Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently

[longyenthanh]

The signature campaign has nothing to do with the project's credibility. It all falls on the team, how it managed, developed and how transparent are they. Signature campaign or any bounty program is just a good way to advertise or publicize a project, it doesn't add to the project's credibility as a whole.

It actually kind of does though. If you look at the oldest signature campaigns, they all started out with a good bang of signature campaigns for a new business,,, and especially if you see the participants AND the manager are really good ones, then you know the project itself at least recognizes good people and wants to work with them.

I agree that this is often how people think that if a signature campaign is running a well-known manager, it means that the project is credible.
Unfortunately, this can often be confusing. Even the best manager is unable to guess what the project owner intends to do.
I think that no one should be suggested by who manages the campaign or that all participants receive payments on time. Everyone before investing in project or using its services, should make research about the it themselves.

[GreenStox]

the most important thing is the project itself, all projects can make their signature because that's only part of the promotion of each project. if indeed the project is feasible then many will join the promotion, only the added value for the project attracts people's attention.

[perla]

I'm not quite sure if signature could really increase ICO's credibility right now we are in a Defi hype and I think soon it will end and let's hope that the ICO would soon rise again with new and legitimate projects not just a proper signature but I think good advertising strategy could really  boost the ICO's credibility.

[terizla]

Good ICO credibility is not from Signature campaign. There are many reason to increase credibility ICO and i think Signature campaign is one of reason to increase credibility ICO by promoting in forum.

[Blackrain13]

Signature campaign is just a part of their marketing to spread the news about the project and to create awareness to the people. It is just a promotional tool and the team and project itself are liable for the  increase of ICO credibility.

[Wapfika]

The signature campaign has nothing to do with the project's credibility. It all falls on the team, how it managed, developed and how transparent are they. Signature campaign or any bounty program is just a good way to advertise or publicize a project, it doesn't add to the project's credibility as a whole.

It will get the attention of many investors once they are active here in forum and sees many participants joining here especially if they are new investors, the key first is to have a good marketing so it will be noticed and can add traffic on their websites and can seek prospect investors but long time investors didn't just want the marketing but about the project itself and how well they plan and proceed their projects develop. The credibility will still depends on teams customer service and product performance.

[Emitdama]

The signature campaign has nothing to do with the project's credibility. It all falls on the team, how it managed, developed and how transparent are they. Signature campaign or any bounty program is just a good way to advertise or publicize a project, it doesn't add to the project's credibility as a whole.

There is a misconception that if a token sale (ICO, ITO, IPO) has a signature Campaign in Bitcointalk paying in BTC that means that project is serious about the project and that project is legit and have credibility. Paying in BTC suddenly increases a project's reputation and people start thinking that they should invest in their project because if they are paying in BTC then they can't be scams.

I would say that is not the case. Scammers are very smart and scammers can invest money to gain community trust too. paying in BTC doesn't increase any ICO's credibility and should not be trusted bases on that only. There were a lot of cases in fast where projects paid in BTC and  at the end turned into scams, shut down the projects and users lost their money.

So, never judge a projects credibility by signature campaigns or their other marketing campaigns (because there is same conception about projects who promote their projects in coinmarketcap or google adsense).

[abel1337]

The signature campaign has nothing to do with the project's credibility. It all falls on the team, how it managed, developed and how transparent are they. Signature campaign or any bounty program is just a good way to advertise or publicize a project, it doesn't add to the project's credibility as a whole.

There is a misconception that if a token sale (ICO, ITO, IPO) has a signature Campaign in Bitcointalk paying in BTC that means that project is serious about the project and that project is legit and have credibility. Paying in BTC suddenly increases a project's reputation and people start thinking that they should invest in their project because if they are paying in BTC then they can't be scams.

I would say that is not the case. Scammers are very smart and scammers can invest money to gain community trust too. paying in BTC doesn't increase any ICO's credibility and should not be trusted bases on that only. There were a lot of cases in fast where projects paid in BTC and  at the end turned into scams, shut down the projects and users lost their money.

So, never judge a projects credibility by signature campaigns or their other marketing campaigns (because there is same conception about projects who promote their projects in coinmarketcap or google adsense).

That's right, Some new investor can have a misconception about altcoin campaigns that are paying bitcoin thinking that it would be safe to invest with because they believe that the project is serious enough to pay participants bitcoin or other mainstream tokens to promote their campaign. Research would be more sensible rather than basing if a project is offering a paid signature campaign.

If we are talking about giving an ICO pure credibility with just the paid signature campaign, it would be a bad choice. But if we are eyeing a project and find out that it has the potential, at the same time it offers a paid signature campaign, it will add more credibility to the project.

[xiboothrezi]

Snip~~~
If we are talking about giving an ICO pure credibility with just the paid signature campaign, it would be a bad choice. But if we are eyeing a project and find out that it has the potential, at the same time it offers a paid signature campaign, it will add more credibility to the project.

Project credibility will be better if the dev team is active in introducing the project and regularly provides reports regarding the progress that has been achieved. This interaction will create a good ecosystem, because the progress is clear and the products can actually be seen as beneficial.

This will be even better when the trusted forum members on this forum give good feedback. through a signature campaign, it can be an effective way, especially if handled by a trusted bounty manager and the selection is tight. but remember, this is only an alternative option.

[alisonwonder]

well, the existence of a signature campaign gives the understanding that currently there is a very good program that is used by many people, especially when you use a signature campaign on an account that has a Legendary or Hero rank which in my opinion can have an influence on many people in this forum.

[aioc]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

Yes somewhat it increase credibility, because they show that they want to present their project in a right way, but signature campaign doesn't guarantee success and it's potential in the market, signature is just for promotional the platform and the people behind the project is the one that will put credibility on the project.

[Josefjix]

Signature campaigns are designed to advertise the campaign or the project in general and it is not designed to increase a company's profile hence its credibility. We only join signature campaigns because we work to advertise the project and make it known to many people using bitcointalk, that's it. I don't see myself as someone who can elevate a company's profile, unless you are Elon Musk and you invested 10 million dollars to the project thereby elevating its prestige but still, the product or service would still be a big factor in determining where the project is good or bad.

Signature campaign does increase ICO, why? The goal of every advertisement placed on a goods by the manufacturer is to attract customers either organic or inorganic. You're wearing the signature of the company you're working for, a potential customer could come across your post which picks his/her interest and he/she would  decide to look up the project and make investment. Traffic and trust has been gained already through signature campaign.


That's why it is advisable by the Signature campaign managers to ensure the participants make high quality post/comments to generate attention. The project teams advertising through signature campaigns must have stopped if there is no turn out from the process.

[ropyu1978]

Some time bounty signature campaign worth as promoting an ICO project and some time not get respond from investor after promote by bounty hunter with signature campaign or other campaign. Depend with how serious an ICO project how to design and make investor very interested for investing with ICO project not matter with signature promote campaign, I think when designed and give many offer for investor from bonus until how long ICO coin listed will give worth value for investor to make them interested, if an ICO project not giving any more how long promote on signature campaign is not matter and not give impact any more.

[Lhaine]

Some time bounty signature campaign worth as promoting an ICO project and some time not get respond from investor after promote by bounty hunter with signature campaign or other campaign. Depend with how serious an ICO project how to design and make investor very interested for investing with ICO project not matter with signature promote campaign, I think when designed and give many offer for investor from bonus until how long ICO coin listed will give worth value for investor to make them interested, if an ICO project not giving any more how long promote on signature campaign is not matter and not give impact any more.

It is always depend in the project it self they need to use many kind of advertisement if they want to see it by many people and possible customer. Signature can only help them in these forum but they need to use other kind of advertisement if they want to see it by other potential buyers  and having that they need to use their own money.

[Balladtony77]

There is no more ICO projects, can you promote ICO bounties if you see one now? We know what damages ICO did in crypto space, unless the project is on same level with projects like Avalanche project or high quality project only, if not no one will promote or invest on such project and to answer your question, credibility is team duty, this has nothing to do with bounty hunters, team have the power to add more credibility of decrease their credibility.

[cryptolord2077]

There is no more ICO projects, can you promote ICO bounties if you see one now? We know what damages ICO did in crypto space, unless the project is on same level with projects like Avalanche project or high quality project only, if not no one will promote or invest on such project and to answer your question, credibility is team duty, this has nothing to do with bounty hunters, team have the power to add more credibility of decrease their credibility.

Nevertheless, projects continue to bounty companies. That being said, many of these projects are really worth your attention. Of course, we cannot talk about the safety of our funds and the funds of other people when we advertise something like that, but no one talks about guarantees. We work for those projects we believe in. Whether they succeed or not depends not only on our efforts, but also on the developers.

[pelumi20]

Signature was a part of advertisement to make awareness, however in the event that you are discussing the credibility of an ico and it absolutely relies upon the ico's reputation here, the advertisement can carry a good impression to the platforms yet this thing was exceptionally abstract since it relies upon the sincere belief after the initial introduction with the ico.

On the off chance that the team has just utilized the believed administrators to deal with its mission and afterward it could be considered as a pledge to run the project.

There's a ton of components that has assumed significant functions for this situation.

[kayvie]

No, signature campaign is only part of their marketing strategy. It not included whether the project is credible or not. It is only to spread awareness about the project and not to increase the ICO credibility. It will always depends on the project itself, the team, the plan, and so on.

[kevinzxz]

Does Signature campaign increase ICO credibility? I see few good ICOs recently using Signature campaign to promote their private sale.

Being a newbie, I would like to know your thoughts through experience.

I think signature campaign does not increase ICO credibility, because signature campaign only helps promote the ICO, so that investors know about the ICO, but what determines ICO credibility is the team and the project idea of ​​the ICO, because if the team responds to investors very quickly and the idea of ​​the project is good for the future, then I believe ICO credibility will definitely increase.

[wajik-tempe]

Of course it will, because a new project need attention for the new investors and one of the best way to promote it is doing the airdrop or bounty campaign. Giving the token/coin allocation for bounty and airdrops is a must for new projects (except a project that is under big name company, maybe they won't need it anymore).