Bitcoin Forum
August 08, 2022, 01:33:44 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 23.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38]
  Print  
Author Topic: CoinJoin: Bitcoin privacy for the real world  (Read 293937 times)
hv_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1054

Clean Code and Scale


View Profile WWW
June 07, 2019, 09:54:21 AM
 #741

Wouldn't you guys not just create a 'dark' pool here where only dark / gray coins are getting mixxed with each other and no reasonable one will use that  for anything good after ?



Privacy and/or anonymity work both ways round.

  • People use privacy to do bad things because good people are stopping them otherwise
  • People use privacy to do good things because bad people are stopping them otherwise

In (coming?) the world wide adoption path all other Banks (except Carlton) will prefere the more transparent blockchains - so all tainted and on purpose more ano chains will be dismissed from that path. 

Carpe diem  -  understand the White Paper and mine honest.
Fix real world issues: Check out b-vote.com
The simple way is the genius way - Satoshi's Rules: humana veris _
1659922424
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1659922424

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1659922424
Reply with quote  #2

1659922424
Report to moderator
1659922424
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1659922424

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1659922424
Reply with quote  #2

1659922424
Report to moderator
1659922424
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1659922424

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1659922424
Reply with quote  #2

1659922424
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1659922424
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1659922424

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1659922424
Reply with quote  #2

1659922424
Report to moderator
1659922424
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1659922424

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1659922424
Reply with quote  #2

1659922424
Report to moderator
1659922424
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1659922424

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1659922424
Reply with quote  #2

1659922424
Report to moderator
BurtW
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 1097

All paid signature campaigns should be banned.


View Profile WWW
June 07, 2019, 12:32:33 PM
Merited by ETFbitcoin (1)
 #742

In (coming?) the world wide adoption path all other Banks (except Carlton) will prefere the more transparent blockchains - so all tainted and on purpose more ano chains will be dismissed from that path. 
You obviously do not know your audience.

Our family was terrorized by Homeland Security.  Read all about it here:  http://www.jmwagner.com/ and http://www.burtw.com/  Any donations to help us recover from the $300,000 in legal fees and forced donations to the Federal Asset Forfeiture slush fund are greatly appreciated!
TheNewAnon135246
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2198
Merit: 1938


฿uy ฿itcoin


View Profile
June 11, 2019, 10:31:49 AM
 #743

In (coming?) the world wide adoption path all other Banks (except Carlton) will prefere the more transparent blockchains - so all tainted and on purpose more ano chains will be dismissed from that path. 
You obviously do not know your audience.

No need to reply to his post. He's a BSV shill.
Wind_FURY
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1387



View Profile
June 14, 2019, 11:40:58 AM
 #744

I believe hv_ has a point. A user must still be careful, and manage his UTXOs well to maintain its privacy after CoinJoin.

Would it create a "dark pool"? I do not know, maybe, but consolidating your coinjoined coins with non-coinjoined coins might remove the privacy gained.

                                       ▄▄▄                         ████
   ▄██████ ▄██████▄                    ███                         ████
  ▄██████  ▀▀▀▀▀████        ▄▄▄▄       ███▄▄▄▄▄▄        ▄▄▄▄       ████       ▄▄▄▄        ▄▄       ▄▄▄
  ██████         ███     ▄████████▄    ██████████    ▄████████▄    ████    ▄████████▄    ███       ███
 ██████▄▄▄  ▄▄▄▄███▀    ███▀    ▀███   ███▀▀▀▀▀▀    ███▀    ▀███   ████  ▄███▀▀  ▀▀███   ███       ███
████████▀ ▄████████▄   ████▄▄▄▄▄▄████  ███         ███▀      ▀███  ████  ███▀      ▀███  ███       ███
   ████▀        ▀████  ████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀  ███    ▄▄▄  ███▄      ▄███  ████  ███▄      ▄███  ███▄     ▄███
  ████▀ █        ████   ███▄    ▄▄▄▄   ███▄  ▄███  ████▄    ▄███▀  ████  ▀███▄▄  ▄▄████  ▀███▄   ▄████
 ▄███ ▄█████████████▀    ▀████████▀    ▀████████▀  ███▀████████▀   ████   ▀████████▀███   ▀▀██████▀███
 ██▀  ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀         ▀▀▀▀          ▀▀▀▀     ███   ▀▀▀▀       ▀▀        ▀▀▀▀  ▀▀▀   ▄▄ ▀▀▀▀ ▄███
 █▀                                                ███                                    ███▄▄ ▄▄███▀
█▀                                                 ███                                     ▀███████▀
.
.PLAY NOW.
garlonicon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 467
Merit: 1057


ghidra-sre.org


View Profile WWW
July 02, 2019, 11:19:25 PM
 #745

What do you think about BIG CoinJoin transactions? For example as big as adding one more input or output would exceed the maximum block size, so the newly mined block will finally contain nothing more than one huge CoinJoin transaction.
ETFbitcoin
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2226
Merit: 4772


View Profile
July 03, 2019, 07:31:47 PM
 #746

What do you think about BIG CoinJoin transactions? For example as big as adding one more input or output would exceed the maximum block size, so the newly mined block will finally contain nothing more than one huge CoinJoin transaction.

I don't see point of create CoinJoin transaction with lots of input & output, if total output and Bitcoin amount of each amount isn't controlled, deanonymization could be easier.

Besides, transaction size above 100KB or 400.000 weight unit isn't allowed by current Bitcoin protocol.

garlonicon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 467
Merit: 1057


ghidra-sre.org


View Profile WWW
July 04, 2019, 01:10:51 AM
 #747

Quote
deanonymization could be easier
I didn't think mainly about deanonymization, rather I thought about confirming more transactions per block without increasing the maximum block size. It could be especially useful when we have something like this in mempool:

A -> B -> C -> D -> E -> F -> G

Then, the miner could create a "CoinJoin proposal" like this:

A -> G

And if A will sign it, the miner will save some space. If not, the miner could propose something else, for example:

A -> B -> G

Of course, when we have N transactions in mempool, there are 2^N-(N+1) possible combinations of such "CoinJoin proposals". To avoid spam, we can add some nonce and difficulty to them (since such proposals are "not-yet-signed-by-all-participants" transactions). And if the miner won't collect all needed signatures, it can still use the original non-CoinJoin transactions.
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 3696
Merit: 6435



View Profile
July 04, 2019, 05:05:13 AM
 #748

Quote
deanonymization could be easier
I didn't think mainly about deanonymization, rather I thought about confirming more transactions per block without increasing the maximum block size. It could be especially useful when we have something like this in mempool:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=281848.0
morninguser
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 24, 2020, 05:01:50 AM
 #749

Anyone knows how to contact someone's at Bob Wallet?  https://bobwallet.github.io/ 

It was a candidate for the bounty, and I used the service recently but it seams that it won't work and will be nice if I can talk to someone to recover the coins.

Thanks
morninguser
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 25, 2020, 02:14:06 AM
 #750

I followed your advises, and we'll see if someone will reply in some way.

Thanks
Karartma1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2310
Merit: 1421



View Profile
October 25, 2020, 08:40:27 AM
 #751

I followed your advises, and we'll see if someone will reply in some way.

Thanks
If you get no reply in a reasonable amount of time I would go as far as opening a thread in the Scam Accusation board. Better be safe than sorry.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!