Long-time sig campaign farm ID'd via single wallet transaction

[DaveF]

How the heck do users even post with that many accounts? They have to be posting in the same threads and answering each other. I barely post on my 1 account, couldn't imagine the hell it would be to try making quotas weekly on 10+ accounts.

Think of it as a full time job.
40 hours a week +/- a bit.
3 posts and hour = 120 posts a week.
If you are in 4 campaigns that all need 20 to 25 posts a week you have a nice buffer.
Then add in 1 or 2 shit post accounts that you are slowly building up and you're done.

There are times that the 20 posts a week that the sig I am wearing wants are tough. But I have a full time job and such. If I just spent the same 8 hours a day here I could probably do 100+ posts without much work. Would be bored out of my mind, but I could do it.

-Dave

[1714904786]

1714904786

[1714904786]

1714904786

[1714904786]

1714904786

[1714904786]

1714904786

[1714904786]

1714904786

[suchmoon]

How the heck do users even post with that many accounts? They have to be posting in the same threads and answering each other. I barely post on my 1 account, couldn't imagine the hell it would be to try making quotas weekly on 10+ accounts.

Well, recently he only had the 3 active ones in Chipmixer campaign and I think only 2 of those would approach the full 50-post quota so as DaveF pointed out doing 100-120 posts per week is possible, perhaps even at a reasonable level of quality. I haven't seen them talking to each other and I'm too busy to check now but I wouldn't be surprised if he had a plan as to which account was used on which boards/threads. OTOH, reviving one of the other accounts is what triggered the exposé so you could say excessive greed killed the farm.

Edit: grammar.

[TheBeardedBaby]

I don't know about you guys but I'm adding all of these accounts to my distrust list. One of them is in my DT2 network. Those kind of people have no place near DT at all.

Code:

~figmentofmyass
~illyiller
~illinest
~squatter
~marky89
~exstasie
~MAbtc
~romani245
~manchester93

[Swordsoffreedom]

Special thanks to @nutildah, for bursting such a piece of sensational information. He has been working on the Chip Mixer campaign for about 174 weeks.
It is very sad and matter of shame that the familiar faces of the forum, the old members are getting lost one by one, some are going to be responsible for cheating and some are leaving the forum on their own. If we all used the forum in a clean way, we would not have to face such unpleasant incidents.

[nutildah]

your investigations always explode with a lot of emotions.

it would indeed appear that way.

Perhaps the manager will draw the right conclusions, and it will be fair if Nutildah can take an honest place in the ChipMixer subscription.

I'm not going to apply, it wouldn't be right. I'm comfortable enough where I am without having to pressure myself to pass muster for the CM campaign. But thanks for your recommendation, I appreciate it.

[cygan]

has there been a statement or at least a reaction or apology from figmentofmyass?
i think that he should at least take a stand before he is banned from the forum (if it has not already happened)

[Rikafip]

i think that he should at least take a stand before he is banned from the forum (if it has not already happened)

Having multiple accounts in the same campaign is not a banable offense. Those accounts will get tagged and excluded from trust lists and that's about it.

[LoyceMobile]

has there been a statement or at least a reaction or apology from figmentofmyass?
i think that he should at least take a stand before he is banned from the forum (if it has not already happened)

The only reason for a ban would be ban evading, if one of his alts is banned already. I don't think that's the case.

[khaled0111]

before he is banned from the forum (if it has not already happened)

he didn't break any of the forum's rule. he is not going to be banned.
(according to what have been presented in op)

edit:
Well, according to dkbit and yoshi, one of foma's alts (HarHarHar9965) has been banned. Therefore all other accounts should be banned too.
According to bpip, the foma account hasn't been banned yet. So either no one has reported it to mods or they don't think the evidences are compelling enough.

[cygan]

i think that he should at least take a stand before he is banned from the forum (if it has not already happened)

Having multiple accounts in the same campaign is not a banable offense. Those accounts will get tagged and excluded from trust lists and that's about it.

has there been a statement or at least a reaction or apology from figmentofmyass?
i think that he should at least take a stand before he is banned from the forum (if it has not already happened)

The only reason for a ban would be ban evading, if one of his alts is banned already. I don't think that's the case.

before he is banned from the forum (if it has not already happened)

he didn't break any of the forum's rule. he is not going to be banned.

aah, ok.
then i have said nothing

[khaled0111]

then i have said nothing

in fact you're right. I know many members who think that figmentofmyass is a great user and that he's contributed alot to this forum. they consider him as their mentor FGS!! he owe them an apology or at least an explanation. I don't give a shit about what he'll say, if he will ever do

Let's see how many posts he makes without getting paid for it.

It's going to be 0 such with his other inactive accounts.

[LoyceMobile]

in fact you're right. I know many members who think that figmentofmyass is a great user and that he's contributed alot to this forum. they consider him as their mentor FGS!! he owe them an apology or at least an explanation.

Let's see how many posts he makes without getting paid for it.

[suchmoon]

Let's see how many posts he makes without getting paid for it.

I was gonna say - none, why waste time, but he already made a few this week before being kicked out by DarkStar_, without payment I assume.

But I would be surprised if we don't get at least a fallacy-ridden sorry-not-sorry attack on nutildah. FOMA was very active in the QS/PN7 debate, now we know why.

[khaled0111]

BFOMA was very active in the QS/PN7 debate, now we know why.

why?

edit:

PN7 was exposed mainly on linguistic proof.

I wasn't aware of this, probably I missed that topic. However, it will be interesting if someone reuses the same technique used to link Panthers52 and Qs here against pn7 too.
The accounts exposed in this topic had totally different writing stylesand without the blockchain evidence, no one could've suspected them to be alts.

[cygan]

for this action nutildah should be rewarded by DarkStar_ with a spot at ChipMixer - no matter if he wants to apply there or not 👌👍💪

[suchmoon]

BFOMA was very active in the QS/PN7 debate, now we know why.

why?

PN7 was exposed mainly on linguistic proof. FOMA worked hard to dispute it. I'm quite sure that this was an attempt to discredit such proof in case this type of link was ever established between his accounts. Unlucky for him he was caught via blockchain.

Edit: grammar.

[nutildah]

FOMA was very active in the QS/PN7 debate, now we know why.

FOMA's staunch opposition to the "methodology" I employed in linking 2 accounts was curious to me; here I was thinking I was making sense and this guy is turning everything I said upside-down.

I didn't know for sure he had alt accounts but over the last year I began to put it together that he probably had alt accounts. I certainly couldn't prove anything though, so I never mentioned it publicly.

Since we know the 3 active accounts do all belong to the same person (with a fair to high degree of certainty), its reasonable to point out that searching the forum for unique phrases to identify potential alt accounts does have some merit to it, although blockchain evidence trumps this every time.

"federated model"

And the private and/or federated model can work too -- I think that's the proposal for Liquid -- but it doesn't need to be private.

In those cases, using a federated model like Liquid seems better than a single point of failure like a Bitcoin exchange.

"Peel chains"

they are making assumptions about peel chains many, many hops out.

They use complex peel chains and mixing, then use Chinese agents to sell to OTC brokers who interface with Huobi, OKEx, and other lax exchanges.

He endorses LocalCryptos:

The obvious alternatives in the aftermath were Paxful and LocalCryptos, although the number of offers is always disappointing.

I've since moved on to LocalCryptos. It's nowhere near as active as the old LBC, but I managed to make one cash trade recently -- for a good price too.

check out localcryptos. buyers using paypal are paying 25-50% over market: https://localcryptos.com/Bitcoin/PayPal/Buy

Anyway, it seems any doubt was removed by the 4th post in this thread or so. I have tagged all 9 accounts. Exstasie is no longer DT2 and FOMA is very excluded from DT1, so not much more to be done at the moment.

[JollyGood]

~snip~

Anyway, it seems any doubt was removed by the 4th post in this thread or so. I have tagged all 9 accounts. Exstasie is no longer DT2 and FOMA is very excluded from DT1, so not much more to be done at the moment.

Excellent thread.

I am tagging all 9 too but figmentofmyass was on my distrust list from a long time ago, he reciprocated in revenge of course.

I remember when I was contacted by at least one users telling me figmentofmyass was sending PMs to users trying to me and get others off their trust list so I knew he was a low life long ago. Thankfully just as others got caught out with strong evidence when they got too big for their boots this low life did too.

Thank you nutildah

[FatFork]

... so not much more to be done at the moment.

You've done enough. Now take a well-deserved break.

[JollyGood]

in fact you're right. I know many members who think that figmentofmyass is a great user and that he's contributed alot to this forum. they consider him as their mentor FGS!! he owe them an apology or at least an explanation.

Let's see how many posts he makes without getting paid for it.

I would say the total amount of post those 9 accounts will make from now on towards the end of the year say 31st December 2021 is going to be almost zero. It might take more time before other accounts that the same person operated come to light.


It is simple, everybody should add those accounts to their distrust list:

~figmentofmyass
~illyiller
~illinest
~squatter
~marky89
~exstasie
~MAbtc
~romani245
~manchester93