SCAM!!! AdkinsBet scammed me for amount of 196 mBTC in completely blatant way

[AdkinsBET]

In our ToS was always written that you can not use VPN to manipulate your location. Realscout used VPN to hide his home country, which is not allowed.
Realscout already admitted by himself that he is doing courtsiding, which is simply cheating.
We will release his deposit from 37 mBTC in installments from 5 mBTC weekly.
This will be done to prevent that DT users keep the card active. If DT members could remove their vote on the red card then we will start with the first payment of 5 mBTC.
Thank you.

[1714187676]

1714187676

[1714187676]

1714187676

[1714187676]

1714187676

[1714187676]

1714187676

[1714187676]

1714187676

[1714187676]

1714187676

[JollyGood]

You saying you will refund his deposit periodically based on DT users removing support the flag is nothing but shameful and you have fallen to a new low.

In our ToS was always written that you can not use VPN to manipulate your location. Realscout used VPN to hide his home country, which is not allowed.
Realscout already admitted by himself that he is doing courtsiding, which is simply cheating.
We will release his deposit from 37 mBTC in installments from 5 mBTC weekly.
This will be done to prevent that DT users keep the card active. If DT members could remove their vote on the red card then we will start with the first payment of 5 mBTC.
Thank you.

[MI6]

You saying you will refund his deposit periodically based on DT users removing support the flag is nothing but shameful and you have fallen to a new low.

In our ToS was always written that you can not use VPN to manipulate your location. Realscout used VPN to hide his home country, which is not allowed.
Realscout already admitted by himself that he is doing courtsiding, which is simply cheating.
We will release his deposit from 37 mBTC in installments from 5 mBTC weekly.
This will be done to prevent that DT users keep the card active. If DT members could remove their vote on the red card then we will start with the first payment of 5 mBTC.
Thank you.

Perhaps not the most convenient way for Adkinsbet to handle it this way, maybe you are right about that. I think they want to do it this way because Royse is a good friend of the op, and they might not trust it that the card will be removed after they release the deposit. Things what actmyname are saying are completeley ridiculous though. I just checked his trust rating, last ratings are 2/3 years ago. How reliable is this guy?
He already made 2 neutral comments in Adkinsbet profile and 1 negative within just 1 week. Do we have to think he is connected to Royse? I pretty much get the feeling he is.
Nice detail that he is the one who made a Spammers shit list. Maybe he could include himself as well after his spamming attitude on Adkinsbet.

[JollyGood]

You are right, it was not the most convenient way for AdkinsBET to have handled this, in my opinion they have made this easy-to-sort-out issue in to a public relations disaster.

And there is no conspiracy going on with DT members colluding so please do not try to take this situation down conspiracy lines that do nothing except detract from the core issue.

I think AdkinsBET asking DT members to remove support for flags before victims will receive just a portion of their funds back is a very low thing to do.

You saying you will refund his deposit periodically based on DT users removing support the flag is nothing but shameful and you have fallen to a new low.

In our ToS was always written that you can not use VPN to manipulate your location. Realscout used VPN to hide his home country, which is not allowed.
Realscout already admitted by himself that he is doing courtsiding, which is simply cheating.
We will release his deposit from 37 mBTC in installments from 5 mBTC weekly.
This will be done to prevent that DT users keep the card active. If DT members could remove their vote on the red card then we will start with the first payment of 5 mBTC.
Thank you.

Perhaps not the most convenient way for Adkinsbet to handle it this way, maybe you are right about that. I think they want to do it this way because Royse is a good friend of the op, and they might not trust it that the card will be removed after they release the deposit. Things what actmyname are saying are completeley ridiculous though. I just checked his trust rating, last ratings are 2/3 years ago. How reliable is this guy?
He already made 2 neutral comments in Adkinsbet profile and 1 negative within just 1 week. Do we have to think he is connected to Royse? I pretty much get the feeling he is.
Nice detail that he is the one who made a Spammers shit list. Maybe he could include himself as well after his spamming attitude on Adkinsbet.

[AB de Royse777]

Who is your provider?
Another question, who do the KYC for you?

I asked the above two questions (let's give them number, 1 and 2) before and no answer from adkinsbet yet.

Now when I read the following (the bold part) :

We will release his deposit from 37 mBTC in installments from 5 mBTC weekly.

I add another question.
3. Can you sign a message with a bitcoin address that has a convincing amount of bitcoin to run your gambling business?
For example, once cloudbet or another sportbook was asked to sign a message with bitcoin holding for their business and they were able to sign an address holding 300+ BTC if my memory is correct.

This will be done to prevent that DT users keep the card active. If DT members could remove their vote on the red card then we will start with the first payment of 5 mBTC.

None of your moves were correct so far and this adds another one. To bad for your reputation and business if you still are considering to run the business.

[LoyceV]

We will release his deposit from 37 mBTC in installments from 5 mBTC weekly.
This will be done to prevent that DT users keep the card active. If DT members could remove their vote on the red card then we will start with the first payment of 5 mBTC.

Do yourself a favor and read up on the Trust system. Threats/blackmail/extortion/bribes usually don't turn out very well, and my feedback sure as hell isn't for sale.

[AB de Royse777]

Do yourself a favor and read up on the Trust system. Threats/blackmail/extortion/bribes usually don't turn out very well, and my feedback sure as hell isn't for sale.

You are giving them another chance to come up with another excuse. I believe they are not too dumb to think that we are not bunches of fools. They are trying their last bit in my opinion which obviously will not work from my side too.

[realscout]

this is bullshit about vpn. also my connection didnt change between 1st and 2nd deposit. moreover i told them about where i do live before i registered as i wanted to know if im allowed to play from my country

and they come up with vpn reason 47 days after starting their 'security checks'

what ive done before isnt related to case anyhow as such type of betting couldnt be used in bets i placed at adkins. anybody who has eyes can see it as i attached all my betting history to the accusation

[realscout]

lol i found that email and it turned out that u actually gave me permission to use vpn, although if i recall well i didnt use it at all

https://imgur.com/a/DNg1WxW

also there is a question how are u going to pay winnings if somebody bets 1btc on something as your limits allow it if u wanna return 37 mbtc during 6 weeks

https://imgur.com/a/2rkvZ0I am i the only one curios what the next reason not to pay winnings will be?

[JollyGood]

I add another question.
3. Can you sign a message with a bitcoin address that has a convincing amount of bitcoin to run your gambling business?
For example, once cloudbet or another sportbook was asked to sign a message with bitcoin holding for their business and they were able to sign an address holding 300+ BTC if my memory is correct.

I have to concur, this seems like a good idea. Does AdkinsBET even have funds to pay out?

Judging by the way things are going in this thread (namely the attitude several users including AdkinsBET representatives have shown), I am not confident about them signing any address to show they are solvent but maybe they will prove me wrong. Other online betting platforms have done this throughout the years so I hope AdkinsBET will follow suit.

[Eureka_07]

<snip>
We will release his deposit from 37 mBTC in installments from 5 mBTC weekly.
This will be done to prevent that DT users keep the card active. If DT members could remove their vote on the red card then we will start with the first payment of 5 mBTC.
Thank you.

Not an expert at this, but IMO, why not resolve all of those accusations about your business, that way it's likely that those red flags to your account will be removed by the DTs who put them if they are convinced. Maybe that way you can build up your reputation again like other crypto casino has done here. The issue will be great to you if it is resolved, you'll regain trust (possibly).
IMO it is best for you to make changes on your ToS, make it more fair on both parties.
Just sayin'.

[examplens]

This will be done to prevent that DT users keep the card active. If DT members could remove their vote on the red card then we will start with the first payment of 5 mBTC.
Thank you.

things work a little differently here. You are not in a position to set conditions and blackmail. You just stimulated me to give you a neg. tag.
if you want to consider removing negative tags and a red flag against you, first you have to go back all the money and to solve all scam accusations against you.

[nasipadang]

I think Adkinsbet is getting it wrong this way. there are too many accusations now. They don't come out of the blue either. I was a longtime supporter of the site as we only had a few major sportsbook and I liked that a newcomer was joining. now, however, I am starting to have my doubts about it. If they want to save or improve their reputation, they will have to pay the people first.

[JollyGood]

It certainly seemed like AdkinsBET were trying to set conditions and effectively blackmail users in to submission. I wonder the latest is with the scam allegation, things seem to have gone a bit quiet here now.

This will be done to prevent that DT users keep the card active. If DT members could remove their vote on the red card then we will start with the first payment of 5 mBTC.
Thank you.

things work a little differently here. You are not in a position to set conditions and blackmail. You just stimulated me to give you a neg. tag.
if you want to consider removing negative tags and a red flag against you, first you have to go back all the money and to solve all scam accusations against you.

[FatFork]

OK, I finally catch up with these scam accusation topics. From everything shown so far, it seems to me that something really strange is happening with AdkinsBet. I supported the flag primarily because of the way AdiknsBet is trying to resolve this situation. Blackmail and setting conditions for DT members to remove negative trust to pay off a player is not the way to go.

[wildan88]

OK, I finally catch up with these scam accusation topics. From everything shown so far, it seems to me that something really strange is happening with AdkinsBet. I supported the flag primarily because of the way AdiknsBet is trying to resolve this situation. Blackmail and setting conditions for DT members to remove negative trust to pay off a player is not the way to go.

Somebody just admitted he supports the flag primarily without even reading the content.

[FatFork]

Somebody just admitted he supports the flag primarily without even reading the content.

Please read my post again. This time with understanding.
As I previously stated, I have carefully read both topics and all the accompanying evidence. My support for the flag is based on my view of the whole situation and I will be very happy to remove the support if it turns out I was wrong.

If you find blackmail acceptable on this forum, that's your problem not mine.

[wildan88]

Somebody just admitted he supports the flag primarily without even reading the content.

Please read my post again. This time with understanding.
As I previously stated, I have carefully read both topics and all the accompanying evidence. My support for the flag is based on my view of the whole situation and I will be very happy to remove the support if it turns out I was wrong.

If you find blackmail acceptable on this forum, that's your problem not mine.

They are new to the forum. So they have to learn how to solve situations the way it is required by the forum. Do you really think they want to solve the situation if everybody is attacking them and pressure them?
They are not trying to blackmail, they just trying to get some insurance that the flag will be removed after they paid the amount from the second deposit.
And asking many DT members to support the flag until the friend of royse777 is paid is not blackmailing of course 

[LoyceV]

Somebody just admitted he supports the flag primarily without even reading the content.

You Opposed the valid Flag. Why?
Please read how Trust Flags are supposed to be used:

Creating or supporting a scammer flag is actively affirming a set of pretty clear fact-statements.

They are new to the forum. So they have to learn how to solve situations the way it is required by the forum.

Last month, you left them positive feedback (without Reference link) stating they're very professional. Now you claim they don't even know how the forum works.

Do you really think they want to solve the situation if everybody is attacking them and pressure them?

No. I think they don't want to resolve the situation and they don't want to pay realscout. They have only themselves to thank for the reputation they have now.

they just trying to get some insurance that the flag will be removed after they paid the amount from the second deposit.

The ensurance is part of the Flag system:

If someone knowingly supports a flag containing incorrect fact-statements, then that is crystal-clear abuse, and I will seek to have such people removed from DT ASAP. People who are habitually wrong, even not knowingly, should also be removed.

And asking many DT members to support the flag until the friend of royse777 is paid is not blackmailing of course 

It doesn't matter who the victim is. Supporting a valid Flag is correct use of the Trust Flag system. Opposing a valid Flag is wrong. Luckily, you're far from DT:

Trust list for: wildan88 (Trust: awaiting update) (45 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2021-01-23_Sat_04.05h)
Back to index

wildan88's judgement is Trusted by:
-

~wildan88's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. NEW examplens (Trust: +3 / =3 / -0) (DT1! (7) 380 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. NEW Royse777 (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (11) 1227 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.

[JollyGood]

The AdkinsBET user account last logged in here on 20th January 2021 (3 days ago) so there does not seem to be any real hurry to pay the OP the funds that are being withheld: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2882335

In a short space of time AdkinsBET have had their reputation destroyed and all those posts that are made mentioning DT conspiracy theories are nothing but a smokescreen trying to deflect from the real issue.