The Kracken!

[sirazimuth]

Keep dreaming my friend.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNi9ztjcjwY

This is a SCOTUS case now, nothing is over for 2020/Trump yet.

You actually believe SCOTUS will reverse this election?  If so, you must be from same planet as Spendy.

[TwitchySeal]

Didn't know you'd have to make a bet to take sides in politics.

That's new.

I guess it is natural when almost 90% of the paid signatures are casino ads.

You don't.

But it's a good way to figure out if someone actually believes what they are saying or just being a troll.

[mindrust]

You actually believe SCOTUS will reverse this election?

Why not if there is enough evidence? That's why the US have a SCOTUS... to fix what is wrong.

If so, you must be from same planet as Spendy.

Which planet he is from?

Didn't know you'd have to make a bet to take sides in politics.
That's new.
I guess it is natural when almost 90% of the paid signatures are casino ads.

You don't.
But it's a good way to figure out if someone actually believes what they are saying or just being a troll.

Actually it doesn't prove anything. One can believe in something without having to make a bet on it. There is a whole world where people don't gamble or don't even think about gambling at all and they still express their opinions. That doesn't mean their opinions are worthless. They still cast votes. (look at the ballz on those pricks) Voting is free.

I know it is kind of hard to imagine a world free of gambling in this forum but if you try hard enough you can do it.

[suchmoon]

Why not if there is enough evidence? That's why the US have a SCOTUS... to fix what is wrong.

SCOTUS can't produce evidence. Trump's lawyers failed to do so comprehensively in 40+ cases. There is no path for them to change the election result, even if they can con their way to SCOTUS on some technicality. AFAIK there is only one case the got as far as a circuit court decision and it was like this: "Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."

This is over and has been for weeks.

[Tash]

At 43 min, 3 Star Lt. General McInerney China, Russia, Iran involved and 5 special force Soldiers killed when seizing server farm in Germany
Interview with  Lt. General Michael Flynn
305 unit is kraken

[DaveF]

But it's a good way to figure out if someone actually believes what they are saying or just being a troll.

Agreed. It's the "put up or shut up" thing.
Which is also why *most* of the bets that have been thrown around are for trivial amounts.
Mine vs. PN7 / Suchmoon vs. eddie13 (remember when it was made BTC was 1/2 of what it is now) and so on.

Kind of like if mindrust / you / me wanted a bet. $50 is about the weekly pay we get for wearing a sig. So putting up the little bit of extra BTC that it makes us it not a big deal.
Because of bets I made a "real" books this political season the amount I put up against PN7 is still "betting with the houses money"

Like the guy at the bar who insists this year the Texas Rangers are going to win the World Series and will not shut up about it. All you do is have some wings and drink some beer with your friends.

So you whip out a $50 and tell him it's his all he has to do is put up $50 and it's on.
I have never had anyone take it and they usually shut up an go away and wings and beer can be consumed.

Note 1) You can use Vikings for football, Canucks for hockey, etc. There is just always that guy.

Note 2) There is always a risk i.e. 2016 Cubs. but it's still a good bet, and let's face it if you are out drinking / eating with friends you are probably going to be out more then $50 by the end of the night anyway.

Note 3) Since most of the trash talk and betting talk has been about US politics I am assuming we are all US based where for anyone with an internet connection and the time to spend here it's not a real amount of money.

Note 4) Yeah I posted the 3BTC / 30BTC thing with Spendulus but that was after he posted the $100k / $1M BS so I figured I would call him on it.

Note 5) For todays bet: Will I be able to get and keep enough air in my tire to make it to the shop or will I be driving on the spare today? Tune in tomorrow for the answer. And I'm buying a new tire. too far into the sidewall to fix.

-Dave

[Spendulus]

Why not if there is enough evidence? That's why the US have a SCOTUS... to fix what is wrong.

SCOTUS...

This is over and has been for weeks.

You are only saying here that SCOTUS could find for Trump, or against Trump.

That's not exactly the same as asserting "this is over and has been for weeks."

[Spendulus]

.....

So you whip out a $50 and tell him it's his all he has to do is put up $50 and it's on.
I have never had anyone take it and they usually shut up an go away and wings and beer can be consumed.
....

-Dave

Okay I'll make it easy for you. I'll bet my (net after minor fees) $5 against your $50, no escrow required because of the low amounts.

Happy now?

I'm gonna be pissed if sending $5 costs $21 AFTER MINER FEES.

[KingScorpio]

Keep dreaming my friend.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNi9ztjcjwY

This is a SCOTUS case now, nothing is over for 2020/Trump yet.

You actually believe SCOTUS will reverse this election?  If so, you must be from same planet as Spendy.

this is all a lie, judges all over the us, have ruled to stop the election.

the election fraud was all over the place.

[Spendulus]

Keep dreaming my friend.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNi9ztjcjwY

This is a SCOTUS case now, nothing is over for 2020/Trump yet.

You actually believe SCOTUS will reverse this election?  If so, you must be from same planet as Spendy.

this is all a lie, judges all over the us, have ruled to stop the election.

the election fraud was all over the place.

SCOTUS does not have to "reverse the election." They only have to rule that there were enough problems to invalidate the counts, and toss the problem into Congress to be solved.

Despite the blandishments of the narrative, which seek to seduce you into acquiescence with rumors of inevitability, we really do not know how this story, which seems so familiar, will end.

https://amgreatness.com/2020/11/28/reality-and-the-narrative/

[TwitchySeal]

SCOTUS does not have to "reverse the election." They only have to rule that there were enough problems to invalidate the counts, and toss the problem into Congress to be solved.

Doesn't Biden win if it goes to congress?  I thought the plan was cancel everyones vote in PA and then convince/bribe/extort the PA electorates to just give Trump votes.  And then repeat the process in a couple other states with a few dozen more electorates.

Also, do we know for sure SCOTUS will hear the case at all?  Don't they have a thing about not hearing cases with zero merit?

[Spendulus]

SCOTUS does not have to "reverse the election." They only have to rule that there were enough problems to invalidate the counts, and toss the problem into Congress to be solved.

Doesn't Biden win if it goes to congress?  I thought the plan was cancel everyones vote in PA and then convince/bribe/extort the PA electorates to just give Trump votes.  And then repeat the process in a couple other states with a few dozen more electorates.

Also, do we know for sure SCOTUS will hear the case at all?  Don't they have a thing about not hearing cases with zero merit?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/how-congress-certifies-who-is-president

one vote per state in a contingent election in the House

Republicans currently control 26 state delegations. Democrats control 22. Two states are essentially tied. The GOP holds more state delegations than Democrats. But this is all decided in the new Congress. Moreover, dozens of House seats aren’t settled yet.

But here’s the problem for Democrats: California has 53 House seats. But California only counts as a solitary vote in a contingent election. By contrast, South Dakota has but one House seat. But, all states are equal in a contingent election. So, it’s possible that South Dakota or other small states would offset California’s presumptive delegation vote for Biden.

It's certainly a good question whether SCOTUS will hear a case, but I can think of some avenues of legal pleading that would definitely interest SCOTUS. And of others that would seem to not interest them.

[BADecker]

The Kraken is the name of some Internet observation software that the DoD owns. They used it to observe the vote fraud of the people and companies who were trying to push Biden into office.

Biden already admitted on video long ago, that he was involved in the blackmail-like operations that got the $billion for the Ukraine, and enhanced Hunter's wallet big time. His admitting of this makes him ineligible to hold federal government office - http://themillenniumreport.com/2020/08/united-states-code-joe-biden-is-permanently-disqualified-from-holding-any-public-office-in-the-u-s-federal-government/.

Any of the government that is interested knows that Biden is not eligible to hold office because of this. So, what has Trump done? He has talked Joe into playing the game with him, so that he and the DoD can take down the election fraud companies. How did he talk Joe into doing this for him? Maybe this way - https://www.brighteon.com/embed/1448d722-7874-4d50-bdd1-f88dec6eaa5b.

The whole election always was Trump's and everybody knows it. The whole vote fraud thing is simply a method Trump is using to clean up some major, worldwide racketeering that has set itself against the USA.

Will SCOTUS be involved? Possibly, but not necessarily. Everybody knows that Biden was the only would-be candidate who stood a chance of winning against Trump. So, now that Biden is (or always has been) out of the way, no election material need go to SCOTUS.

[sirazimuth]

...
Which planet he is from?
.....

Theoryius Crakpotopia. It orbits about the star Voterfraudal Delusionese. (hey, you asked)

....next question?

[BADecker]

Trump's been playing a game all along. Check two posts up.


Trump's not done

,,,, which today rules (albeit only 5-4) that's it's again legal to go to church or synagogue in New York

Internationally recognized cyber-crime expert swears under oath: evidence 'overwhelming and incontrovertible' that 'hundreds of thousands' of Trump votes were 'transferred to Vice President Biden' »

Trump says election-fraud facts on his side, time is not:

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/11/27/donald-trump-facts-our-side-election-fight-time-isnt/

Georgia Rep. Mo Brooks: If only legal votes are counted, Biden did NOT win the Electoral College:

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020/11/26/gop-rep-brooks-biden-did-not-win-the-electoral-college-if-vote-limited-to-lawful-votes-cast/

[sirazimuth]

blah blah blah

^My good buddy BADecker comes from that planet too...

[sirazimuth]

Donald Trump has spent $3 million on a recount of votes in Wisconsin, which has boosted the total for Joe Biden.

Stay tuned?? Well alrighty then!....I'm holding my breath...  

(I have it on good authority that our dear old impotus may well be from above named planet too)

[Spendulus]

blah blah blah

^My good buddy BADecker comes from that planet too...

You mean the same counters are counting?

[sirazimuth]

Damn...
I admire your tenacity dude.....fruitless though it maybe.

[DaveF]

.....

So you whip out a $50 and tell him it's his all he has to do is put up $50 and it's on.
I have never had anyone take it and they usually shut up an go away and wings and beer can be consumed.
....

-Dave

Okay I'll make it easy for you. I'll bet my (net after minor fees) $5 against your $50, no escrow required because of the low amounts.

Happy now?

I'm gonna be pissed if sending $5 costs $21 AFTER MINER FEES.

Substituting you for primenumber7 and $5/$50 (preev.com rate - fees) for the amounts do the rules posted here work for you?:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5287833.msg55552981#msg55552981

For fees unless you have a ton of small inputs I can't see them being that bad unless BTC really goes up in price.
And OT for the P&S board but I like https://mempool.space/ for looking at estimated fees for the next few blocks and how large the backlog is. Even shows up well on my phone.

-Dave