trolls to the prudence

[icopress]

Guys ... personal showdowns please move somewhere else  

Btw, Many misinterpret the meaning of the word Antihero and give their votes to 1xBit, which hypothetically should win a prize (and I think it's unacceptable no matter how you look at it). So it's likely that some of you will have to red tag me for being biased... because it would be a great example of me counting votes at my own discretion.

And more ... what should I do if Satoshi asked to remove his candidacy from the vote? Refuse him?

[Bitcoin SV]

Btw, Many misinterpret the meaning of the word Antihero and give their votes to 1xBit

1xBit is not antihero. 1xBit is a scam. the main antihero is franky

And more ... what should I do if Satoshi asked to remove his candidacy from the vote?

Which one of Satoshies, please specify. Anyway removing candidacy of 1xBit will be right. I support this proposal

Guys ... personal showdowns please move somewhere else  

Tell this to BitcoinGirl.Club. This troll the first one starts and then shouts that he is beaten

https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5921/59219678.html

Guys ...

BitcoinGirl.Club is guy. I knew it

[dkbit98]

Btw, Many misinterpret the meaning of the word Antihero and give their votes to 1xBit, which hypothetically should win a prize (and I think it's unacceptable no matter how you look at it). So it's likely that some of you will have to red tag me for being biased... because it would be a great example of me counting votes at my own discretion.

Instead of doing that and excluding only 1xBit why don't you just remove reward from that category all together?
Antihero is clearly a villain character no matter what definition you wrote in voting topic, so for example I voted for crazy humanrightsfoundation but I don't want him to receive any financial reward, and that was never the point of voting (I  hope so).

And more ... what should I do if Satoshi asked to remove his candidacy from the vote? Refuse him?

Satoshi probably wouldn't care much about any voting, so it's unlikely he would ever ask this.
Did theymos asked to be removed? 

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

And more ... what should I do if Satoshi asked to remove his candidacy from the vote? Refuse him?

Honour his wish 😂
He kept himself above everything from this community from long years. I do not think he has any interest to make a statement about this voting.

Guys ... personal showdowns please move somewhere else  

Care to mention the nicks LOL

[Bitcoin SV]

1xBit should be excluded from the voting

Care to mention the nicks LOL

Are you still here, sportsbet hooker? Get out of here while the real men are talking

[icopress]

Which one of Satoshies, please specify [...]

If you think there are several Satoshi's on our timeline at the moment, please contact the Time Variance Authority and they will make adjustments as soon as possible. But if you're hinting at your patron, then I can assure you that last year he already received a consolation prize.

As for the nominations in which Satoshi and Lauda won, I can assure you that this question also bothered me until I contacted ^{[permanent@ban.com]} them directly. They unanimously expressed their desire to trade their T-shirts for a T-shirt for CW and frankly, I was surprised that FedEx delivered the package to him before Christmas.

Did theymos asked to be removed? 

I think if this happens, he will announce it himself .. but I, as a typical egoist, intend to refuse him! 

[LoyceV]

Btw, Many misinterpret the meaning of the word Antihero and give their votes to xxx

That's why last year the "troll of the year" category was removed. In this case giving them any attention is already more than they deserve.

So it's likely that some of you will have to red tag me for being biased... because it would be a great example of me counting votes at my own discretion.

You're joking now, but be careful. Technically, your Note says you can only ignore recently awakened or inactive posters:

You must have 50 merit or be a full member or higher to vote ➥ Note.

Spambies and scammers can't be excluded at your discretion

what should I do if Satoshi asked to remove his candidacy from the vote? Refuse him?

Ask him to sign a message And send my regards
If he decides to vote, I suggest to double the weight of his vote. We owe him that.

[Foxpup]

BitcoinGirl.Club is guy. I knew it

Are you still here, sportsbet hooker? Get out of here while the real men are talking

This nonsense has gone on long enough. If you're going to persist with this creepy fascination with other people's genders, can you at least be consistent about it? Just pick one of the many genders, accuse us of "really" being it, and stick with it already.

[Bitcoin SV]

If you're going to persist with this creepy fascination with other people's genders, can you at least be consistent about it? Just pick one of the many genders, accuse us of "really" being it, and stick with it already.

Calm down, cadet. You are not a real girl too Foxpup. Nobody has seen your photos. I do not understand those weirdos who nominates you for "Miss Bitcointalk" nomination

Looks like that the one real girl here is sensualbellax (VERY BEAUTIFUL)

This nonsense has gone on long enough.

Yes, those "pretending-to-be-a-girl" tricks of some users (like Foxpup, BitcoinGirl.Club & other gender-bender fagg0ts) has gone on long enough.

[LoyceV]

Nobody has seen your photos.

I would love to respond to this, but this isn't the place.

[Bitcoin SV]

Btw, Many misinterpret the meaning of the word Antihero and give their votes to xxx

That's why last year the "troll of the year" category was removed. In this case giving them any attention is already more than they deserve.

What a naive person. "Troll of the year" category was removed because then in this category nutildah would have won. DT farmers just were afraid to disgrace

[franky1]

Btw, Many misinterpret the meaning of the word Antihero and give their votes to 1xBit, which hypothetically should win a prize (and I think it's unacceptable no matter how you look at it). So it's likely that some of you will have to red tag me for being biased... because it would be a great example of me counting votes at my own discretion.

Instead of doing that and excluding only 1xBit why don't you just remove reward from that category all together?
Antihero is clearly a villain character no matter what definition you wrote in voting topic, so for example I voted for crazy humanrightsfoundation but I don't want him to receive any financial reward, and that was never the point of voting (I  hope so).

a villain is a villain.. hense giving it the title villain

an anti-hero is a hero without the boyscout personality/charm

take to comic personalities superman. vs hancock(will smith with superpowers)
superman is the boyscout type,. hancock is the realist that helps others but doesnt care about his slang, personality, property damage while doing it

other examples
EG james bond (007 books and movies) is an anti-hero
he is a womanising man that has a licence to kill and happily crashes cars and steal/abuse government property.. but he does it for the greater good of stopping the villains

EG severus snape (harry potter books and movies) is the anti-hero
antagonist, not afraid to use the dark arts, but he is not the villain. his actions actually go against the villain
example of boyscout hero: harry potter
example of true villain: voldermort

EG robin hood
steals from the rich. not afraid to use arrows. gets into fights. but does it to give to the poor

EG rambo
not afraid to use arrows, knives, guns. gets into fights. but does it to help those in need

EG wolverine & deadpool(xmen)
not afraid to slice and dice with his knife appendages to hands. but does it to help those in need even if they didnt ask for that sort of help
example of boyscout hero: professor X, cyclops
example of true villain: juggernaut, apocalypse

EG batman (DC books/comics/movies)
not afraid to damage property and hurt people. does it to help the greater good/sort out the bigger threat
example of boyscout hero: superman, wonder woman
example of true villain: lex luthor, joker

P.S im not looking for financial reward if i win anti-hero status. i just like the title and wish to continue using the antihero in avatar
(technically i have not earned the title. but im presuming the assumptions are high that i will... give any financial reward to runner up)

[icopress]

I, too, was surprised by such praise. Giving someone else's money has become a miracle in our time. Just doing the right thing is an act. There is clearly something wrong with this world. Does that mean that someone who thinks it's a miracle to get the money back wouldn't do the same if they were in that situation?

The fact is that returning 1000 dollars is not the same as returning a quarter of a million ... therefore, on the eve of next year, I will take more care to convey to everyone who wants to vote to convey the idea that I put in the description of the categories. Perhaps I will even ask one of the trusted users in parallel with me to count the votes at their own discretion (to derive an average value).

Baryom

2018-11-03

I sent him 39.4 BTC instead of 0.394 BTC for a signature campaign payment. (My mistake obviously) He returned me 39.005 BTC as soon as he saw that : https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/3a9248a8b02038e237569c3bab0faa674f11575de97bc0dee7ccb307e121b10f We are talking about $250,000. Thanks a lot.

[n0nce]

So, I went through pages 10-14 with BPIP browser extension and this is a list of users just in these 5 pages with either <50 merits or <50 earned merits.
Technically, the latter is allowed, as far as I know, but it seems odd to me that someone earned less than 50 merits (some even ZERO) since the introduction of the merit system and is still so interested to these community awards. I've checked a few profiles and most of them just post in bounty campaigns or sports betting stuff; nothing regarding Bitcoin itself.


13 merit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59248413#msg59248413
0 merit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59283818#msg59283818 (didn't even bother going past place 7)
3 merit (ALL through this post): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59174074#msg59174074
5 merit (1 through this post): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59176082#msg59176082
0 merit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59176111#msg59176111
38 merit (5 through this post): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59189120#msg59189120

14 earned merit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59236409#msg59236409
46 earned merit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59275293#msg59275293
15 earned merit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59196996#msg59196996
27 earned merit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59215200#msg59215200
27 earned merit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59179852#msg59179852
4 earned merit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59181511#msg59181511
5 earned merit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59182557#msg59182557
7 earned merit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59182727#msg59182727
15 earned merit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59183637#msg59183637
21 earned merit: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59184763#msg59184763
13 earned merit (6 through this post): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59190795#msg59190795
13 earned merit (4 through this post): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59174706#msg59174706
4 earned merit (ALL through this post): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59177686#msg59177686
15 earned merit (5 through this post): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5382917.msg59178215#msg59178215

[BITCOIN4X]

~Snip

Some of them may take advantage of the opportunity to get merit, but some of them also sincerely want to choose. I'm not entirely sure what the goal is, but merit is one of the main draws of most spammers during voting.

I probably wouldn't blame them completely but maybe some merit source would also really like to appreciate it even if some of them aren't great posters so far. But I can think of something positive about it and one of them is introducing merit to spammers who might later change their behavior when they realize that merit is a rank up requirement.