~OgNasty's self scratching

[OgNasty]

Back on topic:  OG lied about not losing 6,500 btc.   Is he being as honest about his DT inclusions?

Imagine standing behind Vod's ridiculous lies like LoyceV and suchmoon do while including him into their trust networks, and then trying to call out others for adding honest members with legitimate feedback to the trust network.  Is it clear yet that the goal for these users isn't an honest trust system tied to real life happenings, but to have control over who can or can't be in the trust network based on their own emotions?  Imagine wanting to exclude one of longest the most active trading histories on the forum because of honest positive feedback, while simultaneously including a user like Vod with now a very long verifiable record of lying (see recent example above) based on nothing but his own delusions while drunk.  It should be clear from this debacle that the trust network is not functioning as intended and needs some intervention from theymos.

[suchmoon]

~OgNasty

Deflection is all you got. I don't give a toss about "control" or whatever it is you're fantasizing about. I have always encouraged other users to exclude me if they don't trust my judgement, don't like my opinion... fuck, even if they just don't like me saying "fuck" too often they should go ahead and exclude me. And unlike you I don't retaliate, neither for trust exclusions nor red trust ratings.

You on the other hand - clinging to the imaginary "most trusted" title with all that you got, trust system integrity be damned - pathetic.

Also before you accuse others of lying you should make sure your own statements are truthful but that's probably too much to ask of you... never much of a facts person, are you.

[Vod]

Back on topic:  OG lied about not losing 6,500 btc.   Is he being as honest about his DT inclusions?

Imagine standing behind Vod's ridiculous lies

I am Vod.  You are OGNasty.

Did you lose your funds like everyone else, or have you never lost any funds?

You contradict yourself.  

[LoyceV]

like LoyceV and suchmoon do while including him into their trust networks

Why are you specifically mentioning me in this context so many times? There are 135 users who included Vod on their Trust list.

It should be clear from this debacle that the trust network is not functioning as intended and needs some intervention from theymos.

Theymos doesn't seem like the guy who wants to rule by himself. It's up to the community, and the community gave Vod DT2 Strength (16).

Did I fall for it again by quoting an off-topic post?

[peloso]

Why are you specifically mentioning me in this context so many times? There are 135 users who included Vod on their Trust list.

because u must begin by yourself
you are talking about lofty matters, start with yourself

most of this 135 users scammers and idiots, your mind like of them

[suchmoon]

Probably a good time to bump this... OgNasty is not in DT1 this month so his score is:


(image created via loyce.club)

As opposed to the usual +87 (BTW the image in the OP updated as well so now it makes no sense... I should have made a copy of the image).

[Vod]

Probably a good time to bump this... OgNasty is not in DT1 this month so his score is:


(image created via loyce.club)

Look at this data that is being indexed by search engines right now.  stake.com is sponsoring his continued attacks. :/  
In my defense, I am starting to trade more and publically/officially trust a lot more as well.



The entire reply is self centered bullshit, but his last line is the one I'd like to quote:
"Learn your bitcointalk history."

Everyone should learn how OgNasty lost thousands of coins that were returned to him, from the words of OgNasty himself.

[OgNasty]

Probably a good time to bump this... OgNasty is not in DT1 this month so his score is:


(image created via loyce.club)

As opposed to the usual +87 (BTW the image in the OP updated as well so now it makes no sense... I should have made a copy of the image).

And yet I've never been happier. 

Sort of makes all your hard work to manipulate the trust network in an attempt to punish me seem a bit foolish no?  All your abuse can't even stop me from joining a signature campaign.  That's gotta hurt considering your daily quest for power here. 

[owlcatz]

And yet I've never been happier. 

Sort of makes all your hard work to manipulate the trust network in an attempt to punish me seem a bit foolish no?  All your abuse can't even stop me from joining a signature campaign.  That's gotta hurt considering your daily quest for power here. 

LOL... Sure, like anybody gives 2 fucks... I find it hilarious that you think you are so "relevant" here, just because you  are a long-term ponzi scammer who knows how to manipulate words and threads to your own choosing.

You still did the shit you did, it doesn't change anything, sorry dude...

[Vod]

And yet I've never been happier.  

You still did the shit you did, it doesn't change anything, sorry dude...

Agreed.  Og is quick to bring up how Theymos continues to trust him and distrust me, despite Og's admitted ponzi, and Theymos been paying him the entire time he's been scamming and telling people I was a pedophile.    

Who wouldn't be happy if they had stolen enough to be set for life?  (Og's words)

($250 million in stolen FIAT and he is not sad.   At least he knows society expects his immoral actions need to be punished)

[suchmoon]

And yet I've never been happier.  

Sort of makes all your hard work to manipulate the trust network in an attempt to punish me seem a bit foolish no?  All your abuse can't even stop me from joining a signature campaign.  That's gotta hurt considering your daily quest for power here.  

I hope I can speak for everyone when I say that we are very excited to see you make some money in a signature campaign. But you're still the same slimy conniving liar as ever and your signature doesn't have anything to do with your self-serving trust list.

~

Nor does this. Let's stick to the topic.

[OgNasty]

Nor does this. Let's stick to the topic.

You're right.  I shouldn't troll you.  We should get back to the fact that none of the accounts I added had any controversial trust ratings but you have a problem with them because they trust someone who has been proven to be trustworthy but you don't like because you are guided by your emotions and not logic or the best interests of the trust network. 

[Vod]

who has been proven to be trustworthy

My signature has pages of your definition of trustworthy. 

[suchmoon]

You're right.  I shouldn't troll you.  We should get back to the fact that none of the accounts I added had any controversial trust ratings but you have a problem with them because they trust someone who has been proven to be trustworthy but you don't like because you are guided by your emotions and not logic or the best interests of the trust network.  

I have a problem with your lying and trust abuse. That's a reasonable problem to have but you or anyone else is welcome to exclude me if they don't think so. Likewise they should exclude you if they don't think that sending red trust for opinions or including people to boost your own score is acceptable use of the trust system.

[OgNasty]

You're right.  I shouldn't troll you.  We should get back to the fact that none of the accounts I added had any controversial trust ratings but you have a problem with them because they trust someone who has been proven to be trustworthy but you don't like because you are guided by your emotions and not logic or the best interests of the trust network.  

I have a problem with your lying and trust abuse. That's a reasonable problem to have but you or anyone else is welcome to exclude me if they don't think so. Likewise they should exclude you if they don't think that sending red trust for opinions or including people to boost your own score is acceptable use of the trust system.

I don't believe I've ever lied or left trust that is in any way dishonest.  I've never left you red trust and you are all bad opinions so all evidence points to you being full of it.  I also don't care about my trust score or I wouldn't be so independent in giving you the finger when you try and tell me who I can and cannot add to my network, so you're projecting your own use of the system on my honest inclusion of honest members I wish to include in my network.  I'm not even in DT anymore so the entire self scratching argument doesn't even make sense.  

You're a crazed emotional woman trying to enact some form of revenge because I excluded you from my network long ago for having horrible judgement.  What you don't realize is that everything you've done towards me since I made that decision has only enforced that I made the right decision in excluding you and you can pull the wool over everyone else's eyes, but I see you for what you are.  Not that it makes a difference to me, as I wouldn't give 2 shits about you if you would stop attacking me with this sort of nonsense constantly.  It's sad how much time and effort you spend vying for my attention when I am staying active in my Bitcoin projects and continuing to offer trustworthy services.  I'm a great addition to this forum whether you like it or not, and you should appreciate what I do here instead of constantly trying to be a gnat buzzing around my head.

Edit: 2 of the members you listed below as me giving bad feedback to have threatened to kill me. The other was involved in the well documented extortion and harassment of a user here. Such a fail that you use those as your evidence of bad feedback. They very much deserve those negatives and the fact you side with people like that says everything about you.

[Vod]

[I don't believe I've ever lied or left trust that is in any way dishonest.  

Edit:  I was going to compile a list of his dishonest trust, but it would be for a shrinking list of people that still believe him.   He lies, period.

I'm not even in DT anymore

If only....

[suchmoon]

I don't believe I've ever lied
[...]
You're a crazed emotional woman

LOL

I don't believe I've ever lied or left trust that is in any way dishonest.

You may honestly believe that e.g. eoakland's proof of account ownership was insufficient, or that minifrij's misunderstanding of your post was worthy of neg trust, or that anonymousminer deserves red trust for saying bad things about you, and it can still be abuse of the trust system because none of these things make them high risk in a trade. Nice straw man.

I've never left you red trust and you are all bad opinions so all evidence points to you being full of it.

Another fallacy. I never said that you red trust every opinion you dislike... just the ones where you think you can get away with it.

I'm not even in DT anymore so the entire self scratching argument doesn't even make sense.

Fingers crossed.

[Vod]

I'm not even in DT anymore so the entire self scratching argument doesn't even make sense.

Jan 21:
"I'm not even the President anymore so the entire inciting a riot argument doesn't even make sense."

Temporal Cluelessness

@suchmoon:  I'm not sure how constructive such topics are anymore, esp for me since I'm not being paid to argue/"defend".  Theymos has been paying Og bitcoin throughout his entire scam (even while Og stole from him), and Theymos controls the proof of Og's crimes, which seems to keep vanishing.   Even if they aren't cooperating, Og is sure spinning it that way to boost his credibility.

Where is the post where Og told you and I that Theymos knows what Og is doing?

[ibminer]

I certainly can't speak to what theymos knows or doesn't know... but I get the feeling he personally doesn't like ponzi's.

But, it is certainly quite clear that OgNasty has no issues with ponzi's... as long as they "pay the bills", of course.

Theymos is accepting illegal ads from a ponzi scheme - makebtc.org.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=450959.20

It's obviously a ponzi scheme. I'm not sure what his jurisdiction is, but it is most likely illegal to have a ponzi scheme.

I pm-ed him and got no response.

If the website was labeled as gambling it would be legal in some jurisdictions. However it is not.

As he is making money from advertising the scam, he is morally and legally responsible for it.

How much BTC have you donated to keep the forum running? None? Then be happy someone is paying the bills.

The ends will always justify the means with OgNasty, no matter what the 'means' are. Just like above.. he's OK turning a blind eye to scammers taking advantage of people on this forum, just as long as they pay their advertising dues.. to stay in the scammers club.  Just like he's OK adding random people on his trust list without really caring what feedback they've left.. because he wants to boost his own grandiose perspective of himself.

It's just one way he can feed his narcissistic supply.

Why the forum puts this kinda guy up on a pedestal, and backs him up with biased behaviors, is beyond me. I can only hope him being in a prominent "position" on this forum doesn't jeopardize the forum itself when his flagrant behaviors and poor business ethics eventually piss off the wrong person.

[icopress]

Theymos has been paying Og bitcoin throughout his entire scam (even while Og stole from him), and Theymos controls the proof of Og's crimes, which seems to keep vanishing.   Even if they aren't cooperating, Og is sure spinning it that way to boost his credibility.

Can you clarify what this is about? As I understand it, you mean that OG returned 500 bitcoins to Theymos, but throughout the entire storage period, he operated on it at his own discretion? I honestly don't remember the content of the contract between OG and Theymos, as I read it for a long time (and I can't remember where to find it).

OgNasty

2019-05-25

Held 500 BTC for the forum from 2013 to 2019.